ABC'S Weir: Why Don't Dems Fight President, End War?

Photo of Mark Finkelstein.

Interviewing anti-war Senator Russ Feingold this morning, Good Morning America weekend co-host Bill Weir offered his interpretation of the mid-term election results and virtually taunted Democrats for being insufficiently aggressive in confronting President Bush:
"Do you hold your party responsible, not only for the authorization, but for the seeming inability to muster a unified front to fight the president on this, to get what you want, and apparently what the American people wanted with the mid-term elections, and end the war?"
View video here.

Feingold, in full pass-the-buck mode: "This is George Bush's war without a doubt."

He continued: "Those Democrats who voted for it made a mistake, and many of them have said they shouldn't have done it [nice little Hillary jab, Russ], but the key now is, are the Democrats going to continue this momentum? Having this special session Saturday is the way to show that we're serious. But it has to be followed by very aggressive action to actually end the war."

Mark was in Iraq in November. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Other than Weir's presumption

Other than Weir's presumption of what the American people want, I don't have a problem with his question to Feingold.  The Democrats made the war the primary issue in the last election --- as it should have been --- and made grandiose promises to withdraw troops (anywhere from immediately to 18 months), with many even threatening to cut off funding if the President didn't comply.

So, where's that vote?  If the Dems felt in November that this was the time to force a withdrawal, why are they wasting time with a useless but harmful non-binding resolution?

I suspect that many of them fear committing themselves to a funding reduction only to have the President veto the bill.  That could be used against them in the next election if the situation in Iraq improves. 

Gal -- have to correct you on

Gal -- have to correct you on one, small thing. ...When the situation in Iraq improves. Of course, you won't hear about that from the MSM. As things get better, Iraq will move off their radar. Iraq? Never heard of it. Old news. Let's talk about that rock star, Obama, instead.

They are wasting time becau

They are wasting time because they don't have the stomach, or the parts below, to really pull the plug. They want to nibble at the edges, retreat a little at a time, all the while denying that they are responsible for the consequences. When the country slides into chaos, I can't wait to hear how they spin it as not their fault.

...what the American people w

...what the American people wanted with the mid-term elections, and end the war?

Wow! I'm sure glad I don't have to do anymore thinking -- it's been done for me, already. Thanks, Weir -- sure glad we have people like you around to do our thinking, to interpret everything, and much, much more. BTW, I need to take the trash out -- can you come over and do that for me, too?

Bill Weir: Why don't you fight the Terrorist and not America?

Bill Weir do you hold yourself accountable for begging a sellout the American Troops response from your Extreme Leftwing Liberal guest?

COWARDS!

The F*CKING Democrats are nothing but COWARDS!  They will turn tail at the firsty sign of conflict or challenging situation!  Bill Blow-job Clinton "went to war" in Bosnia where there was no challenge to our forces and no threat to our Country.  But HE left the Islamofacists alone and unchallenged  because that would have been a real WAR and they just don't have the stomach for conflict.  If the Democrats win the WH in 08, we WILLL be attacked again, but this time it won't just be on a TV show, the NUKES will be REAL!

Mark, what are the chances of the Republicans caving in the Sena

Mark, what are the chances of the Republicans caving in the Senate?

"but the key now is, are the Democrats going to continue this momentum? Having this special session Saturday is the way to show that we're serious. But it has to be followed by very aggressive action to actually end the war."

Now it appears to me and I would assume several other Americans that this statement is foolish.

Translation:  We don't have enough courage of conviction to actually vote a binding resolution so we are going to vote a silly non-binding resolution that has zero meaning whatsoever to show the President we are 'serious'.

That being done, we'll do some aggressive action to end the war.

Huh?

Pretty pathetic if you ask me.  And since no one has asked, I'll ask myself.

Isn't that pretty pathetic?

Self:  Um.... Yep, that would be.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

ACA,It is pathetic.Here's an

ACA,

It is pathetic.

Here's an interesting take on non-binding resolutions:

The non-binding resolution before us today, we all know, is only a prologue. That is why the fight over it – procedural and substantive – over these past weeks has been so intense. It is the first skirmish in an escalating battle that threatens to consume our government over many months ahead, a battle that will neither solve the sprawling challenges we face in Iraq nor strengthen our nation to defeat the enemies of our security throughout the world from Islamist extremists. That is to say, in our war against the terrorists that attacked us. 

We still have a choice not to go down this path – it’s a choice that goes beyond the immediate resolution before the Senate – a chance to step back from the brink and find a better way to express and arbitrate our opinion, and I hope we will seize the moment and take that chance.”

~ Joe Lieberman

It's too bad the democrats hate him so much for aligning with the administration in the GWT.  He's the only one bright enough to lead them away from this destructive path, but they're too obtuse to listen.

There used to be a lot of Dem

There used to be a lot of Democrats like Lieberman.  Harry Truman, for one.  JFK and  John Stennis are two more.   Carl Vinson, LBJ too.  Now Lieberman is a pariah in a party that he once might have led.   I have to believe this leftward tilt in the country is the result ofthe steady stream of leftist propaganda that has been in the MSM since the 50's and on America's campuses.

I heard somewhere this morn

I heard somewhere this morning - perhaps in the course of this same interview - speculation that the Senate would probably not adopt the resolution.

The dems are just plain brain

The dems are just plain brain dead. Their hatred for Bush has corrupted their minds like a computer virus would destroy a hard drive. Their brains could possibly be  in the process of crashing.They have just boxes themsleves in. They obviously never entertained the thought a troop surge might work. What poetic justice if this wound up being a a giant rope-a -dope. How do they spin it if our forces start putting things in place so they can wrap this up and leave. What are they going to say? " I was against it before I was for it?" 

I was against it before I was

I was against it before I was for it.

I think one of them tried a version of that before, IIRC, it didn't work out too well.  :)

Nope Midnight, they will 'pretzel' the issue.

Nope Midnight, they will 'pretzel' the issue.

Not quite a triangulation, like Hillary is trying, but a pretzel.

Kerry in overdrive to the absurd.

"I voted for it before I voted against it, but now I'm for it.

"I think...

"But, don't hold me to it because I have nothing left to offer...by the way I'm no longer running for President.  Also, those weren't really my medals.  I have my medals right here, see, on the wall.  I'm a great heroic patriotic American, yessireee, great...patriotic.

"American.

"That's what I am."

Pause

"Did I say I hate George Bush?  Wait, don't turn off the lights yet, did..."

Fade to Burma Shave Commercial.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

Will the Democrats vote for

Will the Democrats vote for Victory, or hatred? Oh wait, I already know the answer :P

Amazing Race All-Stars Survivor

Faced with an ill-conceived US troop surge, Iraqi freedom-fighters flee Baghdad for some well-deserved rest and relaxation in exotic Iran this week.  These bomb-making workaholics just might find some time to join the rest of the world in watching the latest hit American hybrid reality show, Amazing Race All-Stars Survivor.

Today, ABC's moderate commentator, Senator Russ Feingold, offers us his objective expertise so Americans will understand exactly who they should be rooting for.

First, let's recap.  The All Star Race pits the compassionate Mediacratic Party against the embattled Bush Neocon Team. The winner of the Race will determine who the survivor in Iraq will be, the current unreliable proxy government that will never be able to stabalize the country, imposed on the Iraqi people by Team Bush or the outgunned, oppressed freedom-fighting Iraqi patriots supported by Team Mediacrat, that only wish to control their own destiny offering a lasting peace to the Iraqi people and the rest of the Middle East.  So, describe this latest development we watched on yesterday's episode Russ.

That's right Bill, the winner of the race will determine a lot more than just who the survivor in Iraq turns out to be. Thanks to Team Mediacrat, compassion for our troops was a survivor right here in our own nation's capital yesterday which translates into one more thumping for Team Bush. The world continues to watch in disbelief that Team Bush continues the Race in face of such overwhelming odds for defeat.  I think you will see the Mediacrat Party stepping up the pressure in coming episodes to drive home, along with US troops, their humanitarian position that Team Bush cannot win in Iraq.

Thank you for that in-depth analysis Russ. But lets not bring those troops home in defeat quite yet.  We still have quite a long way to go before our  final episode in the 2008 season when we tell the world who our real survivor will be.  Now let's go over to Diane Sawyer who will tell us why we should like Iran's western-loving President.

Pretty good acumen. Pretty good.

Pretty good acumen.  Pretty good.

I think we resort to these humorous asides from the well of frustration.

Thanks for the grins.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

What are Weir and Feingold ev

What are Weir and Feingold even worried about...their blathering leftist bunk has worked, just ask Waxman...he announced we have lost the war in Iraq yesterday on the House Floor....

That's that.

We must lose at all costs...according to those with a 'D' behind your name...(other than Lieberman, Marshall or Taylor.)..throw in the leftist media trying to manage this defeat...spearhead it if you will...

Pathetic tribe of enemies are they not?

Btw...can you imagine if this was the other way around, and the Republicans were not letting the dem's have an opposing resolution, one that states Victory and no defunding any of our troops at any time....the media would scream to high heaven until the Republicans backed down, like they usually do...

Ahhh.... the control of the leftist media...sickening.

Feingold

I noticed how this creep Weir (do) cocked his head a little and had to think before he said Americans want to end the war. Down hear in Orlando, Florida,  there is almost open rebellion against (Republican?) Congressman Ric Keller's vote and speech opposing the surge. 97% against him in one radio poll. Americans want to WIN this war, not cut and run. But there are traitors of all stripes in this un-representative, corrupt Congress.

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

Good catch on Weir's hesita

Good catch on Weir's hesitation. I think he realized he was getting into deep water but decided to plunge ahead.

Weir crawled out from local T

Weir crawled out from local TV here in LA.

Years ago I saw an especially appalling piece that he did on gang violence. Not in support of police putting these murderers where they belong mind you, but instead focusing on the 'no choice but to kill' angle. Disgusting. I'm surprised that NBC didn't snap him up before ABC got their claws on him.

Weir

Why Don't Dems Fight President,......

My question is, exactly which desert has this Weir guy been wandering in for the last year or so? The DimLibs, both elected ones and those who make up the majority of the MSM, have thrown everything at Mr Bush they could get there grimy little paws on, including the kitchen sink. The DimLibs as a whole have done everything they can to undermine the war effort, to the point of, IMO, giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

As for the "no confidence" vote held yesterday, I was pretty upset about it for most of the afternoon. I thought it was a truly gutless cheap shot at our president as well as our soldiers, which it was. I even heard some DimLib congressman (I cannot recall who it was just now) say the vote was carried in order to help the troups. I had to get up and leave the room for fear I was going to put my foot deep into the TV.

However, the more I thought about it, the happier I was that the vote was taken, and even happier that the Dims made a big deal about it. I'm glad the people in this country got to see what this party of turn-coats is really all about. Who knows, perhaps it will cause some people out there to stop and think? If iveseenitall is correct, and the majority of Americans really do want us to win this thing, and I believe they do, that childish, cowardly stunt the DimLibs pulled yesterday might just turn around and bite them.

I hate newspapermen.....I regard them as spies.....If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast. -Gen. William T. Sherman

Yeah it's always extremely la

Yeah it's always extremely laughable when liberals and Democrats say the Dems need to get more aggressive in fighting Bush. (Remember that blithering nutcase Howard Dean saying that on one of those Sunday morning shows?) Good grief, the DemocRATS have mercilessly pounded Bush every day for years. Bush is by far the most viciously attacked President ever. That was John sKerry's entire sCampaign -> Blast Bush. 2004 was really something. I had never seen an election before where a candidate (sKerry) had literally nothing he was running on. His sole verbiage was to blast Bush. And boy did he ever. I had also never seen an election season where the Dems were that nasty (and that's saying something!). And I'm sure the Dragon Lady and the Demagouges and the MSM will top that in 2008. In other words, we ain't seen nothin' yet.

And wow Bill Weir couldn't have any more clearly shown his Democrat clothing. We talk a lot about the numerous instances of liberal bias in the media. But this goes far beyond mere bias. It may as well have been Howard Dean interviewing that chowderhead Feingold.