Open Thread Friday


Comment on the news of the day and anything else.

Read commentsFree bias alerts

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I want to say that today the House votes on its non-binding ...

I want to say that today the House votes on its non-binding (worthless) resolution opposing Bush's pursuit of the war while at the same time claiming the resolution will not affect our troops' morale.

Over the past week there has been a great deal of huffing over the TV show 24 which has been claimed to influence our troops to torture.

This is a day of infamy for America.

But my question is how can the MSM reconcile the two Points of View?

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

Cowards

This is the day that will be carried by THE traitors, cowards and prostitutes.

. There is no question of who the DEMOCRAT party represents; they are the cowards.

Nor is there any question of what vice that the MSM represents; that was established in the 1960's and we have hence only hagled about their price.

The most blaspmemous group are the republicans who go along with the DEMOCRAT party in the house today. They occupy the slot of the traitors but might as easily be placed in the other two categories of cowards and prostitutes as well.

I have never voted for a democrat in my life but I most certainly would before I would EVER vote for one of these Turncoats. We should note who they are, record their names in the Republican Book of vengeance and GO AFTER them on the next election day AND RUN THEIR FAT, SOFT BUTTS RIGHT OUT OF OFFICE. They in NO WAY deserve the right to be called Republicans any more. The only thing obvious about their spines is their absence of them. 

During the last election cycl

During the last election cycle I saved a bushel basket full of begging letters from the RNC. They still call and write, although not so much. I've been blowing them off lately for their lack of fortitude and displine. The next time they call, I think I'll have a word with'em. Maybe 2 words.

Sad to say  my RINO congress

Sad to say  my RINO congressman in suburban Washington, D.C. Tom Davis (R-VA) is voting for the resolution.  I called his office and after launching into a "I'm never voting for Davis again"  tirade had a decent conversation with the staffer who answered the phone.   He said Davis is against the surge but will never vote to defund.  I suggested that perhaps the congressman needs to take a look at the long term effect of the vote on those who want to kill us and how it will only embolden them.

Sigh.

Treason - These people have no clue!

We are fighting a war on global terror and Extremist Islamic religious hatred of us and everything we have done for the world.  We have been attacked for years around the world and on 911. 

Irag is nothing more than a subset of this defense of our nation against our destruction.

Anyone who does not believe in America, our way of life, and our global mission, is subject to committing treason, if I understand the definition of that term.  Correct me if I am wrong!

Today in America, are there any consequences to committing treason?  It's about to the point where I think not, regardless of our history.  Today is our representatives' proof of this.

Is America asleep?  Is this the legacy of of our "enlightened" Liberal society?

God help us!

Pickersenior

ACA - they're bi-polar - and

ACA - they're bi-polar - and it would be similar to taching a pig to fly, a waste of time and it annoys the pig, but for us at least, we'd get bacon. And don't for get the eggs, the ones that were good for you, then weren't, then were good again - reported by the same folks who brought us Shock and Awe in all of its glory, 'cause it was good tv, but won't show us the open schools and flowing water in Iraq.

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

"24" Hurts our troo

"24" Hurts our troops?  Who would say such a thing?

"This past November, U.S. Army Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan, the dean of the United States Military Academy at West Point, flew to Southern California to meet with the creative team behind “24.” Finnegan, who was accompanied by three of the most experienced military and F.B.I. interrogators in the country, arrived on the set as the crew was filming. At first, Finnegan—wearing an immaculate Army uniform, his chest covered in ribbons and medals—aroused confusion: he was taken for an actor and was asked by someone what time his “call” was.

"In fact, Finnegan and the others had come to voice their concern that the show’s central political premise—that the letter of American law must be sacrificed for the country’s security—was having a toxic effect. In their view, the show promoted unethical and illegal behavior and had adversely affected the training and performance of real American soldiers. “I’d like them to stop,” Finnegan said of the show’s producers. “They should do a show where torture backfires...

"At other moments, the discussion was more strained. Finnegan told the producers that “24,” by suggesting that the U.S. government perpetrates myriad forms of torture, hurts the country’s image internationally. Finnegan, who is a lawyer, has for a number of years taught a course on the laws of war to West Point seniors—cadets who would soon be commanders in the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan. He always tries, he said, to get his students to sort out not just what is legal but what is right. However, it had become increasingly hard to convince some cadets that America had to respect the rule of law and human rights, even when terrorists did not. One reason for the growing resistance, he suggested, was misperceptions spread by “24,” which was exceptionally popular with his students. As he told me, “The kids see it, and say, ‘If torture is wrong, what about “24”?’ ” He continued, “The disturbing thing is that although torture may cause Jack Bauer some angst, it is always the patriotic thing to do...

"The third expert at the meeting was Tony Lagouranis, a former Army interrogator in the war in Iraq. He told the show’s staff that DVDs of shows such as “24” circulate widely among soldiers stationed in Iraq. Lagouranis said to me, “People watch the shows, and then walk into the interrogation booths and do the same things they’ve just seen.” He recalled that some men he had worked with in Iraq watched a television program in which a suspect was forced to hear tortured screams from a neighboring cell; the men later tried to persuade their Iraqi translator to act the part of a torture “victim,” in a similar intimidation ploy. Lagouranis intervened: such scenarios constitute psychological torture.

“In Iraq, I never saw pain produce intelligence,” Lagouranis told me. “I worked with someone who used waterboarding”—an interrogation method involving the repeated near-drowning of a suspect. “I used severe hypothermia, dogs, and sleep deprivation. I saw suspects after soldiers had gone into their homes and broken their bones, or made them sit on a Humvee’s hot exhaust pipes until they got third-degree burns. Nothing happened.” Some people, he said, “gave confessions. But they just told us what we already knew. It never opened up a stream of new information.” If anything, he said, “physical pain can strengthen the resolve to clam up...”

- The New Yorker, February 19, 2007.

Please spare me comments about The New Yorker as a source.  The new US Military Counterinsurgency Field Manual includes just 3 acknowledgements  - one of them is The New Yorker.  If it's good enough for those folks, it certainly is good enough for NB.

Bogus story. Already debunk

Bogus story. Already debunked this. Move along. Nothing to see here.

Though I am outraged that a government employee has the gall to fly at tax payers expense to California, to intimidate and attack the free speech rights of private citizens.

Ever heard of the 1st Amendment, pal? This is a classic case of why it was written. A pity you don't see that.

But if you want to see what the actual boots on the ground military, as opposed to desk lawyers, think of 24, check the credits.

"Our readers don't give a rat's ass about what you think. They want facts."

Elmore Leonard, 'The Hot Kid'.

You make a career of out miss

You make a career of out missing the point.  The issue isn't whether or not "24" has support among active US Military personnel.  There is general agreement about that.  The point is:  Is this a good thing or not?

I'm sure Gen. Finnegan is deeply concerned about your opinion of his actions.

There is no First Amendment issue here.  Nobody has said Fox doesn't have the right to show this crap.  The proper questions is:  Is it a good idea?  Folks who put their name and career out there have said it isn't and I happen to agree with them.  You don't.  So?

I can publish a book about how to make pipe bombs and publish it with addresses of houses of worship across our Nation.  Would that be a good idea?  Of course not.  Would it be legal?  Sure.  Dumb, but legal.

So you are also against the p

So you are also against the publishing of William Arkins book in which classified material is released?

don't forget the NYT publishi

don't forget the NYT publishing classified info

Nobody has said Fox doesn't

Nobody has said Fox doesn't have the right to show this crap.

FCC targets '24'

I posted a long list of very popular shows under the watchful eye of you mungheads, out to protect and serve. Imagine children watching Ellen, Opra, or troop deaths at night. One certainly could not watch sports!

JDW

Wounded skier. Corrections have been causing time-outs so mistakes will be made.

New pro-adoption dems, what about replacing abortions?

I, an instructor at the MI Ce

I, an instructor at the MI Center and School, disagree with the lawyer.

Got a problem with that?

OK, you're an instructor at t

OK, you're an instructor at the "MI Center and School."  Brig. Gen. Finnegan is Dean of West Point (or Dead of the Academic Council at West Point - various web sources provide various titles).  With all due respect, would I listen more to the president of a major university than a teacher at a state school?  Probably.

However, in this particular article I would listen to Mr. Lagouranis. 

So you would prefer to listen

So you would prefer to listen to the dean of the law school, rather than an instructor who has taught interogation tactics, techniques, and procedures as I have on the specific subject of how the protrayal of a harsh technique of interogation on a TV show influences Interogators?

REALLY???????

ARE YOU SURE?

I don't think you correctly c

I don't think you correctly characterize Gen. Finnegan's position at West Point.

In the meantime, have you read The New Yorker article?  Joe Vavarro, "one of the F.B.I.'s top experts in questionning techniques..." - who estimates he has conducted some 12,000 interrogations - was part of the group.  Tony Lagouranis - quoted above.  And others.

I would say they make a very strong case, yes. 

General Finnegan is a school

General Finnegan is a school trained JAG, in which he is more likely to feel at home watching "Law and Order" than actually participate in screening ops.

Regarding the FBI interogator, I would say that his opinion counts for little as he is not subject to the same world as our guys here at Huachuca.  I would not wish my folks interogate Al Capone, nor would I wish his participation in the Interogation of Abu Sabaya.

Oooh by the way, and I have worked with the FBI as well.  Have you or General Finnegan? 

BrigGen Finnegan

Link to the Generals CV. Sorry - I'm not impressed. Not exactly my idea of a "warrior General"!

http://www.dean.usma.edu/DeansCorner/dean_bio.cfm

I also have worked with FBI on many occasions. Not impressed with them either. Sorry if that offends you image of them - no doubt gained via extensive watching of television.

Gen. Finnegan is Dean of the

Gen. Finnegan is Dean of the Academic Board of West Point.  Apparently that is the "CAO" position.

I find it fascinating that conservatives brag about supporting the troops and then find it convenient to tear apart any current or ex-military person who disagrees with their perceived wisdom.  Talk about eating your young!

And how exactly is Lieberm

And how exactly is Lieberman faring with the democrats?

Is he is or is he ain't?

Gen. Finnegan is Dean of the Academic Board of West Point. Apparently that is the "CAO" position.

Correct! And from this we can extrapolate that he is an "academic", not a war-fighter. Thanks for making my point.

But hey - I enjoyed your song "Last dance" from 1965, was it? How are the Cavaliers doing these days?

Yes, but in the immortal 'Dirty Dozen' words of Donald Sutherlan

Yes, but in the immortal 'Dirty Dozen' (paraphrased) words of Donald Sutherland, playing the General inspecting the troops impromptu.

"But, can he fight?"

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

But regardless of who you listen to j frank you agree about the

But regardless of who you listen to j frank you agree about the House resolution destroying the troops' morale, right?  Can't have one without the other, right?

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

J Frank is too afraid to answ

J Frank is too afraid to answer you ACA.

Ooooh... Touche!!!!!

Ooooh... Touche!!!!!

I guess I didn't realize the

I guess I didn't realize the morale of our troops was so fragile.  Sen. Chuck Hagel did a nice job of addressing this question a few weeks ago on Face the Nation.  I would certainly agree with him.

Soooooo..... A TV Show will t

Soooooo..... A TV Show will turn my school trained interogators into auto-torture machines. 

But having the liberal half of our country tell us that we cannot win, nor should we even try is totally harmless......

Which will you endorse?

So, j frank, a little invested in losing the war, aren't you?

So, j frank, a little invested in losing the war, aren't you?

What are you gonna do when we win it?  Cry?

So, I'm not overly impressed with this grandstanding story about a West Point General I've never heard about bringing his lawyerly expertise to the psychological question about:

1) whether fantasy TV shows actually 'affect' our troops who if affected need a serious lot more training than they have and certainly this move by the General proves I'd never follow him into a battle.  Ever had to do that, j frank?  Follow a man into battle?

2) whether the House resolution will negatively affect the morale of our troops psychologically.

But even if I take your completely silly story to heart and agree that 24 does in fact affect our troops' behavior, then you must agree that the House Resolution will demoralize our troops as well as sap the will to fight at home.

Which is what you and your brethern want, isn't it?

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

If lib***ls teach us one th

If lib***ls teach us one thing, it is this:

TV and movies have no effect on the behavior of people.

So anything goes. Just ask Sundance. (And I do mean the kid rape.)

"Our readers don't give a rat's ass about what you think. They want facts."

Elmore Leonard, 'The Hot Kid'.

I'm going out on a limb here

I'm going out on a limb here and guessing he's never heard of you, either.

And he probably sleeps just fine at night, just the same.

If you want to argue that the United States Army places a General into a vital position at West Point who does not know what he's doing, that's your opinion.  It certainly isn't mine.  The West Point saying - "The history we teach was made by our graduates" - makes sense to me.  And I remain confident West Point continues to graduate outstanding officers.  Guess you don't...

In the meantime, try listening to the words from Mr. Lagouranis - who speaks from personal experience.

When you go in for a kidney t

When you go in for a kidney transplant, will you listen to Einstein, or a surgeon?

I've worked with a lot of

I've worked with a lot of West Point, Naval Academy, and Air Force Academy officers and there were a few that were okay. There were a few that weren't worth a dime. Then there were a lot that were just average.

Although, flag officers are paid to know a lot and to make the important decisions (and the flag officers I've worked for were - for the most part - very intelligent), they depend on their staff to give them that information.

As for listening to an instructor at the Intel Center and School or a flag officer on this particular subject - well, I'd listen to the instructor. You see, even a flag officer will tell you that the instructor is the subject matter expert (SME) on this particular issue. The flag officer is not.

There are many flag officers and field grade officers who think just because of their rank they somehow inherently know more then folks who do all the work. It takes a smart officer to realize who the worker bees are and depends on them for their well-being.

Yeah...I've worked with the FBI too and other agencies. Don't be overly impressed with their public reputations.

After all this is said and done, you'll do what you want. Your mind is already set. You're obviously the expert here.

Eric T. I too have worked with all the folks you cite.

Eric T.  I too have worked with all the folks you cite.

Some were good, some were really good and some were ...

well...

average might be one way to describe them.

I wholly share your comments about the FBI.  I could refer you to some public stories about their totally failed automation efforts.  Those projects would make your hair stand on end.  The difference between TV and reality is greater than the distance between j franks skull and brain matter.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

A thoughtful, reasoned, well-

Mr. Turner:  A thoughtful, reasoned, well-written and civil post.  Nicely done!

PS;  Unlike other posters here, I do not claim to be "the expert."  I read the article and said that it makes a great deal of sense to me - and the combined credentials of those quoted in the article are impressive.

The credentials are meaningle

The credentials are meaningless unless they are SME.

Of course I'm not invested in

Of course I'm not invested in losing the war.  That's the point the right wingnutz seem to never get.  I am very interested in winning it.  I'm not interested in seeing a continued failure.

Okay, to paraphrase Sean Conn

Okay, to paraphrase Sean Connery from "The Untouchables", what are you willing to DO to see victory?

blarson you dishonestly misrepresent your Bush 41 quote.

blarson you dishonestly misrepresent your Bush 41 quote.

 "The Quote reproduced above is reasonably accurate, although — as indicated by the ellipses — some of the context has been elided.

In 1998, former President George Bush and Brent Scowcroft, National Security Advisor during the Bush administration, collaborated on the book A World Transformed, a political history covering significant world events which occurred during the first three years of Bush's presidency (1989-1991): the collapse of the Soviet empire, the unification of Germany, Tiananmen Square, and the Gulf War.

In Chapter 19, which discusses the aftermath of the 1991 Gulf War (also known as "Desert Storm," the military operation to liberate Kuwait from occupation by invading Iraqi forces), they wrote:

Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream, engaging in "mission creep," and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama, which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under the circumstances, there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles. Furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different — and perhaps barren — outcome.

But you are a dishonest person, right?

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

Lizard Boy:  How are things

Lizard Boy:  How are things out there in right field?  What the h**l is this post about?  Nice cut 'n' paste job, though - with no attribution.

Do you have some kind of visi

Do you have some kind of visioin or reading comprehension problem?  I see a hyperlink to snopes and a direct identification of a book [title plus one of its authors] being quoted in the post. 

You have some problem identifying these as references?

Vision problems?

Of course he does - because it conflicts with his erroneous statements and beliefs. You surely don't expect a DimLib to admit he was <strong>wrong</strong>, do you? The old expressions ...

"I'm not always RIGHT - but I'm NEVER wrong!"

...comes to mind.

Drop what you're doing, and r

Drop what you're doing, and run - don't walk to the store - and get a clue.

j frank,You should run....don

j frank,

You should run....don't walk...back to ACA's post and re-read it.

You know, the post you attacked for being a cut and paste job.  With no references.

I cannot believe you had the gall to reply as you did.  (Perhaps that should rightly be gaul...you have the reading comprehension of a socialist frenchman).

Who is reading deficient here?

That would be YOU, j. frank.

Twice.  ROTFLMAO.

And too stupid to realize it.  Wow.

So you object that the entire

So you object that the entire text of the book is not available for hyperlink online, or do you object to ACA referencing a print media only item in a debate here?  You are always free to go check the veracity of the quotation.  Knowing ACA, I'd bet its spot on.  And you may also check the context of the quotation and post a reply at a later date.

I don't need to drop anything.  I just made you drop your pants right here by calling your BS about ACA's souurces not being referenced.  And I see a scorch mark!  What a surprise!

When the sources are referenced in the post, you'd best shut your mouth about there being no source material, because that is a naked lie or all to see.

I find nothing wrong with Bri

I find nothing wrong with Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan speaking out like this. Free speech is free speech, after all.

However, that being said, it is not surprising that the New Yorker did not find it odd that a group of "Progressive" anti-American nutjobs like Human Rights First had brought this guy to Hollywood to plead their case for them. Apparently, because, they both have the same "Progressive" agenda, don’t they?

Let's take a quick look at Human Rights Watch's funding, shall we?

Here's a partial  list of contributors of over $100,000 to Human Rights First.

Their ratings from the Capital Research Center (if available): A "1" means "radical Left", and an "8" means "free market Right". Contributors to the Center for Constitutional Rights will have a CCR next to it.

The Atlantic Philanthropies – founded by NYU School of Law director, funds the CCR

Ford Foundation – 0. CCR.

JEHT Foundation – 0. CCR.

Kaplen Foundation – 0.

The Oak Foiundation – 0.

The Open Society Institute – founded by George Soros. Enough said.

The Picower Foundation – 0.

What, no Tides Foundation?

So, what is my point? A "Progressive" rag props up a "Progressive" non-profit who found one general out of thousands (a dean, no less. Academia, anybody?) that had a similar view. And, this occurred 2 months BEFORE the latest season of "24" began. To me, the INCREASED amount of torturing this season tells me that the producers of "24" told Human Rights First to go F themselves. Humanely, of course. And thanks for the free publicity, douchebags!

Thanks for that aciaguana

Thanks for that aciaguana.

I tend to think the msm jerks need the living daylights beaten out of them. That would reconcile the 2 views, and would prove torture works.

:-)

How about learning yesterday

How about learning yesterday that the Dragon Lady (who used to call herself Hillary Rodham and now calls herself Hillary Clinton and will go back to Hillary Rodham after the 2008 election) paid $200,000 to a black state senator of South Carolina, Darrell Jackson, in exchange for his endorsement for her. Obviously she is worried about Obama garnering much of the black vote so she wants to buy her way out of that problem. She'll stoop to anything to become President, and that's a big reason why it'll be so very hard for any Republican or Democrat to beat her.

But the reason we learned about this yesterday was from sources outside the MSM. So here we have yet another example of liberal Democrat bias from the MSM via omission. (Just like they omitted the fact that the Utah shopping mall killer was a muslim).

Anyway, here we are only in February 2007 and HiLIARy is already engaging in so much corruption and dishonesty. Just think what we are in for in the next year and a half and then some. Wow. You would think that just maybe she will pull too much crap to survive. But the MSM will gladly give her a pass on everything else that comes just as they did with this bribe.

In a page ten report in USA t

In a page ten report in USA today yesterday, suthor Paul Wiseman finally reported that the US and our Filipino allies have been relentlessly hammering the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) on Jolo Island to the point that disinterested observers are indicating that the ASG is probably on its deathbed.

You will probably remember the ASG as the group that beheaded US citizen Guillermo Sobero as well as a whole host of Christian Filipinos, and held US citizens Jeff Schilling and the Burnhams for an interminable period until the point Martin-Burnham was killed in a firefight on Mindinao

This is being done by our military using military, medical, and civil affairs efforts amongst a mostly Islamic populace which last saw US troops in 1913.

Of course, this pre-empted news on CBS/ABC/NBC/ and CNN last night, right?

60 Minutes is covering it in a segment next sunday, right?

20/20 has a reporter sitting sidesaddle with US forces, right?

BD

Jolo Island is off the coast by the oil port of Um Qasr, Iraq - right ? Uhh, if not why are you even bringing this up - there's a war going on . Did Abu Sayaff attack us on 911 now along with Saddam ? Does bin laden or wmd mean anything to you,other than "missing" ? I don't see what you said has to do with anything going on, why even post it, it doesn't matter to 3,000 wasted lives.

How did I do balboa ? blarsen ?

( Use a baseball bat, a golf club is too flexible )

Meanwhile, back on Planet Gor

Meanwhile, back on Planet Gore:

At the news conference Thursday announcing this summer's ambitious "Live Earth" concerts -- designed as an exercise in "mass persuasion" about threats of global warming -- Al Gore described his vision: a 24-hour musical extravaganza across seven continents, featuring as many as 150 of the world's top recording artists, introduced by an army of "celebrities and thought leaders" (think: Cameron Diaz and Richard Branson), playing before a total live audience of a million people, and reaching 2 billion more via television, radio and the Internet on July 7.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/15/AR2007021502058.html?sub=AR

Make that 2 billion minus 1,

Make that 2 billion minus 1, because I certainly won't be watching or listening to it.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Christopher Horner live on

Christopher Horner live on KSFO Talk radio now.

"Our readers don't give a rat's ass about what you think. They want facts."

Elmore Leonard, 'The Hot Kid'.

Hmmmmmm..... according to Bri

Hmmmmmm..... according to Brit Hume on Special Report....

A social justice professor who lectures at Loyola University in Chicago and Northwester Illinois University has written an article on a San Francisco-based Web site about her experiences with military veterans in class.

June Terpstra says a Marine told her class about killing Iraqi civilians at a checkpoint — but that he had followed the rules of engagement. Her reaction: "I knew in that moment that this was what the future of teaching about justice would include: teaching war criminals who sit glaring at me with hatred for daring to speak the truth of their atrocities and who, if paid to, would disappear, torture and kill me. The American military and mercenary soldiers who 'sacrificed' their lives did not do so for the teacher's freedom to teach the truth about the so-called War on terror ... They sacrificed their lives, limbs and sanity for money, some education and the thrills of the violence for which they are socially bred."

Just like Arkin, this will be covered by the MSM tonight, right?

The war on vibrators contin

The war on vibrators continues...Good thing southern state legislatures & cops & judges have so much time on their hands!
JMR

The people passing and enforc

The people passing and enforcing these laws are truly afraid of the female orgasm.

Looks like the score is three to three Agnostic front

Looks like the score is three to three Agnostic front

[Colorado, Kansas and Louisiana courts have all said that laws banning the sale of sex toys on obscenity grounds are unconstitutional.

Courts in Georgia, Mississippi and Texas have upheld sex toy bans.]

Seems to me it's not fear of a woman orgasm at all. If they can't have their appliances, they need the real thing.

 

Here's an interesting tidbit

Here's an interesting tidbit on this case, Sarc.

The three-judge panel (all men) were 2 appeals judges and 1 district judge.

Of the two appeals judges, one was appointed by Bush (Dubina), the other by Clinton (Wilson).

The district judge (Hodges) has to be older than dirt (I have since found he is 73), having sat on the bench since 1971. Now, Nixon was prez, but the Dems controlled the Senate, which has to approve all judges at that level, unless I am mistaken.

This ruling is stupid, but is it BI-PARTISAN stupidity. You may want to correct some of the lesser-endowed mental giants who posted comments to that story @Reason.

I actually agree with you, Sh

I actually agree with you, Shrub. This ruling has little to do with left/right politics, and much to do with being sexually repressed.

The dildo lobby is not exactly a powerful one. ; )

Maybe the batteries needs rep

Maybe the batteries needs replaced?

*cue rimshot*

No, that sounds like a &quo

No, that sounds like a "do it yourself" project to me. I'm sure the fans of the ban are the main targets, and control-freakery (as you've noted in this case & I've noted repeatedly around here...) knows no party.
JMR

Oh. Comments like...1. The ri

Oh. Comments like...

1. The right is so afraid of the female orgasm because they've never witnessed one up close.

2. Th dumb asses are too decrepit to know about the interweb…Oh, you dumb bunny conservatives, when you realize that commercial activity is ALSO private.

3. Good for them, who needs this immoral junk. God does not want us to use them. Anything that helps the police to protect us from disobeying God is inherintly a good thing. I'm all for it.

...makes me feel like I am reading a Hufftard thread.

I've seen a few 'tard-threa

I've seen a few 'tard-threads around here, too. Anyway, as I said, it's a do it yourself project, I'll stick with doing what I want to do, as I see no big problem with the commentary on Reason's blog compared to other blogs (like this one). Comment number 3 above especially hits home on the control-freak fans of this law, come to think of it...When the other side leads with their chins, Roger, you can expect the occasional Colbert-style jab, and I'm glad you included this one because it made the point perfectly, even though its tone apparently annoys you (a bonus!). :)
JMR

And now, today's special Kyot

And now, today's special Kyoto Protocol Day edition of The Shrub Report®:

Here's a great story of a foiled plane hijacking.

Wild, Wonderful, Fat and dying of Heart Attacks, West Virgin-I-A!

This one is for Sarc… This one, too. Love that FCC. Ahem.

In Turkmenistan, presidential elections were held. Winning with 89% of the vote was Gurbanguly Berdimuhammedow, and Amanýaz Atajykow came in second, barely beating out Işanguly Nuryýew and Muhammetnazar Gurbanow. Poor old Orazmyrat Garajaýew finished a distant 5th, and apparently only Aşyrnyýaz Pomanow's parent voted for him (I think it's a him). I am not making this up.

George Bush hates Mardi Gras!

George Bush hates Christian soldiers!

George Bush hates paragliders! Karl Rove's weather machine is eyed as culprit.

It's George Bush fault for Tim Hardaway hating the gays!

Pirates of the Bay of Bengal?

Sing with me… Spam, Spam Spam, Spam

Uh-uh, our favorite Frenchy-French Socialist Chick is in twouble!

Here is a "Culture of Corruption" update for you. Not to be outdone by Philly, the other side of the Keystone State, in Pittsburgh, things are just as "Democrat(ic)" as can be. The governor, Fast Eddie Swindell, did his part to keep Harrisburg in the mix.

Here is how our brothers and sisters (of peace, of course) over at Hufftard U. reacted to Mookie and his boys fleeing Iraq for Iran. Here's a sample: "This "surge" must not and CANNOT succeed. America must suffer a decisive defeat. Then and only then can it be welcomed back into the world community." Amazing.

No, you're not smart, not good enough, and, doggonit, people don’t like you.

Perhaps Representative Ellison should be spending his time more constructively doing this instead of whining like a little girl about cigar smoke.

Man, back in the old days, they only did this to Jews.

Today in Liberalism History: It's a banner day for "Progressives" everywhere. On this date, in 1959, Fidel Castro becomes premier of Cuba, AND the most pure and holy Kim Jong Il is born in 1941!

MSM

Sex, Lies, and Video Tapes --- the MSM, the American "educational " community, and the U.S. Congress roll on!

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

OK, I've got MSM figured out

OK, I've got MSM figured out as "video tapes", but it's a toss-up to me which of "educational" community and U.S. Congress is "sex" and which is "lies".  A little help?

JoeBob

Without recognizing the ordinances of Heaven, it is impossible to be a superior man. - Confucious

&quot;Without violating the

"Without violating the First Amendment" apparently means "by invisibly repealing it through big-government regulation at taxpayer expense, just as we've done with the 4th, 9th & 10th amendments on other issues!" And yes, the gold market is full of happy news these days, but a look at history (and at blatant market-manipulation pretty-much ignored by the "mainstream" news media) suggests the real opportunity is silver.
JMR

I agree. The FCC is a worhwh

I agree. The FCC is a worhwhile expenditure of my tax dollars.

You're free to pay for my s

You're free to pay for my share of the FCC (and a variety of other useless, questionably-Constitutional-at-best agencies if you actually like paying for 'em) but I've heard all this before... Right at this point of the conversation, nobody ever seems to want to volunteer to pay most of sarcasmo's very-high taxes! But April 15th is coming, and hope springs eternal.
JMR

Sarc, I am going to check the

Sarc, I am going to check the box on my return that says "Donate $1 to help pay Sarc's federal taxes"...

btw, I was being sarcastic in my above lines about the FCC. I just wanted to make sure you knew that...

Oh, I know, this is just my

Oh, I know, this is just my form of "humor," but your comment brings to mind the truly heartening news of how few people are checking that FECal (and lying -- money is by definition fungible yet the explanation on your 1040 form pretends it's not!) box these days. I can proudly say I've never checked it. I still dream of a day when Libertarians can somehow broker a PBS-&-FCC-killing bill to the Demopublicans & Republicrats, but it's sure not a popular idea yet this decade!
JMR

Anyone have any statistics on

Anyone have any statistics on how many truly-retarded Americans (And Republicans for that matter - why limit this to Democrats, right? harharhar) actually mark that "donate $3 to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund" checkbox?

Right, without the FCC, who c

Right, without the FCC, who controls the electromagnetic Spectrum?

Like listening to KBKA?  What if Cingular decided that they liked that bandwidth to hang a repeater on?

The free marketplace, moder

The free marketplace, moderated in case of dispute over property rights by the court system. The FCC seems more-interested in controlling politically-incorrect speech than in maintaining the integrity of spectrum now that it has grown so-f---ing-huge, anyway, so your argument here is off-point anyway, but "what if Cingular decided to hang a repeater on your house?" answers your question anyway.
JMR

So, which policy arm of the f

So, which policy arm of the federal court system will assign Cell Phone Bandwidth?

Which arm of the federal courts will decide which bandwidth to assign to XM versus Serius?

Which arm of the federal courts will coordinate wtih Mexico to insure that the Mexican radio station in Agua Prieta does not interfere with the radio stations located in Douglas Arizona?  Which arm will coordinate with the Warsaw treaty countries regarding flight transponder frequency use for commercial aviation?

Geeeeeeeee....... sounds like that policy branch of the federal courts is called the FCC!

Please do not discuss things you do not understand.

SARCASMO GOING DOWN IN FLAMES!!!!!!   No parachutes spotted, no need to call air/sea rescue......

Which policy arm assigns th

Which policy arm assigns the property rights to real estate? (Answer, in some cases, goes back to king of Spain here in FL, but basically govt. declares ownership for govt. & sells it all and gets out of that business unless it's simply owning freqs they need for police/fire/etc.).

I presume any disputes now handled at the FCC (which, again, seems more interested in limiting speech than in handling spectrum at this point, despite your obvious reluctance to address that issue...) can be handled by federal judges, that's why we have federal judges (or more-expensive FCC bureaucrats, come to think of it).

As for me not understanding this issue, in your dreams. Nope, nobody "down" here, no flames, sorry, try again BD.
JMR

Right, so how does a federal

Right, so how does a federal court assure that Mexico does not broadcast on a US frequency? After all, unlike real estate, the Electro-Magnetic Spectrum does not respect borders. 

Which federal judge is going to attend treaty meetings and argue for our use of the shrinking bandwidth?

And, let us say that a new technology is developed by the GPS industry, but it requires additional bandwidth to make it a reality, how does a federal court make a resoned decision without a coordination agency?

Which federal judge do you trust to say "Ooohhhh, I know it is currently in use, but I think we will now migrate GPS to 2.4 GHRZ".....

You are against the FCC, but refuse to admit they have a vital role in our society today.  Just more immature thinking on your part.

How does the FCC stop Cuba

How does the FCC stop Cuba from broadcasting super-powerful stations right NOW? (Answer, they don't, and Cuba does because the US FCC is impotent there!) The Federal Court system has an answer, cheaper, to all your other questions, as CATO & various others with policy expertise in this field have noted. And once-again, you've managed to avoid the speech-issue in spite of the fact that it and not spectrum property rights is the subject of Roger's original post. Just more immature thinking on BD's part...
JMR

Coordination between friendly

Coordination between friendly nations immediately adjacent to us is required.  Cuba "ATTEMPTS" to interfere with our bandwidth, but due to distance can be effectively minimized by other assets.  I am curious though, how would a federal judge cause Cuba to STOP jamming us any better than the FCC?  Hmmmm.... Thought provoking.

Regarding your point that CATO might not agree with the role of the FCC in controlling the bandwidth, that is immaterial to me.  As someone who has to coordinate such activities on a regular basis I realize that we are currently operating in the best of worlds regarding control of the spectrum.  Substitution of a federal judge