On last night's Hardball Chris Matthews, interviewing Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, was peeved that Democrats weren't pushing hard enough to have a vote on the surge. Citing polls in opposition to the surge a flustered Matthews worried Democrats were going to roll over for the President and demanded Hoyer not let the President ignore Democrats like he ignored Katrina. In the first segment of the February 14th, Hardball Matthews declared to Hoyer: "He is gonna treat you, the first branch of the Constitution, as if you're Katrina, not to be paid attention to."
The following is the full question from Matthews:
Chris Matthews: "Well, we have a new poll that shows that seven, seven out of 10 Americans are watching Congress to see how they vote on this and they say that they vote and they say that if they vote the wrong way, they're going to remember that come election time. You know, Mr. Leader, you and I were grew up in a country where presidents were very attune to Congress and respectful of it, especially those who came out of Congress like Lyndon Johnson and John F. Kennedy and even Richard Nixon. They watched the Congress, they paid attention to it and they cared about its legislative duties. This President, and I know you respect him as we do, as President, but he came out and said the other day that he's not even gonna bother watching the floor debate. He doesn't even want to hear about it. He's got other things to do. He is gonna treat you, the first branch of the Constitution, as if you're Katrina, not to be paid attention to. Does that bother you constitutionally that the President doesn't think that this major debate on war is something he's not even gonna bother to watch on television?"
—Geoffrey Dickens is the senior news analyst at the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
The next question
February 14, 2007 - 10:45 ET by exLibAnd then the question:
So, Mr. President what did you do today?
I sat at home and watched C-SPAN.
You mean you watch a House Debate when there are kids dying in Iraq?
(Sarc off.)
Can't Stand Sissy TV Hosts
February 14, 2007 - 11:58 ET by Eagle OneChris Matthews is a sissy. I have no respect for any Republican who does not challange him on his Sissy Show. I have no question that Chris has experimented with both male a female sex partners in his life. You can tell by watching him he has a major problem with his sexual identity.
If your liberal your a nut!
Chrissy's lying whine
February 15, 2007 - 21:35 ET by SportPoliticsChrissy's lying whine:
70% of those polled voters are watching the vote blah blahblah...
Yes, that includes conservatives like me who won't support anyone who votes with the democrats, and won't support any democrats who vote for it - ever. I'm part of that 70%.
Nice spin job though, spittleboy Chrissy.
Thanks for being wise President Bush and not wasting your life watching a bunch of retards whine and piss and moan and pull their hair out over a non-binding do nothing idiot resolution.
When the democrats call for allowing a blood bath in Iraq then it's time to call them on it, and play Kerry's 30 year old TV appearance with O'Neal, where he denies the bloodbath waiting in Nam when the south is defunded.
A million slaughtered in Iraq won't do much to the modern murderous baby killing liberal. They'ell feel good about it. Then they can gloat that our military was holding back the tide, and was powerless to continue to save people.
The insane vampires are at outside the vault,and they want blood.
Dear Chris Matthead, NO, it d
February 14, 2007 - 10:47 ET by JayTeeDear Chris Matthead,
NO, it doesn't bother me that the President is NOT watching the Congressional Debate.....but the American People (as You said) ARE watching. I doubt if you will report the True Results of the Debate.
Chris, Does it bother you that American are NOT watching YOUR news broadcast ?
Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled, or hanged.”
President Abraham Lincoln
How does Matthews know who an
February 14, 2007 - 10:54 ET by TruthMongerHow does Matthews know who and WTF the president watches?!
...and you can just STFU with your racist cheapshot baby-tantrum Katrina commentary, Matthews - no the prez ain't just gonna do what you and congress want him to do like a freaking puppet - that ain't the way the system is designed to work, d*ckhead...
I've really had it with these pondscum MSM jerkwads...
Gee, TruthMonger, don't hol
February 14, 2007 - 10:59 ET by Tom1969caGee, TruthMonger, don't hold back on us. Tell us how you really feel...
~~~
VOTE DEMOCRAT!
(It's easier than thinking)
...if I do they'll ban me fro
February 14, 2007 - 13:10 ET by TruthMonger...if I do they'll ban me from NB, dammit...
Lucky for matthews...
Question Truth. If NO is so d
February 14, 2007 - 13:13 ET by bassndudeQuestion Truth. If NO is so devistated from Katrina, and goverment hasent rebuilt it for them yet. How do they know there was a tornado there? Could it be that there was no tornada, and that it is damage from katrina? How can a tornado destroy what is not there? Kinda like a tree in a forrest.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Ha bass! I do notice that the
February 14, 2007 - 14:01 ET by TruthMongerHa bass! I do notice that the racist MSM strangely seems to be ignoring this NO tornado - maybe it was only white people affected this time...?
They are still fixated on Kat
February 14, 2007 - 14:48 ET by bassndudeThey are still fixated on Katrina. The tornado must have been good news. Did some much neede clean up through one area, I guess. Picked us some debris and carried it off.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
Truthmonger......Gee, such Ac
February 14, 2007 - 14:12 ET by JayTeeTruthmonger......Gee, such Acronyms....shame shame......but, hey, I think Edwards has a couple of new openings for Bloggers, but you will have to STEP UP your vitrolic hate retoric another few notches...might be out of your reach, but Eduardo needs help. WWJD ?
Congressmen who willfully take actions during wartime that damage morale and undermine the military are saboteurs and should be arrested, exiled, or hanged.”
President Abraham Lincoln
WWJD? Here's a little bit:)..
February 15, 2007 - 15:45 ET by TruthMongerWWJD? Here's a little bit:)...
http://www.churches-...
And Chris Matthews point would be?
February 14, 2007 - 10:50 ET by acaiguanaAnd Chris Matthews point would be?
He is gonna treat you, the first branch of the Constitution, as if you're Katrina, not to be paid attention to.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
A major debate
February 14, 2007 - 11:06 ET by iveseenitallA major debate? Whether or not to formally criticize the President and send another message of surrender to the terrorists? Just goes to show what kind of a world this fool Matthews lives in. It was Richard Nixon's downfall to worry too much about what the idiots in Congress were going to do. He was a popular president at the time and should have gone directly to the people. I applaud President Bush for not listening to them. Cackling, politcal, barnyard fowl who strut around the floors of Congress, take all the perks, and doom us to another 911. And if the pig with lipstick takes over, say good-bye to liberty.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
What's the problem Chris? A
February 14, 2007 - 11:01 ET by dscottWhat's the problem Chris? Are you upset that liberal tactics of temper tantrums don't work on Bush? Are you upset that manipulation and triangulation doesn't work on Bush? How about libs showing some leadership for a change? Every responsible parent knows when a kid throws temper tantrum the best thing to do is ignore them and walk away. The point of the tantrum is to gain inappropriate control. Anytime you give in to such behavior you create a brat/monster who then escalates the behavior to gain complete domination. When you libs stop acting like children and start acting like adults, we will treat you accordingly.
BTW-since when was Congress the "first branch" of government? Are you insinuating the Executive and Judicial branches are 2nd and 3rd class? There are 3 co-equal branches, maybe you ought to brush up on civics. Equality means you can say no to the other two.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
matthews
February 14, 2007 - 11:38 ET by dostrowthese comments are hillarious and on target.
Silly me. I was waiting for C
February 14, 2007 - 11:46 ET by CaringwhiteguySilly me. I was waiting for Chris (the Constitutional scholar) to ask Hoyer about his statement that Congress makes policy about the war. I thought the President was CIC and the Executive Branch was the "policy" arm of the Federal Government. Apparently Hoyer thinks the Congress should control more than passing laws and budgets. Hey Steny, does Congress decide cases in the Judicial Branch too?
Bush ignoring Katrina recovery - Ha!
February 14, 2007 - 13:05 ET by Gary HallBush ignoring Katrina recovery - Ha!
I might suggest that the media (and Matthews) is ignoring what the Bush administration has done. Here's a note in the news (USA Today) from March of 2006.
Included in that amount - are you listening Billy Crystal ["if Bush would just spend 1 or 2 days of what he spends in Iraq, in New Orleans"]? - is some $17 billion is funded to be handed out to some 200,000 homeowners to cover catastrophic losses they incurred, not covered by insurance. This breaks down to an average of $85,000 per homeowner. These are grants, not low - interest loans.
I'll bet that hardly a soul out there has a clue of this massive charity from the Bush administration and the Feds to the citizens of Louisiana and Mississippi. I suspect that few journalists have even taken a moment to understand this - and of course, they are not about to inform the public of it, if they had. Bush must be seen, as Matthews suggests - oblivious. This is how the MSM sees thier job.
Ignore Katrina? Chris, your o
February 14, 2007 - 13:21 ET by ThisnThatIgnore Katrina? Chris, your observation is waaaaayyyy off. Pres Bush is going to treat Congress like he treats the MSM -- not to be paid attention to.
BTW -- Bush did not ignore Katrina, you idiot. Instead, he was ignored by that stupid governor, and even dumber mayor. That went on for days. Get your facts straight -- there are people in this country who actually followed and remember those events, just like we remember the events, discussions, comments, and agreements leading up to the Iraq war.
And just WHY should the Pre
February 14, 2007 - 13:27 ET by motherbeltdelete double post
And just WHY should the Pre
February 14, 2007 - 13:31 ET by motherbeltAnd just WHY should the President watch the "debate"?
Does anyone seriously think this is going to be a real debate? What it's going to be, is one Senator after another standing up, bloviating, preening, emoting,and gesticulating before the cameras. Why anyone would want to watch these self-absorbed blowhards is beyond me!
Democrat Not a Journalist
February 14, 2007 - 14:19 ET by ChasvsThis guy needs to stop pretneding to be a journalist and just get his paycheck directly from the Democrat Party. This SOB can kiss my A$$ and go the He((.
If the Democrats Reporters would really assess what happened in Katrina they'd have to take on the Democrat/Black mayor who left his chocolate people to die and the Democrat/Female Govenor who was too busy doing her hair to federalize her Guard and ASK for Federal support! That's how it works, but of course that assessment will never be done by the likes of Chris "Democrat" Mathews
I suspect Chrissy is actually
February 14, 2007 - 17:59 ET by GalvanicI suspect Chrissy is actually angrier over the fact that the President doesn't watch sophomoric shows like his than he is over whether he watches the House on C-Span. He's got more important things to do, but of course, Chrissy wouldn't understand that.
Matthews' very statement was idiotic on its face.
Oh Chris! - Have you even not
February 14, 2007 - 19:35 ET by FastEdOh Chris! - Have you even noticed that the rest of us have been treating the msm (Lsm) the same way? When you start treating us with the same respect you give fellow travelers, start REPORTING and not EDITORILIZING, then maybe, just maybe, we might start respecting you. Oh, you say, we have people watching and listening - true, but when ALL they hear is editorial, then of course they will follow your lead. Problem is, you and yours have forgotten, YOU are NOT elected, and should not be leading. Be honest with yourself and the other fellow travelers, and realize . . . sorry, asking for honesty from a msm stooge, a water boy for the demolibs. What a waste of 3 dimensional space, carbon and water.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Ritalin is not just for child
February 14, 2007 - 21:00 ET by dahliatraversRitalin is not just for children.
NO
February 14, 2007 - 21:13 ET by saurusPlease ... if New Orleans was a predominently WHITE city, the libs would be saying the POTUS was spending too much money there that could be better spent on really important things like education and welfare.
Funny how you don't hear these "Help us, please!" cries coming from states like Mississippi - which suffered as much or more devastation from Katrina than NO.
Nope ... like states in the northeast who have suffered tremendous damage from yearly hurricanes, they pitched in, rolled up their collective sleeves and went to work!
Sissy Chrissy Joins Congressional Wusses
February 15, 2007 - 09:36 ET by emjem24More people should ignore Congress because THEY KNOW NOTHING. They don't know how to conduct a decent war, how to support our troops, or how to support our President. If they were the Department of Morale, I'd cut their funding. These people want conditions for funding the Iraq War. I'm surprised Sissy Chrissy didn't drop an "F" bomb in his frustration. The Congress is a useless institution that is still hugely unpopular after the wonderful Democrat takeover. I wish more Americans would do their homework (not that they know what homework or actual research is) when they vote instead of lodging some absurd protest vote. That's all the 2006 Midterm elections were. Americans made Congress even more useless than usual but since when has the Congres actually passed a decent bill?
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
GEORGE BUSH IN THE GARDEN OF GOOD AND EVIL...
February 15, 2007 - 17:36 ET by John Q CitizenGEORGE BUSH IN THE GARDEN OF GOOD AND EVIL...
George Bush is the first American President expressing Christian certitude in his Presidential decisions. God even speaks to Bush, and as the President told the press, he consulted with “another Father,” “a higher authority” than Bush41 on going to war with Iraq. If true, presumably God would have also told him how to win this Iraq war without all the blunders, suffering and death.
The world has seen Christian certitude before and it’s not a pretty picture: papal infallibility when the Pope had armies, the Inquisition (intolerance at home) and the Crusades (intolerance abroad). When the Crusaders captured Jerusalem in 1099, they slaughtered all its inhabitants. When the Arab leader Saladin recaptured the city, he spared all the Christian inhabitants. So the Middle East is already primed for another war with Christian invaders; and accordingly and as a recent NIE confirmed, the war in Iraq has increased the number of jihadists and terrorists and made America less safe. This is not praise for the enemy, but history and insight into why our “bring it on” cowboy President is only rekindling and fueling this centuries-old fire.
Our brave, innocent young men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan are fighting for a better world, but a leader ignorant of history and cultures can easily cause the opposite. The stupidity of World War I and of Wilson, Lloyd George and Clemenceau caused terrible consequences for another 70 years after the end of that war, including Hilter and Communism. Afghanistan is the right war, certainly a just war and the whole world agreed and was on our side, and if we would have concentrated our efforts there we probably would have wiped out Bin Laden and those responsible for 9-11 by now. Iraq is a total disaster, and Iran will be even worse. Let’s face it, all George Bush knows is how to start wars!
AMERICAN DIPLOMACY… now there’s an oxymoron! The leader of Iran comes off as a whacko, however, the Iranians and the rest of the world view George Bush in the same way, so there is a common starting point. Real diplomacy involves talking with your adversary one-on-one without preconditions, and there’s a lot to discuss with Iran: the CIA in the 1950s, the Shah, the 1979 hostage crisis, sponsorship of terror, Israel and justice in the Middle East, and nuclear issues. But if past is prelude, Bush’s diplomacy with Iran will be perfunctory and rigged - this time, our mentally unbalanced, messianic President needs to provoke a war, AND HE WILL FIND A WAY!
This new Bush war should further help over one billion Muslims in their decision to fight America in a mutual holy war. When the President finally increases the level of hatred against the United States to where it engulfs Pakistan, then we face nuclear terror, and Biblical Armageddon becomes real and a self-fulfilling prophecy. Oh, the joy, the Rapture! Right now roiled Pakistan is just one assassin’s bullet away from going under, and still jihad recruitment is in its infancy.
Back at home, Christian certitude is present in Bush’s politics of division and hate. Nonbelievers of Bush’s Christian values and policies are viewed with contempt, instead of as fellow citizens in a pluralistic democracy. Civility has gone out of our civilization, and this type of Christian Right hate is completely out of the closet with Ann Coulter’s book on 9-11, which has been repudiated by few if any on the right who claim to practice the Christian message of love. Hate, hate, hate -- welcome to the new Christian America (not exactly like Mother Theresa or the Amish).
“Good and evil” is a concept common in religion, morality and ethics. Obviously the whole world needs more good and less evil. But is there a practical definition that everyone can agree on and that lends itself to objective measurement. How about: GOOD is something that makes the many human lives better and no or few lives worse, while EVIL is something that makes many lives worse, and no or few lives better. Some obvious good in this world: Habitat for Humanity, St Jude’s Children Hospital, etc. Evil under this definition would include a considerable number of Hollywood movies, a lot of poison on TV and violent video games.
Measuring George Bush’s actions by this definition with objective facts, our compassionate conservative, Christian President does mostly EVIL: from the Iraq disaster to Katrina mismanagement/incompetence to “no child left behind” (children in extreme poverty up 20% since Bush took office) to the $3 trillion dollar tax giveaway to the rich. Particulars on the last item: SUPPLY-SIDE (trickle-down) economics is a bogus theory promoted by those who benefit from it. In a mature capitalist system, supply side never rules, it’s always the demand side of the equation that governs growth and well-being. Think about the 1930s Depression, General Motors had plenty of supply, but demand evaporated.
Previous U.S. recessions have been cured with only $200 billion in tax cuts targeted to the middle class, because the consumer (the great middle class) spends that tax cut and primes the economic pump. But George Bush has raised the debt that our children and grandchildren will have to pay from almost $6 trillion to almost $9 trillion for this current recovery, which is uniquely without wage gains, and which has shrunk the middle class that makes America strong and great.
Corporations (the supply side) are now loaded with cash, but there’s no place to spend it because they don’t see any demand. So many corporations are using that cash to buy back their stock -- WOW, isn’t supply side wonderful in how it fulfills America’s needs? As the rich-poor divide increases, we’re headed toward previous shining examples of trickle-down economics: South America of the recent past and feudalism in the Middle Ages (South America and feudalism also had no wage gains). This is such good evil by our compassionate conservative, Christian President and his myriad of engorged friends.
I see a dark future for the country we all love. Even our Constitution is at risk when a President says he speaks directly to God (witness how God/Allah influences and corrupts Islamic attempts at democracy). The Constitution guarantees freedom to all, and freedom for all from tyranny. Our precious Constitution binds us together as a nation, and allegiance to it is the definition of patriotism.
J Q evil-Citizen... Your o
February 15, 2007 - 17:45 ET by Clear thinkerJ Q evil-Citizen...
Your own words "I see a dark future for the country we all love" is exactly how I feel about people that think like you. You and your kind will be the downfall of this great country.
I'm sure you'd get an A for that in a left wing college
February 15, 2007 - 17:49 ET by Carl KolchakThat post might get you an A in a left wing college course, but you started out with the Inquisition, Crusades and Pope to talk about how bad Christians are so I have to respond.
The Inquisition was extremly bad and ruthless. They didn't have the patience for others who didn't believe like them, but guess what, left wing Trotsky and Lenin did something similar during the 'Red Terror' after the Bolsheviks came into power in Russia. They were atheists, and killed, deported and tortured those they didn't like. There was an organzation they used called the Cheka to enforce their fear on those who didn't think like them. Left wing Trotksy and Lenin also attacked the Russian Orthodox Church and killed priests.
The "Red Terror" would be the left wing atheist version of the Inquisition.
The Crusades are much bigger than the Pope telling the Christians to go kill people. The Seljuk Turks(Muslims) conquered Jerusalem from the Arabs(Muslims) and then attacked the Byzantine Empire(Christians), then the Byzantines went to the Pope for assistance. Why isn't anything ever said bad about the Muslims attacking the Byzantines. Saladin also forced those he conquered into slavery. Now were the Crusaders a bunch of swell guys when they conquered a city? No, not exactly, in fact many on the way to the Holy Lands thought it was open season on the Jews, but don't try to tell me the Muslims were a bunch of swell guys. Did you know the Muslims invaved Christendom, and we don't ever hear anything bad about that. They were in present day Spain with the Moors. The Almoravids invaded Spain many times with large armies. See El Cid the Champion of Spain for a person who fought against the invading Almmoravids who were Muslims from North Africa. The Muslims also attacked Sicily, Portugal, and other parts of Christendom. You can also find examples of Muslims beheading Christians from that time too.
In the Fourth Crusade, the Crusaders ended up taking Constantinople from the Byzantines, who were Christians. The Crusades are probably much more about conquering territory, than they are about the Pope ordering people to kill like left wing college professors would have you believe.
"I've always been crazy, but it's kept me from going insane" Waylon Jennings
You're Done JQ
February 15, 2007 - 18:18 ET by emjem24Since this website is all about outing the liberal fools of America, I put up for yet another nomination: John Q Citizen. What a lovely, one-sided diatribe you have here. Allegiance to the Constitution is patriotism? How about loyalty to this country? You don't have a clue. Where are your sources for all this crap you spew? God you sound like Murtha and Clinton all wound up into one little neat package. You want some truth. You and your kind are not welcome on this site. Go spew your idiotic conspiracy theories somewhere else...how about Daily K or Huff n' Puff? You get an F for coherence and an F for balance.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
Fellow NBers, it appears we h
February 15, 2007 - 18:30 ET by Dave RFellow NBers, it appears we have an another anti-Christian bigot and anti-semite among us, and an "educated" one, too. I'm guessing he was the apple of his Marxist professors eye. After all, he is also a Marxist/Leninist and has raised cherry-picking to a whole new level.
Notice how he artfully avoids, as all of them do, mentioning that the First Crusade was launched only after 400 years of Islamic barbarian terror. He obviously believes that Pope Urban II just woke up one day and decided to go kill some Moslems.
Notice how he tries to claim the NIE report says that GWB's actions are solely responsible for creating Islamic terrorists. That is not what the report said. He obviously missed the rest of the report, but I'm guessing he gets his news from Keith Olbermann.
Notice he how he claims GWB is responsible for the resurgence of a conflict that has been ebbing and flowing for 1400 years. I am sure the Iranian "students" had GWB in mind but didn't hate us when they took our citizens hostage in 1979, and I suppose Carter's lack of any meaningful action had NOTHING to do with the Jihad we now find ourselves in. I suppose they didn't hate us when Osama's illiterate bastards attacked this country five times while Clinton was president. But they didn't hate us until GWB took office. Right.
His support for diplomacy with the Islamic horde indicates a total lack of knowledge of the history of Islam, Else he would know that they view such negotiating as a sign of weakness and always exploit it for their own benefit.
He then makes a reference to the Biblical Armageddon (actually that is not where the battle will take place)which, had he bothered to learn anything about at all, he would know that three of the invaders of Israel are Persia (modern day Iran) China (the King of the East-the only country on the planet capable of fielding a 200 million man army-the number the Bible plainly says they will have)and Russia.
The next two paragraphs are more of the same anti-Christian ignorance we have all seen before. Not a peep about Islamic hatred of modern civilation, which the child-molesting murderer Mohammed declared war on fourteen centuries ago.
As for the tax cuts for the rich and the rich get richer while the poor get poorer routine, I'll let Noel handle those. I will say this: I benefited from the tax cuts, and I am by no means rich, unless this DimLib, like most of his ilk, considers me so because I have a job.
Evenin', all. I'm going to head over to a wonderful little Italian restaurant down the road and exploit some poor workers by dropping about $50 bucks in their till and leaving a few generous tips.
DR
I hate newspapermen.....I regard them as spies.....If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast. -Gen. William T. Sherman
Edwards campaign worker?
February 15, 2007 - 19:12 ET by acumen"Fellow NBers, it appears we have an another anti-Christian bigot and anti-semite among us...."
In other words, an Edwards campaign worker...
Geez, JQ, when we cut and paste here we generally cite it.
February 15, 2007 - 18:36 ET by acaiguanaGeez, JQ, when we cut and paste here we generally cite it.
Pretty much all I have to say to you.
Well, I will say you have presented one of the most convoluted discussions of 'good' versus 'evil' that I have ever seen. That is quite a feat. If you wrote it yourself, I'd suggest a little less medication (legal or illegal) prior to posting. Might help your credibility.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
George Bush is the first Amer
February 15, 2007 - 18:40 ET by Jack BauerGeorge Bush is the first American President expressing Christian certitude in his Presidential decisions.
Bollocks.
President Harry S. Truman
Inaugural address, Thursday, January 20, 1949
The American people stand firm in the faith which has inspired this Nation from the beginning. We believe that all men are created equal because they are created in the image of God. From this faith we will not be moved.
President Clinton
Inaugural Address, January 20, 1961
With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds; let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth, God's work must truly be our own.
President Jimmy Carter
Inaugural Address, Thursday, January 20, 1977
Here before me is the Bible used in the inauguration of our first President, in 1789, and I have just taken the oath of office on the Bible my mother gave me a few years ago, opened to a timeless admonition from the ancient prophet Micah: "He hath showed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God." (Micah 6:8)
President Franklin D. Roosevelt
First Inaugural Address, Saturday, March 4, 1933
In this dedication of a Nation we humbly ask the blessing of God. May He protect each and every one of us. May He guide me in the days to come.
Fourth Inaugural Address, Saturday, January 20, 1945
As I stand here today, having taken the solemn oath of office in the presence of my fellow countrymen—in the presence of our God—I know that it is America's purpose that we shall not fail.
The Almighty God has blessed our land in many ways. He has given our people stout hearts and strong arms with which to strike mighty blows for freedom and truth. He has given to our country a faith which has become the hope of all peoples in an anguished world.
President Lyndon Baines Johnson
Inaugural Address, Wednesday, January 20, 1965
Under this covenant of justice, liberty, and union we have become a nation—prosperous, great, and mighty. And we have kept our freedom. But we have no promise from God that our greatness will endure. We have been allowed by Him to seek greatness with the sweat of our hands and the strength of our spirit.
Crap Jack
February 15, 2007 - 19:10 ET by acumenCrap Jack. I was on the phone picking out the cemetary plot for America, while multi-tasking on line cancelling my subscription to Catholics-R-Us and you had to come here and mess up my John Queer Public-induced white-male-guilt depression with your stupid facts again.
What's next? I suppose you be telling us the founding fathers of this dark future bound country of ours were also God-fearing men that saw a bright future for this land if we kept up a strong obedience to God's law? Ahhhh, the inhumanity.......
acumen -- yeah, another lib**
February 15, 2007 - 19:28 ET by Jack Baueracumen -- yeah, another lib***l dope who thinks his frackin' weird opinion is fact. You'll note I chose all Democrats, and all professed Christians as well, just to be fair.
Though whether JFK would even get into today's Democrat party, I sincerely doubt. He doesn't pass the abort test.
Back to Jack
February 15, 2007 - 19:51 ET by acumenJack - It would be refreshing, at the least, if they would come up with some 'new' material instead of the same old lame attacks.....I guess that would require some independent thought. Gets tiresome responding to the same old, same old.
I picked up on your party/professed Christian based examples to make your point. Too deep for our brainwashed citizen Q.
On JFK - I think the Dem party died with him - it's a shame. Onward thru the fog.......
acu -- yeah, the tedious la
February 15, 2007 - 20:08 ET by Jack Baueracu -- yeah, the tedious lack of originality is mind-crushingly boring.
The dope doesn't even comprehend that the only coherent critique of President Bush actually comes from conservatives.
Lib***ls are so far gone with BDS, it's all hysterical garbage about a President who's spent about a tenth of the time in church than Clinton did .
It seemed every time I saw Clinton on the news he was either entering, leaving or hallelleujahing in a Church.
Bubba & his bigger than God Bible
February 15, 2007 - 20:31 ET by acumen"It seemed every time I saw Clinton on the news he was either entering, leaving or hallelleujahing in a Church."
I'm surprised there never was a Clinton wheelbarrow fundraiser to help the adulturer-in-thief get his bigger-than-God Bible in and out of church.
Not sure how even Citizen Q could have missed that one.
Matter of fact - I'm sure I read recently, where Bubba is planning his own Christian Church to split the evangelical vote in '08. Another 'I'm sorry honey' gift for Hillary no doubt.
But yeah, back to your point Jack, as with everything else that lib***l's detest, (like organized religion) Bush is to blame. Yawn, burp.......back to work I go. later....
I see a dark future for the country we all love.
February 15, 2007 - 18:49 ET by misterbill"I see a dark future for the country we all love."
There is a good bit of truth in your thoughts, however when GW Bush prayed to me I told him to protect his country from all harm. He has set forth on that path. In subsequent prayers he said that in the world of man, particularly, the United States of America, the laws of man restricted how much he could do to protect the country from the enemy within. He said that no matter what he tried he was challenged by a band of fallen angels. (Many humans refer to them as "devils".)"Lord, when I try to listen to the information shared among potential evildoers, these fallen angels criticize me and say that I am infringing on their freedom."
He said those who deny Jesus as the Son of God have killed many who believe in me. "I can handle them Lord, but I have a hard time with these fallen angels who spread insidious lies using the public media to do so. Many of the worst of these fallen angels have worked their way in to the media where nightly and daily they lie to the citizens of this country. Please guide me."
I told George that I do not often intervene in human matters as their life span on earth is to test their worthiness to enter my Father's mansions. The only advice I can give you George is to beware of the Prince of Darkness, Beelzebub. He will adopt many identities and names. Do not be fooled by him. He will often give himself away. One of his alias names is John Q. Public. He believes his incredibly ill-informed statements will be sneered at by My children but over time they will begin to believe these awful lies simply through repetition. Turn your back on this Satan. Ignore him, do not respond to him for that is how he will entrap you.
My blessings on you George, continue to protect your country from those who would deny my Son. There is much more danger in the future. Stay strong and particularly watch those who profess to be friends of America but will strike when your back is turned. Many of them are among you.
An ugly American is one who does not support his country.
Amen...
February 15, 2007 - 18:51 ET by bigtimerJQC, you have eloquent cut-n-
February 15, 2007 - 19:29 ET by JABJQC, you have eloquent cut-n-paste qualities but here is all I have to say to your liberal BS;
"To bad Ignorance isn't painful to those too lazy to learn"
PS, I find myself using my own tag line more frequently these days (for nothing more than a cogent response to the ...(fill in the blank)), the thick headedness must be growing (on this site anyway). God save the USA.