MSNBC is a JOKE

So, Mark, they can say the word, 'lie', huh?

Was Bush blamed for any of that?

I'm trying really hard to understand the effort put into this segment.  Was the point to get 'evangelicals' to understand that Romney's position now is different that it used to be; therefore it is bad he changed?

If that is the case, then evangelicals should quit tomorrow because last time I checked with my neighboring evangelical trying to 'convert' me he thought I could change.  So, I'm a bit confused.

Buchanan has lost it even more than I thought he could lose it anymore.  Man that is something.  Here he gives us his 'opinion'.  I hope you don't mind my parsing a bit.

"Do I believe these are sincere, honest conversions of Rudy or Romney?  In my judgment, probably not. I think they're changing their positions for political reasons."

So, Buchanan has judgment?  Since what year?  Buchanan is a vile sort of creature that is awfully egocentric about political ideas that went out of date somewhere around the end of WWI.  His take on history is more than strange, it is deluded and filled with ideas that would make the most radical skinhead blush.  But I digress.

Basically a statement of the most shallow and obvious conclusion one person might come to, right?

"And you either accept that or you take the alternative which may be Hillary Rodham Clinton."

And here is why this quote caught my eye.  Buchanan is giving us one alternative to Romney and Rudy.  Another example of a basically shallow mind.  I knew a lot of Buchanans when I was a kid, they were really difficult people because they hadn't any way to adjust to new things.

One might take the more obvious 'alternative' which is that the stands are actually believed by both men.  Buchanan avoids that by bringing in an alternative that wasn't even in the cartoon.

And they pay this guy and let him on TV for these many years.  I've never been impressed with his reasoning, his writings or his political blather.  I for one do not buy into Buchanan being the 'smartest' conservative in the room, even when he is the only one.

Of course he isn't a conservative at all.  That's what is galling about them using him as a foil.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."

MSNBC is so clearly the offical network of the DNC that I don't understand why any Republican even bothers to go on it.

I used my xray vision Mr. Barnacle >  the Mitt's fingers were not decernable though the apposable thumb was in Mitt's announcement in "Mitten State."

Very funny Mr. Barnacle > couldn't you have spent more time on how well Mr. Romney speaks across many subjects clearly and articulately?  He speaks like he may have run an international venture already much concerned with uniform language and level playing field universal standards.  I even wanted to start showing my Irish more after hearing him. 

Oh, and about that poll CNN ran about a mormon, a black, and a woman >>  If only their "qualifications" were close to equal CNN's reporting wouldn't have been have as laughable.

Interesting isn't it that no one dares suggest that maybe he was lying before? Or being politically expedient?

I guess once you say you are pro-abortion you are branded for life. Only anti-abortion people are allowed to legitimately change.

On the flip-side, too many here in Boston are or have been quick on the trigger to brand Mitt the liar because he told everyone that he was pro-abortion and pro-homsexual when elected and now he is changing his tune. Here in Boston most believe him now and it's a bad thing.

I am still unaware of any legislation that Mitt passed that was pro-homsexual or pro-abortion in the state of Massachusetts. He unequivicably opposed the court decision to allow homosexual marriage and vowed to fight it to the end.

I think this line of "debate" is really an attempt to derail Mitt and make sure the stupid evangelicals don't vote for him.