In keeping with their constant quest to saddle the USA with the fault for the growing unrest in he Middle East, the Washington Post has unleashed another article, replete with some efforts to blame-the-USA-first, titled "Across Arab World, a Widening Rift".
In the first paragraph, writer Anthony Shadid illustrates the traditionally intertwined nature of Egypt's Sunni and Shiite communities showing us how they have so easily coexisted in the recent past but quickly gets to the warnings of the danger of the Shiites "rising".
Naturally, this is the fault of the USA who has left Arabs with a sense of "powerlessness and a persistent suspicion of American intentions." The rise of unrest is also blamed on the "United States and others for inflaming it".
Later in the piece, Shadid takes further aim at the USA in particular and the West in general.
"There's a proverb that says, 'Divide and conquer,' " Mohammed said. "Sunnis and Shiites -- they're not both Muslims? What divides them? Who wants to divide them? In whose interest is it to divide them?" he asked.
"It's in the West's interest," he answered. "And at the head of it is America and Israel." He paused. "And Britain."
That sense of Western manipulation is often voiced by Shiite clerics and activists, who say the United States incites sectarianism as a way of blunting Iran's influence. In recent years, some of the most provocative comments have come from America's allies in the region: Egypt's president questioned Shiites' loyalty to their countries, Jordan's king warned of a coming Shiite crescent from Iran to Lebanon, and last month King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia denounced what he called Shiite proselytizing
This illustrates the prosaic penchant for Muslims to resort to overarching and mostly absurd conspiracy theorizing. Blaming everyone but themselves is epidemic in Islam. After all, they are "God's people" so they couldn't be wrong, it is presumed.
Shadid does, however, delineate how embroiled the Sunni/Shiite rift has been since as far back as the 7th century.
The schism between Sunnis and Shiites dates to the 7th century, Islam's earliest days, when a dispute broke out over who would succeed the prophet Muhammad.
Really, this article is quite useful in many ways, when all is said and done. One gets a good measure of much of the blindness to its own troubles endemic in Islam today -- though perhaps the writer didn't realize he had revealed it so himself. While still blaming the US and Western forces, this article clearly shows that these rifts and internecine troubles have been infesting Islam for thousands of years. And, if you read between the lines, you can see how Shiites have been oppressed by Sunnis for generations giving reason for this rift to grow, making it a bomb ready to go off.
"People in the region always complain about a Shiite crescent. You always hear, 'Shiite crescent, Shiite crescent.' That's just a crescent. What about the full Sunni moon?" said Nimr al-Nimr, a Shiite cleric in the eastern Saudi town of Awamiya, who spent five days in police detention for urging that a Shiite curriculum be taught in his predominantly Shiite region.
There is one aspect of the Sunni/Shiite rift that is left somewhat undeveloped by Shadid, though it is given brief mention a few times in the article. And that is the role Iran is playing to enflame sectarian clashes as the Shiite Clerics ruling Iran flex their muscles in the region with their attacks on American forces, their growing Nuclear efforts, and their plan for a "Shiite crescent" of influence in the oil rich regions of the Middle East.
In the background is the growing assertiveness of Shiite Iran as the influence of other traditional regional powers such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia diminishes.
But, as Muslims of both Shiite and Sunni lineage look to the west as the problem, they too often avert their gaze from the problems closer to home, preferring to focus on the outsiders, ignoring their own culpability.
All in all, while this article does fit the general blame-the-USA line of thinking the Washington Post has settled upon, this article does, if you can overlook the blame-the-USA bits, a fair job giving a brief overview of the chief trouble of the Islamic world and it is an internal one that has been roiling for generations.
Now if only we can get American and Western leftists to see that we are not at fault, we'll be on the road to helping them solve this problem. But, don't look to the MSM and the Washington Post for much help there.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Power Beyond Belief
February 13, 2007 - 12:33 ET by allanfAs is the habit of liberals, the writer attibutes power beyond comphrension to the United States. Notice the pattern with the Global Waming enthusiasts. We are all powerful when it comes to causing damage. But have no power for good because of our implicit evil.
I for one am tired of this self flaggelating drivel.
I remember pretty clearly bei
February 13, 2007 - 12:35 ET by BruzillaI remember pretty clearly being a young man in Pittsburgh, and going to our Presbyterian Church to see my baby sister get baptized. When my Dad was a kid, he worked at a Catholic church delivering groceries, distributing flyers, etc., and was friends with the priest... who happened to come to the church that Sunday to watch my sister's baptism.
I remember that day so well because the last person our minister ever expected to see coming into his church back then was a Catholic priest, and before he could stop himself he blurted out "what the Hell are you doing here?", which caused everyone in the church to either gasp in shock or burst out laughing. That was the first and only time I've ever heard something like that in church, but the fact was that there was a lot of animosity between all of the churches, especially back in the 1960s and 1970s. The only difference between the dislike of the Sunnis and Shiites today, and the Catholics and Presbyterians back then, was we weren't raised in a culture where it's okay to shoot up people you don't like and so our exchanges were limited to harsh words rather than bullets and bombs.
Our churches and religions over here have the same distrusts and dislikes as the Sunnis and Shiites in Iraq, and there's no secret/covert US Government operation driving the divide... just natural differences in policies and beliefs. Maybe that's something the MSM could talk about when some "experts" talk about all the religious unrest in Iraq, or the dangers of this deep religious divide.
MSM
February 13, 2007 - 12:43 ET by iveseenitallGood points, Bruzilla. But it would be asking entirely too much for the MSM to go back to real reportage and give up their immature, left-wing name calling and political posturing. Journalism and teaching - dead "professions". Murdered by the liberals.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
The WaPo quotes Muhammed, but fails to educate.
February 13, 2007 - 13:03 ET by acaiguanaThe WaPo quotes Muhammed, but fails to educate.
"It's in the West's interest," he answered. "And at the head of it is America and Israel." He paused. "And Britain."
This was a very good post Warner. I'm glad you caught it.
America was attacked on 9/11 by fanatical Muslims. The only Holocaust Denier worth mentioning (note to idiot Ellen Goodman) is Muhammad.
The Middle East is a hotbed for conspiracy ideas all centering about the US and Israel. What would they do without us? One only has to look at the history of the 8th to 12th Centuries to understand the answer to that question.
The shallow depiction of the Arab Muslim world of the Middle East as being only recently anti-Western Civilization is a horrible disservice to the American public's perceptions of the problems.
Most Americans throw up their hands when the Middle East comes up in conversation. They simply do not know nor really care about all those petty religous insane wars that go on over there. But, it was brought home on 9/11.
And what is the Democrat and MSM response? Shallow analysis; rewritten or ignored history; lack of courage to face the religous issues squarely; and guilt guilt guilt over being a Western Civilized Man.
That's what will lose this war in the Middle East for the US and once that happens, the dogs will be out.
Then, as we stand in the rubble of the next attack on the US or its interests with thousands of innocents dead, innocents who currently throw up their hands in despair at understanding the mess, we will hear the MSM whine:
"Who let the dogs out?"
Remember the Canard? "Who lost China?" Probably not.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
I've spent a lot of time in t
February 13, 2007 - 14:41 ET by BruzillaI've spent a lot of time in the Middle East, and you would be surprised at how most folks who live there throw their hands up when the subject of the United States, Israel, or peace comes up. For the most part they don't care anymore about this stuff than most Americans do. 99% of folks in the Middle East get up, go to work, come home to their families, and go to bed without ever thinking about Great Satans, Zionist Plots, or the ineptness of Islamic leadership. They want to live out their lives as peacefully and quietly as possible... just like most Americans do.
But for every worthless "PAY ATTENTION TO ME" American, you have some twit just like them in the Middle East or in Europe. It's these moronic "apples" who garner a vastly disproportinate amount of attention, and make the whole "bushel" look bad.
Warner Todd Huston >>
February 13, 2007 - 13:10 ET by ucWarner Todd Huston >> sure make me read the Post article and your blog twice >> "...Or it isn't"!!! That is just a mean way to treat us to the truth. Good thing the President only went in with liberation force troop strengths and not occupation force levels. Imagine trying to escape blame for such relations if we had presented with the top down force strengths the Democrats hind sight still can't get to twenty twenty with but still say is clearly right.
As a strategy for conventional war Colin Powell's "overwhelming force" arguements are irrefutable. President Bush's mark is for an "Operation Iraqi Freedom" though.
Cruel Warner, just cruel.
"Growing unrest in the M
February 13, 2007 - 14:30 ET by mattm"Growing unrest in the Middle East" is a sign of American success in the WOT, if you ask me. We're smoking out the bad guys, so the unrest is among the terrorists, not the entire Middle East... Of course, the MSM will never even suggest this...because of their own Bush hating jihad.