MoveOn in Forgiving Mood on Hillary's Iraq Vote

Photo of Mark Finkelstein.

From the moment Tom Matzzie, the Washington director of Moveon.org, turned up on this afternoon's Tucker Carlson, something just didn't feel right. Matzzie just didn't fit the Moveon mold. There was no whiff of the angry zealot about him, no sense that Tucker was one misstep away from witnessing a meltdown. Mattzie came across as one more pleasant-enough fellow with a DC organizational gig. Someone who might even have fit in an outfit as conventional and boring, say, as the 2004 John Kerry campaign. Which is precisely where, as the record reveals, Matzzie did spend the last presidential season, working as the Kerry-Edwards director of online organizing.

Matzzie was on to discuss the issue of whether, from the perspective of the left, Hillary needs to do a full-frontal mea culpa for her 2002 vote authorizing the war in Iraq. Carlson began by playing the clip from this past weekend in New Hampshire of a man at a campaign event solemnly informing Hillary that until she admits to a "mistake" on the vote, he and other like-minded people aren't going to hear all the other "great things" she's saying. Hillary trotted out her shopworn line about having "taken responsibility" for her vote -- whatever that means -- while claiming that "the mistakes were made by this president." The specific issue at hand aside, I would encourage people to view the video of Hillary's remarks. Her tone, and her tendency to blame others, are unappealing, and underline her shortcomings as a candidate.

View video here.

When Carlson asked "why can't Hillary Clinton just apologize?", I fully expected Matzzie to enthusiastically agree. But, au contraire, MoveOn's man responded "I don't think it's about apologies; I think what people really want to hear is how Senator Clinton is going to help get America out of Iraq."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Matzzie did allow that he thinks that Hillary along with many others, should admit the vote was wrong, and focus on what can be done to get the US out of Iraq not when she takes office in 2009, but now.

Carlson then asked Matzzie whether it made him "sick to his stomach" to hear Hillary "roadtesting her new lie," misrepresenting her 2002 vote as merely "authorization to go back to the UN and do something or other," whereas everyone in DC at the time knew it was a war vote. Matzzie again evinced a very forgiving attitude:

"I'm not going to relitigate the past . . . the real challenge we face is how to get the United States out of Iraq."

Wait a second! I thought Matzzie's organization was founded for purposes of encouraging America to "move on" from Bill Clinton's straying from his marital vows, not from the straying by politicians from leftist orthodoxy. Matzzie wouldn't bite even when Carlson, taking Moveon's theory to its logical conclusion, challenged him this way: "so you forgive Bush for his mistakes up until this point? You just want to know what to know what he's going to do from here on out?"

Trapped, Matzzie played it with a light touch: "forgiveness is up to George Bush and his maker." Please. This is an organization that has spent the last four years heaping vitriol on the president over Iraq.

At one point, Carlson stated the obvious truth: "it seems to me that [Hillary's] getting a pass from liberal groups cause they think she can win."

Matzzie: "I don't think that's true at all."

Sure.

Mark was in Iraq in November. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net

—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Move On

For this clown from one of the most nasty, rotten political groups on the face of the earth to bring up "George Bush and his maker" is beyond incredible. No words can express the depth of liberal hypocrisy.

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

ives...No words can express t

ives...

No words can express the depth of liberal hypocrisy.

Actually, there are words that fit the bill, but this is a relatively clean site, sooooo, let's just leave it there.

about having "taken responsibility" for her vote

"about having "taken responsibility" for her vote,"-- and I take responsibility for saying she is a hypocritical slimeball, Mr Fatzzie. --

Oh yes, also Mr Fatzzie, I have a couple of lies I would like to try out on you!
You are so shameless that I should be able to get the lies by you.

Matzzie: "I don't think that's true at all." Well, that means to me that Mr Fatzzie thinks that old Hil cannot win. Hee hee!

An ugly American is one who does not support his country.

It actually looks as if Tucke

It actually looks as if Tucker did an honest job, especially when fairly turning the mantra back on the moveon drone. In this case, the hypocracy is wholly evident by this persons words alone. Created by Hillary's "road test". Based, we can be certain, on focus groups, not staesmenship.

This is going to be fun. If the public pays attention, the only clear picture will be the vacancy of the left.   

Just happened to read a Busin

Just happened to read a Business Week column "The Good News Economy" by Maria Bartiromo.  Brings back the early days of the economy the Clintons left President Bush.  Reminds reader that even before hit to economy by 9/11 and corporated scandals the aftermath of the Clinton years and the .com bust had US heading towards a recession.

What qualifications other than her "evil" asset Bill (termlimited Bill) does she have in her background?  Or should I be more specific and see if maybe we can finally get an answer?  Hillary, what have you yourself done, thought through, accomplished that should even rate minor consideration?

Is MoveOn stuck in reverse?

"The Good News Economy" project regular growth for 2007 and compliments President Bush for 2006.

Hillary took over reforming h

Hillary took over reforming healthcare, as assigned by her President husband. She violated federal disclosure laws, hoarded the data, hired incompetent wonks (remember Ira Magaziner).

She has successfully traded livestock futures

Hillary also has run for office in her "home" state on the heals of her husband's presidency. So no undue influence from him on anyone in NY.

She voted for the war, before she regretted voting for the war.

So, in short, she is qualified.

Liberal success depends on phoniness

Obviously MoveOn has made a political calculation to tone it down so liberal candidates have a better shot at the White House.  Look at the vast difference between the Democrats as portrayed in the last election and the nasty bunch now prowling the halls of Congress.  If libs let themselves be seen for who they are, they'll turn people off.