NY Times Covers Edwards' Hateful Bloggers, But Adds Lame Charges On McCain Blogger

Photo of Clay Waters.

Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards' inflammatory new campaign bloggers Amanda Marcotte and Melissa McEwan will be retained by the campaign after making public apologies for past postings that were controversial, to put it mildly. In a surprise, the New York Times played the story on Friday's front page, albeit under the mild headline "Edwards Learns Campaign Blogs Can Cut 2 Ways").

Marcotte is notorious for a January 7 post on the Duke lacrosse "rape" case, one she later eliminated after it became an issue after her hiring: "Can't a few white boys sexually assault a black woman anymore without people getting all wound up about it? So unfair."

Marcotte has also made many incendiary anti-Catholic statements, as Tim Graham detailed here at NewsBusters.

But in the interest of balance, reporter John Broder devoted several paragraphs to conservative blogger Patrick Hynes, now blog liaison for Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign. In what's surely just coincidence, Hynes had been targeted by the left-side of the blogosphere as a potential reciprocal scalp, should Marcotte and McEwan have been fired by Edwards as a result of pressure from conservative blogs.

The three accusations Broder dredged up against Hynes are pretty weak, and none involve anything Hynes actually wrote on a blog.

"Problems with bloggers have already bedeviled other campaigns. In last year’s Democratic senatorial primary in Connecticut, some bloggers who supported Ned Lamont attacked his opponent, Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, and one posted a picture of Mr. Lieberman in blackface."

(Since Broder won't name her, that blogger would be Jane Hamsher.)

"Last summer, Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, hired Patrick J. Hynes, a conservative blogger and political consultant, to be his campaign’s blog liaison. Mr. Hynes quickly ran afoul of fellow bloggers by initially concealing his relationship to the McCain campaign while he was writing critically about other Republicans."

"He then came under fire for declaring that the United States was a 'Christian nation' in a book and television appearances that predated his work for Mr. McCain. Last November, while employed by Mr. McCain's campaign, Mr. Hynes posted on his personal blog a picture of Representative Henry A. Waxman, Democrat of California, and invited readers to submit nicknames, some of which were anti-Semitic."

(Does the Times hold left-wing bloggers responsible for their commenters as well?)

Broder apparently took his anti-Semitic accusation from left-wing blogger Glenn Greenwald, who wrote Wednesday: "Does McCain countenance his consultant's calling Henry Waxman 'pig man' and encouraging his readers to mock the size of Waxman's big nose (a standard, highly offensive stereotype) and to spray vulgarities at Waxman?" The links go to blog posts suggesting that pointing out that someone has a big honker is a sign of anti-Semitism.

Rather than relying on the Times and Greenwald, feel free to try and discern any actual anti-Semitism in the comments in question.

For more New York Times bias, visit TimesWatch.

—Clay Waters is the director of Times Watch, an MRC project tracking the New York Times.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Edwards' Bloggers

So Edwards didn't fire these idiots?

That's the end of the conversation with Edwards.

Stick a fork in him. He is done.

Biden didn't get out of the starting block and now Edward's

Yep, Biden didn't get out of the starting "black" (I couldn't resist), though he imagines he is still in the race, and now dumb@$$ Edward's own arrogance has placed a pistol in his hand, a hole in his foot that is bledding badly and too stupid to call a doctor. Gawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwd....it is gonna be fun to watch these clowns self-destruct (Kerry couldn't even make it to the race without wrecking)!

If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!

don't be too surprised

I won't be surprised, my friends, if Hillary isn't going down the same path. She has to maintain the agonizing pose of World's Most Intelligent Woman for the best part of two years yet. All while her party is imploding and expiring.

She's not untouchable. -- Wait & see if an annoying ball of feces doesn't hit the fan in some upcoming photo op. Just a feeling I have, don't place bets.

But I won't be bashful; I'll remind our Busters.

Democrats.Pathetic, annoying

Democrats.

Pathetic, annoying hypocrites.

....always get a pass...always.

Jefferson been charged yet?

The conservatives had better learn to fight.

Wait, there's a potential c

Wait, there's a potential conflict of interest and hateful speech going on with McCain's blogger, and you guys are pooh-poohing it while still beating this non-story to death? I'm confused...

Uzumaki/Ayanami '08. Because a ninja and an Eva pilot can govern the nation better that what we have now...

ferrarimanf355 (what a great user name)

ferrarimanf355 (what a great user name)

As a Liberal, I'm sure you understand the need more than anyone else to document your accusation of 'hate speech'.  Now, I understand that cursing at my dog is hate speech to you; but I'd like to know exactly how commenting that America is a Christian Nation is 'hate speech'.  Gee, I guess I have to take the University of Michigan's 're-education' seminar on this stuff.  By the way, are you aware of Communist China's re-education camps?  North Korea?

Ah well, that's not exactly what inspired me to write this post.

The speech by Edwards darlings was without doubt laced with profanities; directed toward a group of religious folks with a no prisoners approach; and in the main leaves the reader with no doubt as to the venom and hate spewing from these bloggers.  I'm a little disturbed by the comparison of someone's nose to actual printed speech, but maybe that's just me?

I'll give Edwards this much.  He actually fired these bloggers until he was criticized for it.  Then he rehired them.  Great Command in Chief material.

Edwards:  Attack, attack, attack.

Public:  Uh, we are a little critical of that attack.

Edwards:  Retreat, withdraw, cut and run.

Public:  Un, we are a little critical of that strategy being as it pretty much shows the US has no principles worth anything.

Edwards:  Attack, attack, attack.

Public:  Um, John, didn't you get the memo above criticizing that attack?

Edwards:  Re-deploy, re-deploy, re-deploy.

Public:  Are you ever going to get this right?

Yeah, that's the kind of principled leader I want in charge of the free world.

Never mind the simple fact that he must totally agree with whatever these bloggers have written in the past.

Keep up the good work Edwards, you twit.  You're going to make Senator John (served in 'Nam ya know) Kerry look like a rock of stability.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says:  "I want to take those profits."