On Wednesday, Ralph Nader continued his media adulation tour, this time stopping by "The Daily Show." Just as with his appearance on "Late Edition," the only tough questioning Nader received was on the issue of the 2000 election and whether he placed George Bush in the White House. Stewart once again made clear exactly why conservatives view him as a not a political humorist, but a partisan, liberal comic. At one point, he told the consumer advocate that he was always right. And when Nader attacked President Ronald Reagan, the Comedy Central host joined right in:
Jon Stewart: "Please welcome back to the program, Ralph Nader! Ralph! Come on! Nice to see you again. Thanks for joining us. So they say they’re going to make a film about you, ‘An Unreasonable Man,’ and they come to you, and you say, ‘I'm in.’"
Ralph Nader: "What are you going to do? ( Laughter ) Everything– You know, you want air bags in cars and seat belts in cars so you lose the freedom to go through a windshield. Reagan didn't like that. He liked the freedom to go through a windshield."
Stewart:: "Exactly. So he was considering you an anti-liberty–."
Nader: "Yeah. Right."
Stewart: "Exactly. Ralph Nader. Tear down that belt. That sort of thing?"
Story Continues Below Ad ↓Nader: "Yeah. Yeah. Yeah."
Stewart: "I understand."
During the segment, which aired at 11:15pm on February 8, Stewart’s only hard-hitting questions were related to the 2000 election. The comedian described how a hypothetical person may feel about the Green Party candidate, saying, "I, somehow, in my irrational core blame you for George Bush and everything that has happened since then." Stewart segued into the topic by mentioning the new documentary about Nader, "An Unreasonable Man":
Stewart: "It is so interesting watching the movie, A, The working conditions for Nader's Raiders and the groups you worked for were terrible. I think Ralph Nader really could have done a job on you. Clearly those people were–
Nader: "You mean, the piles of reports defied the laws of gravity."
Stewart: " That's exactly right. They’re working 24/7. Secondly, you can still see people struggling with how they want to feel about you. That sense of, ‘Boy, I have such great respect for his integrity. I really love seat belts, I really love, you know-’"
Nader; "Clean food."
Stewart: " I love food that is not covered in E. Coli. But, yet, I somehow in my irrational core blame you for George Bush and everything that has happened since then. How are you-- How are you struggling with that?"
Nader: "Well, first off, I call it political bigotry, because, you know, what's the rap on small candidates? I mean, what if nature prevented seeds from sprouting, huh? We wouldn't be here, right?"
Stewart: "Wait, what?"
Nader: "What's the rap? In other words, why don't they say Gore took it away from me. Bush took it away from me. Why is a third-party candidate or Green Party candidate a second-class citizen?"
Stewart: "Well, I don't imagine it's a rational argument to say that Ralph Nader stole the election You know, with everything that went on with all the huge forces, it does seem like yours was a small force but easily blamable."
Nader: "Well, there are a lot of what ifs. One is that Republicans stole it from Gore. I mean, Gore won the election. He won it in Florida but it was stolen from Tallahassee. [Cheers and applause ] And you would think– You would think that these guys would go after the thieves, you know, instead of some little Green Party."
Finally, if there was any doubt as to Stewart’s liberal proclivity, the comedian cleared it up a few minutes later with his syrupy closing comments to Nader:
Stewart: "Well, I will say this -- You have taken your fair share of heat over these years, but one thing nobody has never said is that Ralph Nader wasn't right. And so we appreciate your service and all those things."
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Nader gave us Bush. Thank G
February 8, 2007 - 16:29 ET by spiderdanNader gave us Bush. Thank God.
Perot gave us Clinton. Where were you, God?
John Stewart is left wing, ev
February 8, 2007 - 16:40 ET by toolzJohn Stewart is left wing, everyone knows that. His show is also on Comedy Central, so he is a humorist more than a politicist.
Not to mention he used a triple negative in that sentence, so who knows what he was really trying to say...
Where do these self-imposed e
February 8, 2007 - 16:34 ET by bigtimerWhere do these self-imposed elite leftists get the audacity to say things like but one thing nobody has never said is that Ralph Nader wasn't right.
El Wrongo Stewart.... A lot of people despise Nader and his Raiders, whom Jimmy Carter put a lot of in his administration. (I used to have the link to that...look it up if interested any of you on the left.)
Please.... Run Nader Run!
Ralph Nader wasn't right. The
February 8, 2007 - 16:36 ET by HumanEventsRalph Nader wasn't right. There, I said it. And he wasn't right at all with his idiotic line about Gore winning Florida but it was stolen in Tallahassee. Recount after recount kept showing Bush the winner, duh. And the fact that the audience at this show cheered and appluaded when Nader uttered his stupidity further shows the liberal proclivity of Stewart (he obviously attracts Democrat Koolaid drinkers).
Also what a crock for Nader to say Reagan wanted the freedom to go through a windshield. That's like saying being in favor of people owning houses is wanting the freedom to experience a house fire. Or being in favor of people driving a car is wanting the freedom to be hit by a drunk driver crossing the line. And of course Stewart agrees with him and makes a moronic joke, "Tear down that belt.
What a sickening example of a
February 8, 2007 - 17:59 ET by mattmWhat a sickening example of a sychophantic media hack licking the boots of a Leftist mercenary demagogue liar.
February 8, 2007 - 18:14 ET by mandrake
Not sure the analogy works.
February 8, 2007 - 18:07 ET by balboaNot sure the analogy works. More like being against smoke detectors so that people have the freedom to die in their sleep. Or being against quality standards in meat packing so that people have the freedom to get ecoli.
I just love how Nader lives i
February 8, 2007 - 16:39 ET by msh1973I just love how Nader lives in the past...
Nader: "Well, there are a lot of what ifs. One is that Republicans stole it from Gore. I mean, Gore won the election. He won it in Florida but it was stolen from Tallahassee. [Cheers and applause ] And you would think– You would think that these guys would go after the thieves, you know, instead of some little Green Party."
Give me a break. Every recount the experts did showed that Bush won Florida. Move on Nader!
But Nader's past is some cong
February 8, 2007 - 17:04 ET by GalvanicBut Nader's past is some conglomeration of his consumer-protection glory, myth (Gore won Florida), and brand new lies (the Tennessee vote was stolen from Gore).
Ralph Nader --- "Unhinged At Any Speed"
I bet the wives of these two
February 8, 2007 - 16:43 ET byI bet the wives of these two men are in constant states of yawning. Can we say, "Boring?" Seriously, they have so little to talk about that they have to bash one of the few great presidents this country has ever had--and over a seatbelt issue.
deleted double post
February 8, 2007 - 16:43 ET bydeleted double post
I wish Reagan was still aroun
February 8, 2007 - 16:46 ET by ucI wish Reagan was still around and as fresh as his first term and that we could discuss a female President's right to turn Air Force One into a pink schemed Presidential perk. I wish I could ask him some down home simple and logical questions also about women in the Office; I might start with what I quess would have to be posited as hypothetical since the Clintons would not have been yet President. I still have not been convinced otherwise that a First Lady like say Hillary who gets to their role in "The Office of the President" gets there by "election" and not by "appointment." Furthermore, as Hillary demonstrated (well/poorly?), the First spouse is not limited from very publicly sharing this office she too got to through election. I still ponder and mean to research that she may actually only be limited from signing official documents. (Please post if you know of them any laws stating a President may not use as an equal any contribution from their spouse.) First Spouse gets as much exposure to world leaders and as many of the perks of the Office and maybe even more say in how such is executed. Do you think above would be agreed to by Reagan and without even mentioning the spouse also is one and same in union paid party by the salary of the Office of the President? Follow the money, look at the logic, and then turn it around if not yet in full agreement in a spouse also termlimited. Surely a term limited President is limited themselves from even being the spouse of a later President. Don't know what laws termlimits really can compare to or be contrasted with maybe other than in murder cases where the driver of a get away car may be seen as equally involved. James, did you have too much to eat - how did you come to see such as just about womens rights? Maybe Cheney deserves a new plane and can give Madame Speaker his current as a hand-me-down, at least as long as it is a war time allowance?
Reagan gave us the freedom of
February 8, 2007 - 16:47 ET by Richard RomanoReagan gave us the freedom of personal responsibility--the self-knowledge that we are in charge of our own destinies. In Nader's world, we're too stupid to be trusted, so let's have immense government intervention in every aspect of our lives because we must be saved from ourselves!
Ah liberals, lost, misguided, and naive.
"Ah liberals, lost, misg
February 8, 2007 - 20:26 ET by uc"Ah liberals, lost, misguided, and naive."
Here's to Hannity's stop Hillary now campaign and everyone elses. If "to hold the Office of the President" is to describe a 24/7 personification of the constitutional responsibilities of such office and the word "hold" is not specifically defined in this use to be different than such meaning in "to have and to hold...til death do us part" then how much more misquided and naive the Hillary liberals are seeming to be >> President William Jefferson Clinton is now limited from "holding" such personification again. Lincoln bedroom may have to be renamed as Bills separate bedroom for constitutional convinement. Maybe a save Bill campaign is best way to stop Hillary.
"He/she that doesn't learn from Clinton history is doomed to repeat it."
How might a new resident of a state and soon after their new junior senator get past the seniority in the Senate and grab the emotional spotlight in her district and in the senate? Hopefully through no untowards/untold/misguided way.
Hope you had a Happy Birthday President Reagan.
Although I might not always
February 8, 2007 - 17:12 ET by WhichWingAlthough I might not always agree with the stance taken on the daily show, I must say that I always get a laugh out of it. "Tear down that belt." Come on now, that's funny. And I'm always a little amused at how people look to Jon Stewart to ask "hard hitting" questions. This is comedy central after all.
When he told Nader he was always right, was he referring to politics or the other things he's done??
Have a good one.
You know, I remember that l
February 8, 2007 - 17:58 ET by balboaYou know, I remember that last line from the interview, and was trying to figure out what Stewart was actually saying. If he meant it as it seems, then it makes no sense. But with the triple negative (the hat trick!), I was trying to figure out if he meant that Nader has taken his share of heat, despite people saying you're wrong...confusing turn of a phrase.
His comments made lots of sense to me
February 8, 2007 - 18:09 ET by Carl KolchakStewarts comments were very easy to understand.
Sincerely
Yogi Berra
"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you're going, because you might not get there." Yogi Berra
At the end of the 60's, the c
February 8, 2007 - 21:47 ET by Lancasters Saved UsAt the end of the 60's, the car model with the lowest fatalities per mile driven was the Chevrolet Corvair. Space efficient, frugal by the standards of the day and using advanced materials, it was abandoned by the public due to perception, high cost of manufacturing...and the Mustang. Ralph was Wrong. It wouldn't be the last time.
Can you elaborate? What did R
February 8, 2007 - 22:06 ET by balboaCan you elaborate? What did Ralph have to do with the Corvair and/or Mustang?
Balboa, read, "Unsafe at any Speed" - come back, we'll talk.
February 8, 2007 - 22:24 ET by acaiguanaBalboa, read, "Unsafe at any Speed" - come back, we'll talk.
Geez, the ignorance of our youth.
:-)
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
Sorry! The Ford Pinto is more
February 8, 2007 - 23:08 ET by balboaSorry! The Ford Pinto is more my era. :-)
Didn't Ralph write a book a
February 8, 2007 - 22:28 ET by Free StinkerDidn't Ralph write a book about the Corvair called "unsafe at any speed"?
With his book Unsafe at Any S
February 9, 2007 - 10:18 ET by Lancasters Saved UsWith his book Unsafe at Any Speed, Nader added a big brick to the pile of thought that government knows what is best for you. The Corvair was a great departure from traditional auto design. It had a weight saving aluminum block, independant suspension, flat floor, big trunk, frugal air cooled flat six engine, low center of gravity, unibody construction. It was an R&D response to the VW Bug and lighter European cars. The domestic cars of the day tended to be aimed rather than steered, and the Corvair was agile. Nader didn't like that. GM engineers continually worked the bugs out of the early models, and introduced a 2nd generation model in 65. The fact that once the Stats were gathered and the car had the lowest deaths per mile of any US car is not brought up by social engineers. At the time GM had more than a 50% share of the market. I believe they are sub 20 now.
LSU,You are correct. Ralph an
February 9, 2007 - 10:37 ET by Dave RLSU,
You are correct. Ralph and his henchmen went after the Corvair because it was different. As a result, when the oil "crisis" hit the US car manufacturers, who by then had had any inclination toward technical innovation stifled by Mr. Nader's insane rantings, were caught completely flat-footed. Ralph single-handedly caused damage to the US automakers they have never fully recovered from. Ralph Nader is a mechanical illiterate.
In the immortal words of Mr. Brock Yates, "Speed kills, my ass!"
I hate newspapermen.....I regard them as spies.....If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast. -Gen. William T. Sherman