After Week of Silence: Network Morning Shows Finally Cover Pelosi Plane-gate

Photo of Scott Whitlock.

After more than a week of ignoring the controversy over House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s request for access to an extravagant plane, the three network morning shows finally covered the subject on Thursday, albeit briefly. CBS and ABC both offered full reports during the 7AM hour of the February 8 shows, while only CBS included a quote from a Republican lawmaker who criticized the possible ethical issues raised by having the opportunity to fly friends home in a posh C-32 jet. NBC’s "Today" show mentioned the story only in a news brief and then co-host Matt Lauer briefly asked correspondent David Gregory about the plane controversy.

All three networks included snarky reports on this "hot controversy." Lauer wondered if the incident would make Pelosi "look bad from a PR standpoint," while Cuomo used the pithy term, "turbulence." One wonders why it took a week for the media to jump on such a "hot controversy." At 7:06am, "Good Morning America’s" Cuomo introduced Jake Tapper with a few quips about "plane envy:"

Chris Cuomo: "We begin with the turbulence over Speaker Nancy Pelosi request for a new plane. A request that has been quickly turned down. Senior national correspondent Jake Tapper has the latest on the controversy from Capitol Hill. Jake, is this about security or ego? Sounds like a case of jet envy."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Jake Tapper: "Well, Chris, I guess it depends upon who you ask. Ever since 9/11, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, which is second in line to the Presidency behind only the Vice President, has been afforded use of the military jet to travel for security reasons. But Speaker Pelosi wanted use of a plane that could get her all the way to her California district without having to stop and refuel, perhaps even a large luxury plane. And just a few hours ago, the Pentagon rejected her request. Former Speaker Dennis Hastert used a 12-passenger C-20 plane to fly him to and from his Illinois district."

Both ABC and CBS defensively mentioned the fact that Pelosi is second in line to the presidency. CBS, however included a quote from Republican Minority Whip Roy Blunt in a segment airing at 7:10am:

Susan Roberts: "House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's request for a larger military jet is proving to be a political firestorm. At issue, why she wants a larger and more expensive plane. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is second in line of succession to the presidency, and for security reasons she has access to a military jet for travel. But she doesn't want just any jet. She wants something like this -- a government version of the Boeing 757 that can make the trip between Washington and her San Francisco home without stopping to refuel. Gas alone costs $2,500 an hour. That's $12,000 one way just for fuel. The previous House Speaker, Dennis Hastert, used a smaller commuter size jet. The new Speaker's critics have dubbed her request 'Pelosi 1.' Military officials are said to be grumbling about it, and the Speaker is on the defensive. Wednesday she insisted size doesn't really matter."

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House: "It's not a question of size, it's a question of distance. Well, we want an aircraft that can reach California."

Susan Roberts: But an aircraft like that can comfortably seat 50 and Republican leader Roy Blunt is among those questioning how all those extra seats might get filled."

Roy Blunt, House Minority Whip: "You know, if you can say to your supporters, do you want to fly with me from San Francisco this week, spend the week in New York and then fly with me back? That's an incredible perk. It's an incredible fund-raising tool."

After a quick anchor read, NBC’s Matt Lauer and David Gregory briefly discussed the subject at 7:15am, focusing on how Pelosi would be effected from a PR stand point:

Matt Lauer: "Hey David before I let you go let's talk about the, the size of the plane that Nancy Pelosi has requested from the Pentagon. Depending on the spin you want to believe here. Either, either the Speaker says it's to travel efficiently back and forth to her home district. The Republicans are saying it's an abuse of power. Either way does it just look bad from a PR standpoint?"

David Gregory: "Well I think that's a problem. This is a Democratic leader who's promising to clean up Washington. It's worth remembering post-9/11 the House Speaker gets private air travel by the Air Force to go back to his or her home district. Dennis Hastert went back to Chicago, Nancy Pelosi is going back to San Francisco. She wants the ability to be able to go direct and not have to refuel along the way and have some family members travel with her. None of that is, is untoward but the, the Air Force is saying, the military is saying, 'Look we can't guarantee you a 757,' which is essentially what she wants, 'it depends on availability.' Republicans are saying, 'Look, bottom-line here, that this is more than just efficiency, this is extravagance.'

Lauer: "Right and, and if you were a PR firm, you know, kind of giving guidance to the Speaker you'd probably say take the refueling stop and smile, right?"

Gregory: "Right, right and that's something she's gonna have to grapple with, I think, in the days to come."

Lauer: "Alright David Gregory at the White House for us this morning. David, thanks very much."

The MRC's Tim Graham discussed this subject on the Febuary 7 edition of "Hannity and Colmes"

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Sounds like a case of j

"Sounds like a case of jet envy" - Chris Cuomo, Good Morning America

It amazes me that these liberal spin-meisters always try to put a happy face on anything that may taint a lib.

If the Islamist terrorists drop a nuclear bomb in the midwest, and Hillary is pres, old Chrissy boy will lead the story with:

"Coming up: It doesn't work in Peoria - as a matter of fact, nothing works in Peoria!"

Stop laughing, Bill. I'm glad you were named an honorary indian chief, but being named "Chief Wang-in-Hand" will not get me the native-american vote in '08! - - -Hillary

Rule #1 in the msm playbook.R

Rule #1 in the msm playbook.

Report negative news regarding democrats only and only when it is not possible to keep the lid on it anymore.

Rule #1a If reqired to post negative democrat news (after silence fails), be concerned about the dem's PR, not damaging facts which could deepen crisis. Follow through with positve spin.

And what the MSM did frequent

And what the MSM did frequently during The Great Stainmaker's "presidency" with all his numerous scandals was precede coverage of the scandal with a piece on something like "Pres. Clinton said today he wants to help the elderly with...". So that way, since they had to cover the exploding scandal, people were already shown what a wonderful caring guy he is. Then upon seeing the scandal they could react, "Aw why don't they just leave the poor guy alone and let him do his job."

How disgusting. So a Gulfstre

How disgusting. So a Gulfstream isn't good enough for the queen bee, she now has to fly in a luxury 757? All because she's too important to stop and refuel on her way to San Fran? Typical limousine liberal...and the MSM's ignorance is giving her a free ride.  BTW...Murtha's veiled threat comments about military appropriations getting cut off if they don't do as she wishes is disgusting as well.

The advance of liberal thought will hasten the downfall of this country.

This clearly is a slow time f

This clearly is a slow time for news. So this would be a great time to break out with some tough issues. How about we go on the offense with asking Nancy why she is so uneducated when it comes to the question of when life begins. She wants to portray herself as so maternal, let’s ask her when she started being ‘maternal’ over her own children; before or after they breathed air for the first time. (Maybe she is trying to dodge the tough issues, but all these plane trips. hmm...)

I don't understand what all t

Frankly, I don't understand what all the fuss is about.  If Nasty Peloser needs to fly non-stop between San Francissy and D.C., all she has to do is borrow The Hildebeast's broomstick.

Problem solved.

I hate newspapermen.....I regard them as spies.....If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast. -William T. Sherman

What comes to mind with all

What comes to mind with all the money her clan has, I wonder why she doesn't already have a private jet that makes this question moot.

Heck even John Travolta has a sponserd 747 and he doesn't have the scratch Nancy does.

Very interesting take RT2P. 

Very interesting take RT2P.  Good Point.

It looks like Madame Speaker

It looks like Madame Speaker must not really be all that concerned about Global Warming and saving energy after all, or else she would do her part, huh? I guess the MSM doesn't think that Liberals can contribute to global warming either...

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

To put things in perspectiv

To put things in perspective for those who are not aeronautically astute...

This is what Pelosi has, and this is what she wants.

(I wonder what that second one does to the global warming... </sarcasm>)

~~~
VOTE DEMOCRAT!

(It's easier than thinking)

Tom,But this is what she dese

Tom,

But this is what she deserves.

I hate newspapermen.....I regard them as spies.....If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast. -William T. Sherman

Does anybody have a cost per

Does anybody have a cost per year comparison of the two planes?  What would taxpayers pay for procurement of the new plane (one time) and what more would taxpayers pay for fuel for the new plane (757)?  I know in the article it mentions what the fuel cost of the new plane is, I'd like to see a comparison if anyone knows of one.  Especially if we could break it down by tax payer (for the total bill - procurement and upkeep).  I'm really curious.

These are the people that insist that we are being selfish when we complain about tax rates being confiscatory.  Meanwhile, Madame Speaker wants more money from taxpayers for a regular direct flight.  Shared sacrifice, Madame Speaker.  Connect in Atlanta when you head back to Leftwing Wonderland like the rest of us do.

I think the children should

I think the children should decide, afterall they are running the government, right?

<insert something clever>

I heard a sound bite from Pel

I heard a sound bite from Peloser earlier today.  She sounded simultaneously whiny AND arrogant.

Didn't we go through this before? Dems abusing perks??

Oh yea, MSM has a very Short atttention span. BTW the aircraft in question WILL fly cross country without a fuel stop requirement, depending on the load configuration. The C-37A is a military version of the Gulfstream V business jet. The Gulfstream V can fly non-stop 6,500 nautical miles.

source: http://www.globalsec...