Bill O’Reilly Slams NBC News, GE, and Washington Post for William Arkin’s Comments

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

Fox News’s Bill O’Reilly was on the warpath Monday evening, and with good reason.

The targets of his disaffection were NBC News, GE, and most vehemently, the Washington Post and William Arkin for the latter’s disgracefully disrespectful article about America’s troops published on January 30.

O’Reilly began (video available here, hat tips to Hot Air and LGF): “In a stunning display of hatred, NBC News military analyst William Arkin wrote two Internet columns chastising members of the United States Armed Forces for daring to criticize civilian dissenters of the Iraq war.”

After reading some of the offending passages, O’Reilly released the hounds:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

It is hard to believe that any responsible person would attack the military in this very personal way. Arkin implies that Abu Ghraib and Haditha define how Americans have performed in Iraq and flat out calls our military people mercenaries. That is folks who fight solely for money, have no patriotic intent at all. Ironically, the American military has fought for centuries to allow Arkin the right to say these vile things. We invited Arkin on "The Factor." He, of course, declined.

After showing footage of a Fox News producer trying unsuccessfully to interview the cowardly Arkin, O’Reilly continued:

Mr. Courage, huh? William Arkin has been a military hater for some time. He wrote a book called "Code Names," where he exposed more than 3,000 coded titles, some of which were still classified.

So there's no question, Arkin is an agenda driven guy. The question is why would "The Washington Post" and NBC News hire a person like this?

Great question that is likely an many right-thinking Americans’ minds. As you might imagine, O’Reilly had the answer:

As you know, "Talking Points" believes NBC News has taken a sharp turn the left. It is a business decision made by three men. NBC Universal executives Robert Wright, Jeff Zucker, and Steve Capus, with their approval elements at NBC News, spew out far left propaganda on a daily basis and direct vicious, personal attacks of people with whom they disagree.

Wright, Zucker and Capus believe this is a responsible way to run a news division, but students of journalism know this kind of garbage is unprecedented at the network level.

We asked NBC News for a statement regarding William Arkin and here it is. "The comments in question were made by Mr. Arkin in his Washington Post column, and he does not speak on behalf of NBC News."

We'll deal with "The Washington Post" tomorrow. But notice how NBC didn't criticize Arkin's comments. Hard to believe.

Now there's no sense in confronting the NBC News people about this situation. They're in too deep. They will not change course because that would expose them. But NBC's parent company, General Electric, makes billions of dollars off government contracts including military work. Its CEO, Jeffrey Immelt, is aware of the Arkin problem and the tone of NBC News in general. It is Immelt who is responsible for this debacle, because he has the power to change it.

O’Reilly brought his diatribe to a conclusion:

Fair minded Americans can dissent from the Iraq War. We all know that. The war has not been waged effectively because of poor post-Saddam planning and the failure of the Iraqi people to put aside religious hatreds and fight for democracy.

But clear thinking people also understand that deposing a murderous dictator and trying to bring freedom to millions of oppressed people is a noble endeavor. Just ask the marsh Arabs or the Kurds.

The United States military has performed heroically in Iraq and Afghanistan in brutal environments. For any American, any American to accuse them of being paid agents of oppression is disgraceful and far over the line of rational thought.

NBC News and General Electric and "The Washington Post" will be forever tainted by this situation. Like William Arkin, they can run, but they can't hide. Enough is enough. All Americans, all Americans should condemn this.

We do, Bill – at least, those who haven’t allowed their political dogma to interfere with rational thought.

What follows is a full transcript of this segment. Also, those that are interested should watch O’Reilly discuss this matter further with Michelle Malkin and Kirsten Powers.

BILL O’REILLY: Hi, I'm Bill O'Reilly. Thank you for watching us tonight. Attacking the military, that is the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo."

In a stunning display of hatred, NBC News military analyst William Arkin wrote two Internet columns chastising members of the United States Armed Forces for daring to criticize civilian dissenters of the Iraq war.

The columns appear on "The Washington Post" Internet site and said in part, "I've been mulling over an NBC Nightly News report from Iraq.in which a number of soldiers expressed frustration that with opposition to war in the United States.Through ever Abu Ghraib and Haditha, through every rape and murder, the American public has indulged those in uniform, accepting that the incidents were the product of bad apples or even of some administration or command order. So we pay the soldiers a decent wage, take care of their families, provide them with housing and medical care and vast social support systems and ship obscene amenities into the war zone for them.and their attitude is that we should in addition roll over and play dead, defer to the military and the generals and let them fight their war. [this] NBC report is just an ugly reminder of the price we pay for mercenary - oops sorry, volunteer - force."

It is hard to believe that any responsible person would attack the military in this very personal way. Arkin implies that Abu Ghraib and Haditha define how Americans have performed in Iraq and flat out calls our military people mercenaries. That is folks who fight solely for money, have no patriotic intent at all.

Ironically, the American military has fought for centuries to allow Arkin the right to say these vile things. We invited Arkin on "The Factor." He, of course, declined. So FOX News producer Jesse Watters went to him.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

JESSE WATTERS, FOX NEWS PRODUCER: Bill Arkin, how are you doing? FOX News. How's it going? Mr. Arkin, can we talk to you about some of the comments you made?

BILL ARKIN, NBC NEWS MILITARY ANALYST: Can you leave me alone for just a.

WATTERS: Actually, no, we'd like to talk to you for a second. How could you say what you said? I mean, don't you think it was really hurtful and harmful to the military families, to the soldiers serving in Iraq?

Let's address this. I mean you called these people mercenaries. They're serving in harm's way and you called them mercenaries, sir. Let's address this. You also said they were pawns and naive. How could you say that?

ARKIN: Can you give me a business card?

WATTERS: I'll go get you the business card.

ARKIN: I don't believe you're with FOX News. Go get me one and then I'll talk to you.

WATTERS: Well, I'm -- are you calling me a liar? Mr. Arkin, you said the soldiers.

ARKIN: (INAUDIBLE).

WATTERS: All right, thank you very much. You said that the soldiers should be graceful.

ARKIN: I told you I wanted a card.

WATTERS: You said that they should be grateful that people aren't spitting on them.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O'REILLY: Mr. Courage, huh? William Arkin has been a military hater for some time. He wrote a book called "Code Names," where he exposed more than 3,000 coded titles, some of which were still classified.

So there's no question, Arkin is an agenda driven guy. The question is why would "The Washington Post" and NBC News hire a person like this?

As you know, "Talking Points" believes NBC News has taken a sharp turn the left. It is a business decision made by three men. NBC Universal executives Robert Wright, Jeff Zucker, and Steve Capus, with their approval elements at NBC News, spew out far left propaganda on a daily basis and direct vicious, personal attacks of people with whom they disagree.

Wright, Zucker and Capus believe this is a responsible way to run a news division, but students of journalism know this kind of garbage is unprecedented at the network level.

We asked NBC News for a statement regarding William Arkin and here it is. "The comments in question were made by Mr. Arkin in his Washington Post column, and he does not speak on behalf of NBC News."

We'll deal with "The Washington Post" tomorrow. But notice how NBC didn't criticize Arkin's comments. Hard to believe.

Now there's no sense in confronting the NBC News people about this situation. They're in too deep. They will not change course because that would expose them. But NBC's parent company, General Electric, makes billions of dollars off government contracts including military work. Its CEO, Jeffrey Immelt, is aware of the Arkin problem and the tone of NBC News in general. It is Immelt who is responsible for this debacle, because he has the power to change it.

Fair minded Americans can dissent from the Iraq War. We all know that. The war has not been waged effectively because of poor post-Saddam planning and the failure of the Iraqi people to put aside religious hatreds and fight for democracy.

But clear thinking people also understand that deposing a murderous dictator and trying to bring freedom to millions of oppressed people is a noble endeavor. Just ask the marsh Arabs or the Kurds.

The United States military has performed heroically in Iraq and Afghanistan in brutal environments. For any American, any American to accuse them of being paid agents of oppression is disgraceful and far over the line of rational thought.

NBC News and General Electric and "The Washington Post" will be forever tainted by this situation. Like William Arkin, they can run, but they can't hide. Enough is enough. All Americans, all Americans should condemn this. And that's the "Memo."

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Dear aca, you said exactly

Dear aca, you said exactly what I'm saying. Maybe because it's a no-brainer. It's discriminationSohbet in the market, and that makes the practice actionable. It wouldn't drag on once GE went to their legal dept., Because it's a clear case; the gov't showing preference. Plus; consider that oncemuhabbet it's established as precedent, if the gov't wins it can do the same thing to you and me. To anyone who disagrees with the gov't. Wouldn't Hillary love the opportunities ?

I saw this Noel. Arkin is another one in the many herd.

I saw this Noel.  Arkin is another one in the many herd.

They have cascaded their critic of Bush to the point now where they think they can say anything they want to denegrate both the War and the Military.

I am a Vietnam veteran.  I watched the process at work during the time I returned in 1969 through 1975.  I was saddened by the effect this stuff has on the morale of troops.  These young soldiers want to come home to a 'normal' American where they can get dates, earn their way without hiding on their resumes their service, walk tall and not avoid discussion about their military past and more importantly, not turn to drugs and slack discipline and slack efforts in their service because they are so depressed over the situation they see no future in it.

But that is the goal of the Left and Arkin.

Arkin has no respect for what the US is doing.  He cares not for the WTC attack on people whose only crime was to go to work that day.  He is beyond any description of honor that I cannot find the words to describe my feelings about this man, his article or his employers.

I'm just a lemming, I guess.  But I vowed at the beginning of this War when I heard the crap being spewed out by the Left of 'no WMD' and 'illegal' and 'immoral' war that I would never sit idly by again and watch and experience people spitting on our soldiers which is where I saw it going.

This War will go nuclear before it is done.  I've been saying this for over three years now.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says:  "I want to take those profits."

NUKES

The rational for using the atomic bomb on the Japanese was to save 1,000,000 American lives that would have been lost in the invasion of mainland Japan.  With few exceptions, the popular belief was that this was the right thing to do.  I certainly believe it to be so.  The fact that we needed to drop two bombs because of their unwillingness to surrender supports the idea of the incredible American blood that would have been shed in an invasion.

Today, if a small nuke were to get into the hands of the terrorists, we will lose more than 1,000,000 civilians.  So I agree that a nuclear outcome is certainly possible.  But will our nuclear strike be preemptive or retaliatory?

That being said, how will the Democrats spin their relentless drive for surrender on the war on terror when the island of Manhattan, Wall Street, and some of the most expensive real estate in the world is rendered uninhabitable for untold years, and will be the final resting place for the more than 1,000,000 innocent people who live and work there?

Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"

I had a litle altercation wit

I had a litle altercation with a couple of hippies at LAX in 73. The LAPD picked me up, put me in the backseat, drove me to a nice bar, bought me drinks until it was time to catch my connecting flight, escorted me to the gate  and Thanked me.

Meanwhile, both hippies were visiting the ER.

Semper Fi

Vietnam

I was in Vietnam in 1968. Thank God I left the Country a week before John Kerry arrived.

Two friends in the next hooch received packages from the States with no return addresses. When they opened  them, they found a case of dog food with a  note that said "since you live like dogs you may as well eat like dogs". Our sentry dogs enjoyed the food.

Everyime I see a jerk like William Arkin I always wonder, was he the one that sent the dog food?

Bravo, Bill. Shine the ligh

Bravo, Bill. Shine the light on these bastards. Keep the smackdown on 'em.

NBC = Nothin' But Commies.

Someone needs to grab Mr. Ark

Someone needs to grab Mr. Arkin by the scruff of his neck, shake him like milkshake, stomp his guts a few times with an occasional kick to the head then point out to him how wrong he is.

Good thing I don't know where this POS lives or I would be in jail.

BTW, My youngest son just happens to be one of those fine young Marines  who  has done one tour in Iraq and has extended in order to go back.

Semper Fi

fight...Agree with your senti

fight...

Agree with your sentiments regarding Arkin...the leftist media darling whom I have had the extreme displeasure of listening to for years now...he is a rabid enemy of the USA and all she was founded on and still stands for.

He is despicable tripe.

Thank you and your son both....from a lot of us out here in the real world, may he stay safe.

First - please remind your so

First - please remind your son for me that he is the embodiment of everything that is good with America.  Thank you.

PS - Arkin is a POS.  Shout it from the mountain tops.  I'm sure your son is grateful that Arkin pays his taxes so he can have healthcare, etc.

If libs had 2 wishes

If libs had 2 wishes it would be for Bill O and Rush L to retire and never again have an audience... they "call out" the arrrogant secular socialists... by doing so the true "face" and intentions of liberals are seen by megamillions... and don't think they are not planning weekly how to "get at them"...

Where else would he live but

Where else would he live but Vermont? Google his name...

Bill's insurgent interviewing

I've noticed BOR has taken to upping his use of this "guerrilla" insurgent interviewing technique over the past few weeks. 

And... I LIKE IT!!

It's rather pleasant to see those who constantly lecture the "little people" at the recieeving end of a verbal kicking. Especially as they mostly seem to have NOTHING to say for themselves.

Go Bill. This is like the old days when everyone thought you were actually a conservative.


A "progressive" = a liberal = a socialist = a commie in drag =
laughably wrong about life, the universe and everything.

If it is a business decision,

If it is a business decision, treat it like one: do not grant GE any government contracts, even if they are low bidder.  If GE starts losing billions of dollars because one of their divisions commits treason, that division will be cleaned out and cleaned up in no time.  And, before the bleeding hearts start bleating "censorship", the government doesn't have to do business with any particular entity.  The government would not be telling GE or NBC what to say, they just wouldn't be doing business with someone who is giving aid and comfort to the enemy.  There is nothing in the constitution that says the government has to do business with such an entity.

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Jack and MikeB....I saw this

Jack and MikeB....

I saw this last night, it was great.

I agree with both of your excellent points.

I am very happy to see FOX start to fight back after years of verbal slams from envious networks...it is about time.

I like the points about GE and the Gov't. contracting MikeB...that would be an excellent way to get them to perk up their ears and pay attention...they are very much helping the enemy and they know it full well.

Money is the answer...as it always seems to be at times. GE may actually try to present news as fair and balanced, we report you decide...and be sure to identify who is leftist (as if we don't know) and who is representing the conservative side of the aisle...which is rare, few and far between on NBC and sister stations, they throw in Scarborough, Carlson, a few others, Buchanan, and whats his name from the Wall Street Journal who is absolutely no conservative.....John Harwood.

Lack of money would move me...and my stockholders.

too bad it can't be done

Mike, my friend:

Can't happen, it would be actionable. You may not dig actionable so here it is simple: It's illegal. GE would then sue the U.S. Gov't for the entire state of New York, maybe throw in Texas & New Mexico. And they'd win.

I can sue anyone for anything. Doesn't mean I have standing.

I can sue anyone for anything.  Doesn't mean I have standing.

I can guarantee you that if the US Government decided not to purchase from GE, or you, or anyone else for that matter; it is well within the government's right to do so.

The test would be whether there are similar providers in the industry that meet all the other tests.  Discrimination in the market is done by the government all the time.  For example, if a company doesn't meet the minimum 'made in America' requirements.  Or if a company can be shown to act contrary to the 'interest' of the United States.

There are so many reasons why the government can choose not to buy from any company that even GE with all of its resources couldn't win a lawsuit; no matter that it would hang in the courts for 30 years.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says:  "I want to take those profits."

you said it yourself

Dear aca, you said exactly what I'm saying. Maybe because it's a no-brainer.

It's discrimination in the market, and that makes the practice actionable. It wouldn't drag on once GE went to their legal dept.,

Because it's a clear case; the gov't showing preference. Plus; consider that once it's established as precedent, if the gov't wins it can do the same thing to you and me. To anyone who disagrees with the gov't.

Wouldn't Hillary love the opportunities ?

tumbler_2007, my point is you don't have a clue what you are

tumbler_2007, my point is you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

Go get a government contract.  Then we'll talk.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says:  "I want to take those profits."

nonsense, my fans

You may think I'm crazy; but it's only because you have a bone to pick. You don't see things like these impartially. Low bid is hard to match and lawyers can prove it in court. All else being equal. The gov't has better fish to fry than screwing GE & its stockholders. Just my .02 cts.

I don't have any bone to pick. I'm pointing out you are wrong.

I don't have any bone to pick.  I'm pointing out you are wrong.

Hey, we all are wrong on occasion.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says:  "I want to take those profits."

tumb...Because it's a clear c

tumb...Because it's a clear case; the gov't showing preference

How do you figure it's a clear case? That would be very hard to prove discrimination. Let alone the other idea aca put in there about the Co. putting us in harms way during war, I know those aren't his exact words, but that is how I took it.

By the way...the gov't already does do that to you and me...everyday.

We have to prove our innocence to and through them.

Gov't would be setting the precedent

But that's OK.

If youz guys are so big on this idea, why don't we do it?

You say up here, Get a gov't contract and we'll talk. But isn't the premise just that? The gov't will tell me go to hell, you don't get the contract. Only OUR guys do. And I'll have no legal recourse. Aw, shhh - Fah gettabout it!

I'd give'em New York, just as

I'd give'em New York, just as long as Mark F. has a chance to move.

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

Who wants to place bets that

Who wants to place bets that "Keith Olbermann" will name Bill O'reilly the "Worst Person of the Day" for slamming NBC and the Washington Post? 

I was just wondering what

I was just wondering what difference drupal has made to the way
blogging can be done. Your site is looking good with drupal powered
system, at least the person has to spread across the sign up form
before putting sexy lingerie has to say, and make up your own mind. sexy costumes spam on these blogs. Thanks a lot Drupal. I am even
trying to add drupal to my blog in the below sites.

I heard Keefy on ESPN radio a

I heard Keefy on ESPN radio a little earlier, and he hinted he will be lambasting BoR tonight. Whoop-d-doo!

...hinted Rog...just hinted,

...hinted Rog...just hinted,

Wouldn't that be more like broadcast it for all to hear within earshot, hoping for more ratings via ESPN and his mouth?

LOL!

What a jerk he is.

Thanks for the tip though, I catch him between segments of BOR which is on at the same time here, thats all I can take...laughin' again. 

I'm now wondering if the powe

I'm now wondering if the powers-that-be will try the phrase - "If we knew then, what we know now" would they be putting these idiots anywhere near a word processor, camera or microphone? Yeah - it's Bush's fault and we know the military isn't too smart - ask john kerry (he served in VIet Nam y'know)

There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V

Looks like Jane Fonda is pass

Looks like Jane Fonda is passing the turd sandwich around to the rest of the left.

Traitors all of them! They insult us vets and my sons who were called to duty in Iraq.  Arkin is a coward and a bastard.

there are some things i don't

there are some things i don't agree with bill on but this isn't one of them. 

he is a beacon of light in the dark media world.  monday was bill at his best.  expose them and embarass them who deserve to be exposed.  he said it perfectly.  (didn't i indicate that NBC owns the Wash Post and Newsweek and was told on this board that they don't???)

he gave nbc a real black eye on this this but i worry about bill.  he is so effective in what he does, i fear they will "get" him in some way.    he is the last figure left in the media that speaks out for a return to a more dignified media environment.

watch out bill and keep up the good work.

Bill (and Noel), Thanks f

Bill (and Noel),

Thanks for exposing this clown and his warped sense of reality.

The seriousness of what we are facing can not be overstated. Yet is hardly mentioned by our media.

The actions of our military are held to a higher standard by people who at the same time seek to undercut the effort by virtually every means they can. They take full benefit of freedoms provided to them without acknowledging the sacrifices made on their behalf. I am particularly offended by Arkin's rehashing Abu Grahib and Haditha as he makes his case. It would be akin to me extrapolating Jason Blair or CNN's Bagdhad Bureau's practices in the "production" of all news.

"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"