“Countdown” host Keith Olbermann made a huge mistake last Thursday night: he chose to make radio host Mark Levin “The Worst Person in the World” for nominating Rush Limbaugh as a potential Nobel Peace Prize recipient.
In response, Levin spent a large part of his show on Friday ripping this abomination apart. Audio links are available here and here courtesy of our friend at Olbermann Watch (h/t Dan at Riehl World View).
Before clicking on these links, please be advised that Levin went after Olbermann with guns blazing, and discussed at length allegations of an unsatisfactory tryst in a hotel room with an unhappy female fan that was reported in the New York Post last October. As such, the reader is warned about potentially offensive content.
That said, for those with a sense of humor, and who have a serious distaste for Olbermann -- maybe more important, NBC News for presenting this disgrace on national television as a serious journalist -- are going to have a great time listening to the Great One rip this man apart. Also, pay particular attention to Levin giving credit to the Media Research Center for some of his information.
You took on the wrong guy, Keith; you're way out of your league.
Have fun, all.
















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Here's the problem. KO is so
February 5, 2007 - 11:25 ET by EdhenryHere's the problem. KO is so bad that methinks he is lashing out at conservatives to get some one to bite and banter, creating some notoriety for being on the bad boy list of conservatives. Remember, KO (and the left) have no principles or ideas, just a distaste for anyone who is conservative. Persons who belive individual freedom comes with individual responsibility.
So if he gets into a fight with a conservative, KO wins, or at least generates a chance to become relevant, which at this time he isn't (by a long shot).
"If you get in a fight with a pig, you boith get dirty. The difference, the pig (KO) likes the mud." It's all he has
Can you rip someone a new o
February 5, 2007 - 11:30 ET by dervishCan you rip someone a new one if he IS one?
"hung like a thumbtack"???
An irrefutable exercise in
February 5, 2007 - 13:31 ET by Jack BauerAn irrefutable exercise in logic, dervish!
Jack Bauer
February 5, 2007 - 13:33 ET by Noel SheppardJB et al,
A donkey has one. As such, I think the answer is, "Yes." ns
Noel, was listening, laughing
February 5, 2007 - 11:31 ET by FastEdNoel, was listening, laughing and having a great time when "the great one" was going through his diatribe. KO, if he want's to continue, will have his clock further cleaned, much to the enjoyment of ML's listeners. If the fight get's picked up by others, KO won't have much left to stand on, 'cause ML uses facts, and ultimately, they do overcome the msm (Lsm)'s spin and agenda. In other words, if KO's brains were TNT, he wouldn't be able to blow his nose.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Mark Levin is great guy and
February 5, 2007 - 11:41 ET by ScottyDogMark Levin is great guy and Olbermann has taken person if he thinks he can bully this guy. I look forward to coming battle.
"Then, when "sexual activity began [in] less than an hour," Olbermann
had difficulty. "I pretended he knew what he was doing," the embittered
blogger writes. "I adored the guy. I didn't want him to think he was a
dud in bed," so she faked experiencing ecstasy."
"Limp I hear". LOL!
He even told his listeners that he is a member for the hair club for men.
Is this Mexico or the USA
So I see nobody mentioned tha
February 5, 2007 - 13:37 ET by blarsenSo I see nobody mentioned that this story about Olbermann happened last year and was only made note of in the New York Post which is about as supermarket tabloid as you can get. This story was so shakey that I don't think Faux News even covered it fearing a lawsuit.
I'm sure Levin only brought it up, not because of the Rush numb-a-nation, but to try to bring ratings to his sorry show by mentioning Olbermann's name.
Sounds like somebody's cranky
February 5, 2007 - 13:51 ET by bigtimerSounds like somebody's cranky...did ya wake up on the wrong side of the bed blars...or lose pickin' the Bears yesterday?!
LOL!
Either way...sounds like ya need a great big group hug!
Turn that awful frown upside down!
Well, I think everyone here
February 5, 2007 - 14:39 ET by blarsenWell, I think everyone here needs a big mental group poop considering all of the constipated thinking.
Here's a fact for y'all. Bush approval ratings at 30%. What was Clinton's approval rating after being impeached? I'll save you the heavy lifting--73%!
blars... LMAO! How old are yo
February 5, 2007 - 14:55 ET by bigtimerblars... LMAO!
How old are you anyway...over ten yet, if not, there is hope for ya yet...now put on that big smile there and make yourself happy!
.....thats so much better!
Go easy on Blars... its not e
February 6, 2007 - 07:50 ET by PeskyDaneGo easy on Blars... its not easy showing up here knowing he is totally owned.
Thx for doing all that heavy-
February 5, 2007 - 15:19 ET by Roger the ShrubberThx for doing all that heavy-lifting of off-topic information, Keefy. Invoking Clinton is oh so pertinent.
Since you are tossing out numbers, here is one that actually pertains to the topic at hand: Keefy has 28% of the audience O'Reilly has.
Unlike polls, these are hard numbers.
Here's even more fun facts fo
February 5, 2007 - 15:25 ET by Roger the ShrubberHere's even more fun facts for ya, Keefy:
Your ratings in January were not only below the O'Reilly's 11pm repeats, but also had fewer viewers than CNBC's reruns of "Deal of No Deal".
Rog,I love the chart!Not only
February 5, 2007 - 15:35 ET by bigtimerRog,
I love the chart!
Not only is that hysterically funny, I would be embarrassed if I were msnbc and Ubermann!
You just can't help but wonder when they are going to get a clue, then again, they are a paid free advertising for the leftist party...obvious anymore that must be their only agenda, it sure isn't for making a profit and keeping the leftist losers they have as talkin' heads in their seats as they have...instead of the door.
LOL. You must have been the g
February 5, 2007 - 16:23 ET by Del DolemonteLOL. You must have been the gweeb who was at that big anti-Bush (as opposed to anti-war) rally in DC last weekend-you know, the one holding up the sign that said "Just Poop"?
As for trying to change the subject with "poll numbers", don't forget another poll about Clinton-the one where the majority of Americans said he would only be remembered for getting a Lewinsky, not for anything he ever "accomplished" while keeping the seat warm for the Bushes for 8 years.
And Dubyah does have one poll number that Clinton will never be able to top: the highest-ever job approval number (90%) in the history of the Gallup Polling organization.
Sure, you sound even more d
February 5, 2007 - 13:54 ET by Jack BauerSure, you sound even more deluded than Olbermann -- 2007 winner IgNobel Putz Prize
Levin's show is #1 in every major market: New York, Chicago, Detrot, Washington.
Olbermann is #1 in his dreams.
Jack
February 5, 2007 - 14:03 ET by Noel SheppardJB,
You're bringing in facts again. I've warned you about this in the past. It only makes our extreme left-leaning members queasy. ns
ns -- I know. Sorry sir! Th
February 5, 2007 - 14:16 ET by Jack Bauerns -- I know. Sorry sir!
Though it's hardly a fair fight.
And neither's ML versus the soon to be shredded Olbermann, again.
From what was published in th
February 5, 2007 - 19:52 ET by FastEdFrom what was published in the Post - would it be "wet" dream? Poor obie, hung like a tac, and can't stick anyone.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
It's always good when Keefy d
February 5, 2007 - 14:14 ET by Roger the ShrubberIt's always good when Keefy drops by Newsbusters. I guess bringing up your "sexual inadequacies" brought you out of the woodwork. Not much of a defense, however. Sounds like someone who dishes it out can't take it....
"So I see nobody menti
February 5, 2007 - 17:28 ET by ckc1227"So I see nobody mentioned that this story about Olbermann happened last year and was only made note of in the New York Post which is about as supermarket tabloid as you can get."
Yeah, nobody but the person who started this thread. Ahh, just like most typical liberals, you prove once again that libs either lack reading comprehension skills, or are just flat out liars. Probably both. Whatever it is, you're wrong...AGAIN...on both points, as proven below from text below taken out of the main post:
"Before clicking on these links, please be advised that Levin went after Olbermann with guns blazing, and discussed at length allegations of an unsatisfactory tryst in a hotel room with an unhappy female fan that was reported in the New York Post last October."
"I'm sure Levin only brought it up, not because of the Rush numb-a-nation, but to try to bring ratings to his sorry show by mentioning Olbermann's name."
Again, that reading thing. Levin brought it up because he was named as olberdunce's worst person on one of his shows.
Then again, maybe you're right. He used the name of the host of one of the lowest rated shows on cable news to *snicker* boost his own ratings. Damn, that liberal logic is some scary stuff, I mean to tell ya.
Liberalism is the philosophy of the stupid.
It was Levin who "nomi
February 5, 2007 - 12:21 ET by balboaIt was Levin who "nominated" Rush?
Yes. I'm sure he knows Rush d
February 5, 2007 - 12:30 ET by Hero SquadYes. I'm sure he knows Rush doesn't have a shot at the prize. What Levin did do with this move, however, is devalue the nomination of Al Gore by demonstrating how easy it is to nominate someone for the Nobel Peace Prize. I believe that was his prime motivation.
I'm still perplexed at what Al Gore has allegedly done to further the cause of peace.
*****
"I thought you might say something stupid... or liberal." - Frank Barone
HS
February 5, 2007 - 13:00 ET by Noel SheppardHS,
Be a Democrat, for then according to the media, you are an angel walking on the planet to spread peace regardless of how your words and actions prove otherwise. ns
He has promoted Worldwide soc
February 5, 2007 - 13:41 ET by NL207He has promoted Worldwide socialism and world government. These are the ultimate goals of the far left and it seems the far left has great influence on the Nobel Electors.
Ole BlunderRush doens't have
February 5, 2007 - 16:33 ET by j. frank wilsonOle BlunderRush doens't have a shot at the Prize because he wasn't nominated for it. The Landmark Legal Foundation was not invited to make a nomination, and nominations are by inviation only.
We don't know if Al Gore was nominated. While it would seem logical members of the legislature of Norway are invited to nominate, we don't know that. And we won't until either (1) He wins; or (2) 50 years pass and we can review the list of nominees.
It is an urban myth that anyone can nominate anyone for a Nobel Prize. Mark Levin took full advantage of this, and I give him credit for it. The rubes who fell for it should have known better, of course, but what does one expect?
frank asks...but what does on
February 5, 2007 - 16:40 ET by bigtimerfrank asks...but what does one expect?
I expect people like you to respond just the way you did!
LMAO!
Too funny and too predictable.
We don't know if Al Gore wa
February 5, 2007 - 16:42 ET by Jack BauerWe don't know if Al Gore was nominated. It is an urban myth that anyone can nominate anyone for a Nobel Prize.
Than how exactly do you know Rush wasn't nominated?
Oh good one there Jack!Got f
February 5, 2007 - 16:45 ET by bigtimerOh good one there Jack!
Got frank by the short hairs with that one!
Still LMAO!
If that's a "good one&qu
February 5, 2007 - 17:32 ET by j. frank wilsonIf that's a "good one" you are remarkably easy to please.
Rush-envy
February 5, 2007 - 21:14 ET by acumenWhich balances your remarkable ability to annoy quite nicely.
Because I had the native wit
February 5, 2007 - 17:30 ET by j. frank wilsonBecause I had the native wit to actually read the Landmark Legal Foundation "nomination" and it isn't one.
Why are you such an un-nuan
February 5, 2007 - 20:22 ET by Jack BauerWhy are you such an un-nuanced humorless jerk?
Who says Rush hasn't been nominated by someone qualified to nominate? After all, you already said nobody knows, do they?
Oh, and before we get one of you're patented dead on arrival "comebacks," have you considered a month in "comeback camp" to, y'know, hone your "skills."
You try to argue the facts -
February 5, 2007 - 20:30 ET by j. frank wilsonYou try to argue the facts - but when the facts don't fit you degenerate into name calling. And you call me "predictable."
For the benefit of the right wing nutz out there: The Landmark Legal Foundation letter - if you bothered to read it - correctly states it is an "uninvited" nomination. Surely even you can read that much. The Nobel Prize rules call for invited nomination only. Simple as that.
We don't know about Al Gore's "nomination" because that letter wasn't out there. Just the press release.
Please let me know if I'm going too fast for you...
I give Mark Levin full marks for a clever P.R. stunt. And he was honest enough to state it was an uninvited nomination - that is, not a nomination at all. I'll give him full props for that. But that's what it was - some folks fell for it. Some didn't.
Humorless jerks just can't
February 5, 2007 - 20:32 ET by Jack BauerHumorless jerks just can't shut up.
How amusing. Makes a change for you.
Thanks for proving my point. But you're gonna need a bigger stay in "comeback camp".
Let's be frank here frank. You not funny. And you're not very bright.
But you are easily needled. One mention of Rush and you're off the deep end, big time.
Keep ducking the facts...of c
February 5, 2007 - 20:41 ET by j. frank wilsonKeep ducking the facts...of course, in the t.v. world the pesky truth doesn't ever come up, does it?
I'm going off the deep end? You are a textbook case of projection...
Oh another winner from fran
February 5, 2007 - 20:43 ET by Jack BauerOh, another winner from frankly boring. The unspeakable in full pursuit of the unimportant.
Jack...JFW is related to Rush
February 5, 2007 - 20:44 ET by Clear thinkerJack...
JFW is related to Rush and it just kills him.
clear -- has to be somethin
February 5, 2007 - 20:52 ET by Jack Bauerclear -- has to be something like that.
So funny to watch leftoids getting so bent over this little amusement from the Great One.
It's so easy to press their buttons. I think being humorless jerks is genetic to leftoids.
He's also upset because conse
February 5, 2007 - 21:03 ET by Clear thinkerHe's also upset because conservatives have been labeled 'hate mongers'.
He always assumed that title would be forever his.
"The Great One?"
February 5, 2007 - 21:16 ET by j. frank wilson"The Great One?" I think you have Jackie Gleason mixed up with Crazy Guggenheim.
Guggenheim? Now what in the
February 6, 2007 - 06:15 ET by Jack BauerGuggenheim?
Now what in the world would link Mark Levin and the Guggenheims.
Well ML isn't an art gallery slash museum.
The Guggenheim family aren't constitutional lawyers, or hosts of a #1 radio talk show.
The Guggenheims were famously "liberal"; Levin is famously conservative.
Oh I get it "Guggenheim" and "Levin"! They're both Jewish.
I see now. Boring and possibly anti-Semitic too.
Could you please be a little
February 6, 2007 - 13:29 ET by j. frank wilsonCould you please be a little more ponderous?
It's a television show - Jackie Gleason - "The Great One."
You call me humorless? Lighten up, Francis.
PS: When the right wingnutz start calling others "anti-semitic" you know they're reaching. Again...
dear j frank--
February 6, 2007 - 13:45 ET by tumbler_2007In fact, Jack is being humorous (at your expense, natch) but he works in ironic ways, as opposed to Guggenheim -er-- It wasn't heim but heimer, I seem to recall. That one was DAFFY, Jack is ironically funny.
Irony is often mistaken for simple spite; which has got me a label on NB; I'm the guy they love to hate. I mainly try reductio ad absurdum and irony for humorous "bite". I guess um just a failure. Nobody ever gets it. (sniff.)
Thank you for the correction
February 6, 2007 - 14:19 ET by j. frank wilsonThank you for the correction - I think you are correct - Guggenheimer.
I also think you need to look up the meaning of "irony."
the way I define irony
February 6, 2007 - 14:34 ET by tumbler_2007Come to think about it; I don't have to look it up. IRONY is what my favorite public figure today is so deft and devastating at:
I mean COOL ANN /
Hey tumbler -- I see you're
February 6, 2007 - 14:47 ET by Jack BauerHey tumbler -- I see you're enaging with our resident humorless bore. He has a mind like a papiermache trap.
Thanks for the hat-tip, by the way.
Gee, have a heart
February 6, 2007 - 14:57 ET by tumbler_2007C'm on, Jocko;
Don't be so hard on J frank. Underneath that stolid exterior beats a heart --
Like the state of Alaska? HUGE ( but COLD).
Sure, you could be right tu
February 6, 2007 - 15:12 ET by Jack BauerSure, you could be right tumb...
But the only thing I can't take seriously is someone who takes themselves seriously.
Jack... Seriously? LOL!
February 6, 2007 - 15:34 ET by bigtimerSeriously?
LOL!
Stop laughing. I'm serious.
February 6, 2007 - 15:40 ET by Jack BauerStop laughing. I'm serious.
Jack!Please Stop!I am soooo
February 6, 2007 - 15:55 ET by bigtimerJack!
Please Stop!
I am soooo seriously laughing my rear off!
Ann Falter? Has she been ab
February 6, 2007 - 15:34 ET by j. frank wilsonAnn Falter? Has she been able to figure out where she lives? And that one needs to register before one votes?
Maybe you're one of her fans who thinks she's hot. Personally, she might be ok looking if she'd just shed a few lbs.
ann coolter to you, dude
February 6, 2007 - 15:45 ET by tumbler_2007Cool Ann, never less than a hoot, even without much hooters. I nominate her for the Nobel Peace Prize, and here let her know NewsBusters will lobby for her, minus one uncool dude.
I said possibly. But then I
February 6, 2007 - 14:43 ET by Jack BauerI said possibly. But then I had assumed you'd heard of the Solomon and Peggy Guggenheim.
But I'm dead sure you're anti-humoritic
JFW - Not picking on you but
February 5, 2007 - 17:01 ET by Chicago RepublicanJFW - Not picking on you but I think the only Rubes in this conversation are the people that actually care enough about the Noble Prize to know the details of the nomination process.
Good point - why bother to le
February 5, 2007 - 17:31 ET by j. frank wilsonGood point - why bother to learn what you're writing about?
Good Comeback.
February 5, 2007 - 17:43 ET by Chicago RepublicanGood Comeback.
Thank you.
February 6, 2007 - 13:29 ET by j. frank wilsonThank you.
Your welcome. Brevity is th
February 6, 2007 - 15:05 ET by Chicago RepublicanYour welcome. Brevity is the soul of wit; nice one. However, the spirit of my comment was that this award is a pathetic joke. In truth, I hope Gore wins it so the laughfest over the award of Yassir Arafat can continue.
Actually I believe it was t
February 5, 2007 - 13:28 ET by Jack BauerActually I believe it was the Landmark Legal Foundation, which Levin helped found.
Olbermann has been nominated for the IgNobel Putz Prize.
Keith Olberman is the embodim
February 5, 2007 - 13:03 ET by jonathanandersonKeith Olberman is the embodiment of the great weakness of American democracy : the wicked will always be heard ... and on top of that they'll be made millionaires and be given a talk show to trowel out their vile crap to millions.
I quit commenting on Olbermann a long time ago.
February 5, 2007 - 13:14 ET by acaiguanaI quit commenting on Olbermann a long time ago.
But, Levin is going through a period of disgust that I go through occasionally. Sometimes these folks just need to be slapped around. Olbermann has no problem distorting reality; making up canards; labeling in the most vile manner; and attempting to destroy character with no regret.
Anyone watching him would be reminded of why in Talk Radio, historically anger and hatred does not succeed. There was a guy a long time ago who spewed anger and vile stuff across the airwaves for quite a long time; where is he now? I cannot remember his name - which would be a positive indication I am still somewhat sane.
Rush is entertaining and not vile. Characterization of Rush and the vast majority of Conservative Radio hosts as 'hate-mongering' would be an incorrect characterization and of course, the Democrats try to do that all the time because they can't win on the basis of ideas.
So, I really do not understand why any broadcast network (I'm not sure MSNBC qualifies here) would feel comfortable hanging with this kind of filth.
But, in another way, Olbermann is so Democrat. The Democrats like him. They never denounce what he says. Therefore, they must agree with all of his tirades and shows.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
Thanks for the links this mor
February 5, 2007 - 13:27 ET by bigtimerThanks for the links this morning...I really enjoyed listening to 'The Great One' rip 'The Insane One' a new a$$...it's about time some one did....
(Hung like a thumbtack....hitting below the belt there isn't it? LMAO!)
bigtimer,I actually did hea
February 5, 2007 - 15:22 ET by steviep831bigtimer,
I actually did hear one story from a woman satisfied by KO. But then again it doesn't take much to satisfy an ant.
MSLSD? Great line.As for Keit
February 5, 2007 - 13:50 ET by Dave RMSLSD? Great line.
As for Keithie's a'hem bedroom issues, I will stay away from that as the last time I brought that up around here I got into some really deep feces with some of you.
KO Out of his League with Kindergartners!
February 5, 2007 - 15:04 ET by ChasvsThis moron is out of his league with the dimmest bulbs in the world. KO makes Rosie O look smart and she's the dumbest les-hoe on TV today!
Hey, was that Mark Levin sing
February 5, 2007 - 15:18 ET by Hero SquadHey, was that Mark Levin singing the National Anthem at the Super Bowl last night? :-)
*****
"I thought you might say something stupid... or liberal." - Frank Barone
HS....LOL!Was that what that
February 5, 2007 - 15:24 ET by bigtimerHS....LOL!
Was that what that was...singing?
I love a lot of Billy Joel's music btw...just do not advise him to do that again...just my own thoughts....lol!
I think Roseanne Barr and Carl Lewis are on Broadway
February 5, 2007 - 17:27 ET by Carl KolchakI think they wanted to get Roseanne Barr, or Carl Lewis to sing the National Anthem, but I think both of them are doing Broadway Musicals now, and weren't available.
"I've always been crazy, but it's kept me from going insane" Waylon Jennings
Hilarious!
February 5, 2007 - 16:24 ET by daberkmanOh gosh! I'm so glad too because now we can talk about the sexual picadillos of Ann Coulter. Does this have the same sourcing...
<edit> leave out the filth....daberkman, or don't post.
apologies
February 5, 2007 - 16:44 ET by daberkmanokay, I can leave out the filth. It was a link to a random blog about someone who had, um, had, deviant sexual relations with ann coulter. Same EXACT thing as what Mark Levin was reading. Does that mean that this is fair game? If Olbermann were to read the contents of this blog on the air, would he be committing a more grievous sin than Levin?
Way to go Mark Levin!If only
February 5, 2007 - 18:27 ET by HumanEventsWay to go Mark Levin!
If only we had conservatives in Congress and the White House with guts like him. Too many in the GOP are feckless and intimidated by the wrath of the leftist media and the Dems. Conservative principles without courage to stand by them is often meaningless. We need more Bob Dornans (former bold conservative congressman from California)!
Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
February 6, 2007 - 04:56 ET by old croOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh,
That's got to hurt.
You might want to put some ice on that, Keithy.
"After The Wizard Of Oz I was typecast as a lion,
and there aren't all that many parts for lions."
Bert Lahr.
Where'd Olby go?
February 6, 2007 - 10:02 ET by blackrain4xmasI see after Levin's whip crackin the wet noodle loverboy doesn't seem to have been able to get out from under his desk to do the show. Too concerned we'd all be looking at his hair to see if it's real?
OH! I get it now.Quote: Thei
February 6, 2007 - 14:13 ET by tracheostomyOH! I get it now.
Quote: Their conclusion: Gore's nomination is real because an "acceptable" entity put his name forward (two left- wing members of the Norwegian Parliament), while Rush's isn't because media partisans don't recognize the Landmark Legal Foundation as legitimate.
As for the Nobel Institute's own guidelines, they're a bit fuzzy, so that's what angry leftists are clinging to for their contention that Limbaugh can't be nominated.
Thanks for bringing that to light, J. Frank. >;p
-PJ
Who is stating ole BlunderRus
February 6, 2007 - 15:44 ET by j. frank wilsonWho is stating ole BlunderRush can't be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize? Of course he could be. He hasn't been yet - but that doesn't preclude a qualified entity from nominating him.
The Landmark Legal Foundation wasn't invited to place a nomination. Nothing fuzzy about that. It isn't a question of "media partisans don't recognize the Landmark Legal Foundation as legimate" (although I would have more respect for this "foundation" if they published their annual financial report on their website). That's a typical right wingnut smokescreen. Media partisans don't have anything to do with it - and putting "acceptable" into quotation marks doesn't make it true.
By the way - the two folks who claim to have "nominated" Al Gore are described in the press as political opponents - not "two left-wing members." Those pesky facts again!
A person or other entity either is or is not invited to nominate. Gee - it that really so tough to understand?
Is it likely that members of the Norwegian Parliament were invited to nominate? That's up to each reader to decide. We'll know either later this year or in 2057...
He Heh, it really bugs you that Rush was nominated, huh?
February 6, 2007 - 15:49 ET by acaiguanaHe Heh, it really bugs you that Rush was nominated, huh?
Heh Heh.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
No - doesn't bother me a bit.
February 6, 2007 - 15:54 ET by j. frank wilsonNo - doesn't bother me a bit. Because he wasn't.
I continue to be amused and bemused by the rubes taken in by Mark Levin's clever P.R. ploy. As they used to say in Chicago, "There's one born every minute..."
You can't even be honest about this. I'm saddened by that.
February 6, 2007 - 16:01 ET by acaiguanaYou can't even be honest about this. I'm saddened by that.
You know, j. frank, you have been posting here for a long time. Your obsession with pointing out the Ad Hoc nature of Rush's nomination is funny. What is even more funny is that conservatives are laughing at the whole thing because not only do we know that it is an 'informal' nomination, but also that it would bother people like you to no end.
You don't see much defense of Rush's nomination going on here, do you? That's because it was a 'tweak' at Al Gore.
The Nobel Peace Prize is probably the most worthless piece of paper next to the Pulitzer today. Anyone with character would reject it as a matter of honorable integrity.
But, that's just my opinion. Some still defend it in mathematics. I'm not sure that the taint does not extend to that field. Soon, they will be awarding the Nobel Prize in Mathematics to some Venezuelan because of Hugo.
Its a no brainer.
But, you keep on chirping your song j. frank, I'll just keep on laughing.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
Another swing and a miss...ke
February 6, 2007 - 16:08 ET by j. frank wilsonAnother swing and a miss...keep reading your own thoughts and fears into what others write...it's a cottage industry here at NB. It seems to be a reflex to immediately ascribe hate to others who haven't demonstrated any.
Why would I be bothered by ole BlunderRush? He screetches to the choir. I can't image a half-way intelligent person falling for his blater and made up "facts." America has a long history of believing people who repeat enough times how smart and clever they are (see The Silly Savage for a textbook example).
From time to time I would try to listen to Rush. When he made up his story about Mrs. Kennedy that was it for me. Too mean spirited and too one note. Apparently others find solice in his muck and made up world. You're welcome to it.
Heh Heh Heh
February 6, 2007 - 16:11 ET by acaiguanaHeh Heh Heh
Keep those one liners coming, j. Frank
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
Let's try a semi-serious ques
February 6, 2007 - 16:23 ET by j. frank wilsonLet's try a semi-serious question. The Landmark Legal Foundation website states as one of the organization's aims to eliminate the use of "foreign law" in the American judicial system. (A paraphrase - you're welcome to read it yourself.)
Leaving James Madison and the Declaration of Independence out of the conversation for a moment, what would you think of a Supreme Court justice who consistently quotes as precedent a law textbook from another nation?
j. frank, I don't have intellectual duals with unarmed people.
February 6, 2007 - 16:26 ET by acaiguanaj. frank, I don't have intellectual duals with unarmed people.
ACA
...
Hillary Clinton says: "I want to take those profits."
LMAO - coke on the computer s
February 6, 2007 - 16:33 ET by florida_chadLMAO - coke on the computer screen!
Hey, it's Uncle Milty!
February 6, 2007 - 16:35 ET by balboaHey, it's Uncle Milty!
Why am I not surprised? Typ
February 6, 2007 - 16:36 ET by j. frank wilsonWhy am I not surprised? Typical blowhard - bluster and pontificate and then put your tail [or tale, in your case] between your legs and scuttle off...
You may be sad for me - I have no respect for you.
If Rush wins the prize will G
February 6, 2007 - 16:13 ET by florida_chadIf Rush wins the prize will GW cause hell to freeze over?
fc...Good one!LMAO!
February 6, 2007 - 16:17 ET by bigtimerfc...
Good one!
LMAO!
;-)
February 6, 2007 - 16:21 ET by florida_chad;-)
aca - keep pushing them but
February 6, 2007 - 15:57 ET by Jack Baueraca - keep pushing them buttons. Ha.
very unlikely Gore was nominated
February 6, 2007 - 15:57 ET by tumbler_2007Forget it,
you cannot nominate smegma for a Nobel. Arrafat won, but remember, Muslims are circumcised.
Mark Levin has no reply
February 13, 2007 - 18:05 ET by Chidi NwachukhuDid Levin respond with anything other than some playground name calling and tabloid rumor-mongering? Nope. Why not challenge Keith on the facts? You can't just send in a letter to nominate someone for a peace prize. It isn't open enrollment.
Chidi... Whoa there now....th
February 13, 2007 - 18:13 ET by bigtimerChidi...
Whoa there now....this Mark Levin thing must really be bothering ya...
Boy Howdy!
LMAO!