The Polar Bear Pic They Won't Show You

  • Bookmark and Share

Images available here.

h/t Instapundit - Ann Althouse calls attention to an image of Polar Bears making the rounds, again - it was allegedly taken by Dan Crosbie in 2004 and is currently number one on Yahoo's photo list. The image I have up at right also involves Dan Crosbie from the same period in 2004 during a scientific trip during which they carried rifles to run off polar bears while planting equipment in the ice - ice that was much thicker than they expected it to be. (pertinent excerpted text at bottom)

But what's this? Scroll down and you'll see the same picture was first published with a credit to another person on the trip and the caption made it clear what was really going on.

Mother polar bear and cub on interesting ice sculpture carved by waves. photo © Amanda Byrd.

Wow! I didn't know Global Warming caused .... waves, too! Update: Apparently Amanda is also something of a poet.

 The image has been used in a variety of environmental campaigns over the years, sans the original caption, of course. Here it was used to solicit public comments to Save da' Bears! They've now been, or soon will be listed as an endangered species. It seems the picture makes some people cry. But the Global Warming folks know that, based on this report. Read the bragging over the media manipulation:

One of the credos of journalism is to seek balance in a story, to cover "both sides." But reporters' dogged tendency to do so on the issue of a human role in global warming has had a detrimental impact on the public's understanding of the subject, say many scientists who criticize media coverage of climate change.

In just the last year White said he has noticed a significant shift in media coverage of the subject.

"The reporting is better because I don't see the 'other side' anymore."

And the polar bears make good ammunition - when the caption is inaccurate, of course:

White isn't averse to using elements that people can grasp and relate to, like vanishing sea ice and what that means for polar bear habitat and survival.

"Scientists miss that, " White said. "Many of my colleagues complain that it's all about polar bears -- it is all about polar bears, it's all about seals. You use the ammunition you have."

And they basically admit to exploiting Hurricane Katrina, too.

White also said Hurricane Katrina has been a major influence on the press's new focus. While it's impossible to say conclusively that global warming is to blame for Katrina's strength, White said, the storm was nonetheless a huge catalyst for a growing press interest in warming and rising seas and their effects.

"I've come to appreciate the power of these seminal events," White said. "These are galvanizing events that focus people's attention on the problems."

The text below is from first link above to a trip journal in which the picture originally appeared. Only the ice was so thick they almost gave up and the ammunition they were concerned with was reserved for polar bears, not saving them. The infamous polar bear pic has a home here with three others at Environment Canada.

The ice ends up being almost too good. It is a hard old floe, and takes us a long time to drill with the 2" diameter hand auger. After drilling 4 m, we think that we are almost to the end, but don't have enough extensions. Not willing to give up on this floe, another site is selected, and there we penetrate the ice cover after only about 3.75 m. So the decision is made to go ahead with the deployment there. However, since it is late in the evening by the time we return, the deployment begins on the following day.

Up the next morning at 5:30, on the helicopter deck by 6 AM, and on the ice by 6:15 to deploy the ITP and IMB buoys. Although it was pretty foggy in the morning and visibility was limited, 8 of us were transferred to the ice in three flights (plus gear) for the operations. There were also two slingloads of cargo.

Cutting the 11" diameter hole in the ice was the hardest part of the ITP deployment. Cutting through the 4 m of old hard ice progressed reasonably well until we got past the halfway point. Then water turned the ice shavings into slush, and the auger flutes couldn't remove the material. So the going got very difficult. We tried using four people (instead of the normal two) on the auger, but that still didn't produce results. It helped considerably to set up the tripod and hang the auger from a chainfall, so that we could drill at a controlled rate. When the hole was cut, the anchor weight and wire were smoothly deployed, then the ITP profiler was attached to the wire.

—Dan Riehl is a blogger and journalist. Read more of his work at Riehl World View.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Stranded Polar Bears?

The dishonesty of the MSM knows no bounds!

Are polar bears smart enough to swim to shore? Of course.

If polar bears can swim long distances, one would hope they are smart enough to swim off an ice floe back to land, thus avoiding being stranded.  If they're too stupid to do that, evolutionary "theory" would suggest there shouldn't be any polar bears by now.

It would be funny to see some animal rights group buy an icebreaker and try to rescue "stranded" polar bears, especially when the bears fight back.

Some great ammo against GW

>From Canadian paper...
Notice the libs have already labeled them "deniers".. next they will be
anti-Global Warmers...

maybe not since deniers is such a great smear word

Statistics needed -- The Deniers Part I <http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=22003a0d-37cc-4399-8bcc-39cd20bed2f6&k=0>

Warming is real -- and has benefits -- The Deniers Part II <http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=1d78fc67-3784-4542-a07c-e7eeec46d1fc&k=0>

The hurricane expert who stood up to UN junk science -- The Deniers
Part III <http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=ae9b984d-4a1c-45c0-af24-031a1380121a&k=0>

Polar scientists on thin ice -- The Deniers Part IV <http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=b228f4b0-a869-4f85-ba08-902b95c45dcf&k=0>

The original denier: into the cold -- The Deniers Part V <http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=63ab844f-8c55-4059-9ad8-89de085af353&k=0>

The sun moves climate change -- The Deniers Part VI <http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=fee9a01f-3627-4b01-9222-bf60aa332f1f&k=0>

Will the sun cool us? -- The Deniers Part VII <http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=17fad0e2-6f6b-41f3-bdd8-8e9eeb015777&k=0>

The limits of predictability -- The Deniers Part VIII <http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=9bc9a7c6-2729-4d07-9629-807f1dee479f&k=0>

Look to Mars for the truth on global warming -- The Deniers Part IX <http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=edae9952-3c3e-47ba-913f-7359a5c7f723&k=0>

Limited role for C02 -- the Deniers Part X <http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=069cb5b2-7d81-4a8e-825d-56e0f112aeb5&k=0>

Thanks. There's some good and

Thanks. There's some good and interesting stuff there as:

He conducted his third-party review by assembling an expert panel of statisticians, who also agreed to work pro bono. Wegman also consulted outside statisticians, including the Board of the American Statistical Association. At its conclusion, the Wegman review entirely vindicated the Canadian critics and repudiated Mann's work.

"Our committee believes that the assessments that the decade of the 1990s was the hottest decade in a millennium and that 1998 was the hottest year in a millennium cannot be supported," Wegman stated, adding that "The paucity of data in the more remote past makes the hottest-in-a-millennium claims essentially unverifiable." When Wegman corrected Mann's statistical mistakes, the hockey stick disappeared.

Wegman found that Mann made a basic error that "may be easily overlooked by someone not trained in statistical methodology. We note that there is no evidence that Dr. Mann or any of the other authors in paleoclimate studies have had significant interactions with mainstream statisticians." Instead, this small group of climate scientists were working on their own, largely in isolation, and without the academic scrutiny needed to ferret out false assumptions.

Worse, the problem also applied more generally, to the broader climate-change and meteorological community, which also relied on statistical techniques in their studies...

In other words, Wegman believes that much of the climate science that has been done should be taken with a grain of salt -- although the studies may have been peer reviewed, the reviewers were often unqualified in statistics. Past studies, he believes, should be reassessed by competent statisticians and in future, the climate science world should do better at incorporating statistical know-how.

One place to start is with the American Meteorological Society, which has a committee on probability and statistics.

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”   H.L. Mencken

Further: &quot;I am baffled

Further:

 "I am baffled by the claim that the incorrect method doesn't matter because the answer is correct anyway. Method Wrong + Answer Correct = Bad Science." With bad science, only true believers can assert that they nevertheless obtained the right answer.

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.”   H.L. Mencken

danbo it's called Ad Hominem Tu Quoque fallacy.

danbo it's called Ad Hominem Tu Quoque fallacy.

Since I'm right if you criticize me, you are wrong.  Premise is corrrect.  Method doesn't matter.  Premise is correct.

Anyone who disagrees with me is wrong due to some flaw in their character or background.

ACA

...

Hillary Clinton says:  "I want to take those profits."

viking...I was thinking along

viking...

I was thinking along the same lines. Adult Polar bears can swim as much as 50 miles at a time. If they have a cub with them (of course it will also depend on the age of the cub) they tend to keep the distances much shorter, but the fact remains they can jump off a berg anytime they want and swim to the next one.

It's gotten to the point whereby I can no longer beleive what the media reports concerning science.  

As a final parting shot for the polar bears, and all others... GO BEARS!

&quot;While it's impossible

"While it's impossible to say conclusively that global warming is to blame for Katrina's strength,"

Katrina's strength? Katrina was a cat 3 storm when it came ashore. There was nothing at all abnormal, unusual or extraordinary about Katrina's strength, lol. Nonsense like this is why I also can no longer take serious the news I receive from the msm and those in the global warming camp. If you have to lie to prove your point, you must not have much of a point to begin with.

Liberalism is the philosophy of the stupid.

I think they were inferring t

I think they were inferring that Global Warming was at the heart of the failure of the levies (warm climate + salt water = exponential temporal iron oxidation), however, the devastation along the coastline was profound.

Mr. Riehl, you are such a Glo

Mr. Riehl, you are such a Global Wave Denier!!!

The media will stop at absolu

The media will stop at absolutely nothing now....nothing...and to think summer is around the corner as the arctic blast is finally hitting the east and bone chillin' temps are hitting...but hey, there is always summer right around the corner, just a waiting for the good old dire warnings tripled about GWarming, and the so-called scientists may get lucky and have a few hurricanes thrown in for good measure, as they didn't get any last year that they predicted...

This is really getting old and tired.....unfortunately, no matter what the whiz-bangs in congress do to fight mother nature and natural things that happen here on earth, we will pay for it...using good ol' tax-payers...with more silly unnecessary laws...as usual.

...and to help Algore....just thought I'd throw that in.

In CEJ News link: &quot;We've

In CEJ News link: "We've reached the 'cigarettes cause cancer' point; we don't call the tobacco companies for quotes anymore."

This , of course, in reference to the one-sided GW media coverage. Let's see, what followed the tobacco frenzy? Mmmm, besides a frivilous lawsuit that made a Mississippi lawyer stinking rich, it created nationwide strong-arm regulation of air!

When the MSM becomes exclusively one-sided then you can be sure that a new socialistic brick is about to be laid.

.