Total votes:
|
“Exposing & Combating Liberal Media Bias”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who Should Get the GOP's '08 Nomination?Total votes:
Read comments
Related Stories
Most Emailed StoriesRelated Topics | |
Comments Policy
Well, wasn't that long ago I
February 3, 2007 - 08:37 ET by Indiana JoeWell, wasn't that long ago I thought Mitch McConnell seemed like the next good nominee. What the hell happened to derail that? Or did I misread it from the start?
J.C. Watts!Run JC, RUN!&quo
February 3, 2007 - 09:14 ET by VirindiscreenwriterJ.C. Watts!
Run JC, RUN!
"...And you yourself are a killer of children! Well, of course it's not true. But the world only believes what the media tells them to believe, and I tell the media what to believe. It's really quite simple." -Kane, 'Command and Conquer'
There's another "Other
February 3, 2007 - 09:55 ET by sarcasmoThere's another "Other" voice I'd really like to hear instead. When JC Watts left office -- as non "professional" politicians tend to do every once in a while -- the average-IQ of remaining Republicans in the US congress went waaaaay-down, IMO.
JMR
V - I miss JC. I wish Black
February 3, 2007 - 11:46 ET by Chicago RepublicanV - I miss JC. I wish Black America would make him a role model instead of the usual pack of fools they lionize.
I like J.C. Watts and Duncan
February 3, 2007 - 16:57 ET by BW222I like J.C. Watts and Duncan Hunter.
BW - don't recall which show
February 3, 2007 - 18:19 ET by Chicago RepublicanBW - don't recall which show it was, but I heard Duncan Hunter talking about what is going on over in Iraq and was pleased to hear someboday actually get the story right for a change. Very refreshing. His views on the Immigration issue where a breath of fresh air too. I saw a news blip that he was taking some action toward the Republican nomination in 08. Not sure how electable he may be in a primary, but I like him.
I like him, too, hope he make
February 3, 2007 - 21:24 ET by Aslans GirlI like him, too, hope he makes an impact in the primaries.
Gingrich / Watts or Gingrich / Tancredo in 2008
February 3, 2007 - 22:50 ET by Eric TurnerYes! J.C. Watts! Now there's a guy I've mentioned in the last couple of weeks as well.
I'd like to see a Gingrich / Watts or Gingrich / Tancredo ticket
Newt, Tancredo, Mitt, Rudy..
February 3, 2007 - 23:47 ET by The FugitiveNewt, Tancredo, Mitt, Rudy.. in that order of preference. Either way I want whoever to kick her worthless butt. Remember this ( from a bumper sticker I saw...) " Life's a bitch, don't vote for one"
Why is it that EVERYTIME a liberal opens their mouth, I feel a sudden urge to hand them a roll of toilet paper?
Shameless plug
February 4, 2007 - 13:15 ET by dmntd1Not my site, but having seen you put the "life's a bitch, don't vote for one" onthere, I had to find it... Lots of good stuff at www.cafepress.com/hillaryscaresme
Anti Hillary, 'Obumma' and Al Gore
Please make sure your train of thought carries freight.
I like Duncan Hunter, Tom Tan
February 4, 2007 - 16:50 ET by USA4freedomI like Duncan Hunter, Tom Tancredo, Mike Huckabee, have no problem with J.C. Watts, maybe to a lesser extent Mitt, or Newt (with baggage). I was hoping for a Allen / Condi run. I think that Rudy Giuliani, will be unbeatable as a Democrat. I think he will do just that, and jump ship. He would be perfect for them. The Democrats need some one that is more then a bowl of Jell-O in the face of terror. He is pro abortion, anti gun. He is closer to what the Democrats USE TO BE,….. thirty years ago. One thing I believe is, we don’t need any more country club Republicans. I want as close to Regan as we can get!!!!!
America is best described by one word, freedom... Dwight D. Eisenhower
USA...I agree...I really like
February 4, 2007 - 17:11 ET by bigtimerUSA...
I agree...I really like Hunter/Tancredo too....
As an aside wouldn't it be too delicious if Allen ran against Warner in Va. this upcoming election, that is if Allen has decided against a run for Prez.
yes it would.America is best
February 4, 2007 - 17:29 ET by USA4freedomyes it would.
America is best described by one word, freedom... Dwight D. Eisenhower
No more half ass Republicans.
February 4, 2007 - 17:48 ET by USA4freedomNo more half ass Republicans.
#1: Tax cutting
#2: spending cutting
#3 pro gun
#4 pro life
#5 no ear marks
#6 build fence
#7 clamp down on companies using illegal help
#8 fair or flat tax
#9 strong defense
#10 drill for oil
# 11 build more refineries
#12 cut foreign aid to countries that criticize us for 5 years
# 13 make election day April 16th.
America is best described by one word, freedom... Dwight D. Eisenhower
USA...I Second every proposal
February 4, 2007 - 17:52 ET by bigtimerUSA...
I Second every proposal you have with the exemption of #12...I would make that one year...if not one time!
On top of my list would be Conservative Judges!
I can live with that, just do
February 4, 2007 - 18:00 ET by USA4freedomI can live with that, just do something, and stop taking $hit from these "friends".
America is best described by one word, freedom... Dwight D. Eisenhower
I think he meant cut off fu
February 4, 2007 - 18:10 ET by Conservative VoiceI think he meant cut off funding for 5 years, not that they have 5 years to be critical of us. This goes with the Rush doctorine, I am not sure what number he uses but essentially they have 5 years to prove themselves worthy by being pro-American.
I love the last one.
February 4, 2007 - 18:11 ET by Conservative VoiceI love the last one.
Ya know, its OUR MONEY... a
February 4, 2007 - 18:14 ET by USA4freedomYa know, its OUR MONEY... after all.
America is best described by one word, freedom... Dwight D. Eisenhower
I've always thought that it w
February 4, 2007 - 19:30 ET by aeroI've always thought that it would be nice if everyone had to spend at least one year self-employed. When you have to write a check for the entire amount that goes to the government on your behalf (including what an employer would have withheld plus the portion they would contribute for Social Security and your own SS contribution), you turn conservative REALLY fast if you weren't already!
which is an argument that the
February 5, 2007 - 01:12 ET by Conservative Voicewhich is an argument that the business owner should not pay anything extra, or have it automatically withdrawn. If people actually write a physical check it hurts a little more, and they are more aware. The thing is people like to think the employer has to match whatever so they think they are sticking it to the man, in reality the account sheet is the same. The employer sees how much of a liability you are to keep, and determines if your assets are worth the total cost. Government loves the current system because people get use to their net income and are comfortable with it, hence they can steal more without raising a fuss from the general public.
You go girl !You read my mi
February 4, 2007 - 20:54 ET by ScottyDogYou go girl ! and you too USA4freedom
You read my mind.
How about Hunter/Tancredo or even Ron Paul on the ticket.
I am just so sick and tired of RHINO's and America is ready for the real deal
IMHO
Is this Mexico or the USA
'08 election
February 3, 2007 - 08:57 ET by seejayFred Thompson/ Tom Tancredo
Kill the terrorists.
Send the illegals packing.
Tom Tancredo
February 3, 2007 - 22:21 ET by raiderSeejay, I'd support that ticket.
www.electtancredo.com and www.teamtancredo.org
Does anyone think Rudy or Mc
February 3, 2007 - 09:21 ET by Casey97Does anyone think Rudy or McCain can win in the south?
/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-/*-
With Democrat revisionist history and liberals guaranteeing the future (global warming, nuclear destruction, etc.) only the future is certain; the past is always changing<
2 years ago I would have said
February 3, 2007 - 11:40 ET by midnight cowboy2 years ago I would have said no way Rudy can with the south. Today it might be a possibility. Rudy is liberal on a few social issues, and the strong social conservatives will find him unacceptable. However the big differrence between Rudy and someone like McCain is that Rudy respects your social views when they are not in line with his. He wouldn't pull a McCain and bash Bob Jones University in 2000 then try to suck up to them in 2006. Most Americans don't know his record in New York and many social conservatives would like what he did. Times square and 42 street were red light districts. Peep shows, prostitutes, rampant drug running. I would walk down 42 street in the 70's, and in one block would be approached 4 to 5 times to buy a variety of drugs. Rudy re-zoned the entire area (of course the libs fought him at every step) putting all those establishmnets out of business then beefed up the police presence. He encouraged private captital investment in the times square area and millions poured in from various hotel chains and other large corporations. Today it is not uncommon to see a mother pushing a baby stroller in the times square area.
The other thing to remember is while some southern states may not be a guarantee, but it put states like New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and even California in play where the democrats who usually take those state for granted would forces them to spend alot of money in expensive markets.
"Rudy is lereral on a FE
February 3, 2007 - 17:08 ET by BW222"Rudy is lereral on a FEW social issues"? What social issues isn't he liberal on?
These may not all classify as
February 3, 2007 - 22:38 ET by midnight cowboyThese may not all classify as social issues , but they definitely play to society as a whole.
Just a couple of things from his record as NY mayor.
Murder rate when he took office: over 2100 murders per year. Murder rate when he left office: Under 600
Cut taxes and the NYC economy exploded
Defunded the Brooklyn Museum of Art when they ran a sacrilegious piece of art depicting the Virgin Mary.
Went after and got rid of the squeegie punks, removed the bums sleeping in Grand Central Station and on the sidewalks where they usually also relieved themselves, and put them in homeless shelters, calling them “quality of life crimes.”
Raided and shut down the crack houses which then reduced drug related crimes.
When Yassir Arafat was being swooned over by the UN after getting a Nobel Peace Prize, Rudy shut him out of city owned buildings claiming he was and always will be a terrorist inciting the Achillea Lauoro (sp?) in which Arafat’s people murdered a wheelchair bound New Yorker.
Right after 9/11 when Saudi Arabia was giving a large check to the city to rebuild, The Saudi ambassador happened to take a jab at Israel while presenting the check. Rudy then told him where he can shove that check.
Has praised GWB’s picks of Roberts and Alito to the SCOTUS
Rudy is pro-abortion.
February 3, 2007 - 22:02 ET by fosstenRudy is pro-abortion.
Tell me again...what did non-pro-choice Bush do about abortion?
February 4, 2007 - 12:08 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasTell me again what non-pro-choice President Bush did on abortion. Yes, he echoed the sentiment of the pro-illegal abortionists...but exactly what has President Bush done regarding this all important issue you seem to indicate is so VITAL for a Presidential candidate...even Ronald Reagan, a wonderful conservative, voiced a similar position...what did either do to change such laws? ......
I think the crickets are chirpping.
If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
Made it a point to ban part
February 4, 2007 - 12:28 ET by JerryMade it a point to ban partial birth abortions. Appointed conservative supreme court justices. Speaks out about the sanctity of life. What more can he do? If he comes out and declares that we are going to ban all abortion, the vitriol he is currently experiencing would be like ripple on a pond in comparison to the tsunami of hatred he would have encountered.
With a pro-choice conservative, you will hopefully get conservative judges, but they may or may not be pro-life. You might not have gotten a ban on partial birth abortions. You won't get any attempt to change people's hearts and attitudes about the sanctity of life.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
Giulani didn't support partial birth abortions either...
February 4, 2007 - 12:50 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasWow stunning...and these conservative voices on the Supreme court have? And the partial birth abortion was already banned in many states.
But if President Bush was truly a man against abortion wouldn't his principles lead him to be clear and not compromise. Obviously you accept compromise in President Bush who you excuse for not coming out and declare it is all going to be banned. I mean, if it is murder (it isn't) then there is OK murder and it demonstrates character to NOT come out and try fervently to get that form of MURDER banned?
The truth is President Bush doesn't really see it the way he tells you, he just knows to you and voters like you, it is important that you hear it. Giulani, on the other hand is willing to experience the immature wrath of the those who disagree with him by saying one thing but doing something far different.
If abortion is the murder anti-abortionists say it is and Bush agrees with this, how much LESS of a principled man he is to lessen his approach to it to soften the blows. Come on already.
The reason most people like President Bush say a lot about abortion and do little is to pacify biblical untaught or biblically ignorant conservatives on the right who believe it is murder. He knows you and the rest of those holding to this self-righteous point of view and who maintain a crusadership mentality demand some form of verbal acquiescence and he delivers with a very mild and already enacted partial birth abortion ban in many states on a federal level and then presto, his job is finished and all these alleged murders are happening everyday. Come on again, if he REALLY believed they were murders do you really think he would respond without immediate demands for action and legislation to ban them all? Come off it already. The truth is he is appeasing you and has. But this isn't worth the argument here.
Go Rudy...from a born again Christian!
If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
Been lurking here for awhil
February 3, 2007 - 09:26 ET by Russell6Been lurking here for awhile, great site. Romney / Gingrich
Romney
February 3, 2007 - 09:36 ET by iveseenitallRomney and Rudy ( Newt or John) = winning ticket.
NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal
I´ll second that. However, G
February 3, 2007 - 14:16 ET by slaphappyI´ll second that. However, Gingrich / Romney
Newt!
February 3, 2007 - 09:44 ET by Iowa BoyNewt!
Other. (Comment: Obviously,
February 3, 2007 - 09:47 ET by sarcasmoOther. (Comment: Obviously, he doesn't really have much of a shot at the nomination, but it would be nice -- for nostalgia, if nothing else -- to hear a voice which has consistently been a vote for smaller government in every way actually allowed into the "debate.") Of course, it would be nice if non-libertarian, non-internet news media even-noticed his candidacy whether or not Dr. Paul's actually allowed in the room.
JMR
Newt or Tony Snow
February 3, 2007 - 10:19 ET by aeroNewt or Tony Snow
Tony Snow is a god. I'd lov
February 3, 2007 - 12:01 ET by Chicago RepublicanTony Snow is a god. I'd love for him to run but he'd never do it.
just recall
February 3, 2007 - 14:42 ET by tumbler_2007Let us recall one other conservative commentator (not even as great as Tony Snow) and the way we lost her. Geo W Bush was about to name Linda Chavez to a cabinet post, when she ran afoul of the illegal alien hangmen. She had hired a nanny, I think, who was in the U.S. illegally. When it was made public, Linda went out the door fast.
I found that very regrettable, as you all would understand. Linda was a HELLUVA good choice for Sec'y of Labor (I think that was the appointment). It was bad luck.
Tony Snow is in line for just such a rise in GOP circles. He won't run on the Presidential ticket; that would be obscenely irregular. But-- just see if he isn't named to the highest of cabinet positions after we elect Newt Gingrich. A no-brainer.
Linda Chavez is conservative
February 3, 2007 - 17:00 ET by BW222Linda Chavez is conservative when it suits her agenda. She is pro-abortion and pro-illegal alien. She wasn't that big a loss.
BW222 back it up, please?
February 3, 2007 - 23:10 ET by tumbler_2007Linda Chavez is not an abortion supporter.
She may strike you as pro-illegal alien, but that's not the drawback you consider it to be. She's an hispanic American out of the same roots as I am; and I'm proud to speak here almost daily on behalf of Mexicans who come to work. The fact they're illegally here is a huge problem, I admit. But it's not as immoral as abortion; and to date about half our population supports that most immoral of atrocities.
To raise bloody hell over an illegal alien crashing our party because he wants to work and help his family and not object to the greater crime, aborted babies by the million;
Is simply a major hypocrisy. (I do realize many who rant about illegal aliens also rant justifiably about the crime of abortion. That is reassuring to me.) Let me then ask you to furnish proof that Linda Chavez supports abortion. If you prove it, I'll concede your point.
Enforcement
February 4, 2007 - 10:52 ET by UnsaneWhat value is American citizenship then, tumbler?
And do you feel the same, for instance, about Chinese illegal immigrants? Or Eastern European illegal immigrants?
Should we just have the Border Patrol give everyone who walks across the border a BIG HUG to show how much we LOVE him/her? At what point do we enforce the laws, tumbler?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
Tumbler - When you're right,
February 3, 2007 - 22:03 ET by fosstenTumbler -
When you're right, you're right. I agree wholeheartedly!
GOP nominee
February 3, 2007 - 10:27 ET by heartlanderJeb Bush, especially if Hillary wins the Democrat nod. He's more conservative than the previous Bush presidents, he's well-liked, articulate (and clean, I imagine), and the differences between conservatism and liberalism would be made stark. Hill's nomination would negate the downside of him being 'another Bush', since she could just as easily be seen as 'another Clinton'.
If I were Jeb Bush and I want
February 3, 2007 - 17:02 ET by BW222If I were Jeb Bush and I wanted to be President, the first thing I'd do is put myself up for adoption and change my name to that of my new family. Even many conservative Republicans don't want any more members of the Bush family in the White House.
If I were Jeb Bush and I want
February 3, 2007 - 17:02 ET by BW222If I were Jeb Bush and I wanted to be President, the first thing I'd do is put myself up for adoption and change my name to that of my new family. Even many conservative Republicans don't want any more members of the Bush family in the White House.
Jeb Bush
February 3, 2007 - 22:33 ET by CaliosFool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. Like hell will I vote for another Bush. I am shocked and amazed how conservatives are being duped into thinking this Bush-come-lately is a conservative.
Like the increase production of the dollar devalued it, the increase in the number of citizens will devalue the individual citizen.
Newt
February 3, 2007 - 10:50 ET by Evil KlownNewt
NEWT!!"everymorning and
February 3, 2007 - 11:02 ET by OklahomaIsShapedFunnyNEWT!!
"everymorning and everyday, I bossa nova with you"
Love that username!
February 3, 2007 - 23:53 ET by fosstenLove that username!
John Cox
February 3, 2007 - 11:06 ET by dmntd1Although I don't think he'd appeal to enough people.... I think John Cox would pull us in the right direction (pun intended)
Please make sure your train of thought carries freight.
Newt!
February 3, 2007 - 11:39 ET by eucherNewt!
Jeb & Rudy
February 3, 2007 - 11:51 ET by pbdmillerJeb Bush and Rudy Giuliani would win.
"Jeb Bush and Rudy Giuli
February 3, 2007 - 17:10 ET by BW222"Jeb Bush and Rudy Giuliani would win."
Win what?
Snow/Rice in 08! It will hap
February 3, 2007 - 12:07 ET by Interested and concerned CDNSnow/Rice in 08! It will happen after Romney steps out. His mormonism will be an anchor.
I know its a super long shot
for Heaven's sake--
February 3, 2007 - 12:10 ET by misterbillSnow is a newscaster---he has little following in political circles. I consider myself a Tony Snow fan--but President??? You're as deluded as an Obama freak.
Now now, I put myself out on
February 3, 2007 - 12:24 ET by Interested and concerned CDNNow now, I put myself out on a limb and I think your bold condemning comment belies your position in hugging the trunk.
Snow is a commentator, not a
February 3, 2007 - 13:22 ET by aeroSnow is a commentator, not a newscaster. As such, he thinks deeply about politics, foreign affairs, and domestic issues and can debate them with ease. Moreover, he's extremely well-liked, up-beat, motivational, and a fantastic speaker. He can handle a hostile media like very few others. He also has strong conservative convictions that are deeply rooted in a genuine belief in the rightness of his beliefs. That's leadership.
As for having little following in political circles, that's true. But he could quickly gather momentum if he decided to enter politics. Bill Clinton had little following or name recognition in national politics when he entered the presidential race, remember? Tony Snow has far more name recognition than Bill Clinton did, and more people know and like what he believes. I don't think it's delusional at all to say that he could make a credible run if he wanted to. At the very least, he's certainly a great pick for VP for virtually any of the candidates who are running.
I really like Tony Snow, bu
February 3, 2007 - 17:05 ET by Conservative VoiceI really like Tony Snow, but the one thing I really disagree with him is he agrees with President Bush on the border.
Personally I really like Newt.
If anything Snow is even more
February 3, 2007 - 17:12 ET by BW222If anything Snow is even more pro-open border than Bush.
We don't really know Snow's a
February 3, 2007 - 22:07 ET by fosstenWe don't really know Snow's actual position on the border, do we? After all, his job is to be literally the President's mouthpiece. That means advocating Bush's positions to the media.
We may find out later that he disagrees with it, but could you picture the headlines if he came out publicly opposing any policy?
that is true, I just rememb
February 3, 2007 - 22:16 ET by Conservative Voicethat is true, I just remember him being a guest on Rush and he supported President's Bush's plan, and he didn't seem too troubled saying it.
I remember that day. I hear
February 3, 2007 - 22:39 ET by fosstenI remember that day. I heard every word he said, and it was frustrating, but I also realize that he's an advocate, and a very good one.
Not that I would be in favor of him being in charge of Homeland Security just yet.
Tony Snow
February 3, 2007 - 22:37 ET by CaliosCV you got that right. Where in the world are people getting Tony Snow's name from. He's a media guy and he's a open border man too.
Here's one article at the Am
February 3, 2007 - 23:42 ET by aeroHere's one article at the American Spectator that got people thinking seriously about the idea of Tony Snow running for high public office.
And here's a discussion of that AmSpec article at Hot Air.
Tony himself has not expressed any interest in running for office to my knowledge. I would just like to see him run for something for the refreshing change it would represent. It would not be a bad thing in my mind to break the cycle of electing professional politicians, Washington insiders, and Ivy League elitists to national office--or the thinking that they're the only ones who should be allowed or encouraged to run. I'd personally like to see some more "real" people who can relate to me and my life running for office (fantasy, I know--that's not how our political system works).
Well, Tony Snow has chimed in
February 4, 2007 - 14:05 ET by aeroWell, Tony Snow has chimed in. He says he won't run for any office. He wants to spend more time with his family after finishing his job as Press Sec. (h/t Hot Air)
That's okay. Newt's my guy. I just wanted to toss a new and interesting name in the mix. As I've mentioned before, I really think our next candidate has to be a strong communicator, a motivator, an optimist, and a visionary. Tony has a lot of that, which is why he was interesting to me. But Newt has lots more of it. I REALLY hope Newt runs!
Go Rudy!
February 3, 2007 - 12:14 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasGo Rudy! It is a long way before we really know who is going to lead the pack when it counts most, but I like Rudy. I clearly do not embrace every single position of Rudy Giuliani, but that isn't why I vote for someone.
Rudy seems to understand clearly the fundamental principles of Republicanism which points to living in a constitutional republic and such a republic emphaizes individual freedom and minimal but strong government.
There is something about Giuliani that I see missing in most of the crop of political leaders in the current dog and pony show and that is the capacity to work without encouraging unnecessary partisan antagonism, an engaging and believable demeanor, an avoidance of strong associations with extremists in his party, a track record of success with a very challenging city/state, and an political adeptness missing in our current President and potential candidates that is demonstrated in his savy approach to building bridges and communicating with people and parties that are too often unreachable by others. He is viable and realistic.
I am a Christian and unfortunately there is a gross doctrine that is taught and re-taught within evangelicalism and those within the circle of its influence that in order for a President to be successful and bring blessing to this country he or she must in some form or fashion acquiesce to Christian beliefs or identify himself in someway as at least as a cultural Christian.
And therein will lie the greatest but needless weakness of Giuliani. While Giuliani may or may not be a christian, I don't know, he certainly is not a visibly a religious man. But government leadership is not spiritual leadership and need not be. Government is not a spiritual body nor the guardian of the spiritual. It is the guardian of people, religious and irreligious. It is the protector of freedoms and the insurer of such expressions...the guardian of saftey. The government is there to protect the freedom of its people and provide the necessary civil constuct for our betterment. But within the Christian body U.S.A. there is the fallacy that a good leader must have a high degree of spiritual announcement and behavior and certainly no less than an easily visible minimum.
This is untrue, completely. Justice is predicated on a right application of the law, law that applies to all people. Freedom is maintained by a strong military, a stable economy and an application of local and federal criminal laws...there is nothing religous about that. When such stability is created we are at our freest to enjoy our religious expression, both christian and non-christian as well as the non-religious freedom to not believe and live that way.
Blessing to a nation comes when its laws are just. Blessing to a nation is when freedom is preserved. Blessing comes with stability. Rudy can and will provide that, he understands that, and my hope is that the religious body who receives such poor ideas that an evangelical or one that associates with evangelcials or sympathaizes with their theocratic leanings is really the one that will bring blessing by some kind of magical default that impresses God, will be grown beyond and understood to be anti-biblical.
If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
rudy can't help us
February 3, 2007 - 14:10 ET by tumbler_2007There's a big difference between admiring Giuliani for his accomplishments and manliness and making him our President. I certainly admire him, and he'd likely carry New York and a lot of the eastern seaboard. That won't be nearly enough to win on Super Tuesday; though he might not hurt us as badly on the ticket running for VP.
He can't buy a vote in the southern states, Guy. He's pro-abortion, pro gay marriage, gun controller, etc., Rudy appointing judges as President would turn off any good conservative voter, IMO. Me for sure. And the Religious Right won't turn out to vote for him in the Presidential slot. That's almost as polarizing at election time as Hillary herself. He might well win the GOP nomination. But he'll lose the election for us.
GAT - I agree with you comp
February 4, 2007 - 05:41 ET by old croGAT - I agree with you completely. Although Rudy has his faults, at this time conservatives need someone who can "Win, baby". Rudy is the only one out there at this time I see capable with the name recognition and proven track record of anti-terrorism and anti-crime positions that this country needs. The number one threat to this country is terrorism, anything else can sit on the back burner for 4-8 years until that problem is overcome, We need someone who can be elected! Not a religious - pc hack or whatever conservative, an able leader to guide this country through the most crucial years of it's existance since it's inception! Everything else good he may or may not bring to the table is just gravy.
"It is time for us to stand and cheer for the doer, the achiever, the one
who recognizes the challenge and does something about it."
- Vince Lombardi
For curiosity's sake, if the
February 3, 2007 - 12:27 ET by StayOnPointFor curiosity's sake, if the choice were only the five mentioned, who would the 'other' voters pick? I like Tancredo
Those of us who get it protect those of you who don't
Newt is the top "other&q
February 3, 2007 - 13:26 ET by aeroNewt is the top "other" choice on most of the blogs I frequent ("other" being someone who has not officially declared an intention to enter the race).
I know Newt is my top choice, "other" or not!
all of us will vote for Newt
February 3, 2007 - 14:23 ET by tumbler_2007It's pretty much certain we'll all back Newt; all he needs do is announce he's running. He has the best chance of beating Hillary. However, it'll be just as close as our last two elections.
He has to find the right VP candidate for his ticket; a man OR WOMAN who'll capture electoral votes out of the SOUTH. Not Jeb Bush-- the country would never back another Bush off W's coattails. Same with Condi -- Condi would remind too many disillusioned voters of W's administration and Iraq. We need a new face for VP, but we follow NEWT all the way for President!
Rudy???
February 3, 2007 - 12:36 ET by misterbillI have posted my choice of Newt on this blog. I have received input re: baggage. Have you all forgotten Rudy's baggage in Gracie mansion??? Frankly, I believe for a large part of America, certain past sins will not be the decision maker in their vote. In Newt and Rudy's cases , they both married the women they allegedly had affairs with. I am a Christian, but I have feet of clay and so I am forgiving. I am willing to look at a candidate for the experience and knowledge they bring to the job. I am a registered Republican and Pro-life. I have, nonetheless, voted for Democrats and in one case the Dem was pro-choice. It, to me , was the lesser of two evils when countered against their opponents. Here are Newt's eleven points:
1. Make English the Official Language of Government.
2. Control the Borders.
3. Keep God in the Pledge.
4. Require a Voter ID Card.
5. Repeal the Death Tax, for Good.
6. Restore Property Rights.
7. Achieve Sustainable Energy Independence.
8. Control Spending and Balance the Budget.
9. Tie Education Funding to Teacher Accountability.
10 .Defend America From the Irreconcilable Wing of Islam.
11. Focus on Iran and North Korea.
To learn more go here ..
PS Rudy-McCain
February 3, 2007 - 12:53 ET by misterbillIf the choice I have to make is Rudy or McChangeable--I guess my sarcasm lets you know it would be Rudy, all the way. But I am still a Newt man.
If my election day choice is McCain versus Clinton, well then, I might choose death.
Sounds like Newt is for every
February 3, 2007 - 17:06 ET by BW222Sounds like Newt is for everything that Rudy is against and vice versa.
Thanks for the link, mb...He'
February 3, 2007 - 22:14 ET by fosstenThanks for the link, mb...
He's got my vote too.
Very interesting column by Mr
February 3, 2007 - 23:00 ET by Cape ConservativeVery interesting column by Mr. Gingrich! He has my vote!!!! Such common sense is needed in this crazy world today. He seems to be very well "grounded"
Amen to that!
February 4, 2007 - 14:29 ET by aeroAmen to that!
Newt or another real Republ
February 3, 2007 - 12:58 ET by MudhenNewt or another real Republican
Newt!
February 3, 2007 - 13:04 ET by DeepSouthFarRightNewt needs to be on the ticket. Even if it's just as VP.
I was a George Allen man due
February 3, 2007 - 13:22 ET by ArmedDadI was a George Allen man due in part to his 0% Brady campaign rating.The right to keep and bear arms in defense of my life,my family,my home,my country is vital to me and I am leery of anyone who supports more infringment of that right.McCain,Rudy and Romney all support more gun control in some form.
Newt! My fantasy presidential
February 3, 2007 - 13:34 ET by winston smithNewt!
My fantasy presidential debate: Gingrich v. Obama. or Gingrich v. Hillary.
Winston,Couldn't agree more.
February 3, 2007 - 13:49 ET by NeoConfirmedWinston,
Couldn't agree more. Newt, Newt, Newt. (Did I mention Newt?)
Newt for Prez
February 3, 2007 - 13:49 ET by Mr. TerryMy vote is and has been for someone who knows what the founders actually founded - Newt Gingrich. The United States of America. Will anyone listen to him or read his book?
This man can debate the issues...but where did he disappear to?
Newt's not gone by any means!
February 3, 2007 - 13:53 ET by aeroNewt's not gone by any means! He's writing and speaking and doing the TV circuit like a madman! Go to Newt.org to see what he's up to. He has a couple of books out, an updated version of the Contract with America, speaking engagements every month, a grassroots movement, and an email newsletter. Sign up for his newsletter and you'll get a weekly dose of Newt's wisdom to keep you going!
Mr Terry
February 3, 2007 - 14:18 ET by misterbillIf you go to the site listed above, you can subscribe to the New(t)sletter (joke mine). I get it and read it faithfully. Every issue puts me more in amore NEWTral mood.
I want a Newt/Steele ticket
February 3, 2007 - 14:42 ET by JPninerI want a Newt/Steele ticket, which would be a very articulate one two punch, the debates would be alot of fun. that said, can Newt get elected nationally?
michael steele vice president
February 3, 2007 - 14:51 ET by tumbler_2007Could launch a Newt presidency; absolutely. Steele ought to please the border fence lobbyists here in our blogsite.
He's a southerner of impeccable credentials. A black conservative would sure make this the powerful ticket we need. He would sure make Obama cut & run.
Sam ...
February 3, 2007 - 15:11 ET by Dave PierreSAM BROWNBACK would be the absolute best for the GOP. Please add his name!
Have you seen Sam Brownback t
February 3, 2007 - 17:15 ET by BW222Have you seen Sam Brownback talk? He is so bad he makes Bush look good (by comparison).
Constant griping
February 3, 2007 - 22:05 ET by UnsaneBrownback has been badmouthin