On Tuesday’s "Good Morning America," co-host Diane Sawyer and reporter Jake Tapper highlighted the Democrats’ strategy to "get tough on the White House." The ABC correspondent discussed plans to begin hearings on holding the Bush administration accountable for issues such as global warming, Hurricane Katrina, Darfur, and Iraq. Tapper indicated that the President would soon be assailed from all sides. A sampling of the report’s phrasing seems to indicate approval for these hard-nosed Democrats:
Diane Sawyer: "Well, global warming. We said that the Democrats had promised to get tough on the White House. They're doing it with hearings on all fronts. But up first, global warming, and the charge that scientists who warned about global warming were muzzled by the Bush administration."
Next, Jake Tapper apparently found a phrase that he enjoyed:
Jake Tapper: "It's just one of many Democratic investigations where they hope to hold the White House's feet to any number of fires. The White House is under attack from every angle. From global warming, to the rebuilding of New Orleans, to Darfur, to Iraq."
Later in the report, he discussed hearings on Hurricane Katrina and returned to the fire analogy:
Tapper: "This week, a Senate committee went to New Orleans to hold the President's feet to the fire on Katrina recovery."
Notice a trend? After introducing the piece, which aired at 7:12am on January 30, Tapper cited the former gossip columnist and ex-editor of Wonkette, Ana Marie Cox, as an expert on the scrutiny that Bush will face under the Democrats (Cox is now the Washington editor of Time.com.):
Diane Sawyer: "Well, global warming. We said that the Democrats had promised to get tough on the White House. They're doing it with hearings on all fronts. But up first, global warming, and the charge that scientists who warned about global warming were muzzled by the Bush administration. We have more now on that from our senior political correspondent, Jake Tapper."
Jake Tapper: "Good morning, Diane. Well, this morning, the Democratic congressman who took on big tobacco is going to take on the Bush administration on the subject of whether or not the White House suppressed global warming science. It's just one of many Democratic investigations where they hope to hold the White House's feet to any number of fires. The White House is under attack from every angle. From global warming, to the rebuilding of New Orleans, to Darfur, to Iraq."
Ana Marie Cox (Washington Editor, Time Magazine): "This will be an unprecedented level of scrutiny for them, an unprecedented level of scrutiny at all levels."
Tapper: "This morning, Congressman Henry Waxman and the House Government Reform Committee will hear from government scientists who will testify that their work on global warming was distorted or suppressed by the Bush administration. The committee is also aggressively trying to get White House documents on possible political influence used to downplay findings on climate change."
Henry Waxman: "We have the power of subpoena, but I don't think the subpoena is what you use in the first instance. You make requests."
Interestingly, it appears as though only Republican feet will be held to the fire. According to a front page report in yesterday’s "USA Today," several high profile congressional Democrats are involved in a scandal that revolves around questionable roles in family charities. This, however, went unmentioned by ABC.
Tapper closed the segment by reiterating the Democrats’ plan to "hold the President’s feet to the fire."
Tapper: "But Waxman says his top priority is finding the billions lost in Iraq."
Waxman: "What we've seen so far in Iraq, according to the government's own auditors, is billions of dollars that have gone to waste and corruption, graft. We're going to look into that more carefully."
Tapper: "It's just one of many hearings planned on gas prices, privacy issues, and Iraq, Iraq, Iraq."
Tony Snow: "If some members within the Democratic Party decide that they want to engage in sort of political acts of that sort, we'll certainly be prepared."
Tapper: "This week, a Senate committee went to New Orleans to hold the President's feet to the fire on Katrina recovery."
Barack Obama: "There's not a sense of urgency out of this White House and administration to get this done."
Tapper: "And some more extreme members of the party had originally talked about commencing with impeachment proceedings against the President. But Democratic leaders squashed that talk wanting instead, Chris, to focus on issues that they feel the public can rally behind them on."
While Mr. Tapper should receive some credit for using the word "extreme" in the same sentence as a reference to the Democratic Party, his comment could also be seen as a way to make the Nancy Pelosi wing of the party look more moderate and reasonable. After all, they think impeaching George W. Bush is a bad idea–now.
—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
"Global warming scientis
January 30, 2007 - 14:19 ET by mattm"Global warming scientists....muzzled by the Bush Administration..." Gee, it's so hard to find anything in print, or in video or broadcast media of any kind that supports the global warming concept...
Obvioulsy, to the Left, free speech means only THEY get to speak, and everyone has to listen to them...
If the Dems want to conduct hearing after hearing...let them... They will be demonstrating to the voters how utterly useless, childish and wrong they are....
Mattm - muzzling is the normal M.O.
January 30, 2007 - 15:20 ET by Gary HallMattm - muzzling is the normal M.O.
Oh, duh.. now on the other hand, if you are a nationally recognized scientist - in fact if you are the guy that makes those ever so popular hurricane predictions each and every year, and you just happen to have a different scientific opinion on what causes global warming, then this might be your experience withe muzzling from the White House.
Are your funding problems due in part to your views?
G: I can't be sure, but I think that’s a lot of the reason. I have been around 50 years, so my views on this are well known. I had NOAA money for 30 some years, and then when the Clinton administration came in and Gore started directing some of the environmental stuff, I was cut off. I couldn't get any NOAA money. They turned down 13 straight proposals from me.
Bottom line. As usual, the media is only interested in muzzling on one side of the issue.
they have virtually complete
January 30, 2007 - 14:42 ET by buddycthey have virtually complete authority to submit legislation to bush that would accomplish what global warming extremists think is necessary. all bush can do is try to veto it. they have the power. they should use it.
they don't want to pass such legislation because many of them are from districts/states like tenn, michigan, ohio, penn, wisc and texas, who could not get re-elected if they took the steps demanded by the environmental left. so they will investigate and do nothing else?
didn't the republicans just suffer major losses because it was obvious they were more concerned with politics than with accomplishing something?
good point, buddyc. I suppose
January 30, 2007 - 14:55 ET by Mica the Magnificentgood point, buddyc. I suppose the libs would have to vote for the funding of the extremist 'warming' agenda, before they vote against it.
Missed it by this much! - Maxwell Smart teasing John Kerry after the last presidential election
We live in the Bizarro world
January 30, 2007 - 14:54 ET by King of the BritonsWe live in the Bizarro world my friends.
After decrying Bush's lack of a plan in Iraq for months, the Dems have announced THEIR plan - Investigate Bush!
I feel like I am taking crazy pills here.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!´´
--Patrick Henry
Oooooo, Hold his heat to the fire
January 30, 2007 - 15:06 ET by blackrain4xmasTo what end? I mean, non-binding resolutions aren't going to do anything.
Dems don't have the nerve to undermine the war in Iraq because then they'd inherit chaos in 08 and have to justify/sell a 3rd invasion to Iraq after running as anti-war
Hearings? Ooooo, make me shiver and quiver. Look out! I'm sure the Pres is just terrified that his poll numbers might get lower (after a certain point, even W doesn't care how low they go).
So, what're they gonna do?
Nothing. They'll hold hearings to keep things in the spotlight for their 08 runs, and that's it.
Those toothless tigers can't do anything but whine, and the more they whine the more he'll be inclined to use the veto-leaving them with no accomplishments to run on in 08.
Hold his feet to the fire-what danger is the fire?
br4x,I, for one, will be inte
January 30, 2007 - 15:17 ET by Blondebr4x,
I, for one, will be interested to see who votes on this non-binding idiocy and how.
Then when we're successful, we can see who "voted the way I did because I was misinformed". (George Bush misinformed me!!!!).
How Hillary will vote? And how will she spin it?
This is going to be fascinating to watch. But I'm furious that these idiots would even do this while "supporting the troops". I have news for them....the troops aren't buying it.
Nobody's buying the non-binding BS
January 30, 2007 - 19:16 ET by blackrain4xmasWhile Dems LOVE raving about how low President Bush's approval ratings are...when was the last time you heard a Chris Matthew's say, "Yeah, but you ratings and the ratings of even this new Congress are far lower."
People don't buy it.
Most people are just doing their jobs, go about their days, check the tv, or pickup passed around/telephone-game info from other sources.
Oh, they will be waking up. Yep.
The last problem with all the hearings is that we know they're useless PR stunts. It's not even like they're hiding it anymore. It's like holding a big party and no one comes. Look at the previous investigations etc. All that got repeated was the talking points from AP reporters who had seen summaries of the reports before they came out.
ISG Duelfer Report is 1000 pages-probably 500,000 words and pics. MSM reports only 5 letters "NO WMD" and everything else is moot. Um, no.
I can list example after example. People just aren't gonna watch and buy the BS, and even if they did...no one is running against W in 08. Campaigning against him is useles. Attacking him is useless. He's a lameduck.
All that attacking him will do is make him bury his heels in deeper and feel more free to do what needs be done
Henry 'nostril humongous&q
January 30, 2007 - 16:32 ET by midnight cowboyHenry 'nostril humongous" Waxman:
Please hold hearings, hearings and more hearings. You guys just can't help yourself. So what's your point? Trying to push Bush's poll numbers lower? That's going to benefit you how? For every action there is an equal opposite reaction. Bush's poll numbers are as low as they can get, you morons are setting yourselves up for the mother of all backlashes.
mc...They still think he can
January 30, 2007 - 16:40 ET by Clear thinkermc...
They still think he can win in 08'.
ABB08!!!!
January 30, 2007 - 19:21 ET by blackrain4xmasAnybody But Bush in 2008 is gonna be a BIT of a problem.
Hey, 1/4 Senators is running for President. Hold enough hearings they won't be able to campaign. Campaign enough, and they won't be able to attend meetings (like Kerry in 2003 and 2004). It's a lose lose for them.
The won the election, but are going to lose everything else hard.
No put up,
no shut up
Nothing to show for having voted them in
Hey midnight cowboy!Loved y
January 30, 2007 - 19:23 ET by bigtimerHey midnight cowboy!
Loved your description of Waxman....(my he misses being in charge of everything...feels right at home in that chair again doesn't he?) he is a hard fella to behold and take serious...been watching him for years...unfortunately.
What I loved the most about your post is the backlash remark....they keep it up and it is going to happen...give 'em time and enough rope and we know what happens next....
You are so right.
That's Funny GMA
January 30, 2007 - 17:53 ET by emjem24It has begun, folks. Committee, committee, committee. I just love that to hold Pres. Bush's feet to the fire, let's harangue and investigate him by committee. I like that non-binding resolution, Dems. Nothing says resolution like saying in one breath the war in Iraq is a failure, but you, troops, are okay. I really love it. Why don't they next break into song with "God Bless America" and really convince us that they give a sh$%# about this country or the troops. Yeah, I'm really convinced. Oh, and where's the urgency in fixing New Orleans? It's broken, Obama and even you know it. I love how the Democratic engenue loves to lecture us about responsibility and accountability but can't be truthful about even the basic principles he's running on as a presidential candidate. Again, corrupt on the inside but love to lecture us on responsibility and accountability on the outside.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
Barack Obama: "There's n
January 30, 2007 - 18:19 ET by bigtimerBarack Obama: "There's not a sense of urgency out of this White House and administration to get this done."
My response to all of this is...
....blah blah blah and blah!
Get off your lazy rear ends and do it yourselves!
This is getting way past old, enough money from us tax-payers have been thrown at the situation. let alone donations from all kinds of people, including big bad corporations.
It's up to you in N.O.'s to get er' done!
Sick of hearing about it, as I am sure most people in this country are.
Iraq vs. Darfur
January 30, 2007 - 18:28 ET by UnsaneAmazing how the Left cannot stand us being in Iraq, yet they cannot wait for us to go in and take care of Darfur, ins't it?
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
This should be good for Bush.
January 30, 2007 - 18:29 ET by ucThis should be good for Bush. >> Since the market is already justifying green house gas reduction strategies, and, the economy is looking strong, and, that freedom is still worth fighting for especially for those oppressed for many years. Sounds like we should all get ready to run Laura Bush for President >> Bush may come out looking so successful even the liberals and MSM won't mind helping her raise $500,000,000 as mentioned for Hillary. I can't see why MSM would raise any objections to another eight years without Bushs needing to even change one member of their administration. I hear might Laura might be a very good leader and deligator. There are not any laws keeping the Bushs from eight more years are there?
The Bushs won't even have to
January 30, 2007 - 18:32 ET by ucThe Bushs won't even have to reinvent themselves, or carpetbag. Sounds fair to me.
Has Hillary pulled out of the
January 30, 2007 - 19:04 ET by ucHas Hillary pulled out of the race yet? I am thinking things could start looking so good (using regular "its the economy stupid" standards) that all a "Laura for President" campaign would have to have her say is "we are exactly what you have been saying you wanted" and replay Hillary's arguments for depth. Has Hillary pulled out yet? I wouldn't want to muddy America's image with having to record Bill and Hillary after hours when they recenter themselves as a couple for another day and then find out with comparisons to their past eight years in office that they sound the same and have no new ideas. Hillary, do you feel that global appreciation for Democracy benefits from diversity? Is Hillary out of race yet? Is Bill able to walk by a McDonalds yet? Any other compulsive behaviors?
Hillary? What was that? Y
January 30, 2007 - 19:15 ET by ucHillary? What was that? You're not in favor of diversity?
Should we start a pool on how many more days Hillary should stay in race. Maybe Jim Webb will rejoin the Republican party and get Joe Lieberman to run with him?
How many more days?
uc....How many more days?A lo
January 30, 2007 - 19:30 ET by bigtimeruc....How many more days?
A lot!
At least somebody answered ya besides yourself there ...
Don't think your Webb/Lieberman scenario is gonna work any time soon...lol!
I know she is trying to get $
January 30, 2007 - 19:35 ET by ucI know she is trying to get $500,000,000 million out of Americans. Is she getting her legal advice from Bill, and wasn't he disbarred? How many days are left for a woman of intellect and unencumbered character to enter the race for President? I was just thinking about asking Hillary what 1X1 equals just to hear her explain it is really two, because not all marriages are created equal.
Do we have enough media types
January 30, 2007 - 19:38 ET by ucDo we have enough media types trained in letting candidates down easy if needed?
Don't worry Hillary, I have
January 30, 2007 - 20:07 ET by ucDon't worry Hillary, I have been thinking about you for quite a while. You and Bill did get the coffee mugs I sent you years ago I hope. I know you got the small puzzle with fried egg picture and can see your letter from where I sit at this moment. It is still hard to remember all the times I wrote to help you both when you seemed to be slipping in the past and then saw your positions improve. I still like the day/evening David Gergen spoke of "it is like starting with a blank page" after I sent a stack of blank paper and the pen I had used for years to him. As it is now, I am trying to remember when it was while you both were still in office that a friend then teaching a "women in politics" course raised the still hard to believe thought that such close friends and loyal subjects didn't think you should also be term limited. It may be the day I gave Rep. Gephardt a similar coffee mug and ended up at this venue in Cambridge with twelve Ukrainian generals walking by. Still think you and Bill fell short and someone else deserves a turn, and not because I went back to right of center. I really still also feel the economy fixed itself and to even let you near it thinking it was your work is just too scary a thought to have again. So I guess I have been having same thoughts for over ten years now.
uc...I would say that would b
January 30, 2007 - 20:11 ET by bigtimeruc...
I would say that would be a yes.