On Saturday evening, the networks highlighted the anti-Iraq War protests in Washington, D.C., and other cities. While ABC's World News Saturday drummed up the anti-war movement as "getting warmed up," displaying the words "Peace Surge" on-screen, the CBS Evening News focused on military families who are part of the movement, suggesting that such participants could provide "political cover" to Democrats who fear looking "unpatriotic" if they "stand up to the President." The NBC Nightly News led with the story, with correspondent John Yang relaying a Newsweek poll showing that 67 percent of Americans believe the President's Iraq policy is "based on his personal beliefs regardless of facts." (Transcripts follow)
On the CBS Evening News, after the lead story on the latest in computer chip technology, correspondent Joie Chen filed a report which put substantial focus on military families who support the anti-war movement, including a man with three sons in the military. Chen concluded her report: "Military families like Syverson's can provide important political cover on Capitol Hill here, especially for Democrats who are concerned about looking unpatriotic if they stand up to the President."
ABC's World News Saturday ran its story somewhat later, plugging the possibility of a coming surge in the anti-war movement. Anchor Bill Weir introduced the story referring to protesters who are "newly energized in their struggle to end the war." Correspondent Laura Marquez relayed protest participant and actor Sean Penn's belief that the relative disinterest in protesting compared to the Vietnam War era may be "about to change." The ABC correspondent also discussed the possibility that the movement's "fund-raising machine could turn the tide." Marquez concluded: "And if today's crowds snaking up the streets to the Capitol are any indication, the anti-war movement may just be getting warmed up."
Below are complete transcripts of the relevant stories from ABC's World News Saturday, the CBS Evening News, and the NBC Nightly News, from Saturday January 27:
From ABC's World News Saturday:
Bill Weir: "That steady drumbeat of death was on the minds of demonstrators from Washington, D.C., to the West Coast today, protesters angry and frustrated over the war in Iraq and the President's call for more troops. As ABC's Laura Marquez reports, the people who marched today say they are newly energized in their struggle to end the war."
Laura Marquez: "The tens of thousands of protesters who gathered on both coasts today spoke with a single voice: They want the U.S. out of Iraq."
Clip of protesters: "Give peace a chance."
Marquez: "This mother, who lost her son in Iraq, came with a message for other parents."
Unidentified female protester: "I don't want you to go through the heartache that we go through."
Sean Penn, Actor: "-and the troops come home."
Marquez: "Hollywood celebrities crowded the stage, including Jane Fonda, a controversial figure from the Vietnam anti-war movement."
Jane Fonda, Actress: "-but I'm so sad that we still have to do this, that we did not learn the lessons from the Vietnam War."
Marquez: "There were bigger protests against Vietnam and more of them, but actor and activist Sean Penn believes that's about to change."
Penn: "There are going to be more Americans taking to the streets. I think everything, you know, the truth is a stubborn thing, and it has stuck it out till now, and I think the egg shell is cracked open."
Marquez: "Anti-war demonstrators want to take this protest from the streets to the halls of Congress. In just two weeks, they've raised $1.5 million to pressure lawmakers, both Republicans and Democrats, to oppose the President's plan to send more troops to Iraq. Although there were major anti-war demonstrations before the Iraq War began, public protest has been muted in recent years. Now, some believe this organized fund-raising machine could turn the tide."
Allan Lichtman, American University: "The lobbying is the essential right cross that follows the left jab of the demonstrations."
Clip of protesters chanting: "No more President, no more war!"
Marquez: "And if today's crowds snaking up the streets to the Capitol are any indication, the anti-war movement may just be getting warmed up. Laura Marquez, ABC News, Washington."
From the CBS Evening News:
Thalia Assuras: "The battle for Iraq took another heavy toll of American lives today as the debate over the war spilled out onto U.S. streets. The military today announced the death of seven more American soldiers in Iraq, bringing the total number of deaths to at least 3,075. Here at home, there were anti-war protests in Washington and other cities as well. Joie Chen is at the Capitol tonight. Joie?"
Joie Chen: "Good evening, Thalia. Yeah, this was not the first, this was not the biggest protest of its type this city has seen. Still, organizers believe that it will have a significant impact, mostly because it tried to change the direction of the debate over the war by changing the direction of the protest. The surge of protesters pushed off, led by faces you might expect -- activist Jesse Jackson, actor Sean Penn, and Jane Fonda, who admitted she'd avoided this soap box since the days when she was called 'Hanoi Jane.'"
Jane Fonda, Actress: "-but I'm so sad that we still have to do this, that we did not learn the lessons from the Vietnam War."
Chen: "But for all the tie dye and familiar chants, the anti-war movement has moved on and changed direction. Today's protest didn't go near the White House, instead leading tens of thousands up Constitution Avenue to the Capitol, bearing a message for the new Congress, now controlled by Democrats."
Connie Gordon, Anti-war demonstrator: "I think the Democrats are well aware that a lot of Democrats were elected this year over Republicans because of this issue."
Unidentified female protester: "This has to stop. The only way they can do it is to cut off the money."
Chen: "Energized by new signs of congressional resistance to the President's Iraq strategy and polls showing the public's increasing impatience, the protest actually began a day earlier with activists visiting lawmakers to press for an end to the war. They are determined to raise the profile of military families opposed to the war, keeping parents like Larry Syverson out front. He's a father of four sons, one retired military, three of them now on active duty."
Larry Syverson, Military Families Speak Out: "Between the three of them they've been to Iraq five times."
Chen: "Syverson's sons have written home to give their blessing and backing for their father's activism, even when fellow soldiers object."
Syverson, reading his son's letter: "'I tell them that you have three sons in the military, and two of which are in Iraq. You can say or do whatever you want. You've earned it.'"
Chen: "Today their faces were on his side and in his heart as he marched beneath the Capitol. They don't consider you disloyal to the troops?"
Syverson: "Oh, no, not at all. They know that I love them, and they know that the best support I can give them as a father is to bring them home."
Chen: "Military families like Syverson's can provide important political cover on Capitol Hill here, especially for Democrats who are concerned about looking unpatriotic if they stand up to the President, Thalia."
Assuras: "Well, you said that the protesters didn't go by the White House, but did the President have a reaction today?"
Chen: "Not much of one. A spokesman said that he understands that the American people want to see an end to the war, and he does believe that this is the course that will get us there."
Assuras: "Joie Chen on Capitol Hill, thanks so much. Well, other cities held anti-war protests today. More than 1,000 protestors turned out in San Francisco, and several thousand marched in Los Angeles to an anti-war rally at the federal courthouse. Hundreds braved the cold to demonstrate in Albuquerque, New Mexico."
From the NBC Nightly News:
John Siegenthaler: "Good evening, everyone. On a day when the U.S. military announced the deaths of seven more American troops in Iraq, there were protests in this country. Tens of thousands of Americans converged on Washington, D.C., demonstrating against the war in Iraq, urging the U.S. government to bring the troops home. The crowd gathered on the Washington mall joined by politicians and celebrities like Jane Fonda delivering a message that was clearly intended for the President. NBC's John Yang joins us tonight from the White House with the story. Good evening, John."
John Yang: "John, President Bush has asked the American people to give his plan for Iraq a chance. But the people who marched in the streets in Washington and other cities today were in no mood to be patient."
Unidentified female protester: "What do we want?"
Crowd of protesters: "Peace!"
Female protester: "When do we want it?"
Crowd: "Now!"
Yang: "The demonstrators' message: No more troops to Iraq and bring all the troops home."
Unidentified male protester #1: "Power to the peaceful!"
Yang: "It was aimed at both President Bush and the new Democratic majority in Congress."
Unidentified male protester #2: "We were expecting more from them than nonbinding resolutions, which don't mean a hill of beans."
Yang: "Only a handful of lawmakers appeared, among them Democrat John Conyers of Michigan."
Rep. John Conyers (D-MI): "We stopped the war in Vietnam, didn't we?"
Yang: "Veterans of the Iraq War spoke, as did veterans of protests past, such as Jane Fonda, her first appearance at an anti-war rally in 34 years."
Jane Fonda, Actress: "-and I'm so sad that we still have to do this, that we did not learn the lessons from the Vietnam War."
Yang: "The demonstration came as a new Newsweek poll puts President Bush's job approval at 30 percent, a new low. And 67 percent of Americans now say the President's Iraq policy is based on his personal beliefs regardless of facts. No surprise that Mr. Bush spent the week trying to draw attention to his domestic agenda."
Craig Crawford, NBC News Political Analyst: "He's trying to distract the Democratic Party from some of the things they want to do with Iraq by talking about a lot of their issues -- education, health care and those things."
Yang: "But as he used his State of the Union Address to reach out to Democrats with domestic initiatives, Republican support for his troop buildup continues to show signs of fraying."
Senator John Warner (R-VA): "I personally, speaking for myself, have great concern about the American GI being thrust into that situation."
Yang: "Republican Senator John Warner, once a strong supporter of the war, introduced a resolution disagreeing with the policy while still supporting Mr. Bush."
Crawford: "If what the President has proposed in Iraq does not make a difference soon, maybe within six months, a lot of these tepid supporters like Warner are gonna bolt."
Yang: "For now Senator Warner is helping the White House, refusing to talk to Democrats about a single compromise resolution. As long as there's more than one resolution up for a vote, John, it's less likely that a big bipartisan majority will vote against Mr. Bush."




Chen: "Energized by new signs of congressional resistance to the President's Iraq strategy and polls showing the public's increasing impatience, the protest actually began a day earlier with activists visiting lawmakers to press for an end to the war. They are determined to raise the profile of military families opposed to the war, keeping parents like Larry Syverson out front. He's a father of four sons, one retired military, three of them now on active duty."













Editor at Large
Comments Policy
protest
January 28, 2007 - 00:15 ET by rbosqueI say we give war a chance. They have their collective heads in the Iraqi sand if they think the terrorists are just going to go away.
My oldest was there last year and my second son is there now. They say Fight on!!!
Thank them for us here.Bless
January 28, 2007 - 00:31 ET by bigtimerThank them for us here.
Bless them...and I pray they stay safe.
My gratitude is endless.
I'll pass it along thank you
January 28, 2007 - 00:35 ET by rbosqueI'll pass it along thank you BT.
rbosque me too!
January 28, 2007 - 00:39 ET by misterbillrbosque me too! Tell your kids to stay safe and there's a lot of us old bastards out here who love them and respect them and admire them for the service they render to America!
Of course, thanks!
January 28, 2007 - 00:47 ET by rbosqueOf course, thanks!
Please add my thanks also,
January 28, 2007 - 04:53 ET by Indiana JoePlease add my thanks also, rbosque. May God Bless and keep you and yours safe.
Syverson, also Fonda
January 28, 2007 - 00:48 ET by misterbillSyverson: "Oh, no, not at all. They know that I love them, and they know that the best support I can give them as a father is to bring them home."
I am sorry sir, that is the best LOVE you can give them, not the best support.
Fonda--someone ought to shove a grenade up that traitor's butt. Mr Syverson has earned the right to speak out. Jane ought to go over and pose with the guys cutting Pearl's head off. That's her style.
Tens Of Thousands?
January 28, 2007 - 00:56 ET by emjem24Gosh, no bias here, huh? I'll reiterate what I said before in a previous post. I pretty much tuned out of the protests today. The guy with the three sons makes me sick. What a way to show your support. Does he ever wonder why we have a military? No, it's all well and good to bomb Bosnia, drop off aid and supplies to tsunami victims, but to reaffirm 17 UN resolutions? No. I bet, if this guy could have his way, he'd see our proud military disbanded, just like all these other peaceniks want. Then what? Iran, Syria, and North Korea will just go away? All the terrorists will go away? I'm so tired of this. The same old rush to war garbage all over again. Nothing about 17 resolutions and all the chances Hussein got will ever matter in the conversation. I'm beginning to wonder what Americans trully want anymore. I mean, do you want a military to defend you from enemies foreign and domestic? Or perhaps, you'd rather we wait for our enemies to attack us? I just don't understand this. The problems in the world will not go away. Yes, I know we're not the policemen of the world but who takes the stand against an Iran, Iraq, Syria, or North Korea? Who says enough is enough? I feel like I'm the only one who remembers 9/11 (I lost two college buddies that day) and now Americans just want to wish it away. How are we to fend off these threats? Should we send Jane Fonda over to Iran or North Korea as our new appeasement ambassador and she can hold hands and sing campfire songs? Why do we grow weak in the face of threats and dictators? Do we no longer do any inward thinking or do we just let the MSM do it for us, America? Where is your spine? It was convenient to support the military when we were heady with victory but now that things aren't so simple, gosh, it's not our problem. I'm afraid that that attitude won't be the first (or last) mistake this country makes.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
emjem24
January 28, 2007 - 01:14 ET by misterbillemjem24 You are scaring me. I believe all the points you raise are true. I haven't forgotten 9/11, but , darn it, I said the same thing to my wife last night. This country of luxury-loving Americans are quick to forget the wounds unless they are personally wounded. The families of those protecting us are fully aware, every day, every minute. And Americans are forgetting the troops too. In spite of the insincere, "I support the Troops" declarations. It is going to take a suitcase nuke or a major anthrax attack to wake up the populace. When they hear the boots of other countries troops pounding on our streets they will finally pull their heads out of their butts, but maybe. too late. I am losing some of my strong supportive feelings for our President, but not because of Iraq. His stand on some other issues are causing that feeling. I stand four-square with him on Iraq. I do not know what he is going to do with 20,000 more troops, but I SHOULD NOT KNOW. You do not win battles by telling the enemy your plans.
These Are Scary Times
January 28, 2007 - 21:56 ET by emjem24misterbill, unfortunately, these are scary times. I wish it was not so but it is. I am of agreement with you about losing support for the President. I don't like his immigration plan, I don't like that he now agrees with the dems about global warming, and I don't like the No Child Left Behind policy (as a teacher) because it has meant much more testing that makes it impossible to prepare children for real life. I don't like how Pres. Bush "may" rescind his tax cut pledge so that he might have a "legendary" presidency. I'm not trying to be harsh but I feel like many Republicans need to wake up about immigration (especially in the Senate). I've been extremely disappointed in how Pres. Bush has let others, especially dems, define his presidency. His leadership is lacking and I feel for him to recapture the magic that he once embodied he needs to go on the offensive. Inside, I feel a deep forboding that lies ahead for all of us Conservatives and Republicans if we don't confront the Democrats and dispell their seductive message. Giving millions of people (the poor, uneducated, and illegal) what they want doesn't mean it's good for the country.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
We Should Not Know
January 28, 2007 - 21:59 ET by JimboI do not know what he is going to do with 20,000 more troops, but I SHOULD NOT KNOW. You do not win battles by telling the enemy your plans.
That may be the best line I read all day.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Just the caption on this blog
January 28, 2007 - 00:58 ET by bigtimerJust the caption on this blog inserted in the screen on the nightly news story is pure madness....
'Peace Surge'
Oh Puhleeeze!
I dare anyone to watch this crowd on C-Span...the reruns will be playing, I imagine between this and 'Shrillary Does Iowa' all week-end long...
Well, you will understand why I am not going to say anymore, other than God help us all!....
Where were all these whining
January 28, 2007 - 01:54 ET by Right Wing Attack DogWhere were all these whining cowards when the horny hick from Hot Springs was bombing Christians in Bosnia for defending themselves from the islamo-fascists? These elitist know-it-alls are the diarrhea of humanity. If conservatives don't get off their behinds, they will soon be running the country into the ground.
The Question is Futility
January 28, 2007 - 03:34 ET by prestonlewisI like to think nearly all Americans are patriotic, support the troops and the government. What I don't like to see is our government waste the lives of good American youth in a futile war. Case in point, Vietnam. 58,184 DEAD servicemen according to the DOD. Yes, and we had those horrible liberal media types saying Washington's "success is just around the corner" messages were wrong. It finally took Walter Cronkite to go over to Vietnam, took a look see, and tell the American public the war is a lost cause; and it was. 58,184 dead Americans for nothing. I think that is what people worry about with Iraq. Like the Vietnamese, Iraqis do not share our culture, values, religions, well pretty much they share nothing with us. How are we to "democratize" them? There are many parallels between Vietnam and Iraq and many Americans, myself included, do not want to see another 58,184 dead in a lost cause that a bunch of Washington types think is winnable when sitting in their air conditioned offices surrounded by yes men. Patriotic? Absolutely. But letting thousands of Americans die for nothing is not patriotism. It's stupidity, which is what the Vietnam war was. (Of course, we could have won the Vietnam war if local commanders could have bombed Russian shipping and missile batteries known to contain Russians but those darn Washington politicians said no).
Preston, It sounds like yo
January 28, 2007 - 07:47 ET by JerryPreston, It sounds like you are trying to equate the current situation with the Vietnam war. There is no comparison, IMO, other than the military was hamstrung by the MSM and liberal politicians.
"Like the Vietnamese, Iraqis do not share our culture, values, religions..."
And the Japanese did? Japan is now one of the most peaceful and prosperous countries in the world.
"But letting thousands of Americans die for nothing is not patriotism."
Fighting the war against terror is not NOTHING.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
Preston, I'm not questioning
January 28, 2007 - 10:55 ET by Chicago RepublicanPreston, I'm not questioning your patriotism, but I think you perspective is skewed by the Useful Idiots. The only thing that caused Saigon to fall in 1975 was a loss of American willpower brought on by the presentation of 'facts' by the MSM. That's it. Sound familiar?
Fact of the matter is, leaving Iraq before it is ready to defend itself will
Vietnam was a tragedy, but only a tragedy in that the media reported falsely/one-sidedly. The North Vietnamese, like the Islamists/Baathists in Iraq today, knew the only way they could win was by the US losing its will to fight. Our enemies, I've said before and I'll say again, have the patience and perspective to keep taking the fight to us. Do we have the willpower to meet them? That's the question.
It finally took Walter Cronki
January 28, 2007 - 11:05 ET by Jack BauerIt finally took Walter Cronkite to go over to Vietnam, took a look see, and tell the American public the war is a lost cause;
Oh please. Are you really as stupid as the above sentence.
General Võ Nguyên Giáp who led the Tet Offensive, has admitted numerous times that the US defeated the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army utterly. The whole action was ruinous for them.
They were beaten. Down and out. All over.
So imagine the surprise to him and the North when Cronkite and the US media declared the US the LOSERS in Vietnam. It was a lie then and it's lie now.
Your ignorance is profound.
Preston
January 28, 2007 - 11:07 ET by JimboLike the Vietnamese, Iraqis do not share our culture, values, religions, well pretty much they share nothing with us. How are we to "democratize" them?
Preston - True, the Iraqi’s do not share our culture, values, or religions with us, but I disagree with the assertion that they share “nothing” with us. I believe they share the desire to live a life free of a dictorship, free of mass murders from their government, free of government sanctioned tortures and rapes, and the list goes on and on.
True, they are taking longer than any of us would like to stand up on their own to support these ideals, but when put in the perspectives of logistical realities as well as historical, it really isnt all that long.
Although I don’t agree with it, I can respect most of your position, with the exception of one point. The American troops dying in Iraq are most certainly not dying for NOTHING. If you can’t get behind the idea of establishing democracy in Iraq, then get behind the fact that they are protecting YOU by fighting the war on terror.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Yes, prestonlewis, Vietnam was a lost cause. Liberals lost it.
January 28, 2007 - 11:28 ET by acaiguanaYes, prestonlewis, Vietnam was a lost cause. Liberals lost it. They are directly responsible and to blame as well as their representatives in Congress, the Democrat Party.
"It finally took Walter Cronkite to go over to Vietnam, took a look see, and tell the American public the war is a lost cause; and it was."
And that lesson has not been 'lost' on a lot of us. Stalinist forces backing the North Vietnamese with money, materials and equipment kept the Vietnam war raging much longer than was necessary; and the Walter Conkrite's eroded the morale of the America and abused their trust in following the script written by the Soviets.
The Socialist Left's eagerness to see America humiliated and defeated in Vietnam was continuous from about 1965 forward. They levered the draft into a club to wield over the heads of Johnson (D), Nixon(R) and Ford(R). To them it mattered not who was the President of the United States. Their goal was the absolute humiliation of this country.
To this end, the Liberals in the Media and the Traitors in the Defense Department (Schorr) and others worked hard to undermine the War as well as to destroy the credibility of any politician who dared to stand up and defend it.
Whether the War was necessary is arguable but there are strong arguments on both sides. Whether the War was waged correctly is pretty much conceded as being a failure. The Politicians got directly involved in the operational management of that War and the results were needless American deaths and tactical errors from which the people of Southeast Asia are still suffering.
Does any of this sound familiar yet?
Iraq is not Vietnam. But the template of the MSM and the Liberal Left is the same. The Liberal Left is desparately searching for a 'Pentagon Paper' to release and have been for over three years. The Liberal Left deliberately portrays events with a use of verbage and slant that denies any 'good' to the American effort in the Middle East.
How? The Left and the MSM and the Democrats refuse to discuss or deliberately ignore the 'big' picture in the War on Terror. The solution to the problems in the Middle East and with Islamic Muslim Terrorists lies not in the past; we've tried the past.
The solution lies in a new paradigm. That would be to redefine the political and possibly the geographic landscape in the Middle East. To this end, governments have to be toppled and brutal 6th Century forms of Feudal or Theocratic governments must be destroyed. Like Saddam and possibly (more likely probably) Iran.
Sound familiar yet?
Nowhere do you see this issue addressed in depth.
Why?
Because the MSM and the Democrat Party are obsessed with only one thing. That one thing would be power to control the resouces of the United States of America. That means full Democrat control of both houses and the Presidency which leads eventually to control of the Supreme Court.
And our enemies march onward. How can one think that the Middle East will change to anything other than a caldron of seething hatred of Western Civilization (note I didn't say the United States alone) with or without Israel given the history over the past 800 years?
I challenge you to consider what the change would be toward the West in the Middle East if some how, some way, Israel vanished overnight? When General Charles 'Chinese' Gordon died at Kartoom; there was no Israel.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "I love blind Monkeys and any inference that I am making fun of blind Monkeys would be wrong.
You're Wrong
January 28, 2007 - 22:23 ET by emjem24Prestonlewis, you're wrong. Have you ever served in the military or for that matter in either of the wars you mention? Where's this depth of experience that leads you to your conclusions? I would like to know. There is never a lost cause unless all hope is lost and there isn't. We were winning the Vietnam War but we lost the PR campaign for the hearts and minds of both the Vietnamese and Americans at home. Because of our withdrawal, millions of people were killed. That end has left a gaping wound that will never heal in the hearts of those who served there and people like me who were born into that era. My parents never speak of it as if it were a plague that will again appear. I don't think your comparisons between the two wars are valid. Their cultures and belief systems may be different from ours but that doesn't mean they aren't worthy of experiencing the same freedoms we do. That's just blatant, self-absorbed jingoism on your part. The Iraqis nor the Vietnamese are not worthy because they are different from us. Let the vultures peck at them. Sir, the only parallels you see between the two wars are that you think they failed or will fail. I also don't think Americans have much faith in either myself, the people I love in harm's way, or the government. There's so much cynicism and doubt in the hearts of Americans it's much easier to sink into it than to rise above it. I see that you'd rather sink than rise above your cynicism and doubts (especially with the phrase "the Vietnam war was...stupidity." Please don't qualify a war simply through your own individual prism...there are many more Vietnam veterans who'd disagree (as well as Iraq War veterans).
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
It's a freakin "Peace
January 28, 2007 - 05:21 ET by old croIt's a freakin "Peace ESCALATION". Can't the turds even read thier own memos.
Thank you US Sevicemen and woman. Every single day your in my thoughts. God Bless You and keep you safe.
Sweet Jane
January 28, 2007 - 05:28 ET by JimboJane Fonda, Actress: "-but I'm so sad that we still have to do this, that we did not learn the lessons from the Vietnam War."
She couldn’t be more right. We did not learn the lessons from the Vietnam war, particuarly what it means to our country and the affected country to surrender. We are talking about surrender based on peacenick pressure and not sound strategic judgment.
I just heard that Al-Sader’s hit squads have fled into Iraq in anticipation of the surge. Anticipation of the surge! My God. That’s great news. But the MSM would rather cover “peace demonstrations”. I'm simply amazed.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
Exactly! Think how much j
January 28, 2007 - 08:02 ET by JerryExactly! Think how much joy and hope this kind of crap brings to our enemies. It's just unfathomable the treachery that passes for news, and the treasonous actions that pass for democratic rallies.
When the democrat party gained control of congress, the terrorists had to be dancing in the streets, knowing that help was on the way and the Americans would soon be leaving.
Bush did a brilliant thing by immediately requesting a troop SURGE, sending a message to the terrorists that not only are we going to stay the course, but we are going to send MORE troops. This had to be devastating news to the terrorists, as indicated by the fleeing of Al-Sader hit squads.
But now, with the MSM and liberals doing their damnedest to, once again, come to the rescue of the terrorist, they will soon be further emboldened to maintain their resistance, resulting in MORE deaths of our brave soldiers.
We are fighting the war on two fronts, in Iraq and at home, and I don't know which enemy is more evil and dangerous.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
Blueprint for Victory
January 28, 2007 - 11:47 ET by JimboExactly Jerry. The sad reality of this is that the terrorsts have learned more from Vietnam than Americans did. The terrorsts know that if they can hold out long enough, and fuel the MSM with a constatant steam of casulaties, then it is just a matter of time before the politicians of this country will stifle the effort and force a withdrawl. The liberals of this country are playuing directly into the enemy’s game plan. I’d like to think that the liberals are too short sighted to realize this, but I think the reality of it is that they just don’t care.
Can you imagine what it would be like if surrender is once again the outcome of this conflict like it was in Vietnam?? Every enemy on the planet will have a clear blueprint for victory against the United States. It is a frightening thought to say the least.
Jimbo says - "There is a fine line between freedom of speech and treason"
These people make me sick.
January 28, 2007 - 08:36 ET by mytwocentsThese people make me sick. They will never get it. They learned nothing from the "lessons of Vietnam". I believe that our first act in wartime is to take out our own main stream media. It would surely save a lot of lives.
Well, Iraq ain't Viet Nam. To demonstrate is American.
January 28, 2007 - 09:03 ET by acaiguanaWell, Iraq ain't Viet Nam. To demonstrate is American.
I've been there, done that. I went back to University after my Viet Nam life. It was a 'riot'. Sigh.
But, why not report factually on things. What kind of a number is tens of thousands? Vague, non-factual and silly. It lends credence to a group that apparently hasn't been able to put together much of a crowd for four years.
It'll be another four years until the next 'demonstration' on the Mall?
These folks are primarily nuts. There are a few people who are passionately against any war. Always have been these people. Always will.
But, they obviously don't represent 99% of the American people. This misrepresentation of perspective and the facts of the demonstration by the MSM anti-Bush socialist gaggle of media is unethical and unprofessional.
All these MSM writers think they are Studs Terkel or Kurt Vonnegut.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "I love blind Monkeys and any inference that I am making fun of blind Monkeys would be wrong.
numbers: Peace march vs. March for Life
January 28, 2007 - 09:20 ET by Eric TurnerI still want the numbers compared. Has anyone seen a comparison of the numbers between (diesen sogenannten "friedensmarsch") this so-called "peace march" and the annual "March for Life" which draws larger and larger numbers every year?
(sorry for the German, it's just that I really like the word "sogenannten")
AKA: armyvet
Military families against the war
January 28, 2007 - 09:52 ET by nkviking75I'm in no position to prove it, but what do you want to bet the march organizers helpfully found a few military malcontents and helpfully passed their contact information on to the MSM? In a group the size of the military and their families, there are bound to be some dissenters. Unless you can find reliable numbers, they mean nothing.
This is the same media tha
January 28, 2007 - 11:37 ET by kathleenirishThis is the same media that barely bring itself to acknowledge the voices of our brave and wonderful soldiers in the field in Iraq, yet falls all over itself to promote the voices of a select few who sharetheir "peace" propaganda message. That message being destructive to those who are over their fighting and to this country's goals...supporting the insurgent terrorists' cause instead.
I have never been more sickened by the MSM and the Left than I am this weekend. Sleazy, scumbag bastards.
Jane Fonda up on that podium...unbelievable. So much for her lame and phony apologies she made a few years ago for her trips to North Vietnam. Go to Hell, Traitor.
"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere" -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph