While Vice President Dick Cheney stared daggers into CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer over his pushing questions about his lesbian daughter’s December announcement of her pregnancy, Blitzer insisted it was a “responsible and fair question.” Cheney disagreed. There's an argument that Blitzer's question citing Focus on the Family, when considered alone, is a fair (if not kind) question. There's no doubt that Blitzer's question was a trouble-making question, which could easily serve to sow division among Republicans and press Cheney into making a big gaffe or controversy.
Here’s where it’s clearly unfair. When has a Democratic national candidate’s sons or daughters ever been the subject of a national controversy? Try this as Exhibit A. In 2000, while the networks tried to make great hay in the election’s last weekend over an antique George W. Bush drunk-driving ticket, CNN and the other liberal networks hyper-sensitively avoided the story of Al Gore's teenage son Albert Gore III, caught driving 97 miles per hour on an interstate highway, an offense on the public record, just two days before the 2000 Democratic convention. As I wrote for National Review Online in 2000:
But the 17-year-old boy arrested for wild speeding is Al Gore III, driving back to Washington from the Outer Banks of North Carolina on August 12, 2000. Clearly Young Al is not supposed to be a public figure. Clearly it would seem beyond the pale for any political operative or hard-charging talk-radio host to blame his dad for doing a rotten job of the boy's upbringing. But is it fair to spike the unfavorable news angles — especially when a presidential nominee's child breaks the law — and then celebrate the child, or more precisely, celebrate the parenting of the child, on a different day? The Clintons and the Gores have both benefited politically from exploiting their children in a way that invites backhanded compliments from sympathetic journalists.
Young Al's speeding was noted in the New York Times with a 185-word Associated Press dispatch. The Washington Post carried 89 words of wire copy below three other wire service items. But both newspapers devoted a much larger story (and photos) to Young Al's Sidwell Friends football games, and how the publicly paternal vice president never misses one.
A Nexis search using the terms "Al Gore" and "speeding" brought no news mentions of the son’s ticket. But a search using the terms "Al Gore" and "son Albert" brought a selection of items making candidate Gore look like Dear Old Dad in 2000:
-- November 10 CNN Today (an afternoon show), then-CNN reporter Jonathan Karl: "Nothing from the candidate yet. He's had no public schedule, although tonight he does have an awards dinner for his son Albert, a high school football player, and we expect to at least see some pictures of the vice president today, but keeping a very low profile."
-- November 9 Morning News, Jonathan Karl: "He is expected to go to Washington sometime before Friday evening, however, because Friday evening his son Albert has a football banquet. And as you probably know, the vice president never missed any of his football games, and has no intention of missing that banquet either.
-- October 22 Democracy In America, a long profile of Al Gore by correspondent Ken Bode: "For Gore himself, it was back to the Senate, back to work. Then, another family tragedy: his son, Albert III, 6 years old, is struck by a car."
Video clip of Gore: "Tipper and I watched as he was thrown 30 feet through the air and scraped another 20 feet on the pavement after he hit the ground."
Bode: "His son was in a body cast. His family deeply strained. Tipper was treated for depression. Gore began to reassess. He decided he wanted to make a difference, to write a book, a global environmental manifesto."
October 17 on the afternoon show Inside Politics, Jonathan Karl: "Following the debate, the vice president plans to campaign virtually nonstop until Election Day, returning home only once and then only for a few hours, long enough to watch his son Albert’s homecoming football game -- Judy?"
September 4 NewsStand (airing at 10 PM Eastern time)
Judy Woodruff: "The failure, coming at age 40, sent Al Gore into something of a midlife funk.But an event the following year in his family life had an even greater impact. Leaving Camden Yards after a Baltimore Oriole's game, Gore's 6-year-old son, Albert III, slipped from his father's hand and into the path of a moving car. He was lucky to survive. The rest of Gore's children, Sarah, Kristin and Karenna, saw a change in their father."
Karenna Gore Schiff: "I remember my dad really making it clear to the schedulers in his office, and his friends and everybody that nothing was don't owe going to interfere with family time."
Woodruff: "During this period of introspection, Gore wrote and published Earth in the Balance, summing up his views on the environment."
August 17 live convention coverage: After recounting how Al Gore "still manages to make time for Halloween," an odd claim you’re your youngest child is getting speeding tickets, Tipper Gore recounts son Albert’s accident in her 2000 convention address to underline how it helped her seek help for depression.
This was not CNN's or Wolf Blitzer's approach when President Bush's twin daughters were cited for underage drinking as 20-year-olds in the spring of 2001. Blitzer kept on that embarrassing story, exposing his and CNN's partisan news judgment in the process:
--May 30, 2001 Wolf Blitzer Reports: "Police in Austin, Texas say Jenna Bush tried to buy alcohol at a restaurant Tuesday using someone else's identification. Jenna's sister Barbara was with her at the time. Last month, Jenna was cited for underage alcohol possession. No charges have been filed in this latest incident."
-- May 31, 2001 Wolf Blitzer Reports: "Welcome back.Police in Austin, Texas today cited President Bush's twin daughters for violating state alcoholic beverage laws. Questions about the incident remain off limits at the White House. As CNN's Anne McDermott reminds us, all first families struggle to retain a little privacy." That's right. An entire news story.
-- June 1, 2001 Wolf Blitzer Reports: "Welcome back. In other news tonight, the Bush twins could face victim -- could fall victim to a tough zero-tolerance law signed by their father while Texas governor. Jenna Bush was cited this week for using someone else's identification to buy alcohol. Barbara was ticketed for possession of alcohol by a minor. Under the law, Jenna could lose her license for 60 days while Barbara could lose hers for 30."
Blitzer’s question, when considered alone, without the partisan double standards, can be defended as a fair question. After all, Mary Cheney or some political ally of hers clearly leaked to very favorable Washington Post gossips to make the pregnancy a national story. (Mary Cheney is an activist who also publicly supported a liberal Virginia campaign against a state marriage amendment, which would be fair game for questions.) The Focus on the Family quote Blitzer used was not a personal attack on the Cheney family, but it was clearly critical of the choice to raise children without a father, as social conservatives from before and after Dan Quayle's Murphy Brown speech have argued.
The problem for Blitzer is what Cheney and every other conservative was reading into his question: that he enjoys badgering the Cheneys on this issue. CNN jumped all over Mary Cheney's Baby last month. Don't forget Blitzer pressing Democratic press releases on Mrs. Cheney about lesbian themes in her novels just before the November elections in defense of Democrat Jim Webb.
CNN milked its Blitzer vs. Cheney showdown on Thursday. They replayed it on "American Morning," advertised a poll question coming up in their "Your World Today" program in the noon (Eastern time) hour, asked a poll question during the 1pm hour of "Newsroom" and read letters in response in the 2 pm hour. One was conservative, and the other two were liberal.
—Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Blitzer was looking for a com
January 25, 2007 - 18:33 ET by crsheddBlitzer was looking for a comment by Cheney about a statement from Focus on the Family, a conservative group. You may have a point about the treatment of presidential kids, but Blitzer, in this instance, is not a good example.
Other good examples would be:
"Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?" McCain said at a GOP fund-raiser in Washington." http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/7/5/00548.shtml
or,
'...showing a picture of 13-year-old Chelsea on his television show, and announcing it was a photograph of “the White House dog.”' (Rush Limbaugh) http://www.campusprogress.org/tools/448/know-your-right-wing-speakers-rush-limbaugh
Thank goodness, the right wing NEVER stoops to slamming the children of their opponents.
Both sides do crap like this. Maybe someday, one side will decide that they are too good for this s**t and quit the 'they did it first' whine.
I remember such comments abou
January 25, 2007 - 18:45 ET by Dan The Man 2I remember such comments about her and how the press, which Wolf Blitzed is a part of, said many nice things in her defense and derided the peopel who said she was a dog and such. It quixckly died down and not much badly was spoken of her again, under penaly of being Clintooned.
There is a differnce in audiences and you fail to see that.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark. -- save my gun, shoot a liberal.
LOL! I see Crash is taking a
January 25, 2007 - 19:18 ET by Del DolemonteLOL! I see Crash is taking a page from the Keith Olbermann playbook, quoting a conservative "news source" (Newsmax) when it suits his agenda.
Unfortunately, when one actually reads the entire Newsmax story, it continues to say that McCain later apologized to both Bill and Hill for the remark. And Limbaugh personally apologized to Hillary for his remark as well. Has Blitzer apologized to *any* of the Presidential kids whose privacy *he* invaded? Of course not.
Wolfman Hack is definitely fair game, as he is perhaps the most visible news host on CNN, a network that reaches across the entire world. His audience globally is many times higher that Limbaugh's.
Please point out where they
January 25, 2007 - 19:38 ET by 1sttofightPlease point out where they were wrong.
SORRY CRuSSHHHeD
January 25, 2007 - 23:54 ET by SportPoliticsMaybe you didn't notice but that's not Brit Hume asking the question to one of the Clintons or Al Gore, you idiot.
Next time Brit Hume invites on Al Gore and pulls it, when he's VP, let me know you fool.
( you have years and years of archives to check and you got zero bubba)
Dude, are you serious?Are you
January 26, 2007 - 09:46 ET by GordyDude, are you serious?
Are you defending Blitzer's lack of impartiality by comparing his actions to a conservative talk show host and a Republican Senator?
Do you even see what's wrong with your logic? Here's a tip, tell us about a 'reporter' that did the same thing to a Democrat.
I think even more revealing a
January 25, 2007 - 18:37 ET by GalvanicI think even more revealing are the coverages given to William Kennedy Smith (accused of rape; found not guilty), and Michael Kennedy (accused of having sex with the underage babysitter of his children, before dying in a reckless skiing accident). Neither seemed to get as much press as the bar-hopping hijinx of the daughters Bush, despite being far more serious in nature.
Of course, the Kennedys have always been the darlings of the press, which covered for JFK and RFK as well.
Don't forget when Jeb Bush's
January 25, 2007 - 18:41 ET by msh1973Don't forget when Jeb Bush's daughter, Noel, was arrested in January 2002 for prescription fraud, that made headline news. When she was sentenced it was on the CBS news. Then in Sept. 2005, Jeb's son John was arrested for resisting arrest and public intoxication. That made the news, including his mug shot. The story on msnbc included that he was the nephew of the President.
Anything the msm can do to embarrass the Bush family or the Bush Administration is fair game, according to them.
Jeb Bush was a joke and is a joke...
January 25, 2007 - 18:56 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasRegarding Jeb Bush...he was and is a joke of a leader. Florida passed more new laws during his 8 years that the previous 12 years in Florida. Florida's Department of Children and Families was a disaster under Bush and he failed to take responsibility for his failure. Jeb Bush was and is an excuse maker with little to no original thought or leadership. He was and is a reactionary. You can call him conservative, christian, Republican, whatever but in no way does Jeb Bush even remotely resemble a genuine conservative and I am not talking about a right wing evangelical conservative. He thinks and responds like a liberal and just as the genuine closet super-lib every time there was a problem in Florida what does Jebby want to do? Yep, pass another law instead of enforcing the already sufficient laws existing. Jeb was a law passer, someone truly without answers other than to make crossing the street a felony in Florida. I truly am thankful that a duplicitous hypocrite like Jeb has been marginalized by his brother and is highly unlikely to infect the Presidential elections. Never mind his children that received kid glove treatment in the courts for their crimes. Bush provided the very same treatment for his children Democrats are famous for.
If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.
What?
January 25, 2007 - 19:15 ET by msh1973What? How did you go to that rant on Jeb Bush from what I said referring to his children?
Jeb is not a liberal , so h
January 25, 2007 - 19:41 ET by 1sttofightJeb is not a liberal , so he is fair game, so are his children.
Have you never heard of a spring board?
January 26, 2007 - 11:31 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasHave you never heard of a spring board or a rabbit trail? It was just a convenient place to go hunting off the trail for lesser game for a bit. Relax, and Blonde...I am quite aware of Rotten Lawton...Jeb still is a joke. He is a kneejerk lawmaking Republican and there is little original in his leadership and thinking.
If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal. Go Rudy!
GAT,You are wrong about JEB.
January 25, 2007 - 20:20 ET by BlondeGAT,
You are wrong about JEB.
As far as "the children" go in Florida, the FDC&F has been a disaster for years and years and years. Does the old H.R.S. ring a bell with you? Lawton Chiles was pilloried for that agency, and it's successor has become marginally better under Jeb Bush.
Furthermore, JEB pushed through vouchers, allowing people to have some choice in their children's schools. And bye-bye quotas under JEB. Of course the liberals and teachers' unions went totally bats*** and screamed bloody murder.
"Kid Glove Treatment" for his kids? Hardly.
Do me a favor. Stay at the Georgia border next time you decide to visit Florida.
Blonde,Thanks for your reply
January 25, 2007 - 20:41 ET by msh1973Blonde,
Thanks for your reply to GAT. I was beginning to wonder if I missed something.
msh,The snowbirds are maddeni
January 25, 2007 - 20:49 ET by Blondemsh,
The snowbirds are maddening in more ways than one (clogging up the roads!).
I wish they'd keep their New York opinions (sorry Mark!) in New York.
Jeb was a pretty good governer. I'd have voted for him for a fourth time, had it been possible.
Regards.
When it comes to the children
January 25, 2007 - 20:31 ET by FastEdWhen it comes to the children of the president, at least the military know how to prepare.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
I don't see how the son of a
January 25, 2007 - 20:59 ET by Trouble2KI don't see how the son of a potential VP driving 97mph compares to an actual DUI of a presidential canidate. Talk about grasping at straws.
I think it was a fair question and Cheney just got bent b/c he was being called out as a hypocrite. If you are a public official you don't have a private life, it's as simple as that. Besides the quote that Wolf read before the question was from a conservative group. Cheney can't have it both ways.
"A satellite has no conscience."
Wrong T2K.Vice President Chen
January 25, 2007 - 21:12 ET by BlondeWrong T2K.
Vice President Cheney was perfectly appropriate in both his tone and his words.
Blitzer was the one who was inappropriate and offensive. Typical of the MsM. He was attempting to sandbag V.P. Cheney and create a media sensation of a remark....a la the Chris Wallace interview of Slick Willie going ballistic, pointing the finger and laying hands on the interviewer.
Talk about the "drive by" media.
"Besides the quote tha
January 25, 2007 - 21:20 ET by ckc1227"Besides the quote that Wolf read before the question was from a conservative group."
The logic of you puppet heads never ceases to amaze me, lol.
Liberalism is the philosophy of the stupid.
Touche
January 25, 2007 - 22:05 ET by The TruthTouche
Why the question is unfair
January 25, 2007 - 22:49 ET by nkviking75The question is unfair because it puts Cheney in a no-win situation. He either has to alienate his daughter or alienate his base. That's why the question is being asked. There's nothing he can say that won't make him look bad. Whatever Dick Cheney thinks of his daughter's situation, it was Mary's choice and Mary can answer for it if she chooses. If someone asked her about it, do you suppose she'd tell the press to leave her parents out of it?
2K, I wonder if you were arguing that a public figure has no private life when Clinton went through his problems.
NK,Personally, I think VP Che
January 25, 2007 - 23:05 ET by BlondeNK,
Personally, I think VP Cheney found the only appropriate reply in the "no-win" situation you described above.
Blitzer was befuddled.
Big surprise.
Dick Cheney was absolutely spot on in his response.
Do you suppose any other MSM drive by "journalist" is going to try to pull this shtick again? I doubt it.
Don't be too sure
January 25, 2007 - 23:12 ET by nkviking75"Do you suppose any other MSM drive by "journalist" is going to try to pull this shtick again? I doubt it."
I'm not that optomistic, Blonde. I can imagine some reporter figuring that the question got under Cheney's skin, and figuring there must be another way to attack the issue so Cheney will crack.
Now if Cheney would bring his duck-hunting gun to the interview... :-)
Good evening NK.(Nice forum p
January 25, 2007 - 23:25 ET by BlondeGood evening NK.
(Nice forum post today, BTW! I think it hit the main pages here this a.m...but I could be wrong...sleep deprivation, etc.).
If I had one, and only one, wish granted in my life, it would be that Dick Cheney's heart was that of a twenty year old.
I heard (and saw) this interview about five times today. Dick was merely annoyed.
My Vice President smoked Wolfie. And he'll do it again. He is the grown up in the word of "gotcha" journalism. Compare and contrast to Slick's interview with Chris Wallace with the finger pointing, inappropriate touching, etc.
The Cheney's (and I absolutely admire his wife) are the most reviled couple...in the MsM's view.
They rock!
And as far as their daughter is concerned....so what? She's a private citizen. And not "fair game" for the media's little smarmy innuendos.
Compare and Contrast: Cheney vs. Bubba
January 25, 2007 - 23:33 ET by nkviking75Blonde, you make a great point. Bubba went off on a long rant against the sinister motives of Fox News and Chris Wallace. Cheney shot down the question (not the questioner or his network) in one sentence, and when Wolf didn't get the hint the first time, Cheney essentially repeated himself. Classy.
I don't know who I support for the GOP nomination in '08, but I'd love it if Cheney had kept himself in the running.
nk,I know what you mean.My fi
January 25, 2007 - 23:41 ET by Blondenk,
I know what you mean.
My first choice is Dick Cheney. Second is Newt. Third is JEB.
But I know I shall be sorely disappointed.
So I just continue to slave away, aspiring to the next tax bracket...you know, so Nancy Pelosi et. al. can rob me blind.
Sheesh.
Lets get one thing straight a
January 26, 2007 - 11:03 ET by Trouble2KLets get one thing straight a public figure has no private life, thats mass comm. law 101 folks. Also its not like Mary is hiding out -in fact she was sitting across from Wolf less than a year ago on the same show so she too is a public figure. Also she wrote about some details of her life in her book so its hardly off limits. Cheney got caught being a hypocrite and its as simple as that. He can't have it both ways. He is suppose it represent the base (familiy values) but is on the other side of the fence in his familiy life. Thats the reason Cheney got bent. Wolf was not out of line, Cheney just had no where to hide with that question. Its called good journalism people.
"A satellite has no conscience."
Regardless of the private v
January 26, 2007 - 11:20 ET by MightyMouthRegardless of the private vs. public life debate, the question was biased on Blitzer's part and political in nature. It's purpose was to drive a wedge between Cheney and the religious right. And you are obviously NOT a father because if you were you would understand how a father can love his child and grandchild and at the same time disaprove of the childs life style. That is not hypocritical. Why don't you comment on issues like this when you have grown up a little.
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
I think it's a pretty valid
January 25, 2007 - 21:59 ET by The TruthI think it's a pretty valid question since he's known to be against homosexuality and now that his daughter is pregnant, I would like to know what he thought of it.
Well since it's a private fam
January 25, 2007 - 22:22 ET by BlondeWell since it's a private family matter, it's really none of your business now, is it?
Regardless of how nosy you may be.
I agree with you Blonde but I
January 25, 2007 - 22:28 ET by Keith PhillipsI agree with you Blonde but I think that the way he responded, with a simple no, says more about him and makes me think of the way Clinton and Frank respond to questions they don't like.
Precisely Keith.Dick Cheney's
January 25, 2007 - 22:42 ET by BlondePrecisely Keith.
Dick Cheney's reputation has been upheld. Class act all the way.
Am I to understand that quest
January 26, 2007 - 19:59 ET by TheDeuceAm I to understand that questions concerning 'private family matters' like infidelity or your kids' life choices are NOW to be fair game...or are these questions only proper when asked of a conservative?