The View co-hosts are so anxious at an opportunity to blast the vice president, that the truth does not seem to matter. On Thursday’s View, co-hosts Rosie O’Donnell, Elisabeth Hasselbeck, Joy Behar, and guest co-host Tina Fey weighed in on the recent interview Vice President Cheney gave to CNN regarding Cheney’s lesbian daughter’s pregnancy. Through the course of the conversation they falsely asserted that Cheney is a staunch gay-marriage opponent.
Although token non-liberal Elisabeth Hasselbeck thought inquiring into his family life was inappropriate, they all agreed the vice president is a hypocrite for not supporting gay marriage while retaining a strong relationship with an openly gay daughter. Joy Behar summed it up along with her ignorance of the vice president's role.
Behar: "But isn't it fun to watch him stuck there like that? You know, if he would have voted for gay marriage, he wouldn't have to worry about his grandchild being born out of wedlock. The Family Council wouldn't be on his case. Just vote, do the right thing. You have it in your family."
As if that were true. In this article that took about two minutes to find, Vice President Cheney has stated publicly he actually opposes the marriage amendment, and did so repeatedly in 2004. He casts no votes as Vice President, unless the Senate ties, and hasn't been a voting member of Congress since 1989, when gay marriage wasn't exactly on anyone's agenda. Unfortunately for the ladies at The View, this takes away from their juicy story, so they have to make facts up. The entire transcript, with false claims about the vice president bolded, is below.
Rosie O’Donnell: "Now, here's the question. Is it a fundamentally fair question to ask the vice president in an administration where they tried to take the constitutional rights away from his daughter, her partner, and the child they're about to have, is it all right to ask him about that or is it not?"
Elisabeth Hasselbeck: "I think a better question could have been asked about the politics instead of is it going to be ok or whatever the--"
Joy Behar: "He was quoting someone."
Hasselbeck: "It was a quote I think from Family First."
Behar: "Family Council."
O’Donnell: "Right, Focus on the family, which is a very right-wing organization."
Hasselbeck: "It is and so I think that that was a personal, it seemed to me it was a more personal sort of attack."
Tina Fey: "I think it's ok to say, this group that is a conservative group says this, how do you reconcile this with what is going on in your own life?"
Hasselbeck: "Yes."
O’Donnell: "With the policies you stand behind."
Hasselbeck: "Yes, if it was policy based, I would have been better, I would have felt better about the question."
Fey: "They wanted him to talk about Focus on the Family. I think it's tricky because those guys have to kind of appease Focus on the Family and keep them on board. But almost anyone who lives in the world, if you have a family of more than three people, you have a gay cousin."
Behar: "But isn't it fun to watch him stuck there like that? You know, if he would have voted for gay marriage, he wouldn't have to worry about his grandchild being born out of wedlock. The Family Council wouldn't be on his case. Just vote, do the right thing. You have it in your family."
Hasselbeck: "I think though, there he was acting as that parent first and I think that he was acting to protect his daughter and his grandchild."
O’Donnell: "From what?"
Hasselbeck: "I'm just saying from answering that question."
O’Donnell: "From the question of what? Of how does she feel to have a father who is against her innate nature?"
Hasselbeck: "That wasn't the question. If that were the question, I would have been fine with that."
O’Donnell: "Well what kind of question, what do you think Wolf Blitzer was trying to ask talking about her?"
Hasselbeck: "I think he was probably trying to get at the fact that there's a duality at, the fact he voted against the rights for his daughter, but yet he's having one and there are these comments made saying this may not be the best environment for a child. I think he should have been more direct asked the political question instead of going after him personally. And I feel though, Cheney, though I'm not a huge fan of his, I think he did a good job in protecting his family."
Behar: "Why aren't you a huge fan of his?"
Hasselbeck: "I just don't like his approach."
Behar: "He's so delightful."
[Laughter]
Behar: "How could you not be a fan of his?" [mocking mouth gesture]
O’Donnell: "You know, it's interesting when I heard it, and watched it actually last night and I saw that he said, you know, I love both my daughters, for a moment my heart surged. I thought he is calling the partner of his daughter his daughter."
Behar: "No."
O’Donnell: "Then he realized he has two biological children. But, you know, Kelli's parents call me their child. You know, when I fly into Baton Rouge I say I'll get a car, they'll drive me. They say, 'no we'll pick up our children. I'm coming to pick you up because you're my daughter.'"
Behar: "That's nice."
O’Donnell: "Not only is it nice, I mean, that's what you do. Don't Tim's parents consider you their daughter?"
Hasselbeck: "Absolutely."
O’Donnell: "Do your in-laws consider you their daughter?"
Fey: "Yes, absolutely."
O’Donnell: "Yes, so when he said that, I had a moment of look at this! The man is reaching out and embracing, but it wasn't that at all."
Fey: "I think he does love his daughters and he may have a perfectly good relationship with his daughter's partner. But it seems like the hesitation to answer the question might be more about not wanting to get Focus on the Family mad at him as much as it is about his family's privacy."
Behar: "Don't you think that politics-"
Hasselbeck: "You don't think he was defending his family as much as his relationship with Focus on the Family?"
Behar: "Do you believe that politics are personal? Because I kind of do."
O’Donnell: "I do too."
Behar: "I believe that what you believe is the way you vote, and that you can't believe one thing and then vote against it. I just don't."
Fey: "And your personal experience is going to inform what you think. Look at Nancy Reagan saying now we need stem cell research because of her experience."
Behar: "Well, hopefully he will see the light because of his experience. Except he'll be out of office pretty soon please! Two years. This is the first time I've wanted two years to fly by at this age."




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
One day, these harridans will
January 25, 2007 - 17:52 ET by Chris NormanOne day, these harridans will go too far. They just can't seem to resist the urge to bottom themselves in their cackling attacks. Sooner or later, at least some of their sensible viewers will get tired of their you-know-what. It's an act that doesn't play well in the long-term...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Check THIS out.Gun Safety Tip
January 25, 2007 - 18:01 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveCheck THIS out.
Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)
Yep. I still submit that many
January 25, 2007 - 18:08 ET by Chris NormanYep. I still submit that many of the viewers at airtime are stay-at-home moms, who don't appreciate this radical Bush/Cheney-hating bile gushing out of their televisions. Their natural viewership is at "work" in the public schools, social agencies, and strident women organizations.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
I agree, Chris. Far too man
January 25, 2007 - 22:59 ET by Scout FinchI politely disagree, Chris. Far too many women get most of their news from these morons. It's just so easy to follow along with their "funny" jokes and agree with them. They don't make anyone think too hard. And, hey, every woman's magazine is loaded with tips on how to avoid "stress". The View is seemingly "stress-free". You don't even have to think about it.
Scout,I even more politely di
January 26, 2007 - 09:43 ET by Chris NormanScout,
I even more politely disagree with your disagreement.:) I'm not ready to write off most women as being receptive to these harpies brand of bile. For now, it's like a sideshow. But it will wear thin over the long haul or O'Donnell will say something so heinous that it will be the last straw...
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
I agree, Chris. How long will
January 25, 2007 - 18:11 ET by Mica the MagnificentI agree, Chris. How long will their audience enjoy listening to attacks on Bush? How many times and in how many ways can you say 'I hate Bush!' and get the dumbass audience to cheer?
Besides, eventually Rosie will get hungry and jump in the trough off stage.
I want Bush impeached, that way the losing candidate in the '04 election will become president, John Kerry, as our constitution says. - Something Rosie would say as the audience of The View cheers in agreement
I marvel how some people find
January 25, 2007 - 18:15 ET by Chris NormanI marvel how some people find that grotesque being's bile to be somehow entertaining, when you know any normal person must find her so obnoxiously grating.
The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.
- Arabian Proverb
Must remember who their audie
January 25, 2007 - 19:52 ET by FastEdMust remember who their audience is, and how they perform for them. Upper West side NYC, far left, and I'll bet that their audience thinks (there’s a term foreign to the left) that they haven't gone far enough. What they and the rest of the msm (Lsm) is that there is an undercurrent heading to the center-right - they just haven't gotten the memo. Proof would be the falling numbers of left leaning newspapers and "news" shows. Biggest problem for the astute among us, is that there is a generation coming up that doesn't know much about anything, thanks to the liberal educational and cultural systems that allows children and students to be friends, instead of child to parent and student to teacher.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
The View audience
January 26, 2007 - 04:59 ET by SportPoliticsThe View audience, as far as I'm concerned, is any and every single voting democrat in the USA. What comes out of their mouths is no different than what comes out of the mouths of highest in the party democrat leadership, and all the way down the line of the democrat party.
That's who they are, we might as well face the facts head on.
Cackle, cackle, cackle. And
January 25, 2007 - 17:58 ET by RunningBeerCackle, cackle, cackle. And once again Rosie's eaten all the chicken feed.
Okay, I'm not quite sure wher
January 25, 2007 - 18:03 ET by Darth DutchOkay, I'm not quite sure where to begin with this one. First of all, the idea of VP Cheney having an open relationship with his daughter and being against gay marriage are not mutually exclusive things. I know this is a weak comparison, but it's like saying that I am against drug abuse, but openly talk with and love a drug abuser.
Secondly, let's assume Cheney is anti gay marriage and then, to be "consistent" as they say, shuns his daughter. Then they would probably say that he is cold hearted and "look at how he treats his own daughter".
Third, the ironic part of it is that Cheney is exhibiting what has classically and historically been deemed as "tolerance". He does not approve of the behavior, but does love and accept his daughter. And I thought the Left and especially the gay activists were supposed to place "tolerance" above all things. "Tolerance" today is not really tolerance, but rather it demands acceptance...which isn't really tolerance at all.
Dutch
I don't think there is any
January 25, 2007 - 19:47 ET by MyKindaSpamI don't think there is any evidence that Cheney doesn't "approve of the behavior" and merely tolerates it because he loves her. I think everything indicates that the fact that his daughter is gay doesn't bother him. He doesn't see anything wrong with it. He, of course, can't come right out and say that and still retain his "street cred," but that is my interpretation. I thinkk he has made neutral-sounding statement of support in the past, but I think it would be a good thing if he said that he doesn't think homosexuality is wrong and that the lesbian and gay community can be just as good and just as bad parents as straight parents. He would take hits from some parts of the Republican Party, but he would show the Party might be able to have the Big Tent that Lee Atwater said we had. I think it would be more beneficial in the end. The change is coming to the Republican Party. Younger people don't think homosexuality is wrong. Someone being gay isn't a problem for many Republicans and the party is losing support for its current stance.
could it be because the young
January 25, 2007 - 23:35 ET by Conservative Voicecould it be because the young people aren't taught morals? Its all about fame. Quite frankly I think most people hate the sin but love the sinner...but to accept the sin would be the downfall of the republican party. Sure it may get some votes, but it would lose so much more. You can't out democrat the democrats to win over a democrat voter, it never works and it never will. Republicans best chance is to define themselves with a conservative platform, sure you won't win too many liberal voters, so what else is new? You will however win the base back as well as moderate voters who are looking for leadership and someone who can articulate why a certain position is the most noble position. A Ronald Reagan type is the only hope the Republicans have, because many conservatives are becomming sick and tired of being taken for granted.
CV...Man, did you say it all!
January 25, 2007 - 23:51 ET by bigtimerCV...
Man, did you say it all!
We yearn for a strong conservative leader....all people need that!
The idiots who are running this party need a reality check, and they may or may not get it, at the real conservatives out here...I for one have had it!
Putting Mel Martinez as head of the RNC for '08 is deplorable IMHO!
I am heartsick....we have so much to lose...bet heck, I guess the party likes to be piss ant little wimpy losers...so as they don't offend anybody, have some guts and get rid of the RINO's and support real people who support the Constitution ect...
I am sorry, I just went on a rant....but that is how I feel.
you aren't alone. President
January 26, 2007 - 00:04 ET by Conservative Voiceyou aren't alone. President Bush's worst mistake in office was trying to make the republican party a big tent party by out democrating the democrats. He didn't make any friends in the democrat party and made enemies of his base. A true conservative will unite the country, which the country needs, as we the people are losing faith in the system.
The View Klux Klan
January 25, 2007 - 18:03 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasMore than once I have posted this but it is worth posting repeatedly. Rosie O'D isn't the greatest offender on The View Klux Klan, it is Barbara Walters. Walters is as witchy as they come and has been during her life as a television reporter, interviewer of celebrities, host of a talk show, news show and an experimental network news anchor. As mad as people get with O'D they should double they anger and disgust with Walters.
For years much of Walter's social antagonism and misandry was kept at bay and only observable to those who didn't indulge themselves in a life of personal denial, hence able to detect the nuances of hatefulness in Walters. Walters often hid behind the mask of a journalist, reporter or interviewer to qualifiy her hateful, provocative and obviously disrepectful questions and comments. As well, for many years she was still vying for potential network legitimacy and opportunities in the news business and was restrained by such boundaries.
But now it appears quite clear that the real Walters, the one that has been there for decades, is free to express her most hateful and antagonistic self. The misandric bigot named Barbara Walters, the one that was always there, is alive and well and quite willing to abuse not just the truth but other people...all the way to her co-host Hasselbeck and has emerged quite happy and contented with her flag of bigotry and hate (when I use the word bigot it is not the skewed liberal definition designed to protect and hide the hypocrisies of the left but the word as it has been and should be used historically and properly defined).
And what a sham it is. Hasselbeck who is obviously some form of conservative is a punching bag for Walters who has declared it open season on her via O'D, Behr and of course from Walters herself. Walters has lost any respect she might have earned or deserved, her ethics if she claimed any, have been abandoned. She has no remorse for the excesses and shame of Behr, O'D and herself.
I have some time off from my personal responsibilities. I am going to take the time to observe The View Klux Klan on a couple of days and make a list of their regular advertisers. Gladly I will come here and post who they are and the addresses to those interested in responding to the advertisers who support this hatemongering program and possibly let them discover that they are not immune to consequences. Obviously this is my interest and my effort and in no way is intended to be sponsored or promoted by NB but simply something within the boundaries of posting freedoms here.
Walters needs pressure because she still imagines herself to be legitimate and accepted. Maybe she doesn't though and realizes she is only applauded by the extremist hatemongerers like O'D, Behr and any other social misfit guided by true bigotry, misandry, and hate for social norms and standards, common morality and principles of respect.
And now you know the values and sentiments of Tina Fey as well.
If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.
GAT - I am with you
January 25, 2007 - 18:23 ET by misterbillGAT - I am with you. I will gladly write, email or 'phone the advertisers of the show. Pardon me, while I pat myself on the back. Many years ago, I told my wife that I thought Baba was a hypocrite. I also felt she got her boost upstairs because of the nation's eagerness to show we treat all people equal. I have seen the same kind of thing happen in the corporate world. I position her as the vanguard for all women in media. Perky, little Katie is about as qualified as a news anchor as Regis Philbin is a brain surgeon.
I know you to be a spiritual person and so I share with you that I often pray for those who adulate these people. I see these celebrities (not because of themselves) as the Baals of modern days. What possesses those who fawn over them to act as they do? I believe it is because they do not have God in their lives. I admit that I have had some heroes and heroines in my life, but they all are on a different mortal plane. Oh, what empty lives so many people must lead to offer worship to the likes of some of our celebrities.
And the sin I must repent is that I get quite angry with them and curse them for fools. Perhaps one must (in some cases) get quite old before they see the true value of faith.
PS
January 25, 2007 - 18:24 ET by misterbillPS When I first saw Rosie some years back, I commented to my wife that I felt she was not truly a comic , but an unhappy, mean person.
Strangely...
January 26, 2007 - 08:55 ET by Guy Arthur ThomasStrangley I find a majority of conservatives unable to detect the underlying nastiness and ill-intent of many media faces, both in news and entertainment until it becomes blatant. When Rosie showed up in the 80's on HBO comedies from the very start it was clear she was a hateful and hatefilled person who could only find humor in her insults toward attractive heterosexual women and Walter's long ago should have been exposed for the coward and hatemongerer she is but...the libs hold the mic with the dinosaurs. Thanks for the comments.
If you claim to be a conservative, please don't disgrace yourself and conservatism by thinking and arguing like a liberal.
Let me ask you this: did they
January 25, 2007 - 18:10 ET by balboaLet me ask you this: did they really lie? It's probably more accurate to say they mischaracterized or misspoke in reference to his stance. I can't imagine that Hasselbeck would actually lie about Cheney.
These women may not have lied
January 25, 2007 - 18:19 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveThese women may not have lied. However, they have shown their complete ignorance of the role the Vice-President plays in the Senate, namely voting only when there is a tie. I think it is reckless to spout off crap like they did when they clearly don't know what they are talking about.
Was it Lincoln who said "it is better to remain quiet and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt"?
This show is notorious for the hosts making wishy-washy statements and claims. They speak without thinking just to have something to say...and they call it entertainment. I am amazed at how many people actually watch the show. Show like this are prime examples of how urban legends and other myths are virulently spread thoughout society.
Unfortunately, there are going to be some people that saw this segment of the show and not knowing any better will go through the rest of their life thinking that Dick Cheney didn't vote for or against something when he "should" have...even when the Senate never tied and he never had the opportunity to vote.
Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)
These women may not have lied
January 25, 2007 - 18:22 ET by balboaThese women may not have lied. However, they have shown their complete ignorance of the role the Vice-President plays in the Senate, namely voting only when there is a tie. I think it is reckless to spout off crap like they did when they clearly don't know what they are talking about.
Absolutely. I'm surprised Hasselbeck isn't more aware of Cheney's stance on the subject. The rest, sure, they naturally assumed his position.
Sometimes when the stuff is f
January 25, 2007 - 19:39 ET by FastEdSometimes when the stuff is flying all around you it is better to keep your mouth closed, so I suppose that Hasselbeck was just being careful. The bigger picture and concern is that the viewers BELIEVE what these persons saying as fact. Has to do with educations or lack thereof.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Are these people saying that
January 25, 2007 - 18:18 ET by mattmAre these people saying that anyone who has gay family members, and hasn't disowned them, while remaining opposed to gay-marriage is a hypocrite?
The idiocy of that line of reasoning is astounding!
looks like rosie has some new
January 25, 2007 - 18:19 ET by buddyclooks like rosie has some new curls in her hair. maybe she is worried the donald might really have someone take her little wifey doodle away???? i don't think the donald would be spouting off about that if he didn't have some inside information on it. that would be classic.
The 'token non-liberal Elisab
January 25, 2007 - 18:22 ET by crsheddThe 'token non-liberal Elisabeth Hasselbeck...' just shows that the View is 'fair and balanced' just like how many on this site like to throw Alan Combes out as proof that Fox is 'fair and balanced'. IMHO, neither Elisabeth or Alan are effective in their token roles.
?Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter
January 25, 2007 - 18:24 ET by Mean Gene Dr. Love?
Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)
Shep Smith -- bleeding heart
January 25, 2007 - 18:35 ET by Jack BauerShep Smith -- bleeding heart liberal
Greta van Susteren -- bleeding heart liberal
Geraldo -- bleeding heart liberal
Juan Williams -- bleeding heart liberal
Jane Hall -- bleeding heart liberal
Mort Kondrake -- bleeding heart liberal
Neal Gabler - bleeding heart liberal
Ellis Henican - bleeding heart liberal
Kirsten Powers - bleeding heart liberal
Laura Shultz -- bleeding heart liberal
Diane Feinstein -- bleeding heart liberal
Mara Liasson - bleeding heart liberal
But, I'm getting a headache thinking of all these liberals, so I'll stop now, though there are plenty more on Fox.
In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if there are more liberals on little old Fox, than there are conservatives on all the networks, plus most of the cables COMBINED
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
The scary part is most of the
January 25, 2007 - 18:43 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveThe scary part is most of the lefties (who claim to be moderate/centrist types) think that FOXNEWS is a far-Right network when they are actually pretty moderate. I would hate to see the riots and warnings of the coming apocalypse the left would spawn if there was a truly Right-Wing network.
Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)
Juanito's book aggravated s
January 25, 2007 - 21:37 ET by JDWJuanito's book aggravated some dems.
Mort's a pussy, but consider all of the rinos he could replace.
Mara can be sensible, sometimes.
Humes is not perceptively astute yet he runs the show.
Hannity is not afraid to call out the dems, but why waste time with them?
Colmes is a waste of time.
O'Reilly would go on SNL if they asked.
I do not know anything about television news media, I do not watch.
JDW
Kerry: "You know, education, if you make the most of it ... you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq."
Only one of those people you
January 25, 2007 - 22:39 ET by melvinguntzOnly one of those people you listed is a liberal, Neil Gabler. The rest are moderate democrats and republicans. Fox is a far right network.
Examples:
Hannity-Far Right, O'Reilly-Far Right, Gibson-Far Right, Hume-Far Right, Barnes-Far Right, Cavuto-Far Right, Kilmeade-Far Right, Doocy-Far Right, Gingrich-Far Right, Kristol-Neo-Con, Kondracke-NeoCon, Morris-NeoCon
Mel... Snap out of it!
January 25, 2007 - 22:48 ET by bigtimerMel...
Snap out of it!
He left DIFI out, one of th
January 26, 2007 - 08:52 ET by JDWHe left DIFI out, one of the top 5 wealthiest senators who insists on raising taxes.
JDW
Kerry: "You know, education, if you make the most of it ... you can do well. If you don't, you get stuck in Iraq."
NBC-Uber Left, CBS-Uber Lef
January 25, 2007 - 22:53 ET by JerryNBC-Uber Left, CBS-Uber Left, ABC-Uber Left, CNN-Uber Left, MSNBC-Uber Left, NYTimes-Uber Left, WashingtonPost-Uber Left, LATimes-Uber Left, PBS-Uber Left, NPR-Uber Left, Time Magazine-Uber Left, Newsweek-Uber Left, Colleges&Universities-Uber Left, public schools-Uber Left, Tom Brokaw, Brian Williams, Katie Couric, George Stephanopolis, Keith Olberman, Rosie O'Donnell, Barbara Walters, Joy Behar, Matt Lauer, David Gregory, Tim Russert, Bryant Gumbell, Larry King, etc, etc.
And your point is???? Interesting that you had to include a weather man (Doocy), a former politician (Gingrich), and a former Clinton advisor (Morris) in your so-called list of Fox conservatives. WEAK! And please give an example of bias exhibited by Brit Hume.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
You're clearly a lunatic.
January 26, 2007 - 04:34 ET by Jack BauerYou're clearly a lunatic. So your opinion is worthless.
progressive = socialist = commie lite = laughably wrong about everything
Well close enough Jack Bauer
January 26, 2007 - 04:43 ET by SportPoliticsWell close enough Jack Bauer, but that melted nutz doesn't share his worthless opinion, he's pure lying troll.
No reply from cshredd on this
January 26, 2007 - 13:43 ET by mattmNo reply from cshredd on this????
It amazes me that "arguments" used by Libs can be completely obliterated by facts, so easily and so often, yet they remain Liberals and they continue to use the same bogus arguments...
matt -- how scary is that.Wha
January 26, 2007 - 13:49 ET by Jack Bauermatt -- how scary is that.
What sort of extremist moonbat do you have to be to think uber-liberal Mort Kondrake is a conservative!
Wow. If the guy was any wetter they could grow rice on him. I almost expect to see bleeding stigmata on the guy.
Though I have a soft spot for him as a person. He's just 100% wrong about everything.
"The 'token non-libera
January 25, 2007 - 20:39 ET by ckc1227"The 'token non-liberal Elisabeth Hasselbeck...' just shows that the View is 'fair and balanced' just like how many on this site like to throw Alan Combes out as proof that Fox is 'fair and balanced'. IMHO, neither Elisabeth or Alan are effective in their token roles."
3 liberals to 1 Conservative is not fair and balanced. You need at least 2 more liberals, unless they are rosie and joy. Then you better make it 5 more liberals.
Liberalism is the philosophy of the stupid.
Nothing Like Misrepresenting The Truth
January 25, 2007 - 19:27 ET by emjem24There's nothing like misrepresenting the truth for these witches. Why does Elizabeth put up with this? I mean, she makes conservatives everywhere look timid. C'mon. How about the research, Rosie and Joyless, before you make mischaracterizations? No, of course not, that would actually mean they'd have to shut their traps and be OBJECTIVE, something these virulent liberals will never understand.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
Just to lighten the mood --In
January 25, 2007 - 19:35 ET by Jack BauerJust to lighten the mood --
In a choice between the Donald and the Donut... and if you had to have one or the other
What would you rather have a comb-over like Trump?
Or a dumb-over like O'Donut?
Proud member of the all-powerful and vast militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex
Hola Sr. Bauer,I'd have to vo
January 25, 2007 - 19:52 ET by BlondeHola Sr. Bauer,
I'd have to vote for the hair.
After all, good wigs look, um good.
Dumb is dumb. Or maybe just dumber.
Whatever.
Don't forget, the Trumpster w
January 25, 2007 - 20:10 ET by FastEdDon't forget, the Trumpster would still look better bald, then roseboo after make over. (and Rosie O'Doughnut - has a hole in it, be nice)
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
If you aren’t smart, if you’re intellectually lazy,
January 25, 2007 - 21:33 ET by daveinbocaIf you aren’t smart, if you’re intellectually lazy, and if you are a morbidly obese motor-mouth moron, then you can turn a lazy liberal mosh pit like the View into a pitbull in heat spew session every day like Rosie does.
Barbara Walters invited an 800-pound guerilla into her salon and now can sit back and watch the ratings rise and the classiness plummet.
True Dave- Persoanlly I think
January 25, 2007 - 21:54 ET by NazarethTrue Dave- Persoanlly I think Barbara is rueing the day she found out Rosie was comming on the view, and I persoanlly think she did in fact tell the Donald those things about Rosie that he said she did. I just wish the truth would come out in a big way- Then, all that will be left watchign the shows are the 'see no evil' crowds that love angry lesbian co-hosts
http://sacredscoop.com
Question for Behar
January 25, 2007 - 21:57 ET by nkviking75Hey Joy, when in Dick Cheney's entire career has he had a chance to vote for gay marriage? I don't believe he's ever had the opportunity, even as a private citizen in Wyoming.
And how does having a gay family member require you to endorse gay marriage or any other aspect of homosexuality?
Could someone please explain
January 26, 2007 - 02:37 ET by Right Wing Attack DogCould someone please explain to me why this cretinous humanoid is allowed to have custody of children?
This is where hypocrisy gets
January 26, 2007 - 06:13 ET byThis is where hypocrisy gets a person. Sin only gives birth to more sin. First they want a parent to 'at least still show love for a homosexual child and not put the child out of the family.' Then comes the, 'well, if you are going to accept the child, you have to accept what the child is doing and embrace it.' Cheney is a hypocrite either way. Why? Because he is sitting on the fence.
He needs to get off of that fence and pick a side.
Okay, he has said that he is against the marriage amendment. But, why is he against it? He said it should be left up to the states and followed his statement up with stating that he has a 'gay' daughter. If he had not followed it up with that, one could say that he simply believes it is a state issue; but because he did say it, it shows that because of his daughter, he will not speak against such. He basically wants someone else to lower the boom. Hence, he in no way should be in power. If he were truly okay with homosexual marriage, it stands to reason that he would have said so. He would not have wanted even the states to deny homosexuals the 'right' to 'marry.'
Debra...
www.InformingChristians.com