LA Times’ New Strategy: ‘Break it on the Web, Expand on it in Print’

Photo of Noel Sheppard.
  • Bookmark and Share

In a sign of just how much the Internet is changing the way people get their news, the Los Angeles Times rolled out a new strategy Wednesday designed to focus more attention on web-based delivery.

As reported by the Associated Press (h/t Drudge): “The Los Angeles Times Media Group said Wednesday it is reorganizing the newspaper's newsroom into an around-the-clock operation with an emphasis on breaking news on its Web site and offering expanded coverage in its print edition.”

Certainly, one could ask: What took you so long? After all, though most dailies have a web presence that updates news that is reported throughout the day by the nation’s various wire services, most original content is reserved for publication at the start of the new day.

Unfortunately, in an Internet world, this makes such content stale and “old news.” It therefore seems that the LA Times has finally realized what many have known for years:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Under the new approach, the paper will focus on offering multimedia content on its Web site as stories unfold, as well as more personalized ways to get stories. One example is MyLatimes.com, which the Times launched Wednesday. The site uses RSS feeds -- a technology for notifying users of new entries on their favorite news sites and blogs -- to deliver content directly to computer users.

In its print editions, the newspaper will emphasize editorial analysis, investigative reporting, trend stories and features. Reporters also will be directed to report for both the Web and print editions.

"Our philosophy going forward is, 'Break it on the Web, expand on it in print,"' said Times editor Jim O'Shea. "We have to change what we are doing online, and also in print, to better engage readers and users who can choose every day among myriad sources for their news and information."

Of course, this announcement raises an important question: once LA Times readers have seen Paree, how are you going to get them back on the farm? 

Put another way, as paper publishers continue to expand their Internet strategies, aren't they moving towards the inevitable time when readers no longer need something thrown on their driveways at five o'clock in the morning containing mostly material they read prior to putting on their pajamas the night before? 

—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

A great tool for the print press, if they know how to use it

For years newspapers have been at a disadvantage to broadcast media because radio and TV can report immediately.  Now with the internet, the print media have their own means to report breaking news immediately.  While I'm not sure what it is, I believe the print side of the MSM can find a way to remain viable if they only have the creativity to figure it out.  (Hint:  Being fair would help them out a lot.)

I understand they will use Al

I understand they will use Al-Jazeera's web site.

I have been accused of never smiling. I remember in 1985 I saw the movie, 'The Jerk.' When Steve Martin said "I was born a small, black child," I smiled. I smiled because I found a flaw in the script. How could Steve Martin ever have been a small black child? He's white! Boy, I bet some heads rolled at that studio. - John Kerry getting down

Lord knows they don't need an

Lord knows they don't need any time to research.
Six minutes to put the left spin on anything and let 'er run!

These guys just don't get it.

These guys just don't get it.  They are scrambling to save their jobs with this mutt.  Meanwhile, whether it is on the web or in print, you can't tell the difference between the front page and the editorial page and all of it is liberal spew. 

but, what news will they break?

But, what news will they break?

On Tuesday, Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, according to news reports is credited with saying, "Israel and the United States will soon be destroyed."  Ok, that's not exactly new news - unless you live in LA and depend on the leftist media for your news. It turns out, from my questioning of many well educated elitist educator types (as well as other local leftist worker bees), they really have not heard that message yet. Usually they repsond, oh, that's just right-wing chatter, the man never actually said these things - "all taken out of context."

So, the LA Times once again does what? Well, they don't break the news to their readers. Instead we get an AP wire story on Wed. which, while ommiting the Israel and the United States will soon be destroyed, educates us with these little tid bits:

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday accused the U.S. of stirring up conflict between rival Muslim sects. (note: was it not al-Zarqawi, of al Qaeda fame, that was leading the attacks on the Shia civilians and their mosques for the stated purpose of starting a civil war -- something lost on the readers of the LA Times)

Ahmadinejad said. He also said his goals were peaceful. "Iran is not seeking confrontation with anybody," he said.

That's it folks. That's all the breaking news the LA Times is going to give their readers - Iran's view of the world, but only the part that blames America.

And now we sit and wait for the LA Times to exand the story - "in print." I'm seeing spider webs, while waiting.

La Times

New strategy for reporting the news? They should call it a new strategy for reporting propaganda. I have a suggestion for them that would work. Report the facts! Quit being so left wing biased.