Fourteen months after CNN’s John King showcased retired Marine Colonel Jim Van Riper to illustrate military disillusionment with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and President Bush’s Iraq policy, on Tuesday night, barely an hour before the State of the Union address, King checked in from New Bern, North Carolina and again featured Van Riper’s criticisms as if they had fresh meaning. In a story, near the start of the 8pm EST Situation Room, about the stresses on Marines and soldiers caused by repeated deployments to Iraq, King highlighted how “retired Marine Colonel Jim Van Riper is more optimistic now that the Pentagon is under new leadership, but says strategic blunders by the President and his team have left the military near the breaking point.” Van Riper asserted: “It’s a horrendous operational tempo and along with that you’ve got equipment problems. These men and women now are operating at a much faster pace than we did, particularly in Vietnam or Desert Shield/Desert Storm.”
King, who in 2005 touted Van Riper's take as "telling," then depicted Van Riper’s view as “striking” in a such a pro-Bush state: “It is striking in a state like this, a place with a deep military tradition, respect for the Commander-in-Chief, a state President Bush carried in two presidential elections, to hear such open skepticism, in some cases open criticism and opposition to the President’s war plan.”
During a November 29, 2005 Anderson Cooper 360 story on the opposition to the war from Republican Congressman Walter Jones of North Carolina, John King highlighted, as recounted in December 1, 2005 NewsBusters posting: "Vietnam and Desert Storm combat veteran Jim Van Riper supports the war and agrees any talk of specific withdrawal timetables is a mistake. But recently Van Riper wrote his congressional delegation saying he could no longer support the Republican Party, calling Iraq a textbook case of how not to wage a war. Van Riper says the President is in a mess of his own making for standing by his Defense Secretary." After a soundbite of Van Riper declaring that "I'm more convinced than ever that Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld will be the Republicans' Robert S. McNamara, when history's written that's the way he'll be viewed," King propounded: "Such talk in a patriotic place like this is telling.”
In between King’s two citations of Van Riper, CBS's Byron Pitts traveled to North Carolina and located the very same retired Marine to demonstrate that on the war "even some life-long conservatives are no longer hearing the President's message." On the September 7, 2006 CBS Evening News, Pitts touted Van Riper’s credentials (NewsBusters item with full transcript): "Retired Marine Corps Colonel Jim Van Riper is a Christian, card-carrying member of the NRA who voted for President Bush twice. But as more Marines have died in Iraq, his confidence in the Bush administration died as well." Van Riper asserted: "I don't mind arrogance except when there's dead bodies as a result." Pitts explained how "Van Riper will vote for Democrats across the board," and then cued him up: "If you could sit across from President Bush, what would you say to him?" Van Riper: "Sir, I'm disappointed."
—Brent Baker is Vice President for Research and Publications at the Media Research Center





















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Do we really know that he voted for the President twice? No
January 23, 2007 - 23:32 ET by terrigI happened to stumble upon this guy who gets the great parking spots at the PX and Commissary and listened to him for a while. I've been to New Bern, it's not anymore patriotic there then in a lot of small towns (except for some CA towns near SF) across America. Then having just sat through the very Junior and Immature Senator from the Great Commonwealth of Virginia say the majority of the military is against the war. I've not heard that from anyone I know although the left wing Gannett owned Military Times papers, (Army, Navy, Marines & Air Force) just said in their little article a couple of weeks ago. According to my husband there was a lot of "discussion" about that poll as they all wondered who they talked to or if they just talked to the disgruntled bunch that hangs around the one who gained weight on a hunger strike.
I'm disappointed that they continue to trot this person out while ignoring those who disagree with him. But what else should I expect from the MSM.
Happy Tuesday
Yeah, you do analysis of the
January 24, 2007 - 11:30 ET by BDYeah, you do analysis of the poll from the Military Times you will find that the majority of the respondants indicate that they believe the war in Iraq will be won.
Most respondants also believe that it will successfully conclude in a stable Iraqi Govt in 3-5 years.
How does Webb therefore assume that we are against it?
But the press will not ask this question.
There must be 5 million marin
January 24, 2007 - 11:38 ET by bassndudeThere must be 5 million marines, former marines and retired marines, and the MSM can only find one aginst the war? Sayes something about their so called majority. They must count this guy as more than just 1. He must be the Marine Corps.
Save a SeAL, club a liberal!!
This Van Ripper Guy Doesn't Represent All Military
January 24, 2007 - 11:49 ET by emjem24All the MSM could find was one guy to criticize the war and a retired Colonel too? Have you ever met Colonels? They're full of themselves, they're often abrasive, and they often don't treat their fellow officers any better than they treat enlisted men/women. I've heard of this first hand. It's interesting that he's done a Webb (what I now call someone who leaves the Republican party because of a single issue instead of sticking by the president and the political party at large). Van Ripper doesn't represent all actives or retirees for that matter. The guy is yet another retired, couch quarterback that would rather do the coulda, woulda, shoulda game than offer up any concrete solutions. Here's some advice for the deluded colonel, stop talking to the MSM (though you're probably more of a democrat than a republican because true republicans don't leave the party), stop giving second-guessing analysis, start supporting the troops, and start taking retirement seriously. You're retired, you're no longer in the military, we don't care what you think, you ceased being relevant when you retired. There are a lot of guys/gals out there just like this guy and it just gets tiresome after a while.
The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer. Air Force Motto
emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.
Have i ever met colonels? S
January 24, 2007 - 12:35 ET by BDHave i ever met colonels? Sadly I am only a LTC, can't wait until I get my "Ego Boost" like when I got my mandatory lobotomy when promoted to Major....
I'll be sure to keep all this
January 24, 2007 - 13:44 ET by j. frank wilsonI'll be sure to keep all this in mind the next time I hear Col. Ollie North blowing smoke.
How stupid is King?
January 24, 2007 - 11:49 ET by SportPoliticsHow stupid is King? It's striking to hear in a pro-military state, one Bush won ? How stupid can a person be ? I'll remind myself that everyone in that state voted for Bush, he took the entire population, 100% of adult voters, and further remind myself it is very striking because by golly we all thought 100% of the military was 100% behind everything Bush has done with the war on terror.
I mean, these talking heads ought to listen to their own words once in a while.
Gosh John King, you found one guy, and he's retired, and you reused him ! YOU'RE A LYING, PROPAGANDIZING IDIOT John King.
Hey, Brent, uhh, out of nearly 9 million people in NC, uhh, I ahh, found one that doesn't like John King, this is really amazing, it's like totally unexpected, given their support for the news and their proximity to DC, and pretty much shows John King has so blown it.
Gee - John King could have in
January 24, 2007 - 13:41 ET by j. frank wilsonGee - John King could have interviewed any of the following folks - here's enough stars for the Milky Way:
How about Gen. Joseph P. Hoar, USMC (ret.):
"This administration's handling of the war has been characterized by deceit, mismanagement and a shocking failure to understand the social and political forces that influence events in the Middle East...Sadly, the new strategy, a deeply flawed solution to our current situation, reflects the continuing and chronic inability of the administration to get it right...
"I returned from the Middle East two days ago [testimony January 18, 2007]. I've also had the opportunity before the holidays to speak with several senior active duty members of our armed forces. In virtually every case, knowledgeable people; military, political and academic, state that the solution to solving this civil war in Iraq is political, not military...Having said that, the proposed solution is: send more troops, and it won't work."
Or he could have interviewed Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey, USA (ret.):
"We are in a very difficult position created by a micromanaged Rumsfeld war team that has been incompetent, arrogant and in denial."
Or he could have interviewed Lieut. Gen. Wm. E. Odom about the "surge:"
"I cannot conceive of any achievable missions they could be given to cause a reversal."
Read their testimony in full - US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, January 18, 2007. There is a tremendous amount of excellent information here!
Or he could have interviewed
January 24, 2007 - 16:17 ET by BDOr he could have interviewed ME! (Not that I am self centered or anything....) Or any of my fellow classmates...
Tales from the Crypt..So "Van Riper" he's decaying on camera
January 24, 2007 - 22:30 ET by NOT FOOLED BY THE NEWSI'm "disappointed" this guy is still flapping his gums. Take the green skivvies off, grow some hair, stop calling walls "bulheads" and pens "inksticks" and move on brotha! Talk about "Tales from the Crypt"..This guy is so "Van Riper" he's decaying on camera.