ABC: Plame/Libby Trial to Remind Americans of 'Dirty Politics'

  • Bookmark and Share

On ABC's World News Saturday, correspondent Laura Marquez filed a story on the upcoming trial of Lewis Libby regarding his role in leaking CIA analyst Valerie Plame's identity. Marquez relayed the theory that Bush administration members deliberately leaked her identity "to get back at" her husband, Iraq War critic Joe Wilson, without mentioning the revelation that Richard Armitage, formerly an assistant to Colin Powell and a dove in the run-up to the Iraq War, admitted to having inadvertently been the original leaker. Instead of mentioning this aspect of the story which undermines the theory of a deliberate conspiracy, Marquez suggested "dirty politics" was behind the leak as she pointed out the trial's bad timing with the President's upcoming State of the Union speech. Marquez: "It will remind the American public just how dirty politics can get." (Transcript follows)

Marquez summarized the Libby story referring to the theory that the leak was an intentional retaliation against Wilson. Marquez: "At the heart of the mystery, leaking to the media the name of undercover CIA spy Valerie Plame. The apparent motive, to get back at her husband, Joe Wilson, for challenging the President's claims about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. The man in the middle, Scooter Libby, charged with lying to a grand jury about how and when he learned Plame's true identity."

Marquez relayed Wilson's criticism of President Bush for citing evidence that Saddam Hussein had tried to acquire uranium from Africa without pointing out that some, including former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, have argued that Wilson's own investigation had bolstered that claim rather than undermine it.

After airing a soundbite of liberal law professor Jonathan Turley asserting that the trial would "remind people how the war was sold to them and how the original justifications proved to be false," Marquez concluded: "And it will remind the American public just how dirty politics can get."

Below is a complete transcript of the story from the January 20 World News Saturday:

John Berman: "In Washington this week, the beginning of a trial that reaches the highest levels of power. Former White House aide Lewis 'Scooter' Libby is being tried on five felony counts stemming from the investigation into who outed an undercover CIA agent. While the case involves weighty issues of national security and could send a man to prison, for many in Washington it has all the makings of a good thriller. Here's ABC's Laura Marquez."

Laura Marquez: "The Libby trial is quickly becoming Washington's favorite parlor game, with a juicy plot and a who's who of characters."

Jonathan Turley, George Washington University Law Professor: "This is the World Series. This is the closest this city comes to a real organized sport. And everyone's going to be watching, you know. These are the Untouchables."

Marquez: "At the top of the witness list, Vice President Dick Cheney, Scooter Libby's former boss. Also, NBC's Tim Russert and the Washington Post's Bob Woodward. The plot reads like a whodunnit novel, with the Bush administration at its center. At the heart of the mystery, leaking to the media the name of undercover CIA spy Valerie Plame. The apparent motive, to get back at her husband, Joe Wilson, for challenging the President's claims about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. The man in the middle, Scooter Libby, charged with lying to a grand jury about how and when he learned Plame's true identity."

Harry Jaffe, Washingtonian Magazine: "This is not necessarily about obstruction of justice. It is about power politics in the media and how we play that game in Washington, D.C."

Marquez: "Harry Jaffe, a national editor for Washingtonian Magazine, says the trial gives people outside the Beltway a front-row seat to how the game is played."

Jaffe: "I don't think anybody knows how to play nice. I think this is the way we play, and negative character assassination is what we do."

Marquez: "In what can only be called bad timing, opening statements in the Libby trial begin Tuesday, the same day as the President's State of the Union Address. It was the President's 16 words he gave at a State of the Union Address four years ago which Plame's husband originally criticized."

George W. Bush, dated January 28, 2003: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

Turley: "This case is going to remind people how the war was sold to them and how the original justifications proved to be false."

Marquez: "And it will remind the American public just how dirty politics can get. Laura Marquez, ABC News, Washington."

—Brad Wilmouth is a news analyst at the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Dirty politics? How about '

Dirty politics? How about 'dirty journalism'? That's what I see at work here.

DSG

That's EXACTLY it!If they tol

That's EXACTLY it!

If they told the truth, the story would be WILSON LIED...

...I wish someone would sue someone so that someone on the Left would have to answer for this....

Wilson's turn will be coming

Wilson's turn will be coming down the road with time...one way or the other...

"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under."  Ronald Reagan

If the DimLib MSM beats this

If the DimLib MSM beats this dead horse much longer, they are going to have to get another horse.

Have any public opinion polls

Have any public opinion polls actually been done to determine how many Americans even know who Wilson and Plame are, or how many care about this story? Just curious...

Wilson and Plame Didn't they

Wilson and Plame

Didn't they found the Beach Boys and release Pet Sounds: the second most seminal rock LP of all time?

Proud member of the all-powerful and vast militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex

My opinion Del

My opinion is most all of the average Americans think Bush outed the helpless CIA agent lady almost getting her killed in order to be mean to Joe who told everyone exactly how Bush lied us into war.

 It is, IMO, most definitely the widely believed scenario. The MSM keeps playing because they get millions who buy everything they say against Bush in this.

Del,Heck, most Americans don'

Del,

Heck, most Americans don't even know who their own congressman is. :-(

Del,Heck, most Americans don'

Oops. Double post on the first try of the day. Bad omen, I'd say.......

Dirty politics indeed

Marquez:  "At the heart of the mystery, leaking to the media the name of undercover CIA spy Valerie Plame."  Ms. Marquez, Valerie wasn't undercover at the time of the incident and hadn't been for years. 

Marquez:  "The apparent motive, to get back at her husband, Joe Wilson, for challenging the President's claims about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction."  Ms. Marquez, leave the mind-reading to Kreskin.  Revealing that Valerie Plame sent her husband on this errand rebuts Wilson's claim that VP Cheney sent him.

Who's playing dirty here, Ms. Marquez?

Laura Marquez: "The Libb

Laura Marquez: "The Libby trial is quickly becoming Washington's favorite parlor game, with a juicy plot and a who's who of characters."

Jonathan Turley, George Washington University Law Professor: "This is the World Series. This is the closest this city comes to a real organized sport. And everyone's going to be watching, you know. These are the Untouchables."

It's all Beltway "Inside Baseball."  No one outside of the Beltway cares about Scooter Libby, let alone know who he is. 

Yet, Turley and Marquez seem eager to give this non-event all the significance and anticipation of the OJ Simpson trial.

Libby/Plame/Wilson and the lying MSM

I guess Ms. Marquez forgot the real dirty politics: According to MSM, "Scooter" Libby goes on trail  for leaking the name of a secret CIA agent (as revenge for Joe Wilson's false report on yellowcake uranium). The fact is that Libby is not charged with outing Plame, he is charged with perjury and obstruction and that charge comes down to nothing more than the fact that Mr. Libby's memory of conversations with three different reporter, at different times, differs from that of the reporters themselves. Here's how the judge in the case, Reggie B. Walton, summarized it in a recent ruling on evidence: "The charges against the defendant are based entirely  upon what the defendant has said was discussed during his conversations with these news reporters."  A little background: In the summer of 2003, Washington was abuzz with the allegations of Mr. Wilson, a former ambassador who had been to Africa on a fact-finding mission for the CIA. Mr. Wilson served as the then-anonymous source for several articles alleging deliberate inaccuracies in the Bush Administration's case for war with Iraq, before making the case himself in a July 6, 2003, New York Times op-ed. Mr. Wilson asserted that the now famous 16 words--"The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa"--were false. And, he wrote, Mr. Bush would have known they were false because he knew Mr. Wilson had already debunked the story. But, the truth was that  that far from debunking the Niger-uranium story, the information presented by the intelligence community to President Bush tended to support it. As the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) said: "Iraq also began vigorously trying to procure uranium ore and yellowcake"; and "A foreign government service reported that as of early 2001 Niger planned to send several tons of 'pure uranium' (probably yellowcake) to Iraq. . . . We do not know the status of this arrangement." Later the 16 words were declared to be "well-founded" by Britain's high-level Butler inquiry, as well as by a bipartisan report from the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee.  So, let us start with Plame's own husband, Joe Wilson, on the secret agent lie In July 2003, when Wilson demanded an investigation of a White House cabal for violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act by "outing" his wife, Mr. Wilson knew Ms. Plame did not meet the factual requirements for covert status under the act. She was neither covert at the time of publication nor had a covert foreign assignment within five years. However, she did write a memo pushing her husband as the one to make the trip and investigate the yellowcake rumor; a fact  that has been established  by a Senate investigation. In fact, Mr. Wilson's original claims that Mr. Bush lied about Iraq intelligence have been discredited many times over, including in a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee. Wilson's politics? Having Karl Rove "frog-marched" out of the White House "in handcuffs." That's the fate Democratic partisan Wilson once predicted for Rove. However, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald informed Mr. Rove's lawyers he'll bring no charges as part of his investigation into who leaked the CIA identity of Mr. Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame.  Let us again look at Joe Wilson: He recently asked a federal judge not to force him to testify in the CIA supposed leak case and accused former White House aide I. Lewis 'Scooter' Libby of trying to harass him on the witness stand. According to an Associated Press report from Washington, Wilson's attorneys wrote : "Mr. Libby should not be permitted to compel Mr. Wilson's testimony at trial either for the purpose of harassing Mr. Wilson or to gain an advantage in the civil case," Any doubts about why Wilson does not want to be put under oath? Please re-read the paragraph above. Let us move on to the fact that Richard Armitage, US State Department, after 3 years of watching the Plame/Wilson/Libby mess admitted he was the source of the leak about Plame...a fact the Special Investigator ignores. He also ignores this: During the investigation, Mr. Fitzgerald learned that a former New York Times reporter, Cliff May, twice told the FBI that, prior to Mr. Novak's column, he had heard in an offhand way from a non government employee that Mr. Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, a clear indication that her employment was known on the street. Ditto columnist Hugh Sidey, who wrote that Ms. Plame's name was "knocking around in the sub rosa world . . . for a long time."  Well, so much MSM who continue to promote the same partisan falsehoods, obfuscate reality and leave out facts. 

 Fitzgerald and Libby have c

 Fitzgerald and Libby have crossed legal paths before. Before he joined the Bush Administration, Mr. Libby had, for a number of years in the 1980s and 1990s, been a lawyer for Marc Rich. Mr. Rich is the oil trader and financier who fled to Switzerland in 1983, just ahead of his indictment for tax-evasion by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Bill Clinton pardoned Mr. Rich in 2001, and so the feds never did get their man. The pardon so infuriated Justice lawyers who had worked on the case that the Southern District promptly launched an investigation into whether the pardon had been "proper." One former prosecutor we spoke to described the Rich case as "the single most rancorous case in the history of the Southern District."

Two of the prosecutors who worked on the Rich case over the years were none other than Mr. Fitzgerald and James Comey, who while Deputy Attorney General appointed Mr. Fitzgerald to investigate the Plame leak. Mr. Fitzgerald worked in the Southern District for five years starting in 1988, at the same time that Mr. Libby was developing a legal theory of Mr. Rich's innocence in a bid to get the charges dropped. Mr. Libby and Mr. Comey tangled more recently as well. In 2004, as Mr. Fitzgerald was gearing up his investigation, Mr. Libby was the Administration's point man in trying to get Justice to sign off on the NSA wiretapping program. In early 2004, Mr. Comey was acting Attorney General while John Ashcroft recovered from gall bladder surgery, and Mr. Comey reportedly refused to give the NSA program the greenlight, prompting the White House to seek out Mr. Ashcroft in the hospital in a bid to circumvent Mr. Comey.

Did this long personal history play any role either in Mr. Fitzgerald's  wrong-headed, fact-denying,  single-minded pursuit of Mr. Libby, or in Mr. Comey's decision to grant the prosecutor plenary power even though the central mystery of the case had already been resolved???? 'Nuff said.

British government

The British government found that Bush's 16 words concerning yellowcake in the 2003 SOTU address were "well founded." Our own government found the same thing.

ABC News apparently doesn't think it's worthwhile to tell viewers that.

Also, Joe Wilson wrote two editorials prior to the March 2003 in which he claimed that IRAQ HAD WMD. Those editorials are hidden from the media on Wilson's own web site: www.politicsoftruth.com