When I served as Mayor during the 1990’s, the Administration and Congress helped local communities fight crime by providing funds to hire more police, and making it harder for criminals to get guns. As a result, crime decreased. Over the past few years, however, the approach seems to have been switched. Now cities are often seeing less police but more guns on their streets. These new crime statistics indicate that we’re doing things backwards. – Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence1
Brady Campaign’s new spokesman seems full of high-sounding verbiage these days, but the Clinton administration’s crime policies–contrary to Helmke’s claims–fell short on crime fighting:
· The “100,000 new cops” announced by Clinton amounted to less than half that in terms of real staffing increases;
· Audits found significant corruption in how the funding was spent, resulting in fewer cops being hired than was budgeted;
· More officers did not enhance law enforcement effectiveness in arresting perpetrators, as clearance rates–the ratio between closed cases versus crimes committed–actually fell.2
ATF referrals for violations of federal gun laws barely increased during the Clinton administration, actually dropping 30% during his first term.3 Helmke also ignores the fact that violent crime peaked in 1991, before any Clinton policies could take effect,4 and that Clinton’s Brady Law and “assault weapons” ban were not effective in reducing crime,5,6 rebutting Helmke’s “making it harder for criminals to get guns” claim.
Fewer Cops, More Crime?Helmke promulgates this equation: Fewer Cops + More Guns On the Street = More Violent Crime. If true, right-to-carry (RTC) states, where law-abiding citizens can carry concealed handguns for defensive purposes, should have more violent crime, since there are more “guns on their streets.” Also, states with lower law enforcement officer (LEO) rates should have more violent crime. So Helmke’s equation assumes that states with both RTC and low LEO rates should be the most violent.
Sorting states by 2005 LEO rates (number of LEOs per 100,000 population) and separating them into quintiles, we find that as the LEO rate increases, so does the violent crime rate. In fairness, this correlation might exist because municipalities respond to higher crime rates by enhancing law enforcement. Nevertheless, the first quintile had the lowest LEO rate of 71.9% national average and a violent crime rate 73.3% and murder rate 55.8% national average. The fifth quintile had the highest LEO rate of 145.2% national average, also had higher violent crime and murder rates as well: 138.2% and 159.7% national average, respectively.
We also find that seven states in the fifth quintile are non-RTC states: their average LEO rate is 154.6% U.S. average, the violent crime rate is 153.1%, and the homicide rate 184.5% national average. Since these rates are higher than the entire quintile’s rates, this brings the “RTC effect” into the equation.
Separating states by RTC status, we find that RTC states’ average LEO rate is 29.7% lower than non-RTC states, yet their violent crime rate is 21.6% lower, and murder rate 30.4% lower. Non-RTC states have higher rates than the national average in all three categories: LEO, 125.4%; violence, 119.1%; murder, 129.3%. Meanwhile, RTC states average rates are less than the national average: LEO, 90.3%; violence, 93.5%; murder, 90.0%.
The one possible bright spot in all this for Helmke is to correlate violent crime trends with average LEO staffing rates for the years 2000-2005. Here we find that the first quintile (lowest LEO six-year average rate) averaged only a 0.4% drop in violent crime rates from 2000 through 2005, while the fifth quintile averaged a 6.9% reduction. This may be a pyrrhic victory, however: the fifth quintile (six are non-RTC) has double the LEO staffing rate, but also has more than double the violent crime rate, of the first quintile (all RTC states). Simplistic thinkers might conclude that more cops equals more crime, but this would be as silly claiming that more guns means more crime.7
Practice What You PreachHelmke claims that the Clinton administration “helped local communities fight crime,” implying he supported these efforts as mayor (from 1988-2000) of Fort Wayne, Indiana. During his last five years as mayor, the national violent crime rate fell at a 7.0% faster rate, murder fell 12.6% more nationally, and rape fell 12.1% faster, while the aggravated assault rate in Fort Wayne actually rose 15.9%, trailing the national index by 38.4%. In the five years since Helmke was voted out, Fort Wayne has beaten the national violent crime index by 11.2%.8 This begs the questions: Paul, why did you fail so miserably on your watch; don’t you think you should accept personal responsibility instead of blaming law-abiding citizens you never met?
ConclusionHelmke alleges “these new crime statistics indicate that we’re doing things backwards,” but by using his sources and criteria, current crime data shows large errors in logic and the glossing over of one vital concept: it’s not the number of guns on the streets that causes more crime, it’s who carries them. Brady and company focus on gun violence as a ploy to justify civilian disarmament, but show scant interest in reducing violent crime. Helmke’s record as mayor shows a continuation of this strategy.
Endnotes1 Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, Brady President: Violent Crime Surge Helped By 'More Guns, Less Police' Approach, December 19, 2006. http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=ind_focus.story&STORY=/www/story/12-19-2006/0004494147&EDATE=TUE+Dec+19+2006,+02:56+PM
2 Howard Nemerov, Did COPS Help? ChronWatch, September 1, 2006. http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=23501
3 Howard Nemerov, Only the Truth Will Set You Free, ChronWatch, May 26, 2004. http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=21413
4 Table 1 – Crime in the United States by Volume and Rate per 100,000 Inhabitants, 1986-2005, Federal Bureau of Investigation. http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/documents/05tbl01.xls
5 Charles F. Wellford, John V. Pepper, Carol V. Petrie, et al, Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review, Committee on Law and Justice, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Copyright 2005, pages 93-97.
6 Findings from the Task Force on Community Preventive Services, First Reports Evaluating the Effectiveness of Strategies for Preventing Violence: Firearms Laws, Centers for Disease Control, October 3, 2003. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5214a2.htm
7 Compiled from FBI data. Email request for spreadsheet.
8 Compiled from FBI data, Table 8 – Number of Offenses Known to the Police. Email request for spreadsheet.
About the AuthorHoward Nemerov is a frequent guest on NRA News. He can be reached at HNemerov [at sign] Netvista.net.














Editor at Large

Comments Policy
What Mr. Helmke neglects to m
January 18, 2007 - 18:45 ET by MikeBWhat Mr. Helmke neglects to mention is that Operation Exile worked where it was implemented. All Operation Exile was was a cooperation between local law enforcement and the U.S. Attorney to enforce the laws already on the books. The local law enforcement officers even noted that on drug raids the drug dealers no longer had firearms in the buildings being raided. Operation Exile worked without a huge influx of federal funds, and without a huge increase in the number of cops on the streets. It worked because the criminals figured out that it was no longer profitable for them to engage in breaking gun laws. One gang-banger got 3 years federal time in a facility in another state merely for having one bullet in his pocket.
The Brady campaign will not mention this because it worked without disarming the law-abiding.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
I live in a concealed carry s
January 18, 2007 - 19:00 ET by RunningBeerI live in a concealed carry state and I know perps think twice before accosting somebody here in the metro area. Most of our shootings are of the drive-by nature since gang members don't have fortitued to fight someone face to face. Of course the guns these guys use are the illegally obtained kind so gun laws are useless.
In the rural areas gun crime is almost nonexistent. Virtually all rural residents own guns and you never now who just might start shooting back at you!
You say you never know who ju
January 18, 2007 - 19:12 ET by MikeBYou say you never know who just might start shooting back at you? Man, that's gotta hurt! I wonder how he explains that to his homeys? :->
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
(Great job as usual, Mr. Ne
January 19, 2007 - 06:35 ET by sarcasmo(Great job as usual, Mr. Nemerov.) One factor these groups -- and people in general -- tend to ignore is age. The population is aging in this country, and males in the 16 to 24 age-range tend to commit the most crimes and do the most stupid stuff in general as a group, on average, and over time. Since there are fewer and fewer in the stupid-range and more and more old geezers like me, the lower level of crime over time makes it very-tempting for politicians & police to personally take-credit for what is clearly a demographic & biological phenomenon. So they invariably-do, since doing so also makes higher-spending look like it's a good solution -- which is invariably the natural line for the news media to take on the issue, since they love nothing more than increases in government spending. IMO.
JMR