Jefferson, Adams, Paine... You're Fined $200,000 By The Fed. Gov't!

  • Bookmark and Share

Thomas Paine wrote one of the most famous tracts of the Revolutionary era. Titled "The Rights of Man", it was a tract that many said, should it not have existed, the Revolution could not have occurred. In fact, historians contend rightfully, that the writings of our founders and their contemporaries were incredibly important as much for their content as for their ability to spread the ideas over which we went to war with Great Britain across the hard to travel geography of early America.

Our Founders were true "grassroots" organizers. Without their words, we could not have won the Revolution.

Now the Federal government wants to destroy that same sort of process used to spur our citizens to free themselves from Monarchical despotism. The Washington Times reports that the federal government today wants to quash the ability of small citizen's groups to disseminate information to like minded people by instituting oppressive reporting rules and by claiming they are "lobbyists" bound by Congressional oversight. And if they don't they face oppressive fines.

Under the legislation, grass-roots organizations that attempt to "influence the general public" to contact members of Congress would have to register as lobbyists and file financial reports -- or face a $200,000 fine. The requirements could apply to a preacher who goes on TV or radio and tells listeners to call their congressman in support of a particular issue, such as a constitutional amendment against homosexual "marriage."
It could also affect internet Bloggers and emailing services that advocate for certain policies or political positions before an audience of hundreds or thousands of continuing visitors to their sites.
But issue groups spanning the political spectrum -- from National Right to Life and Focus on the Family to the League of Conservation Voters and the American Civil Liberties Union -- say the expanded definition of lobbyist will imperil citizens' constitutional rights to free speech and to petition the government.

"This bill goes way too far," said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU's Washington legislative office. "This gets at the citizen groups who are really the ones making their voices heard about our democracy."

And so it does. With their ballot box win behind them and in their rush to fool the public that they are "doing something", the Democrats are trying to force a bill on the American people that is anti-American and little more than a refined version of the Alien and Sedition Acts of the 1790s that threw newspaper editors and political leaders in jail in this country.

Senator Robert F. Bennett (R., Utah) attempted to add an amendment to the bill that would exempt grassroots agencies.

"This should be struck from the bill," Mr. Bennett said. "I was taught in civics in high school that [contacting Congress members] was what we were supposed to do."
Not if your imperial Democratic Senate has their druthers, Mr. Bennett.

Our Founders fought for the God given rights of men and one of those rights is the right to free political speech. Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Thomas Paine and many hundreds of their brothers at arms toiled for years behind their pens to raise the consciousness of their fellow citizens to free us from the shackles of the King. We bloggers are the direct descendants of the tract writers, newspaper publishers, and article authors who were our Founding Fathers.

Right now, they all are spinning in their graves as Congress tries to hobble free speech.

Read commentsFree email alertsTake action

Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Registration Leads to Confiscation

The global historical record is clear: when civilian firearms were required to be registered with the government "for safety concerns," they were inevitably confiscated soon after. Now the Dems want to register our First Amendment rights, so they may more easily be confiscated. This will be done to "avoid even the appearance of impropriety during elections or while Congress is in session." (Essentially Ginsberg's justification for ruling the McCain-Feingold campaign finance act was Constitutional.)

I find myself agreeing with t

I find myself agreeing with the ACLU. It makes me queasy. I must lie down now.

The Imperial Congress

The primary reason the founding fathers created Checks and Balances among the three branches of government was to prevent any one of them from becoming an imperial entity.

For the last six years, the Democrats have been trying to do just that by questioning and undermining the Constitutional powers of the President, and suppressing free speech.

To the Democrats, the Constitution is an inconvenient document that keeps them from reorganizing America into their utopian idealism.

One of the things that disa

One of the things that disappeared today was a nice conversation with Warner where I said something like, "including anonymous speech, which would probably be reflexively-restricted today, despite the history of the founding fathers," and he said, "yeah." Anyway, the right to say things -- even nasty-things anonymously or pseudonymously -- is a basic constitutional right in the USA. But it's under attack, obviously. And supporters of this idea DO NOT deserve political power in America.
JMR

An argument for term-limits?

Mindblowing, isn't it Warner?  Not so much this ridiculous legislation as Americans voted for representatives that would propose such nonsense.  The Taliban must be pleased. 

Is term limits the answer?  Would love to get your take on term limits if/should circumstance allow.

I had posted on this thread b

I had posted on this thread before the "crash" and wanted to just put a link in, instead of posting everything again. The link simply leads to an article of mine that gives my thoughts on this issue--as to what I learned studying the bill. I respectfully disagree that the bill poses any threat to true grassroots groups.

http://www.debrajmsmith.com/sb1.html

Debra...
www.InformingChristians.com