GMA’s Sawyer Speaks to 16 Female Senators: No War if Women Ran The World?

Photo of Scott Whitlock.
  • Bookmark and Share

On Wednesday, "Good Morning America" anchor Diane Sawyer spoke with all 16 female members of the Senate. The January 17 interview, broken up into two segments, ranged from silly questions, such as whether more women leaders could result in less war, to queries about whether America is too prejudiced to accept a female president. One question that did go unasked is whether Senator Barbara Boxer, who didn’t appear on camera, should apologize for her recent insinuation that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is oblivious to the effects of war because she doesn’t have children. One would think that in a group of professional women this would be an important topic. Apparently not. Sawyer began by asking the assembled ladies whether or not more women presidents would lead to peace:

Sawyer: "Do you believe that if there were more women presidents in the world, there would be less war? How sure are you that there would be less war? Do you think, actually, war would be--"

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Maria Cantwell (D-WA): "Well, I think, Diane, I think that women are agents of change. And while we're only 16 percent of the United States Senate, we are trying to make change. So, it doesn't mean that you're going to predict the outcome, but it does mean you will hear about collaboration, you will hear about cooperation, and you'll hear about a format I think brings people together. I think that--"

Mary Landrieu (D-LA) "Let me say this, I'm not certain we would have less wars, but I am certain there would be more collaboration. So, while we can't prevent war, we can maybe extend the peace longer, maybe we can bring it more readily. We don't ever claim that could empower, end war. But I do think women bring a different perspective on just how much is enough when it comes to bloodshed and expenditure of funds for weapons."

Clinton (D-NY): "You know, Diane I just got back from Iraq and Afghanistan and in both places, in addition to meeting with our military leaders and the governmental officials from both countries, I met with groups of women, and women who are now in positions of responsibility in both governments. You know, just begged for help from American women, particularly those of us in government, to give them some resources and support. So I don't think that you can foresee or foreordain any particular outcome. But I do think what we're all saying is, that there is at least in our experience, more of an openness to process, to bring people together to the table, that collaboration and collegiality. And that in and of itself can cause positive results. Not that, you know, it's going to end all wars or something as hopeful and aspirational [sic] as that. So I, I do think there are some differences we could build on."

The mostly Democratic women continued. Uninterrupted by questions from Sawyer, they seemed to engage in a coordinated, and not very subtle, effort to build up Hillary Clinton:

Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) "I think women look at power differently, too. I think men have a very -- I was going to say sort of up-scale view of power, that it’s got to really emanate from the top. And most women have gotten wherever we've gotten because of hard work, doing your apprenticeship, earning your spurs, working your way up. It's a very different thing. So you intend to be much more inclusive."

Susan Collins (R-ME) "But I don’t– I don't want to leave the impression that a woman president wouldn't do what is necessary to defend this country. If Elizabeth Dole had been successful and had been president, I'm sure that she would have reacted very strongly and effectively to the attacks on our country on 9/11."

Claire McCaskill (D-MO): "I want to point out, this is a tough, tough group of women. Don't cross these women. If you, if you want to mess with America, if you want to do something that harms our country, I think that at the same time we talk about how we are good at finding common ground and we care very much about collegiality, I don't want this interview to end with anyone being mistaken, whether it be Hillary Clinton or any of these women, if the time comes and any of us have to make a tough decision that has to do with war or defending our country, every woman in this room is ready to do that because, believe me, if she got here, she's tough."

Incidentally, the comment by Susan Collins, was the only time a Republican Senator spoke in the first segment, broadcast at 7:08am. Is this a coincidence, or is ABC trying to assist the promotion of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign?

In the second part, which aired at 8:14, Sawyer became less subtle and wondered if America could handle a woman president:

Sawyer: "There was a Newsweek poll recently that showed that 35 percent of American people do not think America is ready for a woman president. It doesn’t mean they’re saying they wouldn’t vote– They just don’t think America is ready. Are you all absolutely confident?"

Hillary Clinton (D-NY) "We don’t have any way of knowing that."

Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) "I think things that are changing rapidly, as more women become mayors, as they become governors. As they represent us in the state legislatures. As they do well, as they are effective, suddenly people look and say, ‘Ah hah. I know I’m going to get a fair shake. That’s who I’m going to vote for.’"

Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) "That’s why, when Claire and I ran this time, it was a lot easier for people to imagine us in the U.S. Senate, because of the women sitting here today."

Sawyer: "Okay, but let me ask you this. Let me ask you this. What has taken America so long? We’ve got, what, six, seven female presidents, six prime ministers that I know about in the world."

Elizabeth Dole (R-NC): "We still have a long way to go."

Lincoln (D-AR) "But my mother told me, she said, this is history. And it’s going to take time. It’s not a fault. It’s a fact that there aren’t more women elected and it will be our fault if we don’t change that."

Susan Collins (R-ME) "We’re starting to break the glass ceiling for governor. I think that parallels the corporate world where we’ve had a hard time breaking the class ceiling where to become CEOs. And I think, as there are more and more women serving as CEOs, we’re going to see a greater openness to women serving in executive positions in the political world."

If Ms. Sawyer’s questions seem familiar, they should. In November, the ABC anchor interviewed Illinois Senator and 2008 presidential aspirant Barack Obama. Sawyer asked him if America is ‘more racist or sexist’ and then repeated the query on the next day’s program.

—Scott Whitlock is a news analyst for the Media Research Center.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Diane Sawyer: "Do you be

Diane Sawyer: "Do you believe that if there were more women presidents in the world, there would be less war?

Answer: Margaret Thatcher was one of Ragan's stedfast allies in the cold war.

Also, what about the claim that may wars were fought BECAUSE of a woman! (Hellen of Troy, Cleopatra...etc...)

CITA,And don't forget....Magg

CITA,

And don't forget....Maggie went on the offensive against the Argentines over the Falklands.  And won.

I have no problem with a woman president, as long as she has an (R) behind her name.

I still would. Snow from Main

I still would. Snow from Maine is too much of a Dem in Republican clothing for me. It depends on how solid she is in my way of thinking.

Sen. Olympia Snowe (the lette

Sen. Olympia Snowe (that embarrassing letter before S) - Maine

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

Rice and Dole are worthy of c

Rice and Dole are worthy of consideration.

CIA,Like all these hypothetic

CIA,

Like all these hypothetical questions, Sawyer probably meant (without saying it) a liberal woman as president. Perish the thought that a conservative woman would be elected first, but if she was, she wouldn't count... 

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

patently condescending, stereotyping, gender-role reinforcing "u

I am surprised at the patently condescending, stereotyping, gender-role reinforcing "uterus-line", that this whole party bought into!

As though genitalia was a determining factor in anything other than whether you stand or sit to pee...

Halfwits on parade.

"I know I have the body

"I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king, and of a king of England too; and think foul scorn that Parma or Spain, or any prince of Europe, should dare to invade the borders of my realm."

Elizabeth 1 (1553-1603), in an impassioned rally to the troops at Tilbury (River Thames, London) on the approach of the Spanish Armada, 1588.

Sure, nothing warlike there. She kicked the Spanish Butts of Ale all the way back to Madrid, by the way.

Proud member of the all-powerful and vast militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex

And after imprisoning her opp

And after imprisoning her opposition (Mary, Queen of Scots) for 19 years, Elizabeth I had her whacked. 

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

unsane  -- yep, no one messe

unsane  -- yep, no one messed with good Queen Bess.

To the leaders of her council who opposed her on the aforementioned Mary Stuart, Elizabeth's cousin..

"I will make you shorter by the head."

Cold, baby. Cold.

And witty too, considering she's talking about beheading them men.

Proud member of the all-powerful and vast militarist/industrialist/capitalist/zionist-bagelist complex

That may or may not be true b

That may or may not be true by pure statistical fortune--but if avoiding war is to be done in her view, regardless, how would Diane feel about wearing a burqa?

Liberalism is a convenient lie.

Diane, of course war would be

Diane, of course war would be obsolete if women ruled the nations of earth *cough Golda Meir cough Indira Ghandi cough*.  Additionally, everyone would be educated, there would be no sickness, death would be conquered, road rage would disappear, climate would even out over the world, and little children would fly kites in skies filled with rainbows.  By the way, Diane, exactly what kind of mushrooms did you have on your pizza last night?

"A communist is someone who reads Marx.  An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx."  Ronald Reagan

Sawyer (paraphrased, in her w

Sawyer (paraphrased, in her whiney, mawkish manner): So, if we had a woman president would there be less war?

Mr. Kafir (in his manly logical conservative no-nonsense tone): Look honey, if a woman was president, there certainly would be less wars. You know why sweetheart? Well, because WE'D ALL BE DEAD BECAUSE SOME DUMB BE-OTCH DIDN'T HAVE THE BALLS TO FIGHT BACK. That's why dearie. Now, take you fake journalism degree, and your fat salary, and go interview someone your own speed. Say, Brad Pitt....

Mr Kafir, I think you just de

Mr Kafir, I think you just destroyed any chance of ever being interviewed by La Sawyer...

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

liberals

Typical liberal tripe. This issue is not man vs. woman, it's liberal vs.conservative. It's courage vs.cowardice. It's talk vs. action. I'd take a Margaret Thatcher or Jeanne Kirkpatrick over a Kerry, Biden, Kennedy, Dodd, Obama et.al. any day of the week. What has it got to do with gender? Nothing. Just another liberal canard. BTW, I'd wouldn't take Hillary if she were a hermaphrodite.( come to think of it...hmmm ).

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

Bow Down To The Master

Mr. Kafir, love it! You're good and I like you! Let me say this right now...I bow down to the master (in full bow). I'm not worthy.

The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer.  Air Force Motto

emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.

Sure there would be less war

Sure there would be less war if Hillary were president. She would focus on killing unborn children instead of our enemies.

Clintonistas

Don't forget that it was under Janet Reno's justice department that the assault
on Waco
happened. And I will bet my wallet that It was Reno that decided to invade a private
citizen's home to give Elian Gonzales to her fellow communists as a goodwill
gesture.

They will fight but will somehow tell you that fighting for appeasement
is somehow better than fighting for survival.

I have no problems with a wom

I have no problems with a woman as President (I would vote for Condi in a second!)  What I do have a problem with is this BS view that things would be so much different or better if women were running things.  Between being in the Navy, and working as a defense contractor for the Navy, I've worked in businesses that we're highly male-dominated... on the order of 80% of employees being guys.  I now work for a company that's about 9,000 employees and about 80% women, and I can say there's zero difference between how men run things and how women do.

How can a company be 80% women when they make up a skosh over 50% of the population?  Becasue the hiring managers are women, and just like guys in that job, they tend to pick people like themselves.  Backstabbing and corporate intrigue?  It's all here too!  When layoffs had to be made in 2005, all of the folks who got laid off were guys.  Women can wear pretty much anything they want, guys have a highly limited dress code.  Women get hired to provide most of the call center duties, and why?  Because there's a stereotype that they can handle issues better, which is no better than the stereotypes that women complain about men having about them.  What does our company view as it's biggest challenge?  The inability to identify and implement needed changes... so much for women being so apt at implementing change.

I've learned that given the power and authority, there's no difference between men and women as they both handle business exactly the same way.

Please, please, please, pleas

Please, please, please, please tell me the name of your company. Please????

Down boy! Sounds like a co

Down boy! Sounds like a company full of Yakitty-Yak women anyhow. You don't seem like the kind of guy that's gonna take lip from any broad!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

9000 employees, 80% women...

9000 employees, 80% women... I'm guessing Hooters.

truth. Little know fact: Ho

truth. Little know fact: Hooters has 15,000 Hooters girls world wide. Would love to go to that convention!

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

I wish!!!  Not that I notice

I wish!!!  Not that I notice <cough> but most of the ladies I work with wouldn't quite meet the job requirements at Hooters.  Sad to say I work in the medical insurance industry.

Ahh, then you have a mainte

Ahh, then you have a maintenance department soley devoted to fixing or replacing "damaged" chairs. Just guessing...

"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...

I don't know if you realize w

I don't know if you realize what you have just written here, but in civilian companies run by men, reverse the genders and none of this could go on without there being a discrimination complaint. Also, the dress and sex harrassment rules were all put in place by women's lobbying groups.

When women get into power, it becomes like school and personal choice are often taken away. I think there is a difference in the way men and women rule and if women were meant to rule they would have ruled long ago.  The entire idea of women being allowed full reign into a world built by men was a liberal idea.  That can be accepted. But the idea that the society would have to fundamentally change to accomodate these women has been disastrous. It's resulted in decreased productivity, lawsuits and boys now not going to college.

Think about the way girls behaved in high school and think about putting them in charge. That's the society you want to live in?

Right on

Right on, Tony S. No proof women would do any better. More liberal nonsense.

NEVER,NEVER trust a liberal

Hillary

Sounds like Hillary is testing some of her campaign material.

The question is an insult t

The question is an insult to women, in my opinion. (Yeah, I have male anatomy so by modern feminism my opinion isn't worth anything.)

To Elizabeth I and II.

To Boudicca

To Cathrine the Great

To Hatshepsut

To Mary Queen of Scotts

To Margaret Thatcher

To Golda Mieir

Those are just a few names that rose to the surface of my male brain. If Diane Sawyer can't think of at least those names then she doesn't deserve what they are overpaying her.

What's more is the MEN who are overpaying her are overpaid, too.

Sloppy, lazy reporters, lik

Sloppy, lazy reporters, like Katie Couric. Keith Olbermann. et al. And overpaid! Great point.
WhatAMaroon

The office of the president h

The office of the president has no gender as long as he/she can defend and protect its people. The problem is not us, its the islamo-fascist who started this war. When they recognize the value of the lives of their women and children in their society, maybe they'll stop advocating of killing us and also their people. Woman is a third class citizen in their world. 

Just thinking...a woman US president will embolden their desire to kill us all, for it is an abomination to have females rule over them. Think of the female guard in Abu Grhaib...Come on all you leftist-feminist, prove me that I'm wrong with my theory.

hatered

Chief:

They don't need any more excuses to hate us, but I believe you are right. This would be near the top of their list of reasons..

NEVER, NEVER trust a liberal

How many domestic wars[figh

How many domestic wars[fights] are started by womens nagging?

I rest my case.

Years ago, similar gushing wa

Years ago, similar gushing was done over the Norwegian government (I think they focused on some other Scandinavian parliaments as well) and their electing female PMs.  They gushed over how much more compassionate their governments were, how health care and child care got more attention, and so forth.  It was clearly, looking back, a love fest of the worst elements of feminism and socialism.  But why should I or others be surprised.

You need to watch out if the Socialist Segolene Royal is elected President of France this spring.  If you think this interview with these Senators was bad, you ain't seen nothing yet (if Royal is elected president).  You heard it here FIRST.

By the way, there are plenty of female leaders over the years I am quite fond of.  Such as Margaret Thatcher (1979-1990), Catherine the Great (1762-1796), and Elizabeth I (1558-1603).  Let's see the media gush over them!  Yeah, right... 

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

Gender shouldn't prevent you

Gender shouldn't prevent you from voting for someone, nor should it be a reason TO vote for someone.  What are your qualifications, your worldview, your policies, etc. -- that's what's important, not what you look like.

John Gibson was making a similar point on his radio show last night about Sen. Obama -- he's getting so much attention BECAUSE he's black.  What else does he have to offer (aside from sugary platitudes)?  No one seems to know.

It seems that the people who keep score based on gender, race, etc. (number of female Senators or black NFL coaches, first female Speaker or President) are the ones who keep making it an issue.  Most people, I would think, are beyond that. 

Personally, I want the best person for the job, regardless.  I don't care if the next President is female or the next Steelers' coach is black, as long as I think they're the best qualified to get the job done.  Liberals keep wanting to fill quotas.

MERIT? What's THAT?

Hmmm...voting for someone based on MERIT...selecting people for jobs and positions based on MERIT...

Damn!  What a shocking concept!

"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???."  - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)

Drop your logic and back aw

Drop your logic and back away slowly.

Liberalism ≠ liberty.

If a good 'cat-fight' is any

If a good 'cat-fight' is any indication, wars would be much more brutal than they are now. Fighting women use everything at their disposal: fingernails, teeth, long hair, shoes, lamps...whatever they can get a hold of. I will never forget the first real cat-fight I saw while in junior high school. A girl with leukemia (bald from chemo) grabbed a cheerleader's very long and beautiful brown hair, wrapped her fist up in the hair and proceeded to repeatedly bash the cheerleader's face into her knee. Black eyes, broken nose, chipped teeth...all because of a snide remark. I don't think there would be less war BECAUSE women were in control. I really don't think the severity or war would lessen much either. War is war, and these days the politicians think they know how to run a war by crippling our military...if anything more women in charge would probably shrink our military to nothing.

Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)

Do you think these women sena

Do you think these women senators would ever be consistent with their logic and say that our military is now weaker because of having women soldiers? 

They can't have it both ways - either women are more peaceful and nurturing and are therefore not fit for active military duty, or they are just as strong, competent and capable as a man and would fight wars exactly the same way.

Dutch

Let me say this, I'm not cert

Let me say this, I'm not certain we would have less wars, but I am certain there would be more collaboration.

You mean the type of "collaboration" that Nancy Pelosi is doing with those she opposes, the Republicans? 

Dutch

Nah, no war if women ran the

Nah, no war if women ran the world - just nuclear cat fights. Yikes, now I'm in for it...

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

I agree with ya Chris....I m

I agree with ya Chris....

I most likely would of already nuked a couple of prime pieces of property....you give them warnings and warnings, they still do not heed, oh well....

"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under."  Ronald Reagan

Gulp. Yes, ma'am.The dogs bar

Gulp. Yes, ma'am.

The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on.

- Arabian Proverb

    On behalf of semi-inte

    On behalf of semi-intelligent American women everywhere, I apologize for these bobble-headed phonies AGAIN.  What a digrace.  I am embarrassed for them.  Pure, unalterated JUNK!!!!  AAAAARRRGGHHHH!!!!!!!! 

  "Oh, the humanity!!!!"  -said by a reporter at the crash of the Hindenburg.

P.S.  I have never been part

P.S.  I have never been party to a cat fight nor seen one.   Sounds, perhaps, a bit like some of the porn (or fantasies) a few of the males who visit this site seem to be partial to, hmmm?

"He who has a thousand friends has not a friend to spare, and he who has one enemy will meet him everywhere"          -Ali ibn-Abi-Talib, 4th Islamic Caliph

I second that Kath!I am not e

I second that Kath!

I am not embarrassed for them though, they are just too full of themselves, and simple to be shameful, let alone know how absolutely stupid they look to most real women out here, when you have airhead bimbo's like Sawyers, Couric, WaWa,  leading the way in the media....pathetic bunch all.

"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under."  Ronald Reagan

vanity of women cause most wars

Women consume much more than men and most wars are about consumption. (More than 75% of retail is for women.) Because women see children as extensions of themselves, a woman's innate vanity helps them to protect and to care for their children.

But today, with so many childless women or mothers who use nannies, a woman's self-absportion is like a rudder out of water and out-of-control. (Just look at all the millions of dollars the women on this panel spend on clothes, cosmetic surgery, makeup, etc.)

Also, let's not forget that it was a woman who sent men off to explore for a shorter route to India -- to increase consumption. Queen Isabella, a woman, is therefore responsible for what Leftists call the rape and plunder of North America.

That's a tad over the top.I a

That's a tad over the top.

I am a single woman...and I am supporting my elderly parents.

I wish I had the bucks to consume like a wealthy man does....big fast cars, really big boats (and not that I'd want one...but men like this always have a trophy chick....expensive).

So tell me again how I'm so self-absorbed.....

BTW....Isabella was married.

oh boo hoo to Blonde

First get femiNazis to stop generalizing, and I might think about it. And, my dear, how about dads who can't afford to support two families (one from first marriage and a second marriage) and who get thrown in jail by benevolent females who have revived debtors' prisons? A lot of these women live on Easy Street and spend the money frivolously; you know, easy come, easy go. Sorry to hear about your situation but women have been shielded from reality for too long. Welcome to the real world!

Well that's helpful.I have no

Well that's helpful.

I have nothing to do with "feminazis"....so what is your point?

Your contention is that women are the ultimate consumers....I think not.

Sorry...if dad can't support two families...he shouldn't have had two families, now , should he?

Get a grip.

You are full of spite and hot air.

not a bad dame

She has some qualities. It doesn't mean she can't hate Mexicans. If they aren't illegal aliens, she can tolerate them but she'll never like them. They're so . . . despicable. You know; breeding.

Quit stalking me, Tumbler.It'

Quit stalking me, Tumbler.

It's getting to be seriously creepy.

Oh C'mon!

j17ghs, them's fightin' words! I can't believe you're saying this. Look, I'm married and eventually do want children. However, I do not see children as some selfish extension of my self (some women do). Look, I buy clothes, cosmetics, but I've also used the money that I have earned to put into investments as well. I even pamper my pugs by buying them things too. With Isabella, she ruled with Ferdinand and THEY sent explorers to find India which indirectly lead to the New World. Your comment was hoplessly a generalization and doesn't point to some of the things that also divide women and that liberal women have yet to answer for: abortion, education, poverty, employment, sexism, etc. I know what you're saying and that your message is that there are women out there that are extremely selfish and who want what they want when they want it. Please, don't generalize though. All women are different.

The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer.  Air Force Motto

emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.

President Jane: &quot;I'm doi

President Jane: "I'm doing all the work around the world - feeding, protecting, all that stuff.  Cleaning up the world.  What the hell do you do?"

Average Third World Fascist: "Nothing, dear."

President Jane: "You're G*d D$%n Right you don't do anything.  I'm spending all my time running around the world trying to pass the Kyoto protocols, feeding the hungry children of the world, cleaning all of your D$%n oil spills, dealing with those a&^hole Islamofascists, and what help do I get from you??  What the hell do you do all day, when I'm not around??"

Average Third World Fascist: "Well, I....."

President Jane: "No, stop right there, let me answer for you, your running around with your Third World Fascist friends, talking about your G*d D%$n nuclear weapons, while I slave away around the world trying to make things better for the both of us.  Well, F#^k that I'm sick of it!!"

I'm Not Ready

I'm not ready to see a woman as president and I'm a woman. After reading the quotes from all these women senators, I'm more convinced than ever. I hate all the false bravado, "I am woman, hear me roar," crap. We've already seen the emotional, hysterical attacks on Condi Rice by Senator Boxer. Is that how far women have come? I've seen how a lot of the female senators with "d" next to their name are acting. It's disgusting, it's not professional, and it's hardly presidential. This especially goes for Hillary because she's one of the worst offenders. Her constant flip-flopping, false ra ra support for the military, overt self-promotion would give even John Kerry a headache.

The difficult we do immediately; the impossible takes a little longer.  Air Force Motto

emjem says: When your brain's stuck on liberalism it self-destructs.