Despite the media's fawning over Jimmy Carter and the publication of his new book as reported by NewsBusters here, here, here, and here, the former president has suffered even further embarrassment as another fourteen members of The Carter Center have resigned. As reported by the Associated Press (hat tip to Drudge, emphasis mine throughout):
Fourteen members of an advisory board to Jimmy Carter's human rights organization resigned on Thursday to protest his new book, which criticizes Israeli policy in the Palestinian territories.
The resignations from The Carter Center board are the latest backlash against the former president's book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid," which has drawn fire from Jewish groups, been attacked by fellow Democrats and led to the resignation last month of Kenneth Stein, a center fellow and a longtime Carter adviser.
The article continued:
"You have clearly abandoned your historic role of broker in favor of becoming an advocate for one side," the departing members of the Center's Board of Councilors told Carter in their letter of resignation.
The 200-member board is responsible for building public support for the Carter Center. It is not the organization's governing board.
NewsBuster Tom Blumer had previously reported the resignation of Kenneth Stein here, with an elaboration reported by me here. The article continued:
Steve Berman, an Atlanta real estate developer among those who resigned, said members have "watched with great dismay" as Carter defended the book, especially as he implied that Americans might be afraid to discuss the conflict in fear of a powerful Jewish lobby.
Berman said the religious affiliation of the resigning members, which include some prominent Jewish leaders in the Atlanta area, didn't influence their decision.
It will be interesting to see how many media outlets pick up this AP story.
*****Update: NewsBuster Gary Hall wisely pointed out that I omitted the final paragraph with a truly delicious tidbit:
The resignations came a day after Congileo and officials at Brandeis University said Carter will discuss the book at the Waltham, Mass., campus. The Nobel Peace Prize winner will not, however, debate the book with outspoken Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, as Brandeis originally proposed.
Why should Carter debate Dershowitz when a fawning media are available to not challenge a word he says?
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Maybe they all resigned for h
January 11, 2007 - 15:00 ET by Roger the ShrubberMaybe they all resigned for health reasons.
You know, trying not to die from boredom from listening to ex-President Carter drone on and on is no easy task. Imagine the strain on the heart and mind...
Do you think Carter SuperGl
January 11, 2007 - 17:09 ET by MightyMouthDo you think Carter SuperGlued is fingers to his chin for the cover of the book?
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
RELEASE THE SWAMP RABBITS!
January 11, 2007 - 20:53 ET by Interested and concerned CDNRELEASE THE SWAMP RABBITS!
Good Heavens
January 11, 2007 - 15:01 ET by misterbillGood Heavens--Jimmy's ineptitude had transformed to bigotry. So much so that he gave himself away in his book. Even his strongest backers are unable to defend his published thoughts.
I thank heaven that he has given himself away. I deeply regret he is from my state.
Maybe Jimmy can line up a pre
January 11, 2007 - 15:14 ET by seth_kegleyMaybe Jimmy can line up a press conference and give us his famous "Malaise" speech in reference to the Palestinians... that would seem a logical response to all this controversy...
seth I cant help myself
January 11, 2007 - 15:42 ET by misterbillseth I cant help myself--Jimmy thinks Malaise is an Asian country!
My bad I forgot he thought he
January 11, 2007 - 17:46 ET by seth_kegleyMy bad I forgot he thought he was talking about Asian Foreign Policy during that speech... either way it might fit into all the idiotic assertions he makes now so let him give it a shot... lol
"Outspoken former president"
January 11, 2007 - 15:10 ET by Gary HallWhat about:
The AP wire concluded with (my bold) : "The Nobel Peace Prize winner will not, however, debate the book with outspoken Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, as Brandeis originally proposed."
And JC is not outspoken? My recent observations are that we get to hear his outspoken views almost each and every week, compliments of the MSM. Dershowitz - I've heard a peep (via the MSM) out of him once this year.
PS. Noel, in response to your question, surely, fewer than 5% of the voters in the country will every hear of this news. Additionally, given hundreds of future opportunities to ask the former president about this (and so many other historical blunders of his) they will pass. After all he is not a Republican.
Gary Hall
January 11, 2007 - 15:29 ET by Noel SheppardGH,
Thanks for the tip. Amended. ns
I'm awaiting the breaking new
January 11, 2007 - 15:12 ET by bigtimerI'm awaiting the breaking news from the left-wing media in all forms...come on, lets hear a report about this non-stop, that is what it would be if it was anyone with an 'R' after their name, you think Matthews, one of Jimmah's speech-writers or Brian Williams who used to intern for Carter will have a big report, mere mention?
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
Man, I am a bit embarrased th
January 11, 2007 - 15:37 ET by ChrisMatthewsiswackMan, I am a bit embarrased that he was president when I was born
Consider yourself lucky. H
January 11, 2007 - 15:59 ET by Prester JohnConsider yourself lucky. His name is on my Army commission and der Schlickmeister's is on my retirement certificate!
PJ...LMAO!I feel your pain!Th
January 11, 2007 - 16:04 ET by bigtimerPJ...
LMAO!
I feel your pain!
Thanks so much for your service sir.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
You can't feel half my pain.
January 11, 2007 - 16:26 ET by Prester JohnYou can't feel half my pain. At least I had Ronaldus Magnus as CINC and saw the Army rebuilt from what it was when Carter was the Prez.
Geez, Prester, I thought I had it hard from the Army.
January 11, 2007 - 21:00 ET by acaiguanaGeez, Prester, I thought I had it hard from the Army.
I wouldn't wish that on a three legged dog.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
ChrisM,You think you are emba
January 11, 2007 - 16:10 ET by Dave ROops. Itchy trigger finger I guess.
ChrisM,You think you are emba
January 11, 2007 - 16:13 ET by Dave RChrisM,
You think you are embarrassed? Not only is he from my home state, he was governor here before he became president.
It gets worse:
While governor, he attended our church and even taught sunday school. (Thankfully, I was a mere child at the time so, so I didn't have to attend)
It gets worse still:
My brother and Amy were about the same age. They hung out together sometimes at church.
As for the 15 people who have now left him, it appears they know when to get off a sinking ship.
Carter has is own agenda, and
January 11, 2007 - 15:39 ET by GalvanicCarter has his own agenda -- independent of US polciy --- and this book appears to have driven a big wedge between the agenda and his staff.
Why the advice of a man whose Presidency was such a disaster, is praised by intellectuals on the Left and pundits in the media, only verifies his bias.
Galvanic, re-read your last s
January 12, 2007 - 23:05 ET by MikeBGalvanic, re-read your last sentence. "Presidency was a disaster..." Of course lefty intellectuals and media pundits would praise him: he did more to weaken the U.S., economically, militarily and in credibility throughout the world, than almost anyone else, with the possible exception of the Horndog.
"A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Americans...afraid to discuss
January 11, 2007 - 17:00 ET by mattmAmericans...afraid to discuss the subject for fear of a powerful Jewish lobby?
Who "fears" the "powerful" Jewish lobby? Paranoid Jew-hating Nazis? Ultra-Liberal democrat ex-presidents? Kinda makes you wonder if there's a difference...
While watching the coverage o
January 11, 2007 - 21:31 ET by Cape ConservativeWhile watching the coverage of President Ford's funeral, I was reminded once again how first class former presidents act. They get on with their lives and don't believe their every word should be listened to and considered above the current president's decisions. It seems former presidents Carter and Clinton haven't gotten the message. They need to understand that their time has passed!
Of course, neither of them qualifies as "first class"
How many people work(ed) at t
January 11, 2007 - 23:02 ET by entHow many people work(ed) at the Carter Center? More than 15?
I think that was it. Of c
January 11, 2007 - 23:45 ET by terrigI think that was it. Of course not counting the people who do the jobs Americans just won't do.
Carter has angered even left-
January 12, 2007 - 07:43 ET by daveinbocaCarter has angered even left-leaning NGOs with his pious proclamations during "election monitoring" he does in countries like Ethiopia. He parachutes in just before election day, grandstands a bit, anoints the election fair and well run, exits, and then ignores the fact that dozens of people are killed the next day because of rampant corruption at the polls. Meanwhile, hard-working int'l civil servants who actually note fraud and malfeasance have to deal with the consequences. The MSM, of course, never report Jimmy's tomfoolery.
Ditto for Israel and his hypocrisy in accepting Arab monies. JC thinks that AIPAC destroyed him in the '80 election. Unintended consequence: destruction of the Soviet Union by Ronald Reagan and friends. That's another reason bumbling Jimmy hates Israel.
Carter's true nature is exposed and no MSM outlet cares.
January 12, 2007 - 07:53 ET by acaiguanaCarter's true nature is exposed and no MSM outlet cares.
Now, if any other Nobel Peace Prize winner had their entire support structure resign en mass, one that they themselves had assembled for self-aggrandizement purposes, it would be world headlines.
It was obvious at the time of his Nobel award that the Nobel committee was only doing it to highlight their distaste of President Bush's Texas roots and 'cowboy' approch to foreign policy. It had nothing to do with merit.
The facade that Carter of all people, a Democrat from a tradition of election fraud and cheating in his own party, would possibly be able to pronounce any election as 'fair' and 'corruption free' was always a joke.
Another case of hidiing in plain sight, I suppose.
Now this absolute failure of a human being is being exposed for what he really has always been.
A fastideous petty man with bitter hatreds riviling any name calling ever thrown by Progressives toward Mel Gibson.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "I love blind Monkeys and any inference that I am making fun of blind Monkeys would be wrong.