Brief reference to previous Today show global warming talk:
[7:20am]
Meredith Vieira: "You know we were talking about global warming yesterday Al-"
Al Roker: "I saw."
Vieira: "-and wondering if the world is coming to an end but I have proof is coming to an end-"
Roker: "What's that?"
Vieira: "-because I had a house full of boys last night watching the football game and this morning I got up, the basement is clean. Something's wrong, something's not natural or right."
Roger, you know you're going to get slammed for that Rastafarian jab right? Some of the people on this board take affronts to religion VERY seriously, and I'm sure it's not just limited to when Christianity is the target of ridicule in a claymation show aimed at stoned undergraduates....I mean that'd just be downright hypocritical, right? Just warning ya...
Michael Moore = Ann Coulter = Rosie O'Donnell = Sean Hannity. Idiocy is not partisan.
What are you saying? If someone happens to take offense at something that you don't think is worthy of the offense taken, and they argue strenuously against your point, and maybe even against your tone, that's the equivalent of a "slam"?
Like I care if one of the approx.14,000 Rastafarians in the United States come to this site and protest, or if some of the more zealous Christians on this site get bent out of whack. I am quite confident the uproar over the Rastafarian story would be much larger than if I posted a story about a vicar taking a dump on the Virgin Mary. After all, THAT would be art, dammit!
I have survived "Left-handed Albino Lesbians" and "Lawn Bowlers for Christ" in the past. I think I can handle Indigo Freemanvibe, Rupe. Thx for the head up, though!
JAB...I have, and passed it to personal friends of mine via email, and here on NB awhile ago with the link to misterbill and anyone else who was interested, glad you are doing it again! They need all the help they can get.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
Probably not too many wrestling fans on this board, but on Monday night "WWE Raw" on the USA Network featured a match pitting a Rosie O'Donnell lookalike against a Donald Trump lookalike. The "match" was purely played for laughs...
When introducing the combatants, the announcer began with, "From ABC's 'The View', weighing in at God only knows how much ... Rosie O'Donnell!"
During the match, one of the play-by-play announcers said, "Rosie's a tough woman; she could probably lick any girl on our roster!" (I know, I'm a horrible person for finding that funny. Sue me.)
"Trump" won after knocking Rosie out by headbutting her - with his hair.
Well, I see the msm is at it hard and furious to undermine the Presidents speech tomoorw night, all the leftists are terrified, the terrorists and enemies world-wide are laughing their rears off, annd we have had, and still do, and will tomorrow night after the speech.
The dem's in congress with Murtha in the Chair are slowly undoing what the conservatives have done to protect this nation, let alone making us go through the UN on some of the passage, such as boarding a ship that we think has nuclear proliferation on it, that is how we got Libya and Khan ect.. and undoing some of the progress John Bolton made...oh and the good ol' 9-11 commission recommendations they are using as a guise for some of it...it would take too long to explain, you just have to listen to it.
We better pray that this does not get through the House and Senate and it is not veto proof.
Btw...the dem's have already undone a two-third majority rule to raise taxes put in by Newt's bills, just a simple majority now.... they use the ruse pay as you go for that little scheme...
Don't you just love the leftist/communist party? Be very wary people in big cities, I would be. We are for sure going to be in more danger than ever if any of this passes.
The republicans had better learn to fight and fight hard, or we are all doomed. speaking softly and carrying no stick has got them nowhere, they had better learn to speak out loudly, and use that big stick...the enemy within does.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
"Btw...the dem's have already undone a two-third majority rule to raise taxes put in by Newt's bills, just a simple majority now.... they use the ruse pay as you go for that little scheme..."
How much you want to bet that this pay as you go crap the Dims keep spouting will turn into a pay again when you get there and keep paying long after you've arrived.
RB...Exactly, it is just a ruse to raise taxes, if they have now way to pay for their entitlement programs, they have to raise taxes somewhere...that simple. If they want a real pay go rule, they cannot create and form an entitlement or program unless they have a way to show that they can pay for it without raising taxes (which they can't)...simply put, that is why they made it a simple majority instead of two-thirds of the House vote to raise taxes again on us.
The leftists/socialists/commies make me ill.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
She could have very easily left out the second sentence and she would've had a completely rational comment. There was no need for her to bring in the "illegal war" to put the loss of her home into perspective (which I am sure was well insured).
"The Donald" has said, "Any publicity is good publicity."
The Hollywierd elite will do anything to try to remind us of their perceived "illegal war" even when the subject has nothing to do with it. Does she have any living sons or daughters BTW? --just checked Wikipedia (cringe!)-- The only child she has that I know of (if still living) is 41 years old. So not only bringing up the war in her situation is completely irrelevant, it is downright absurd. Maybe...maybeIF there was a draft in effect and he was 17-25 years old, I could see her saying something like that.
I mean C'MON!!!
<\rantoff>
Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)
Gee Balboa. yeah, she put perspective on her house burning.
That's right up there with a family losing a brave soldier loved one in a War on Terror to protect this country from Terrorism; right there with a GI coming home with a loss of limb (that would an arm or leg or both or all); right up there with heros who sacrifice their lives in front of irrefutable losing odds in a firefight to turn the entire battle and result in a victory and the lives of his comrades; right up there with the incredible training and talant that goes face down in the mud for her ungrateful silly insured and overly expensive and exclusive petty little material possession;
HER FRIGGIN' HOUSE.
Bal.
You jumped the shark on this one. You are completely useless for any purpose that I can see with this attitude.
You're completely missing the point. She's saying losing her house is nothing when compared to the possibility of having a loved one in harm's way. Don't you agree with her? It is only a house, is what she's saying.
No, it is a cheap shallow shot using the house and the war in the same breath as if they were on the same playing field in terms of some human tragedy. She is obviously a cheap and shallow person who could bring the two events together and juxtapose the two as if there were any relevance to either.
There are a lot of things she could have said.
"I still have my health?"
"I'm not dead from being trapped in the fire?"
But to bring the two types of events together is beyond shallow, it is offensive and it is obtuse and it is insulting to every serviceman and every person who ever went to War, went through the pain of separation from loved ones, who have to live with suffering the rest of their lives, so this over stuffed silly actress can whine about how lucky she is not to have anyone in her family in Iraq?
I'm of the mind she is unlucky that no one in her family thinks enough about her to bother to defend the country or her from Islamic fanatics. My only regret over her stupidity is that Islamofacists didn't burn her g***d*** house to the ground.
She'll rebuild her friggin' house. Who is going to tell our people in Iraq that the Cut and Run coward Democrats lost their war for them?
I guess her child was too "smart" to get "stuck in Iraq".
Hey Suzanne, you can quit character acting as the ditzy blonde now.... ooops.... I forgot... Three's Company was more of a documentary as far as you were concerned.. No acting involved.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
I agree. I would infer nothing but positive feelings from comparing losing all my worldly possessions being better than having a son or daughter in Iraq. Suzy is definitely all for the Iraq War.
No, the word "illegal" was never used, that I agree with you on that, bro.
It's ok that she is against the war. Plenty of people are. I was just taken aback that, even though she just lost her mansion, all she could do was take a shot at the armed forces and be political. Methinks someone is obsessing a bit much.
As an aside balboa...I have lost everything I owned also when my rented home burnt to the ground while I was at getting ready to go to work from another job, (I was working two jobs at the time), my son was being baby-sat elsewhere (so I thought) I watched it burn to the ground before my eyes, the last thing you think of is world problems...trust me..including a war going on.
She spoke those words for attention...period...and she got it.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
I think it was an apt comparison for the moment. I lost my house. End of the world? No, because there are worse things out there. I could have a loved one facing death every day, being shot at, having to contend with IEDs, etc. I mean, we are at war, right? So it's obviously on her mind.
"I could have died", or "my husband could have died", or "none of my neighbors died" would have been sufficient, Bal. Your defense is getting silly.
Why didn't she say "The fire was like the flames of suffering the poor people of Darfur are enduring", or "this tragedy pales in comparison to the plight of the poor refugees fleeing Somalia"...
Believe me, if I just lost a mansion, I would have been a bit more focused on me, myself, and I, and a lost less focused on "Sheehanizing" the event.
Yeah, well she did the reaching. She brought it up.
No one put a gun to her head and made her think "Oh, what a great opportunity to show my hurt is nothing compared to having a son in Iraq." As if having a son in Iraq was a tragedy.
Do you agree having a son in Iraq is a tragedy? If so, then I must be really tragic having a son-in-law in Afghanistan.
Do you think before you jump onto every bandwagon you find to point out the unfairness of the NBuster's here when we point out stuff? Do you think this makes you the paragon of moderation?
Well, I can tell you what moderation begets. It begets Liberals. And Liberals think nothing at all of trashing someone or something to advance their agenda that their ideas are 'normal'; their brains are nuanced; and their thoughts are meaningful for the rest of us plebes out here.
I reject with all my fiber of being this condescending (look in the mirror over your history here pointing out our fallacies) attitude that would jump over to the side of someone who thinks it is charming to denegrate the sacrifices made by our military in Iraq has any possible place or point to them losing a multi-million dollar mansion in Malabu of all places.
Oh good grief. Please get more melodramatic. I don't think I'm the paragon of anything. I'm not condescending, I don't think I'm better than anyone, I don't think it's "charming" to denigrate sacrifices. I simply have a different point of view and post my opinion. I tend to think that people make too much of inconsequential comments or incidents. So sue me.
Summers said it when she tied the two things together. She equated having a son in Iraq with a personal tragedy. No way can you say she wasn't doing that.
You defend her against criticism. You must agree with her.
I think if I had a son in Iraq I would be an absolute wreck worrying about him, hoping he was safe. I'd be frantic wondering whether he was OK, if he was under fire, how dangerous an area of Iraq he was in. Given my choice, I'd rather have my house burn down than have a child in harm's way in Iraq. I think that's what she was saying.
You're making stuff up now, just to be insulting. You're the one that keeps using the word tragedy, not me. And you have no idea what kind of son I would raise.
I notice your irritation. When you dish it out you forget. Last night didn't you pester me?
About how, "In my day, blacks sat in the back of the bus," so therefore, I'm a racist?
ACA; I think balboa means; look at who supports you now; the guy who irks everybody, Tumbler!
Shame on you, ACA. You should denounce me. Balboa rejected me and he denounces me.
It's OK to insult Tumbler and make up things about him, like racism. Just be good to balboa, don't hurt his feelings.
Think of a celeb having a house burn back in 1944, and saying, "Well, this is nothing compared to having a son fighting in Europe." It would be taken as an homage to some of the "real heroes" of the time, wouldn't it? Not as a slam at the war. Difference in semantics? Well, we ARE talking Suzanne Sommers here, not Douglas Fairbanks.
The problem may be the media's painting of this war versus WWII. It may not be with the comparison itself. Not every celebrity's reference to the war has to be a "slam." I don't personally think Suzanne is slamming the war here. I just think she was giving an example of something worth worrying more about than her house. Maybe phrased it poorly, that's all.
I don't think she's a savvy-enough opportunist to have really meant to make a political statement. At worst, it's a case of "open mouth, insert foot." IMHO, of course....
You may be right but how do you think we've been conditioned to see our Hollywood friends? Yeah. I personally don't care what she said and am glad no one was killed. But anything related to the war from the west coast is met first with suspicion.
I caught it Dr. Love...the press played it big-time this afternoon....of course because of her inference to Iraq, it wasn't as if she didn't know what kind of press she would get from that statement, let alone being guests on Larry King and other shows for a pity party...again.
Suzanne Somers is and always has been a useless idiot...except for the guys who just had a lot of fantasies.
LOL....Thought I had better add that in before I get screamed at by some of my friends here...I know where MM or Rog or a lot of you will go with this.
Btw...this fire is under investigation, it would be too funny if they started the fire themselves or hired someone to do it.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
Oversight and Government Reform Committee Ranking Member Tom Davis (R-VA)
released the following statement today on a committee report that sheds
important new light on Sandy Berger’s theft of classified
documents from the National Archives. The report makes it clear
that the full extent of Mr. Berger’s document removal can never
be known, and consequently the Department of Justice could not assure
the 9/11 Commission that it received all responsive documents to which
Mr. Berger had access.
“My staff’s investigation reveals that President Clinton’s
former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger compromised national
security much more than originally disclosed,” Davis said.
“It is now also clear that Mr. Berger was willing to go to
extraordinary lengths to compromise national security, apparently for
his own convenience.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price,
peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of
soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
The interesting part is they were feuding with one of Russia's closest allies, Belarus, not Europe.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price,
peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of
soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
Also, Ahnold is not only promising health care for illegal children, he is now proposing health care for ALL Californians, illegals included. Courtesy of Doctors and employers, of course. On the plus side, maybe Ohio and Michigan can snag some of the jobs that are sure to flee that state if this goes through
Maybe if CA does turn into a full-board Nanny State, they will show Leftists everywhere just how screwed up the idea is, as jobs and businesses flee the state as you mention.
If CA thought the early 1990s were bad, they ain't seen nothin' yet.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
CKC, it's doubtful Michigan will snag any of those jobs. Businesses are already closing and leaving state. And people are starting to follow. The housing market is saturated with houses that are not selling. It's a buyers market in Michigan.
"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." - George Santayana
CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez was sworn in on Wednesday for a new six-year term that he vowed to use to press a radical socialist revolution including nationalizations that have roiled financial markets.
Emboldened by his landslide re-election win, the typically combative anti-U.S. leader has gone on the attack, deciding to strip a private opposition TV channel of its license and take over some major companies owned by foreign investors.
"Fatherland, socialism or death -- I take the oath," Chavez said.
The man who calls Cuban President Fidel Castro his mentor changed tradition by draping the presidential sash from his left shoulder instead of his right in what he says is a symbol of his socialist credentials.
Legislators at the ceremony in Congress chanted "Long live socialism."
This crap has just got to stop.....UNBELIEVABLE!!!!
Imagine sending your kids off to school, but when they get to the bus they are told they can't get on because they speak English.
That's right, English.
It happened to a few children in St. Paul and now the school district is apologizing.
Rachel Armstrong sent her kids to pick up the bus as usual Monday, but after the driver let the kids on, he told them he would not pick them up again. He even said he wouldn't take them home that afternoon.
Armstrong left work early Tuesday, forced to pick up her kids from Phalen Lake Elementary School.
Her twin girls, 10, and her son, 8, were kicked off their regular school bus. They were told by the bus driver the route is for non-English speaking students only.
"I was furious. I was at work and I was just mad." Armstrong said. "I felt like we were being discriminated because we speak English. Just because they speak English, they can't ride the school bus. I mean, this is America, right?"
WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 — Democratic leaders said Tuesday that they intended to hold symbolic votes in the House and Senate on President Bush’s plan to send more troops to Baghdad, forcing Republicans to take a stand on the proposal and seeking to isolate the president politically over his handling of the war.
Senate Democrats decided to schedule a vote on the resolution after a closed-door meeting on a day when Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts introduced legislation to require Mr. Bush to gain Congressional approval before sending more troops to Iraq.
The actions of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid in their first 100 hours in power have demonstrated the Democrat Party's inability as a political party to take leadership. One of the hallmarks of leadership is the ability to listen to and incorporate diverse ideas which have merit to achieve a goal. The second hallmark of leadership is the recognition that what is popular is so because it was easily spun that way by the omission of the facts. A real leader believes the means must be justified by the ends it proclaims to achieve, that's called consistency and integrity. It should go without saying that leadership is the ability to get people to follow you, however, there is a difference between leadership and salesmanship. A salesman doesn't have to take responsibility of the consequences as a leader does. A salesman's goal is to sell, and telling you want you want to hear is a standard tactic in sales. A leader takes responsibility for the outcome and tells you what you don’t want to hear.
Contrast this with late President Eisenhower's views on leadership: - Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because they want to do it. - Pull the string and it will follow wherever you wish, push it and it will go nowhere at all. - Our real problem, then, is not our strength today; it is rather the vital necessity of action today to ensure our strength tomorrow. - You don't lead by hitting people over the head-that's assault, not leadership.
What the Democrat Party has demonstrated time and again is their ability to sell anything. We see this salesmanship highlighted by the back peddling of several issues they campaigned upon by which the Democrat Party came to power. Chief among those campaign issues is Iraq. The Democrat Party capitalized on the dissatisfaction over the progress in Iraq, their goal to achieve power was to sell the notion that they had a better idea to resolve the problem. However, within a week of the election, Howard Dean, the DNC leader and architect of the campaign, was waffling on the question of a troop pull out from Iraq. How could Howard Dean waffle unless he didn't believe in what he campaigned upon? Howard Dean, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi now tell the President they won't go along with a troop surge, it appears the Democrats are quite happy with the status quo, which is contrary to their campaign pledge. Which brings us to the inevitable conclusion, Howard Dean's campaign was about salesmanship, not leadership. The Democrat Party had no intension of delivering what they promised, they sold America to buy their vote. Just as the salesman over promised to get that sale to collect the money, the Democrats over promised to get your vote. Even Cindy Sheehan and Michael Moore have come to the realization that they were sold and most conservatives recognize these two aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer.
Which brings us to the actions of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid excluding the Republican Party from their constitutional duty to share in governance of the country, after all Democracy isn’t a winner take all contest. What they did was to prevent any amendments on bills under consideration before congress. This is was despite their campaign pledge for bipartisan government. Their refusal to allow a debate of ideas is not bipartisan governance and is a failure of leadership. The refusal to explain your reasoning’s or omit facts is an act of salesmanship, not leadership. No matter how popular the idea they have spun, the failure of the means not being justified by the ends is salesmanship, not leadership. The Democrat Party has proclaimed it is in leadership, however, their means of executing power is salesmanship. Leadership engenders trust, so far by the track record, the Democrat Party has demonstrated a total failure in this regard by all the back pedaling.
President Bush must demonstrate his leadership skills and veto each and every bill from the so-called one hundred hour Democrat agenda. Once he does this, it will force the so-called leaders (in reality salesmen) of the Democrat Party to act as leaders by honoring their campaign pledge of bipartisan governance. Ironically, it will be a Republican President who must teach a Democrat Party what leadership really means. Leadership is not criticizing from the sidelines, leadership is participating at the head of the line. Leadership is not about popularity, it is about responsibility, something Democrats still have to learn. Nor is leadership about forcing ideas down the throats of an unwilling population, that's called tyranny, something else the Democrats still need to learn about. In the end, it is irrelevant what you thought the product was that you bought, the real issue is that you bought it and the salesman has your money.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius
Comments Policy
And now, today's Shrub Report
January 9, 2007 - 16:58 ET by Roger the ShrubberAnd now, today's Shrub Report:
Just on Drudge: Sandy Berger is even more of a traitorous scumbag than we thought… Culture of Corruption, indeed.
Your Global Warming update.
The Titanic begins it's long, slow descent to the bottom of the sea… (curses, Newsbusters, for beating me to this!)
Can the Democrats afford to have two tokens run in 2008?
And in a completely unrelated story…
How the Hufftards reacted to the new stem-cell news…
Scooby-Doo creator dies. Scheduled to deliver eulogies are Grape Ape, Hong Kong Fooey, and Penelope Pitstop.
Your "Damn that Bush Economy" update… This seemingly semi-good news as covered by USA Today.
How do you spell Rastafarian? L-O-S-E-R.
This stunning non-news story just might jeopardize Bush's run in 2008.
Your Iraq update…
Whoops! Will the Democrats break ANOTHER promise? Anyone keeping score out there? (curses, Newsbusters, for beating me to this, too!)
Gaaar!
The Obama circle-jerk continues…
Today in Liberalism History: on this date in 1951, the United Nations HQ opens in New York City.
I'm gonnna add FastEd's Slow
January 9, 2007 - 17:12 ET by FastEdI'm gonnna add FastEd's Slow Take Pic of the Day - be afraid, be very afraid!
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad
Beeeeeautiful, Ed!!!
January 9, 2007 - 17:51 ET by Roger the ShrubberBeeeeeautiful, Ed!!!
Ed!!!You owe me a keyboard!!!
January 9, 2007 - 17:55 ET by bigtimerEd!!!
You owe me a keyboard!!!!!!!
LMAO all over the place!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
RTS:I assume you are a retire
January 9, 2007 - 22:07 ET by Dave HighBrief reference to previous T
January 9, 2007 - 16:59 ET by Tim GrahamBrief reference to previous Today show global warming talk:
[7:20am]
Meredith Vieira: "You know we were talking about global warming yesterday Al-"
Al Roker: "I saw."
Vieira: "-and wondering if the world is coming to an end but I have proof is coming to an end-"
Roker: "What's that?"
Vieira: "-because I had a house full of boys last night watching the football game and this morning I got up, the basement is clean. Something's wrong, something's not natural or right."
Damn that Vieira. She'll be
January 9, 2007 - 17:01 ET by balboaDamn that Vieira. She'll be the end of us all.
Roger, you know you're goin
January 9, 2007 - 17:10 ET by Rupert CadellRoger, you know you're going to get slammed for that Rastafarian jab right? Some of the people on this board take affronts to religion VERY seriously, and I'm sure it's not just limited to when Christianity is the target of ridicule in a claymation show aimed at stoned undergraduates....I mean that'd just be downright hypocritical, right? Just warning ya...
Michael Moore = Ann Coulter = Rosie O'Donnell = Sean Hannity. Idiocy is not partisan.
What are you saying? If som
January 9, 2007 - 18:17 ET by mattmWhat are you saying? If someone happens to take offense at something that you don't think is worthy of the offense taken, and they argue strenuously against your point, and maybe even against your tone, that's the equivalent of a "slam"?
Like I care if one of the app
January 9, 2007 - 18:32 ET by Roger the ShrubberLike I care if one of the approx.14,000 Rastafarians in the United States come to this site and protest, or if some of the more zealous Christians on this site get bent out of whack. I am quite confident the uproar over the Rastafarian story would be much larger than if I posted a story about a vicar taking a dump on the Virgin Mary. After all, THAT would be art, dammit!
I have survived "Left-handed Albino Lesbians" and "Lawn Bowlers for Christ" in the past. I think I can handle Indigo Freemanvibe, Rupe. Thx for the head up, though!
That Penelope Pitstop was suc
January 9, 2007 - 17:14 ET by Dave RThat Penelope Pitstop was such a BABE! :-)
Another maroon in a cocoon.Li
January 9, 2007 - 17:45 ET by Andrew H.Another maroon in a cocoon.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
Thanks Matthew
January 9, 2007 - 17:01 ET by JABBeen waiting all day to link this and ask all NB's to help with the two Border Guards who are going to prison for shooting a criminal.
Please, take one minute out of your busy day and help these two guys. Sign the petition (if nothing else) and send letters to the White House.
"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful to the Ignorant"
JAB...I have, and passed it t
January 9, 2007 - 17:08 ET by bigtimerJAB...I have, and passed it to personal friends of mine via email, and here on NB awhile ago with the link to misterbill and anyone else who was interested, glad you are doing it again! They need all the help they can get.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
Thanks BT
January 9, 2007 - 17:18 ET by JABThanks a million bigtimer; all help is welcomed.
"Too bad Ignorance isn't painful to the Ignorant"
Probably not too many wrest
January 9, 2007 - 17:05 ET by Tom1969caProbably not too many wrestling fans on this board, but on Monday night "WWE Raw" on the USA Network featured a match pitting a Rosie O'Donnell lookalike against a Donald Trump lookalike. The "match" was purely played for laughs...
~~~
VOTE DEMOCRAT!
(It's easier than thinking)
Well, I see the msm is at it
January 9, 2007 - 17:26 ET by bigtimerWell, I see the msm is at it hard and furious to undermine the Presidents speech tomoorw night, all the leftists are terrified, the terrorists and enemies world-wide are laughing their rears off, annd we have had, and still do, and will tomorrow night after the speech.
The dem's in congress with Murtha in the Chair are slowly undoing what the conservatives have done to protect this nation, let alone making us go through the UN on some of the passage, such as boarding a ship that we think has nuclear proliferation on it, that is how we got Libya and Khan ect.. and undoing some of the progress John Bolton made...oh and the good ol' 9-11 commission recommendations they are using as a guise for some of it...it would take too long to explain, you just have to listen to it.
We better pray that this does not get through the House and Senate and it is not veto proof.
Btw...the dem's have already undone a two-third majority rule to raise taxes put in by Newt's bills, just a simple majority now.... they use the ruse pay as you go for that little scheme...
Don't you just love the leftist/communist party? Be very wary people in big cities, I would be. We are for sure going to be in more danger than ever if any of this passes.
The republicans had better learn to fight and fight hard, or we are all doomed. speaking softly and carrying no stick has got them nowhere, they had better learn to speak out loudly, and use that big stick...the enemy within does.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
"Btw...the dem's have al
January 9, 2007 - 18:22 ET by RunningBeer"Btw...the dem's have already undone a two-third majority rule to raise taxes put in by Newt's bills, just a simple majority now.... they use the ruse pay as you go for that little scheme..."
How much you want to bet that this pay as you go crap the Dims keep spouting will turn into a pay again when you get there and keep paying long after you've arrived.
RB...Exactly, it is just a ru
January 9, 2007 - 18:34 ET by bigtimerRB...Exactly, it is just a ruse to raise taxes, if they have now way to pay for their entitlement programs, they have to raise taxes somewhere...that simple. If they want a real pay go rule, they cannot create and form an entitlement or program unless they have a way to show that they can pay for it without raising taxes (which they can't)...simply put, that is why they made it a simple majority instead of two-thirds of the House vote to raise taxes again on us.
The leftists/socialists/commies make me ill.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
Colbert vs. O'Reilly!!!
January 9, 2007 - 17:45 ET by balboaThey're going to appear on each other's shows according to this article.
Holy crap! this has to be s
January 9, 2007 - 18:16 ET by MightyMouthHoly crap! this has to be seen! Some of the funniest DUmmies yet!
"There are two types of people in this country; those who provide freedom and those who enjoy it." MM says...
The products of mixing child-
January 10, 2007 - 07:03 ET by Andrew H.The products of mixing child-like minds and politics.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
Suzanne Somers
January 9, 2007 - 18:48 ET by Mean Gene Dr. LoveAnyone hear about Suzanne Somers' comment in response to her Malibu home burning down? "My nature is to look at the glass half full. I don't have a son or daughter in Iraq. I haven't lost a loved one. We will rebuild, and I truly believe we will learn something great from this experience."
She could have very easily left out the second sentence and she would've had a completely rational comment. There was no need for her to bring in the "illegal war" to put the loss of her home into perspective (which I am sure was well insured).
"The Donald" has said, "Any publicity is good publicity."
The Hollywierd elite will do anything to try to remind us of their perceived "illegal war" even when the subject has nothing to do with it. Does she have any living sons or daughters BTW? --just checked Wikipedia (cringe!)-- The only child she has that I know of (if still living) is 41 years old. So not only bringing up the war in her situation is completely irrelevant, it is downright absurd. Maybe...maybe IF there was a draft in effect and he was 17-25 years old, I could see her saying something like that.
I mean C'MON!!!
<\rantoff>
Gun Safety Tip #8: No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey. (www.imao.us)
Where did she call it an ille
January 9, 2007 - 18:58 ET by balboaWhere did she call it an illegal war?
She inferred it boa...it was
January 9, 2007 - 19:04 ET by bigtimerShe inferred it boa...it was obvious. that is why the press loved it...over and over and over....
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
You guys could infer blood fr
January 9, 2007 - 19:10 ET by balboaYou guys could infer blood from a rock.
She put perspective on the unfortunate destruction of her house. That's all. Fini.
Gee Balboa. yeah, she put perspective on her house burning.
January 9, 2007 - 20:38 ET by acaiguanaGee Balboa. yeah, she put perspective on her house burning.
That's right up there with a family losing a brave soldier loved one in a War on Terror to protect this country from Terrorism; right there with a GI coming home with a loss of limb (that would an arm or leg or both or all); right up there with heros who sacrifice their lives in front of irrefutable losing odds in a firefight to turn the entire battle and result in a victory and the lives of his comrades; right up there with the incredible training and talant that goes face down in the mud for her ungrateful silly insured and overly expensive and exclusive petty little material possession;
HER FRIGGIN' HOUSE.
Bal.
You jumped the shark on this one. You are completely useless for any purpose that I can see with this attitude.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
ACA
January 9, 2007 - 21:43 ET by balboaYou're completely missing the point. She's saying losing her house is nothing when compared to the possibility of having a loved one in harm's way. Don't you agree with her? It is only a house, is what she's saying.
No, it is a cheap shallow shot using the house and the war.
January 9, 2007 - 22:25 ET by acaiguanaNo, it is a cheap shallow shot using the house and the war in the same breath as if they were on the same playing field in terms of some human tragedy. She is obviously a cheap and shallow person who could bring the two events together and juxtapose the two as if there were any relevance to either.
There are a lot of things she could have said.
"I still have my health?"
"I'm not dead from being trapped in the fire?"
But to bring the two types of events together is beyond shallow, it is offensive and it is obtuse and it is insulting to every serviceman and every person who ever went to War, went through the pain of separation from loved ones, who have to live with suffering the rest of their lives, so this over stuffed silly actress can whine about how lucky she is not to have anyone in her family in Iraq?
I'm of the mind she is unlucky that no one in her family thinks enough about her to bother to defend the country or her from Islamic fanatics. My only regret over her stupidity is that Islamofacists didn't burn her g***d*** house to the ground.
She'll rebuild her friggin' house. Who is going to tell our people in Iraq that the Cut and Run coward Democrats lost their war for them?
Riddle me that Balboa.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
Hey, if you want to see it th
January 9, 2007 - 22:30 ET by balboaHey, if you want to see it that way, go right ahead. I'm not saying you can't.
I guess her child was too &
January 9, 2007 - 22:38 ET by JerryI guess her child was too "smart" to get "stuck in Iraq".
Hey Suzanne, you can quit character acting as the ditzy blonde now.... ooops.... I forgot... Three's Company was more of a documentary as far as you were concerned.. No acting involved.
When asked if he went to war with Iraq to derail the impeachment
vote: “I don’t think any serious person would believe that any
President would do such a thing." - President Clinton (Dec 1998).
I agree. I would infer nothin
January 9, 2007 - 21:19 ET by Roger the ShrubberI agree. I would infer nothing but positive feelings from comparing losing all my worldly possessions being better than having a son or daughter in Iraq. Suzy is definitely all for the Iraq War.
No, the word "illegal" was never used, that I agree with you on that, bro.
It's ok that she is against the war. Plenty of people are. I was just taken aback that, even though she just lost her mansion, all she could do was take a shot at the armed forces and be political. Methinks someone is obsessing a bit much.
As an aside balboa...I have l
January 9, 2007 - 21:43 ET by bigtimerAs an aside balboa...I have lost everything I owned also when my rented home burnt to the ground while I was at getting ready to go to work from another job, (I was working two jobs at the time), my son was being baby-sat elsewhere (so I thought) I watched it burn to the ground before my eyes, the last thing you think of is world problems...trust me..including a war going on.
She spoke those words for attention...period...and she got it.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
I think it was an apt compari
January 9, 2007 - 21:45 ET by balboaI think it was an apt comparison for the moment. I lost my house. End of the world? No, because there are worse things out there. I could have a loved one facing death every day, being shot at, having to contend with IEDs, etc. I mean, we are at war, right? So it's obviously on her mind.
boa...Snap out of it!"If
January 9, 2007 - 21:48 ET by bigtimerboa...Snap out of it!
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
"I could have died"
January 9, 2007 - 21:58 ET by Roger the Shrubber"I could have died", or "my husband could have died", or "none of my neighbors died" would have been sufficient, Bal. Your defense is getting silly.
Why didn't she say "The fire was like the flames of suffering the poor people of Darfur are enduring", or "this tragedy pales in comparison to the plight of the poor refugees fleeing Somalia"...
Believe me, if I just lost a mansion, I would have been a bit more focused on me, myself, and I, and a lost less focused on "Sheehanizing" the event.
Eh...I still think this is re
January 9, 2007 - 22:17 ET by balboaEh...I still think this is reaching for an opportunity to bag on a celeb.
A. The only reaching occuring
January 9, 2007 - 22:39 ET by Roger the ShrubberA. The only reaching occuring here is being done by you, my friend.
B. In what decade are we in? Suzy Summers is a celebrity?
Yeah, well she did the reaching. She brought it up.
January 9, 2007 - 22:43 ET by acaiguanaYeah, well she did the reaching. She brought it up.
No one put a gun to her head and made her think "Oh, what a great opportunity to show my hurt is nothing compared to having a son in Iraq." As if having a son in Iraq was a tragedy.
Do you agree having a son in Iraq is a tragedy? If so, then I must be really tragic having a son-in-law in Afghanistan.
Do you think before you jump onto every bandwagon you find to point out the unfairness of the NBuster's here when we point out stuff? Do you think this makes you the paragon of moderation?
Well, I can tell you what moderation begets. It begets Liberals. And Liberals think nothing at all of trashing someone or something to advance their agenda that their ideas are 'normal'; their brains are nuanced; and their thoughts are meaningful for the rest of us plebes out here.
I reject with all my fiber of being this condescending (look in the mirror over your history here pointing out our fallacies) attitude that would jump over to the side of someone who thinks it is charming to denegrate the sacrifices made by our military in Iraq has any possible place or point to them losing a multi-million dollar mansion in Malabu of all places.
Next to Bobby Dylan's house I presume.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
Oh good grief. Please get mor
January 9, 2007 - 23:13 ET by balboaOh good grief. Please get more melodramatic. I don't think I'm the paragon of anything. I'm not condescending, I don't think I'm better than anyone, I don't think it's "charming" to denigrate sacrifices. I simply have a different point of view and post my opinion. I tend to think that people make too much of inconsequential comments or incidents. So sue me.
Climb off the high horse.
"I think it was an apt comparison for the moment."
January 9, 2007 - 23:17 ET by acaiguana"I think it was an apt comparison for the moment."
So, you think having a son in Iraq is a tragedy? What little respect I have left for you just fell out the window.
If that's a high horse, I'm happy to ride it.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
"So, you think having a son i
January 9, 2007 - 23:22 ET by balboa"So, you think having a son in Iraq is a tragedy?"
No, I never said that.
Summers said it when she tied the two things together.
January 9, 2007 - 23:29 ET by acaiguanaSummers said it when she tied the two things together. She equated having a son in Iraq with a personal tragedy. No way can you say she wasn't doing that.
You defend her against criticism. You must agree with her.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
I think if I had a son in Ira
January 9, 2007 - 23:40 ET by balboaI think if I had a son in Iraq I would be an absolute wreck worrying about him, hoping he was safe. I'd be frantic wondering whether he was OK, if he was under fire, how dangerous an area of Iraq he was in. Given my choice, I'd rather have my house burn down than have a child in harm's way in Iraq. I think that's what she was saying.
Yes, that is what she was saying. One tragedy is ...
January 9, 2007 - 23:43 ET by acaiguanaYes, that is what she was saying. One tragedy is overshadowed by another. Having a son in Iraq.
From your comment, it is clear that you would never raise a son that would be in Iraq.
When you cut through all your stuff balboa, you are the tragedy on this site.
ACA
...
Acaiguana says: "Which city is next?"
You're making stuff up now, j
January 9, 2007 - 23:52 ET by balboaYou're making stuff up now, just to be insulting. You're the one that keeps using the word tragedy, not me. And you have no idea what kind of son I would raise.
can't take the heat, balbs?
January 10, 2007 - 00:02 ET by tumbler_2007I notice your irritation. When you dish it out you forget. Last night didn't you pester me?
About how, "In my day, blacks sat in the back of the bus," so therefore, I'm a racist?
Now you dislike the insults. Why?
Happy now, aca? Tumbler is co
January 10, 2007 - 00:07 ET by balboaHappy now, aca? Tumbler is coming to your aid. TUMBLER.
what balboa means
January 10, 2007 - 02:09 ET by tumbler_2007ACA; I think balboa means; look at who supports you now; the guy who irks everybody, Tumbler!
Shame on you, ACA. You should denounce me. Balboa rejected me and he denounces me.
It's OK to insult Tumbler and make up things about him, like racism. Just be good to balboa, don't hurt his feelings.
Let's try this scenario:Think
January 10, 2007 - 06:11 ET by Indiana JoeLet's try this scenario:
Think of a celeb having a house burn back in 1944, and saying, "Well, this is nothing compared to having a son fighting in Europe." It would be taken as an homage to some of the "real heroes" of the time, wouldn't it? Not as a slam at the war. Difference in semantics? Well, we ARE talking Suzanne Sommers here, not Douglas Fairbanks.
The problem may be the media's painting of this war versus WWII. It may not be with the comparison itself. Not every celebrity's reference to the war has to be a "slam." I don't personally think Suzanne is slamming the war here. I just think she was giving an example of something worth worrying more about than her house. Maybe phrased it poorly, that's all.
I don't think she's a savvy-enough opportunist to have really meant to make a political statement. At worst, it's a case of "open mouth, insert foot." IMHO, of course....
You may be right but how do y
January 10, 2007 - 07:07 ET by Andrew H.You may be right but how do you think we've been conditioned to see our Hollywood friends? Yeah. I personally don't care what she said and am glad no one was killed. But anything related to the war from the west coast is met first with suspicion.
Liberalism is a convenient lie.
I caught it Dr. Love...the pr
January 9, 2007 - 19:02 ET by bigtimerI caught it Dr. Love...the press played it big-time this afternoon....of course because of her inference to Iraq, it wasn't as if she didn't know what kind of press she would get from that statement, let alone being guests on Larry King and other shows for a pity party...again.
Suzanne Somers is and always has been a useless idiot...except for the guys who just had a lot of fantasies.
LOL....Thought I had better add that in before I get screamed at by some of my friends here...I know where MM or Rog or a lot of you will go with this.
Btw...this fire is under investigation, it would be too funny if they started the fire themselves or hired someone to do it.
"If we ever forget that we are a Nation Under God....then we will be a Nation Gone Under." Ronald Reagan
Anti-war Seattle newspaper si
January 9, 2007 - 19:36 ET by Del DolemonteAnti-war Seattle newspaper sides with US Army in Watada case-will "Truthout.org" mention it?
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2003515393_watadaed09.html
More about Sandy Berger;htt
January 9, 2007 - 22:14 ET by james789More about Sandy Berger;
http://republicans.oversight.house.gov/news/PRArticle.aspx?NewsID=4
Oversight and Government Reform Committee Ranking Member Tom Davis (R-VA)
released the following statement today on a committee report that sheds
important new light on Sandy Berger’s theft of classified
documents from the National Archives. The report makes it clear
that the full extent of Mr. Berger’s document removal can never
be known, and consequently the Department of Justice could not assure
the 9/11 Commission that it received all responsive documents to which
Mr. Berger had access.
“My staff’s investigation reveals that President Clinton’s
former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger compromised national
security much more than originally disclosed,” Davis said.
“It is now also clear that Mr. Berger was willing to go to
extraordinary lengths to compromise national security, apparently for
his own convenience.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price,
peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of
soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
Theodore Roosevelt
This is why I still believe
January 9, 2007 - 22:22 ET by james789This is why I still believe that we did not win the cold war in 1991.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0a141ef0-9fec-11db-9059-0000779e2340.html
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/379d7c46-9efb-11db-9e2e-0000779e2340.html
The interesting part is they were feuding with one of Russia's closest allies, Belarus, not Europe.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price,
peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of
soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
Theodore Roosevelt
I see the porno links are abo
January 10, 2007 - 03:15 ET by mastersofdeceitI see the porno links are about to get posted.
30kdj
Wow talk about noooooo life.
? 4 the porno link guy. Why d
January 10, 2007 - 03:24 ET by mastersofdeceit? 4 the porno link guy.
Why do you post them in the "da vinci" thread, why not a more recent thread?
In the time you've done this don't you think the "some linkz here" subj line has gotten old?
Why not just post them on Craigslist? Or kos or DU same difference. The kos du poster is probably more your target audience.
Time to declare New Orleans
January 10, 2007 - 03:32 ET by ckc1227Time to declare New Orleans a complete failure and re-deploy.
Also, Ahnold is not only promising health care for illegal children, he is now proposing health care for ALL Californians, illegals included. Courtesy of Doctors and employers, of course. On the plus side, maybe Ohio and Michigan can snag some of the jobs that are sure to flee that state if this goes through
Maybe if CA does turn into a
January 10, 2007 - 06:27 ET by UnsaneMaybe if CA does turn into a full-board Nanny State, they will show Leftists everywhere just how screwed up the idea is, as jobs and businesses flee the state as you mention.
If CA thought the early 1990s were bad, they ain't seen nothin' yet.
"HAV3 TH3 BRIDG3S OF INSANITY B33N CROSS3D AND FOR3V3R R3TRACT3D???." - Meshuggah, "3ntrapm3nt", from Catch Thirty Thr33 (2005)
CKC, it's doubtful Michigan
January 10, 2007 - 08:42 ET by WolfremCKC, it's doubtful Michigan will snag any of those jobs. Businesses are already closing and leaving state. And people are starting to follow. The housing market is saturated with houses that are not selling. It's a buyers market in Michigan.
"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." - George Santayana
What's become of the "Mo
January 10, 2007 - 12:03 ET by donsalesWhat's become of the "Monroe Doctrine"???? Anybody????
Iran's Ahmadinejah to Visit Latin America
Nowhere to Run....Nowhere To Hide.....
Once again, what's become of
January 10, 2007 - 12:09 ET by donsalesOnce again, what's become of the "Monroe Doctrine"???? Anybody???
Chavez sworn in for radical new term in Venezuela
CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez was sworn in on Wednesday for a new six-year term that he vowed to use to press a radical socialist revolution including nationalizations that have roiled financial markets.
Emboldened by his landslide re-election win, the typically combative anti-U.S. leader has gone on the attack, deciding to strip a private opposition TV channel of its license and take over some major companies owned by foreign investors.
"Fatherland, socialism or death -- I take the oath," Chavez said.
The man who calls Cuban President Fidel Castro his mentor changed tradition by draping the presidential sash from his left shoulder instead of his right in what he says is a symbol of his socialist credentials.
Legislators at the ceremony in Congress chanted "Long live socialism."
Nowhere to Run....Nowhere To Hide.....
This crap has just got to st
January 10, 2007 - 12:13 ET by donsalesThis crap has just got to stop.....UNBELIEVABLE!!!!
Imagine sending your kids off to school, but when they get to the bus they are told they can't get on because they speak English.
That's right, English.
It happened to a few children in St. Paul and now the school district is apologizing.
Rachel Armstrong sent her kids to pick up the bus as usual Monday, but after the driver let the kids on, he told them he would not pick them up again. He even said he wouldn't take them home that afternoon.
Armstrong left work early Tuesday, forced to pick up her kids from Phalen Lake Elementary School.
Her twin girls, 10, and her son, 8, were kicked off their regular school bus. They were told by the bus driver the route is for non-English speaking students only.
"I was furious. I was at work and I was just mad." Armstrong said. "I felt like we were being discriminated because we speak English. Just because they speak English, they can't ride the school bus. I mean, this is America, right?"
Nowhere to Run....Nowhere To Hide.....
"Enemies of The State&qu
January 10, 2007 - 12:17 ET by donsales"Enemies of The State" Alert:
Democrats Plan Symbolic Votes Against Iraq Plan
WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 — Democratic leaders said Tuesday that they intended to hold symbolic votes in the House and Senate on President Bush’s plan to send more troops to Baghdad, forcing Republicans to take a stand on the proposal and seeking to isolate the president politically over his handling of the war.
Senate Democrats decided to schedule a vote on the resolution after a closed-door meeting on a day when Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts introduced legislation to require Mr. Bush to gain Congressional approval before sending more troops to Iraq.
Nowhere to Run....Nowhere To Hide.....
A Failure of Leadership
January 11, 2007 - 17:05 ET by dscottThe actions of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid in their first 100 hours in power have demonstrated the Democrat Party's inability as a political party to take leadership. One of the hallmarks of leadership is the ability to listen to and incorporate diverse ideas which have merit to achieve a goal. The second hallmark of leadership is the recognition that what is popular is so because it was easily spun that way by the omission of the facts. A real leader believes the means must be justified by the ends it proclaims to achieve, that's called consistency and integrity. It should go without saying that leadership is the ability to get people to follow you, however, there is a difference between leadership and salesmanship. A salesman doesn't have to take responsibility of the consequences as a leader does. A salesman's goal is to sell, and telling you want you want to hear is a standard tactic in sales. A leader takes responsibility for the outcome and tells you what you don’t want to hear.
Contrast this with late President Eisenhower's views on leadership:
- Leadership is the art of getting someone else to do something you want done because they want to do it.
- Pull the string and it will follow wherever you wish, push it and it will go nowhere at all.
- Our real problem, then, is not our strength today; it is rather the vital necessity of action today to ensure our strength tomorrow.
- You don't lead by hitting people over the head-that's assault, not leadership.
What the Democrat Party has demonstrated time and again is their ability to sell anything. We see this salesmanship highlighted by the back peddling of several issues they campaigned upon by which the Democrat Party came to power. Chief among those campaign issues is Iraq. The Democrat Party capitalized on the dissatisfaction over the progress in Iraq, their goal to achieve power was to sell the notion that they had a better idea to resolve the problem. However, within a week of the election, Howard Dean, the DNC leader and architect of the campaign, was waffling on the question of a troop pull out from Iraq. How could Howard Dean waffle unless he didn't believe in what he campaigned upon? Howard Dean, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi now tell the President they won't go along with a troop surge, it appears the Democrats are quite happy with the status quo, which is contrary to their campaign pledge. Which brings us to the inevitable conclusion, Howard Dean's campaign was about salesmanship, not leadership. The Democrat Party had no intension of delivering what they promised, they sold America to buy their vote. Just as the salesman over promised to get that sale to collect the money, the Democrats over promised to get your vote. Even Cindy Sheehan and Michael Moore have come to the realization that they were sold and most conservatives recognize these two aren't the sharpest knives in the drawer.
Which brings us to the actions of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid excluding the Republican Party from their constitutional duty to share in governance of the country, after all Democracy isn’t a winner take all contest. What they did was to prevent any amendments on bills under consideration before congress. This is was despite their campaign pledge for bipartisan government. Their refusal to allow a debate of ideas is not bipartisan governance and is a failure of leadership. The refusal to explain your reasoning’s or omit facts is an act of salesmanship, not leadership. No matter how popular the idea they have spun, the failure of the means not being justified by the ends is salesmanship, not leadership. The Democrat Party has proclaimed it is in leadership, however, their means of executing power is salesmanship. Leadership engenders trust, so far by the track record, the Democrat Party has demonstrated a total failure in this regard by all the back pedaling.
President Bush must demonstrate his leadership skills and veto each and every bill from the so-called one hundred hour Democrat agenda. Once he does this, it will force the so-called leaders (in reality salesmen) of the Democrat Party to act as leaders by honoring their campaign pledge of bipartisan governance. Ironically, it will be a Republican President who must teach a Democrat Party what leadership really means. Leadership is not criticizing from the sidelines, leadership is participating at the head of the line. Leadership is not about popularity, it is about responsibility, something Democrats still have to learn. Nor is leadership about forcing ideas down the throats of an unwilling population, that's called tyranny, something else the Democrats still need to learn about. In the end, it is irrelevant what you thought the product was that you bought, the real issue is that you bought it and the salesman has your money.
“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” – Marcus Aurelius