On Bended Knee: The Press and Tom Barrett
When the Reagan administration barred critical news media from White House press conferences, liberals quite rightly protested. So where is liberal outrage now that gubernatorial candidate Tom Barrett has blocked a reporter from his public events?
Four male Barrett campaign staffers escorted Wisconsin Reporter’s Dustin Hurst from a Chippewa Falls rally for Barrett, the Democrat hoping to oust Republican Gov. Scott Walker in Tuesday’s Wisconsin recall vote.
Hurst is the Wisconsin Reporter journalist who caught on tape the arrest of a pro-Walker protester at a June 1 Barrett rally featuring former President Bill Clinton.
But limiting Hurst’s access to the Barrett campaign was more likely a reprisal for Hurst’s reports (here and here), earlier that day, revealing that Barrett, Milwaukee’s mayor, hired a convicted felon to work in his administration. That poor hiring decision wouldn’t be newsworthy except for the fact that Barrett has accused his Republican rival of employing a staffer charged — not yet convicted, mind you — of committing a felony.
Barrett’s ties to felons doesn’t end there, as Hurst points out in a June 2 story. Politifact, an online political fact-checking titan franchise of the Tampa Bay Times in St. Petersburg, Fla., found that a former Barrett secretary, Joseph N. Cantu, was charged with two felonies and a misdemeanor in connection with a 2010 assault. Reports say Cantu was accused of suffocating his girlfriend.
Clearly, such revelations undermine the Barrett campaign’s central narrative. Barrett has replaced discussion of public-sector workers in Wisconsin politics with feckless accusations about Walker’s ex-staffer. Just as clearly, Wisconsin Reporter’s Hurst has become an inconvenience to the campaign.
Last summer, following a Wisconsin Reporter story critical of the Democratic Party, state party spokesman Graeme Zielinski threatened to launch an attack on the news organization’s subscriber newspapers.
“What happens next is that I contact the publishers and editors of the papers that publish you as ‘unbiased,’ and let them know our deep concern about the obvious bias that permeates your entire operation,” Zielinski stated in an email.
Barrett’s decision Saturday to bar Hurst raises additional questions about the Man Who Would be Governor of Wisconsin: If this is how Barrett deals with criticism in the courtship phase of his relationship with Wisconsinites, how would he handle critics if he is given even greater power?
- Will Swaim's blog
- Login to post comments















Comments
I sure hope this thug Barrett
Submitted by DontFeedTheTrolls on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 4:21pm.
I sure hope this thug Barrett doesn't win. But, sadly, given the Democrat's track record of voter fraud and 'finding' bags of uncounted votes (all, surprisingly, in their favor). I think he's a shoo-in.
Yes, I was fascinated in the era of voter ID debates
Submitted by merly1 on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 4:39pm.
That apparently over 1 million signatures were turned into officials to try for Walker's recall, but only 930,000 were counted as valid. Thus, even thought nobody says anything, about 10% must have been fradulent or unverifiable. Right?
These were Dems, collecting Dem signatures, so anybody who thinks fraud isnt occurring is delusional.
And it points to who is perpetrating the fraud as well ;o)
June Surprises
Submitted by Fred Gregory on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 4:40pm.
Geez what a bunch of sleazy dirty tricksters are thise union Demorats.
First a last minute rumor that Gov. Walker was under criminal investigation. And now total BS story that 20 years ago he fathered an illigetimate child.
Resorting to these low blow tactics is a sign of desperation and panic !!
Does anyone know what Barrett is running ON?
Submitted by bkeyser on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 5:49pm.
Will he attempt to repeal the collective bargaining provisions signed into law? And if so, will he hike property taxes to pay for it? Will he lay off teachers? I've heard nothing from this guy other than he's the union's pick because ... well ... they picked him. I guess.
Not the Union Pick
Submitted by Clyde Gatton on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 10:05pm.
Actually, the unions chose an even weaker, more unelectable candidate....and if I thought long enough I might even remember her name. Unfortunately for their members, whose money they wasted, they had to settle for Barrett. He's the union pick because Milwaukee residents said so, lol.
V/R
Clyde
"...the aspirants to tyranny are either the...men of the state, who in democracies are demagogues,... or those who hold great offices, and have a long tenure.." - Aristotle, Politics, c350BC
I've been following this
Submitted by celator on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 6:09pm.
I've been following this Barrett character (as best I can) on TV, newspaper accounts and radio. This is one strange dude. Sounds like the people of WI think so too.
Walker needs enough votes so the democrats can't steal
Submitted by ohio granny on Sun, 06/03/2012 - 7:51pm.
Just like Gov. Christie in New Jersey in the last gubernatorial election Gov. Walker will have to have enough votes so the election cannot be stolen. Every honest person in the country knows that democrats will steal any election if it is close enough. Remember all the found ballots in the Minnesota election when Al Franken was named the senator? Same thing a few years ago in the Oregon (I think) governors race.
The way to keep the democrats somewhat honest is to have enough votes so they can't steal the election by finding??? votes. Amazingly almost all the votes they find is for the democrat. What is even more amazing is it is always the democrats who benefit from found ballots.