How ABC Stacked the Deck for Obama

  • Bookmark and Share

With the very first question of its prime time special, Questions for the President: Prescription for America, ABC set the tone that essentially confirmed for viewers that the president was right in his desire to radically remake America's healthcare system. As the infomercial began, "moderator" Charles Gibson asked a seminal question of the doctors and other participants that were about to hear the president speak: "How many of you agree with the president that we need to change our healthcare system?" Naturally they all raised their hands.

Imagine that? This handpicked crowd all agreed with ABC and Obama that "change" was paramount. Surprised? Hardly.

So, as the viewer is introduced to the infomercial, they start off with the unanimous affirmation that the president is right, radical changes have to be made. The premise is set and even the sharp questions to the president later in the show are blunted by the assumption that some major change is needed. And since the president is the only person allowed to offer any plan during this ABC special, the further assumption promulgated is that he is the one that must affect that change.

For viewers of this healthcare infomercial, Obama wins thanks to an assist by ABC. The viewer is deftly led to the desired conclusion.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The problem with the "change" question is, what sort of change are we talking about? Why is Obama's change the only plan on the table, here? Is there no other plan for change out there? ABC's viewers sure won't know from what they got Wednesday night.

Granted, ABC did throw some pointed questions at the president. But, sadly, his non-answers were rarely challenged and Obama was allowed to dole out his talking points without opposition. For instance, the president kept to his "you can keep your plan if you want to" talking point even as more and more politicians, political pundits, and healthcare and economics experts are beginning to say this claim is an untruth. Obama himself recently moderated his claim a bit by saying that he really meant that government wouldn't specifically require that people must lose their current plans. The difference is he went from explicitly saying no one would lose their current plan to tacitly admitting that his policies will force people to lose their plans whether government specifically says they must or not. It's as if he were slowly inching toward the truth. Unfortunately, Obama was not pressed on this point during the ABC infomercial and was allowed to reiterate his earlier, obviously false, claims. A recent study shows that "anywhere from 10.4 million to 119.1 million people could end up switching from their current plans" and onto the public plan if it gets implemented. This will not be a voluntary move, but one forced on them by their employers dropping their current plan in favor of the public option.

ABC did a masterful job setting up the claim that they were fair and balanced, too. A webpage has been launched to "fact check" the president's Wednesday appearance where ABC says that the president was "eager to make his case to the public -- but sometimes glossing over the thorny details of how to achieve reform." But, while they do talk of some of the president's errors, it is unlikely that more than a small percentage of Americans will ever see this webpage. The chances that only one or two percent of the TV audience will see the "fact check" webpage is strong. Even as ABC can say they corrected the president, most people that saw the special will come away on the president's side due to how the show was presented.

Finally, without any strong, intelligent counter voices, this ABC special was all Obama. It did not do much to advance the education of the audience or better inform those at home watching and left anyone viewing with the impression that the only "solutions" are coming from Obama.

Only The One cares. That was ABC's message.


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I guess I'm one of those

I guess I'm one of those the Communists would say, "Well, you didn't watch it so why are you criticizing what you don't know?"

I've never done the mistress-bondage thing either, but I think I get the general idea of what goes on.

What really sickens me is that these Congressional Republicans are trying to offer their own watered-down versions of government health care.  How do they always end up in this trap of being induced to offer 'government-based solutions' that are somehow supposed to be better than the Democrat 'government-based solutions'?

All these types of programs are wasteful and don't work.

How about just saying 'no' to the whole thing for a change and explain why. 

Guess they figure most Americans do indeed have the notion that the federal government can fix things...conservatives just not quite as much as liberals...that is, many so-called conservatives believe that smaller government programs that don't work are more acceptable than bigger government programs that don't work.

One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).

 simple. Because "no"

 simple. Because "no" doesn't buy vote, or create a government dependency where votes are kept because no one wants to vote suicidally. 

 

WWW.GS2AC.COM. 2nd Amendment Grass Roots Action in the Bay Area, CA. We're not all "Breakfast Cereal" folks here! :)

Look to the past to see the future

  • Will this Government plan work better than the failed war on poverty?
  • Will this Government plan work better than the failed war on drugs?
  • Will this Government department work better than the incompetent Department of Education?
  • Will this Government department work better than the incompetent  Post Office?
  • Will this Government department work better than the incompetent  Department of Energy?

You get the drift.

D

Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.

DFTT,

the answer is NO to all the above.  My answer has always been, is, and will be... If you want something to be FUBAR, give it to the government to do.  LOL  In case some of you out there that don't know what FUBAR is, it's an anacronym for F**ked Up Beyond All Repair.  THAT pretty much sums it up in a nutshell.

Will it work better that the VA?

  The VA, the wonderfully efficient government medical program for our veterans.

  So efficient, Obama himself tried to slough off vets with service related medical problems off onto the private insurance industry.

  But then they would have to come right back in under his new plan.

Owww. My head hurts. 

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Some Stupid Questions

Can Mr. Obama point to any government run enterprise (e.g. Fannie, Freddie, Post Office, Amtrak, Medicare, etc.) that has a record of running efficiently?  So why will a government run health care program be any different?  And also, has anyone looked lately at how the VA Healthcare is administered?

Additionally, I don't see how ABC or anyone else is going to produce an hour plus program w/the President and not be hyping it beyond belief.  So here's my take on what I want from this program.  I want the Congress and the President to be the first subscribers; I want verification that there's not an exclusion in whatever bill that surfaces, for the President, the Congress and unionized goverment workers to continue their Cadillac health plans while the rest of us are herded into the public plan. Not likely?  It's already started with the proposal to tax health care benefits - excluding union workers from the tax proposal.

 

 

Ah, you make some decent

Ah, you make some decent points.  I somehow managed to watch the whole infomercial.  Essentially, Obama admitted that when it came down to it that he would not use the public plan.  When it came to his own family, he would do all that he could.  That's admirable in itself, but it's hypocritical when one is pushing a plan for others that won't meet one's own needs. 

As for the rest of this thing...  It was so poorly done.  It wasn't a town hall of any sort.  I got the feel that everything was scripted.  People were called up and questions were asked in an order expected by the President.  Every question seemed to flow into the next, rather than the randomness of a town hall and the deep follow throughs.  It all just came across to me like an infomercial.  Obama talked up his plan, someone asked a question (some pointed, others not) then he went back to the same talking points.

He really never answered a single tough question directly.  He waffled with the tough questions and made it easy to read between the lines.  He was talking out both sides of his mouth and the true answer was contrary to his base argument.  

In the end, there were 2 big questions that were not properly addressed (if any questions were given due consideration.)  How he planned to pay for it was completely glossed over.  He repeated the campaign promise to raise taxes on the 250k+ crowd (which is what was supposed to pay for all his bailouts.)  It was completely ignored that government health insurance would involve a HUGE bureaucracy and rules to keep medical costs down.  Second, they completely ignored the litigation side of things.  He repeatedly mentioned the excessive testing and such as to why costs were up.  Could that possibly be because all medical professionals have to play CYA or face possible costly litigation?  If you think health insurance is expensive, then look at the costs for malpractice insurance.  Even the best doctors face frivolous malpractice suits when everything was done properly.  As I hear from one doctor, every suit filed against him automatically costs $5000 from his malpractice insurance.  Why was the litigation side of high costs completely ignore?

Re For Himself

The Bamster will not use Obamacare for himself and his family because there is a clause in the bill that exempts Congress and all federal government employees from Obamacare and any taxation of healthcare benefits.

As well, Big Union is demanding an exemption from any taxation of healthcare benefits because they tend to have the gold-plated benefits packages including retirees, and taxation of those benefits (as income) would cost them dearly. Just for them, another clause is in the works to exempt all employees that work under contracts negotiated through a trade union.

Obamacare in the most perfect implementation Obama could wish for will be a two-tier system, one for federal government employees and union members, and another for the rest of us.

Thanks ABC

Yes indeed... kudos to State Run Media. Pravda could not have done a better job of shilling for the regime. Why, you have now removed all doubt about having any journalistic ethics, or being fair and impartial. I think you, and USA Today, should change your name. For ABC, you should reband The Obama Network and News, and for USAToday, how about Total Obama Sellout.

Now that ABC has come out

Now that ABC has come out of the closet (regarding their unmitigated love for all things Obama) I guess we can look to NBC and CBS to follow suit.  Then we will be asked to celebrate their leanings.  ABC is the Perez Hilton of news corporations. 

"Who are you going to believe, me or all that lying data?!"
-Al Gore

Does anyone know how many people actually watched?

I can't believe that any sane person would waste an evening watching a show so obviously slanted. It was no secret what you were going to see and hear, a biased informercial promoting a one sided view of government controlled health care.

History in the form of other countries experience with national health and our own experience with government agencies has shown over and over again that this just isn't going to work, yet the administration and congress keep going back to the same well.

Understand this, under Obamacare you will pay more for declining medical services and real people would die as a result.

PS: Per FOX this morning, a second opinion of Obamacare costs indicates that full implementation will be somewhere in the range of  $3 1/2 TRILLION in 2010. This is equal to the rest of the estimated budget for that year, and means increased taxes for everybody, not just the rich.

Ordinary people not just high income earners will be getting hit by massive tax increases on health care, energy and state/local tax increases. It's time to say "enough"!    

 

 

 

Re Ratings

Rush Limbaugh just mentioned that ratings were terrible, but no numbers or no numbers that I heard. I'd like to see some data on it too.

jessieH          

jessieH             If mr. obama is in the show, you know it's scripted.

I didn't watch the special

But Rush is going over the special and the plan as I write this. For an  infomercial, there were a couple of questions Obama avoided or answered callously. This according to Rush. So was it an infomercial or wasn't it? I've never see a tough question in an infomercial.

Anyway, one of the questions had to do with the problem of having a plan that won't pay for a better treatment option, and whether or not the President would go outside of the plan to get the best care. He for the most part dodged the question, saying he would get the best possible care for his family. Rush took this opportunity to rail on Obamas plan, as a way to ration health care.

Now I have no doubt Obama's plan will ration health care. But the intellectual dishonesty is when Rush fails to mention private insurance providers are rationing health care now. I know of a case where a woman was discharged from a hospital less than 12 hours after a double mastectomy. She had a private medical insurance. Who's going to address that? Where is the reform for insurance companies that cut off claimants during catastrophic illness? Are we pretending the insurance industry is above board?

http://newsbusters.o...

Nwahs no one is saying that

Nwahs no one is saying that their isnt need for some reform in the current system what we are saying is that the current complaint do not require the massive redo proposed or the huge tax bill that will come with it. There is no need for this even with the current problems and corruption in our medical system what is being ignored are the facts that even with those problems our system still became the best in the world giving the most up to date treatments to the largest number of people then any other in the world. Lets not destroy it to model ourselves on the failure of others.

Pacifism is a luxury bought with the blood of the valorous

I don't think it has a chance

 I don't think Obama's plan has much of a chance. Its pretty obvious seniors are going to get the short end of the stick, and are going to be the ones to be told to go home and "take a pill."

But we are still at square one with medical insurance being a necessity rather than a luxury. Medical costs are ridiculously high and minor surgery would bankrupt an average income person without it.

So when Obama's plan tanks, what then? I just want to make sure we aren't being used as the insurance lobby. Our medical system became the best in the world before insurance companies started dictating how long of a hospital stay a patient requires.

I had a brother kicked out of ICU because his insurance company said he was ready for a regular room. He had a brain hemorrhage a couple of days later (result of malignant hypertension). That may  well have still happened if he was being monitored in ICU, but I live with the nagging belief he would have had a better chance in ICU. He had private insurance.

http://newsbusters.o...

Click here to see the ABC

Click here to see the ABC logo used to promote their "Homeland Security" show (which I believe is off the air)...

Ratings In

Re ratings: ABC White House Special Struggled for Viewers: http://www.thrfeed.com

"President Obama's town hall meeting on health care delivered a sickly rating Wednesday evening. The one-hour ABC News special "Primetime: Questions for the President: Prescription for America" (4.7 million viewers, 1.1 preliminary adults 18-49 rating) had the fewest viewers in the 10 p.m. hour. The special tied some 8 p.m. comedy repeats as the lowest-rated program on a major broadcast network."

Not much more to the article that what I cut and pasted.

 

 

Fox News

There is one phrase that scares the heck out of MSM...

Fox News   Fox News   Fox News   Fox News   Fox News   Fox News...

The MSM is like the formerly glamorous silent film star who does not recognize that their star has long since faded.  They are sad, they are laughable, they are out of touch, they are soon to be irrelevant. 

http://www.framingthedialogue.com/archives/a-pressmass-carol-chapter-one/

 

 

I want the same

health care  congress has..

 

“Less 1984 — More 1776"