If you would like a great example of how the Old Media takes a story that has no legitimacy at all and uses it as the basis for a smear job, the Associated Press offered a wonderful sampling of the tactic for you on June 8. From a headline that makes the issue seem more weighty than it is, to the lack of competent reporting from both sides of the matter, AP employed this favorite Old Media tactic by taking another swipe at Governor Sarah Palin with little by way of substantive evidence. It's another "seriousness of the charge" story despite the complete lack of evidence as well as a lack of any gravitas on the part of the original source of the charge.
At issue is the false charge leveled by a Huffington Post blogger that Governor Palin "plagiarized" a section of her speech as she introduced talk show host Michael Reagan in Anchorage, Alaska on Wednesday, June 3. HuffPo blogger Geoffrey Dunn charged that Palin lifted several sections of Newt Gingrich's work without attribution, and AP ran with the story even as they allow Palin's lawyer to point out that she cited Gingrich twice in her speech.
The headline is particularly interesting in that it seems to imply something far more formal than a mere HuffPost blogger's blather. The AP story's headline on CBSNews.com screams, "Palin Slapped With Plagiarism Charge." After reading such a headline the "slapped with plagiarism charge" almost seems to say that some legal body had "charged" the Governor with some violation of the law. But the truth is the "charge" is more like a claim and the claim is not backed up even by the person that was supposed to have been plagiarized -- not that AP reports that, of course. Let's not let facts get in the way.
AP lays out the charge in its first few paragraphs.
Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has been accused of paraphrasing at length from an article co-written by Newt Gingrich when she gave a speech, but her lawyer says proper credit was given to the former House speaker.
...Dunn compared Palin's speech introducing conservative talk show host Michael Reagan, son of former President Ronald Reagan, to an Anchorage audience Wednesday to the article urging Republicans to study Reagan, written by Gingrich and Craig Shirley in 2005.
Despite this blogger's claims, Palin did mention Gingrich as the source of the words at the outset of the speech. In fact, Palin mentioned Newt twice during her remarks the first time saying, "Recently, Newt Gingrich had written a good article about Reagan," and the second time she said, "what Newt had written in this article..." What more do you want in a spoken address to indicate a source?
On top of the false charge, AP notes that the blogger is writing a book on Palin and from his work on her thus far, no doubt it will not be a flattering look at her career. So a blogger accuses Palin of stealing from Newt Gingrich and AP reports this story despite the fact that this blogger has no legitimacy on the matter and is writing an adversarial book on her that he is hawking.
Also, notice how AP gives us the "but her lawyer says" line? Well, it turns out that through spokesman Rick Tyler, Newt Gingrich says the same thing as Palin's lawyer. Newt's own people say that no plagiarism occurred. Unfortunately, readers of the AP account were not informed of this fact.
The upshot of this whole deal is that AP used a flimsy charge made by a biased blogger and reported it as a serious matter and then didn't fully report that even the person that was supposed to have been plagiarized said there wasn't any plagiarism.
Now, don't get me wrong, here. I am not charging that a blogger is an insubstantial source merely on the face of it. I am saying this blogger lacks any serious gravitas. I am also saying that the charge itself is silly, flimsy, and foolish made solely to get the blogger attention as opposed to revealing any deep, dark Palin misdeeds.
Sadly, AP uses this bad source anyway and presents it as if it had veracity. And thus we have another smear job on Governor Palin based on unsubstantiated claims from a biased source presented to us as if it were news.
And the hits just keep comin,' folks.



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Palin
June 9, 2009 - 06:13 ET by kilrodI will support Palin if for no other reason than to spite the SSM(sub-slime media).
(Grins) kilrod
Remember, only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American Soldier
heh
June 9, 2009 - 06:18 ET by Warner Todd HustonI know what you mean. You know, I have serious differences with the governor on certain policies, but man if it doesn't make you want to support her just to stick it to the Old Media!!
Be sure and visit my home blog PubliusForum.com.
The snippy Norah O'Donnell
June 9, 2009 - 06:34 ET by SickofLibsThe snippy Norah O'Donnell also just led the Today Show with this fabrication, complete with comparison quotes "proving" Palin plagiarized Newt.
Of course she too left out the part where Palin credited Newt.
If the Messiah is any indication
June 9, 2009 - 06:42 ET by theduck6it would appear that plagarism is a prerequisite for a Vice-Presidential candidate.
Isn't this the same lady who said she knew foreign policy because she could see Russia from her front porch and worships the devil in her church? No wait...those were just more viscous lies perpetuated and spread by the MSM.
Someone needs to file a legal suit finally....
June 9, 2009 - 06:43 ET by jdripperThis has become completely out of control. I know if it was me I would file suit against the AP. It would not go anywhere and I know that but that is not the point.
If the AP had to be constantly spending money to back up their libelous actions then they MIGHT just MIGHT finally have some editors that grab these jerks reporters up and say where is the second and third source for these accusations?
Jack
"If at age 20 you are a conservative then you have no heart. If at age 30 you are a liberal then you have no brains." Sir Winston Churchill
I would much rather ... if
June 9, 2009 - 10:26 ET by amberI would much rather ... if they are found guilty of libel and or slander the organization has 2 choices, fire the people involved or lose their press credentials and constitutional protections. The involved personel would also lose their press credentials and constitutional protections for at least 10 years. The company would also have to read an appology, acceptable to the injured party, over the air every 30 minutes for the first week and cary a disclaimer at the bottom of their publication or television that says the organization was actively involved in lying about (insert name here) and any information learned from this organization should be fully researched before passing it on as truth.
Libs once again employ
June 9, 2009 - 07:39 ET by HockeyKidLibs once again employ their playground tactics. You can just hear this HuffPo nitwit saying, "You accused Joe Biden of plagiarism, so now you can see what it feels like!" I'm surprised there was no extension of his tongue to accompany the charge.
As always, truth and liberals don't ride the same bus.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Except Biden did plagiarize
June 9, 2009 - 12:41 ET by MrSnugglesExcept Biden did plagiarize and the left just doesn't care.
This is deliberate lying on the part of the AP
June 9, 2009 - 08:08 ET by c5thenThis can't hide behind "shoddy reporting" or an "honest mistake". This is purposefully leaving out a major part of the story in order to mislead the reader and to damage the reputation of the target of the story. This is a textbook case of libel.
Where are the GOP lawyers and the conservative organizations? Why is the AP not facing a hailstorm of legal action and criticism from the other media?
Hey, I got the wrong "CHANGE"!
www.loyaltoliberty.com
Yes, Warner ...
June 9, 2009 - 09:37 ET by Dave PierreI agree, Warner. Pretty lame for AP to even mention this, considering that the AP (and the rest of the MSM) totally ignored the flat-out clear plagiarism of a liberal, Al Franken, in his bestselling Lies and the Lying Liars book. Check this out:
FAIR, July/August 2001: "The Most Biased Name in News" by Seth Ackerman, writing about Hannity & Colmes:
FRANKEN, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them (Dutton, 2003, hardcover 1st edition), page 63:
That's a tough one to write off as coincidence. http://www.frankenlies.com/lies/plagiarism.htm
Re MoDo Plagiarism
June 9, 2009 - 09:49 ET by slickwillie2001Speaking of plagiarism, the Maureen Dowd case died pretty quick didn't it? That was a blatant case of admitted plagiarism. What action did al New York Times take against their in-house plagiarizer? Want to bet this Palin bogus charge gets more ink than Dowd's?
Plagiarism oneself?
June 9, 2009 - 09:57 ET by CobraMan"Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has been accused of paraphrasing at length from an article co-written by Newt Gingrich"
Co-written? So she's plagiarizing herself?
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
LOL
June 9, 2009 - 10:04 ET by Warner Todd HustonThey should have said co-written by Newt and another guy.
Be sure and visit my home blog PubliusForum.com.
Yep, it would have helped
June 9, 2009 - 10:27 ET by CobraManYep, it would have helped. But clarity is not something we can expect from the AP.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
The US Constitution
Unless you're a fetus.
The US Supreme Court
Things keep going the way
June 9, 2009 - 10:23 ET by RR GOPThings keep going the way they are, I think voters will pay as much attention to this as Bill Ayers, Reverend Wright, the treatment of Joe the Plumber, ACORN, the missing birth certificate, the Kenyan political connection, voting present, using hard drugs, Tony Rezko, Father Pfleger...
Actually, with all the digging the MSM has done the best they could come up with is that her daughter apparently likes sex.
Oh, the humanities!
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).
Palin is a threat to the
June 9, 2009 - 12:43 ET by MrSnugglesPalin is a threat to the lefts dream of a socialist America. She must be destroyed, even if it costs the media all credibility.
Seriousness of the Charge??
June 9, 2009 - 12:50 ET by boomerconIf that is the only criteria required to give legs to a story, then what the heck happened to the charge that "Obama is NOT a US citizen, born on US soil"???
Whatya say to that, MSM, huh?
Amen. Consider This...They STILL fear her!
June 9, 2009 - 13:06 ET by farstar99They STILL fear her!
What does that suggest to you?
It means she can win.
When you discard the lying media and their doctored polls, Obama's spin on her numbers, they must have done the research and figured out if she had run without McPain, we'd have come closer to winning.
That bodes ill for their desperate attempt to portray conservatism as dead. And it explains why they must continue to attack.
Palin's Plagiarism
June 9, 2009 - 15:14 ET by trueconservI'm sorry, but I don't remember the liberal media have a total cow when Maureen Dowd was guilty of plagiarism just the other day! And what about all the made-up stories from the NY TIMES? Talk about plagiarist, has anyone in the media ever heard of Joe Biden? There were some rumors last year that even Barack Obama had gotten Bill Ayers to help him write his second book because the publisher sent it back to him for being really bad. Did HE give credit? I also seem to remember that many of Obama's speeches were also a copy of other past speeches. Does anyone remember that? These people kill me.
tc... I remember all of
June 9, 2009 - 15:22 ET by bigtimertc...
I remember all of that well, pesky little facts like you mention they just shoo away...
Nothing like msm double-standard with their 24/7 hypocrisy...they never quit...and never will.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
This just gives
June 9, 2009 - 16:51 ET by Another Dead KennedyThis just gives conservatives the perfect excuse to publicly destroy the next democrat to plagiarize.