A 60-year-old Mormon Church in Massachusetts burned to the ground on Sunday. A story about the incident appeared on the Washington Post website last night. It's an AP entry discussing the fire that chased worshippers out of the building in a panic on Sunday. But it is accompanied by a rather odd choice of images. Is it a photo of the fire-damaged church? Perhaps it is a snap of frightened churchgoers or a resolute minister vowing to rebuild? Well, none of those really.
The odd choice of photos accompanying the story of a fire at a Mormon Church is one of gay couples that "brought a lawsuit" over gay marriage in Massachusetts.
One might wonder what the heck a photo of gays has to do with a church burning down? The answer seems to be that the Washington Post doesn't seem to think there is any time that isn’t suitable to attack the Mormon Church over its opposition to gay marriage. They turned this simple story of a fire into an excuse to play politics.
The story is short enough with but a few quick paragraphs detailing the fire and how it gutted the building. Also revealed is that worshipers had been involved in a tele-conference call with Mormon leaders when the fire broke out. It tells us the fire chief said the fire started in the attic and the roof of the 60-year-old building had collapsed. And that is about it.
But the photo put with the story (see screen shot below) has nothing whatever to do with that particular church nor the fire...unless the Post is trying to intimate that gays burned the church down and I doubt that is the case.
No, the photo is of gay couples that the caption dutifully informs us had “brought a lawsuit” against the state over gay marriage. In fact, the caption of the photo is almost longer than the story about the fire.
Gay couples who brought the landmark lawsuit that led to the first legalized gay marriages in the United States pose for a photo during a reunion in Newton Mass, Sunday, May, 17, 2009, celebrate their fifth anniversaries, five years after Massachusetts became the first state to legalize gay marriage. Pictured are, front row, from left, Gina Nortonsmith, Avery Nortonsmith, 12, Heidi Nortonsmith, Quinn Nortonsmith, 9, all of Northampton, Mass., Attorney Mary Banato, who heard the landmark case before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and Ellen Wade, Maureen Brodoff, of Newton, Mass., Rob Compton, and David Wilson, of Boston, Ed Balmelli, and Michael Hogan of Jamaica Plain, Mass., Gary Chalmers and Richard Linnell, of Whitinsville, Mass., and Gloria Bailey-Davies and Linda Bailey Davies, of Orleans, Mass., (AP Photo/Josh Reynolds) (Josh Reynolds - AP)
It might seem odd to you that a story about a Mormon Church burning to the ground is accompanied by a photo of complaining gays. But then one remembers that California's anti-gay marriage Proposition 8 had a major Mormon connection. In California, you see, the Mormon Church helped the anti-gay marriage forces spread the word about Prop 8 and helped get it passed by the majority of Californians.
So the Post seems to have decided that any time Mormons are discussed, even if it is because one of their churches burned down, then that is a good time to discuss how rotten Mormons are for opposing gay marriage.
If this isn't the "news" people acting as advocates, what is?
I took a screen shot of this page just in case the Washington Post suddenly decides that they'd gone too far with this one and decides to scrub history like so many Old Media sites have done over the years.

(H/T NewsBusters reader Joshua Hartshorn)



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
You look at the story, and
May 18, 2009 - 05:58 ET by motherbeltYou look at the story, and the photo, and you think, "That has to be a mistake."
But probably not. After all, the church IS in Massachusetts, so you can understand the connection.
AP/WaPo: No class, all A$$
They might say "Wow, that sucks!" But at least they'll say "Wow!" -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes
WaPo Bias
May 18, 2009 - 07:25 ET by trhugGary Huggins.... Same old wapo trashing decency. I do not even visit their website as I grew sickened by same many, many years ago.
The Washington Compost!
May 18, 2009 - 07:33 ET by rossiThe Post will be on the dung heap just like the rest of the libtard papers. This story is one of the reasons why. They just can not print a story without spinning it to what they want you to believe.
Mormons do not hate people who are gay. They do however object to the gay lifestyle and see it as immoral.
Two words
May 18, 2009 - 07:56 ET by moderncommentaries83FREUDIAN SLIP
But, of course, if the church were burned down by gay activists, it will not be a hate crime or probably even prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. The arsonists would, after all, be acting in the interest of human rights.
In Milwaukee, we have a great religious history and many, many churches dot our skyline. I drive by them and a part of me wonders how soon it will be before leftist thugs burn them to the ground, too.
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
Maybe they will just be
May 18, 2009 - 08:08 ET by sherylsimsMaybe they will just be turned into mosques.
Milwaukee
May 18, 2009 - 12:29 ET by Conservative VoiceI have spent some time in Milwaukee, and remember laughing that there was a church building on every street corner, along with a bar across the street :)
I hope this story backfires ( pun intended ) because at first glance I drew the conclusion that this fire was related to prop 8.
Yeah, that is one strange
May 18, 2009 - 08:43 ET by PewahYeah, that is one strange layout on the page. Absolutely an example of the writer trying their best to make their opinion known. Can you imagine if they had a story of Obama at an award ceremony and next to it a picture of Acorn workers who have been charged with crimes? The MSM continues to do discredit themselves.
I don't believe in
May 18, 2009 - 08:43 ET by Willis_Leon_Johnsongarbage news reporting.
If the WaPo building burns down, will they put my picture with the story?
http://gjresult.com
You missed it
May 18, 2009 - 08:47 ET by T-Bone MassThe WaPo is giving an alibi to the people in the photo, "it wasn't us we were in Newton getting our photo taken, see." It is very coinincedental that is happened on the fifth ann. of the"legalization" of same sex marriage.
Great. Now the gays are
May 18, 2009 - 09:08 ET by redmikeGreat. Now the gays are burning down churches. They're probably all just ex clan members anyway. (Relax, I'm kidding)
Gays
May 18, 2009 - 09:31 ET by Warner Todd HustonGays could never be Klan members. The clothing is just not she-she enough. All white year 'round? How gauche.
Be sure and visit my home blog PubliusForum.com.
That is one happy looking
May 18, 2009 - 09:31 ET by SickofLibsThat is one happy looking group of arsonists, there. Next time, leave the kids home, though, OK?
WAPO Blames Gays for the Fire
May 18, 2009 - 13:29 ET by deerjerkydaveI guess the Washington Post must think that homosexuals are to blame for this fire.
Sort of what I was
May 18, 2009 - 16:56 ET by QueenMumSort of what I was thinking, deerjerk. Perhaps it was God's will? You know. God was sort of sticking up for gay marriage, here.
GO CAVS!!!!!
Veiled threat
May 19, 2009 - 08:41 ET by nkviking75Dave, it almost comes off as a veiled threat, as well as planting the suspicion that radical gay activists are responsible for the fire. I wonder if more level-headed gays are protesting the juxtaposition of the story with the photo.
When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.
This is
May 18, 2009 - 16:47 ET by bigtimerThis is appalling...absolutely disgraceful.
We are in a religious war now...and have been for a long time, in more ways than one.
Newsflash msm...you will be defeated...and you will be shamed, shunned in the end...one way or the other.
Only God knows for sure.
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
Mixing Gay Marriage With Mormon Church Fire
May 28, 2009 - 19:22 ET by rb scottI am reacting late to this report. Apologies.
Wrapping the story of the fire at the Mormon Church in Cambridge around a photo of gay couples celebrating the advent of same sex marriage in Massachusetts is an awkward, unprofessional layout choice. However, in the caption I see no cheap shots aimed at the Mormon Church for its opposition to same sex marriage in California.
Was some editor at The Post was having a little fun? It’s possible, but I doubt it. Perhaps you are overreaching more than just a tad.
Do I have an axe to grind? Yes, several. My profile here reveals that I am a journalist, based in Boston. It does not note that I am a life-long Mormon, nor that I was a missionary in New England shortly after the church was built in Cambridge’s Longfellow Park nor that my daughter, now a student Wellesley, was baptized and worships there.
To the thousands of young Latter-day Saints who have passed through its doors, the people that congregated in the Longfellow Park church represented change, openness, hope, and the blessings derived from perseverance and clear-thinking.
RB Scott
Boston, MA.