Back in 2007, lefty comedian Jon Stewart mercilessly mocked lefty talk show host Chris Matthews over the title of his book when Matthews appeared to flog the tome on Stewart's The Daily Show. The ribbing was so unexpected and so mean spirited that Matthews later said it was a "book interview from hell."
Now Matthews is releasing the book in paperback but amazingly there is a tiny difference between this version of the book and the original. The pulper was originally titled, "Life’s a Campaign: What Politics Has Taught Me About Friendship, Rivalry, Reputation, and Success." But now, all of a sudden the paperback version of this thing is heading to stores as, "The Hardball Handbook: How to Win at Life."
So, what gives? Is Matthews afraid of Stewart's renewed attack on his book? Did Matthews change the book's title for fear of a comedian?
When Matthews appeared with Stewart, the faux newsman ripped into the book title. He called it a Machiavellian "recipe for sadness." And he went on, as the Washington Examiner reminds us:
"If you treat life like a campaign ... at the end of your life, do you give a concession speech?" asked Stewart. "Aren't campaigns fundamentally contrivances?"
And now with the paperback release bearing a wildly different title, it's a bit hard to shake the suspicion that Matthews was afraid of Stewart's renewed attacks on the book.
So, now I have a question. Are we going to see the left-wing, Old Media bemoan that this lefty comedian is forcing others to "backtrack," forcing others to "change" things because of his loud criticism of them? After all, the Old Media falls all over itself to report stories of how they imagine that Republicans are "backtracking" because of Rush Limbaugh, don't they? So, what is the difference in principle between Limbaugh forcing folks on the right to mend their ways for fear of his criticism and folks on the left bowing to pressure from comedian Stewart for his criticism?
I suppose I shouldn't hold my breath, eh?
(Photo credit: transbuddha.com)



















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Wow. Now I can't help but
April 23, 2009 - 06:13 ET by HockeyKidWow. Now I can't help but feel sorry for Matthews. If he thinks life is a political campaign, he must have a pretty miserable existence.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
HockeyKid, He is only
April 23, 2009 - 08:15 ET by Scuba DudeHockeyKid,
He is only emulating that which makes him tingle. He sees that Bambi is on a never ending campaign and is thinking "If its good enough for my Messiah, it's good enough for me".
"The wrOng ONE was elected"
I don't feel sorry for Tingles the Clown...
April 23, 2009 - 12:43 ET by heldmywJon Stewart neutered Tingles Matthews on national TV and ridiculed his "book".
A fast repackaging and MAYBE they'll pass of a few copies on the gullible.
Unless Stewart gets hold of this Title Change chicanery and buries Chrissy's scribblings forever.
I think the new title
April 23, 2009 - 06:26 ET by motherbeltI think the new title offers even more fodder for ridicule!
Chris Matthews holding himself up as an expert on How To Win At Life ?
They might say "Wow, that sucks!" But at least they'll say "Wow!" -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes
Game Of Life
April 23, 2009 - 07:09 ET by DontFeedTheTrollsPerhaps it's a how to guide to winning this game.
I'm sure Chris needs one of these though.
D
Keep the ILLEGALS out, join NumbersUSA to send free faxes to your reps.
Wont matter what it is called
April 23, 2009 - 07:41 ET by general companyIt wont sell.
My Gov. thinks I am dangerous, so be careful
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
Agreed
April 23, 2009 - 08:54 ET by KC MulvilleLanding at MSNBC is hardly evidence for winning at life.
Tingle
April 23, 2009 - 07:08 ET by Nearly NobodyThat gives me a tingle up my leg!!
"Nearly Nobody's News"
He might have changed it
April 23, 2009 - 08:06 ET by balboaHe might have changed it because of Stewart, but he also might have changed it because it didn't sell as as well as they had hoped. Heck, the publisher might have changed it for both those reasons.
Don't know that everyone is going to check with Stewart before releasing books now.
The new title
April 23, 2009 - 08:18 ET by Paul Atreidessounds like a self-help book by some guy on late at night with a microphone/earpiece on his head.
Oh for crying out loud!
April 23, 2009 - 08:46 ET by motherbeltDon't know that everyone is going to check with Stewart before releasing books now. -balboa
bal, you have an innate penchant for playing dumb and pretending you don't know when things are being said "tongue-in-cheek."
Are we going to see the left-wing, Old Media
bemoan that this lefty comedian is forcing others to "backtrack,"
forcing others to "change" things because of his loud criticism of
them? After all, the Old Media falls all over itself to report stories
of how they imagine that Republicans are "backtracking" because of Rush
Limbaugh, don't they?
If that didn't make clear what WTH's intention was, (the point is whether the media will report it that way) then you are being deliberately obtuse.
They might say "Wow, that sucks!" But at least they'll say "Wow!" -Duff Goldman, the Ace of Cakes
Not enough space
April 23, 2009 - 08:07 ET by aakaakaakTo be honest, the original title of the book probably wouldn't fit on the cover of a paperback. At least, that should be his excuse if anyone asks.
http://www.americanw...
Chrissy
April 23, 2009 - 08:20 ET by Paul Atreidescan't even shut up on a book cover. I wonder if the paperback has a flowchart of his leg tingle.
Paul... That was needing
April 23, 2009 - 16:50 ET by bigtimerPaul...
That was needing a spew alert...you have me laughing so hard it isn't funny...all I can say is you nailed Chris to a tee!
Doubling down on stupid is not a particularly good idea. ~Andrew Breitbart
You have to admit
April 23, 2009 - 08:17 ET by Paul Atreidesthe original gasbag title is crummy.
How were the sales of the original title? Were they any better than his ratings? Maybe he thought a new title would make people think it's a different (new) book.
Stewart?
April 23, 2009 - 09:31 ET by slickwillie2001Both titles suck, and this whole topic demonstrates Stewart's gargantuan ego and a way overblown opinion of him. He's a failed C-grade actor, a teleprompter reader and has a clever bunch of writers. If Matthews 'fears' him, then Matthews is even more messed up than we suspect.
Agree -- original too long
April 23, 2009 - 12:00 ET by GreatPlainsThis was a marketing decision. They reduced the title from 14 words to 7, something much easier to remember. With a 14-word title, there'd be no room on the cover for Matthews cherubic countenance.
Short or long, the title's a fiction. Based on his rants, I seriously doubt he's learned a thing.
I'm writing a book right now...
April 23, 2009 - 16:41 ET by Jnoble..it's going to be called "Jon Stewart Is A Huge Douchebag Who Wouldn't Know What To Say Unless Some Liberal Hipster Put It On A Cue-card For Him To Read To His Sheep-like Audience And Then Make A Face To An Edited Out Of Context Video Of A Republican"
Hmmmmmm......I'm starting to doubt I'll get booked on his show to promote it. :-)
Teleprompter
April 23, 2009 - 17:30 ET by slickwillie2001Actually, Stewart uses a set of high-tech LCD teleprompters just like the Bamster does. Andrew Breitbart commented on this after his visit to Stewart's show.
So nice to watch them eat
April 23, 2009 - 23:01 ET by RR GOPSo nice to watch them eat their own every once in a while...they figure they've buried the Conservatives, so now they're fighting for the coveted Alpha Libtard slots in their Politburo-like caste system...I wonder if Stewart would have Matthews down on his back standing victoriously over him if they were dogs? Would be harder for Matthews to hump his Master's leg though, wouldn't it?
Uh, Garcon! More popcorn, sil vous plait!
One of the 34% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 61% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory (yep...approval for Congress now at 39%...do you believe that!?).