Playboy Magazine got its undies in a bundle over the nation wide Tea Party protests held last Friday that were inspired by CNBC's Rick Santelli's free market rant of February 19. As Noel Sheppard noted on March 1, the skin mag published a piece claiming that Santelli was part of a vast right-wing conspiracy to protest Obama's socialist policies.
It turns out, however, that the story has been proven false and in response Playboy has mysteriously removed the piece that first raised the question of the grand conspiracy. Happily, the facts have won over on Playboy forcing it to pull down the fallacious story. In its place, all we now get is a "We're sorry, we couldn't find the page you requested," notice.
To recap, this is what made Playboy run for its tinfoil hats:
What we discovered is that Santelli's "rant" was not at all spontaneous as his alleged fans claim, but rather it was a carefully-planned trigger for the anti-Obama campaign. In PR terms, his February 19th call for a "Chicago Tea Party" was the launch event of a carefully organized and sophisticated PR campaign, one in which Santelli served as a frontman, using the CNBC airwaves for publicity, for the some of the craziest and sleaziest rightwing oligarch clans this country has ever produced. Namely, the Koch family, the multibilllionaire owners of the largest private corporation in America, and funders of scores of rightwing thinktanks and advocacy groups, from the Cato Institute and Reason Magazine to FreedomWorks. The scion of the Koch family, Fred Koch, was a co-founder of the notorious extremist-rightwing John Birch Society.
What they "discovered" turned out to be wrong. David Bauder of the AP is reporting that Santelli had nothing to do with the various Tea Party demonstrations. In fact, Instapundit reported that some of the Tea Party efforts predated Santelli's TV rant.
Bauder reports that Santelli and CNBC requested that one Tea Party site remove Santelli's name from its pages because there was no affiliation between them. AP notes that the original site, http://www.reteaparty.com , even had a disclaimer attached declaring the fact that Santelli was not connected with the site.
Now, above I said "happily facts have won over Playboy forcing the mag to pull down the fallacious story" which is all well and good. But the problem is we now have hundreds perhaps thousands of left-wing DailyKosers and such all imagining they know the real story, the one that corresponds to the fake Playboy tale.
So, while the fake story has been scrubbed, the claim of conspiracy is still floating around like a noxious cloud befouling the air.
And, THAT, my friends, is how the left works. Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.
Update 14:32 | Stephen Gutowski: The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog...


















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Sad but True
March 3, 2009 - 06:22 ET by richb313Sad but True. Let us also be honest that this is also a problem with a common human failing and that is a rush to judgement and also the way the Internet works. It is like spreading a rumor in a small town. Facts and Truth need not apply. Once the rumor circulates in that mythical small town nothing can undo the damage and the recirculation of that rumor. The tinfoil hat crowd live and breathe this stuff.
You are only saying that
March 3, 2009 - 06:34 ET by Warner Todd HustonYou are only saying that because you are a member of the Trilatteral commission... right? A Bilderberger? Maybe a Jesuit? Oh... I know, an alien from Alpha Prime!
ah-hah!! Playboy got
March 3, 2009 - 07:13 ET by MidAmericaah-hah!! Playboy got caught with their pants down...
Note the lack of integrity ....
March 3, 2009 - 07:30 ET by Tom Blumer.... in not posting a retraction.
Same goes with TPM Muckraker which just pulled it without comment. I looked through TPM's home page back to the day before Playboy's Friday pub date per Noel to be sure.
Exactly, Tom. No apology
March 3, 2009 - 07:32 ET by Warner Todd HustonExactly, Tom. No apology no"we'll get to the bottom of this." Just a blank page. A lack of integrity, that's what it is!
It is typical
March 3, 2009 - 08:27 ET by Arelcoming from the left. They will print nice big articles without getting all the facts first and when they get schooled they print a retraction in microscopic size so you can't find it. The problem is the false story posted will be used on every liberal site like it is truth when it fact it couldn't be any further from it.
The problem is that they
March 3, 2009 - 09:21 ET by MichelleCThe problem is that they don't even print a retraction. They only removed the article with no explanation, which is not a retraction. The Daily Kossaks will be quoting this article for years and years to come because Playboy is such a reputable news agency, dontcha know!
Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July. Democrats believe every day is April 15th ~ Ronald Reagan
Lack of Integrity???
March 3, 2009 - 09:22 ET by sherylsimsReally? From such a highly respected publication? I am SHOCKED!
My thoughts EXACTLY!
March 3, 2009 - 18:46 ET by Cape ConservativeIt is no dishonor to be in a minority in the cause of liberty and virtue. ~ Sam Adams
disappeared down the memory hole
March 4, 2009 - 13:21 ET by pst314"The Commissar Vanishes" ;-)
What do you know?
March 3, 2009 - 07:31 ET by HockeyKidWhat do you know? KOSsacks really do read Playboy just for the articles.
"Beauty is only skin deep, but liberal's to the bone." - me
Yes, we all get playboy for the articles...
March 3, 2009 - 08:50 ET by SQL_SamI must admit that wouldn't be the page I would be lookin for!
Integrity from Playboy?
March 3, 2009 - 09:14 ET by ScadsobeesIntegrity from Playboy? Are you kidding?
That isn't a link I'll be clicking on.....
Not many things on the internet REALLY disappear ...
March 3, 2009 - 09:32 ET by Jayke... A Lot get CACHED by Google. You can see the cached article here:
http://74.125.47.132...
Re Cache
March 3, 2009 - 13:44 ET by slickwillie2001Thanks Jayke; my first thought was also 'check the cache'. Google is run by liberals, so even Google's cache might be disappeared. The internet really needs a non-partisan fast-acting caching mechanism. I use 'thewaybackmachine' at: http://www.archive.o...
...regularly, but I don't know if they are as all-inclusive as Google or process-independent from Google.
Surprising!
March 3, 2009 - 09:37 ET by pvoceThere ARE people out there who read Playboy for "the articles";)
Quit trying to act like a
March 3, 2009 - 20:06 ET by RR GOPQuit trying to act like a real magazine. Shut up. Oh, and please release those extras you have from the Cyndi Wood and Monica Tidwell photo shoots I know you guys have locked up somewhere.
TIA.
One of the 24% who thinks George W. Bush was a great President. One of the 89% who wants to bring back the stock and pillory.
Apoligize
October 10, 2009 - 11:57 ET by Jerry MackPlayboy apoligizing would only add fuel to the fire. Besides Playboy accomplished their mission by getting this rumor into the blogosphere.
Next months edition will have Marge Simpson on the cover. They are desperately seeking to increase their readership.