Kmiec in Chicago Trib: GOP Shows 'No Interest in Family, Work or Neighborhood'


For the Chicago Tribune, Romney supporter turned Obama man Douglas Kmiec indulged in quite a litany of name-calling, finger pointing and demagoguery against the GOP that would have been amazing from the same man only one year ago. Hopefully questioning "The Death of the GOP," Kmiec has shown that he no longer cares much how he is viewed, going full Democrat Partisan at this point.

In his Tribune article, Kmiec outrageously says that Republicans don't care about "helping" the country, that they denigrate the "values, hopes and planning of others," and have "no interest in family, work or neighborhood." After heaping such calumny onto the GOP, he then does further damage to poor Mitt Romney by happily reminding us that Romney is a "flip flopper" that should join the Obama administration. Some friend he is!

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Douglas Kmiec used to have a certain reputation as a serious man of the law and a man of religious conviction. Apparently that reputation is no longer important to him if this display of name-calling is any indication.

Kmiec unleashes a false premise in the very first paragraph by taking the Democrat's position that the so-called stimulus bill actually does anything to stimulate the economy. But even Kmiec agrees that the bill is also a massive welfare bill by pointing out the new provisions that are directed at "basic health care, job training, and in the near term, unemployment benefits and food."

Following that admission -- a thing he paints as a positive good -- Kmiec then rips into the motives of Senator Judd Gregg, the man that recently turned down President Obama's offer of a cabinet position. Kmeic decides that the "only reason" that Senator Gregg could possibly have turned down the cabinet position is because Gregg doesn't "want to help" the country.

One wonders how Mr. Kmiec could have gotten into Senator Gregg's head to know this? Apparently how Kmiec infers this disinterest in "helping" the country is via a purposeful misinterpretation of Gregg's stated refusal of the position offered by Obama. What Gregg said was that his governing philosophies clashed with Obama's and because of that he didn't think they would make a good team. Gregg's position is clear. He stands on the opposite side of the issues with Obama and, therefore, could not in good conscience be subservient to Obama, the man that would be running the show.

Gregg's is a principled position to take. After all, when one joins a team run by a strong team captain, one will be required to abide by that captain's directions. But if you know ahead of time that said captain holds ideas you are firmly against, well it's best not to even join the team in the first place.

But this isn't good enough for Kmiec. He thinks Gregg should have thrown away his principles -- like Kmiec himself has done, I guess -- and signed onto the winning team or risk being from the party that is known for "denigrating the values, hopes and planning of others."

Kmiec's next apostasy is to claim that the GOP's refusal to agree to this giant welfare package is somehow a refutation of Ronald Reagan's legacy.

In 1980, Ronald Reagan won many Democrats and independents over to his side by paying special attention to "family, work, neighborhood, peace and freedom." In the last eight years, peace gave way to military occupation with a decidedly murky objective. The freedom of Americans and others has been likewise put at risk by the provocation of hatred and suspicion in cultural circumstances we know little about. And now the GOP is apparently confessing little or no interest in family, work or neighborhood. How else can one explain total disinterest in a stimulus bill that provides $116 billion in direct tax relief for workers, another $70 billion in tax relief for the middle class and that provides economic incentives to buy energy-efficient cars, houses by first-time home buyers and provides $2 billion for health care for the needy and the elderly?

Just look at the overheated, nonsensical rhetoric of that! It is a logical fallacy to say that because the GOP does not support this pork laden bill then the GOP doesn't care about tax relief. Were it up to Republicans there would have been far more tax relief in this mess of a bill. Kmiec has employed the "when have you stopped beating your wife" argument here.

How insincere.

He goes on to insinuate that the GOP's early anti-slavery days is a legacy destroyed by its not voting for this gigantic enlargement of the state today and that Gregg should have seen nothing wrong with taking an office that was in the process of having powers stripped from it.

As to that last, Kmiec seems to imagine that Gregg's pique at Obama's plans to remove the implementation of the census from the Commerce department he'd have headed was somehow the GOP's grab for power and not Obama's. This just boggles the mind. Obama announces he is going to take the census away from the department where its been carried out for ages and put it in his own offices, yet Kmiec scolds the GOP for it's need for power over the census? It's OBAMA that is proposing taking power over the census, not the GOP!

In his penultimate paragraph, Kmiec does his old fried Mitt Romney no favors by dragging his name into this anti-GOP screed claiming that Obama should appoint the former Massachusetts governor as the next nominee for the Commerce Department. And what is Romney's chief qualification in Kmiec's eyes? Romney is a "flip flopper" that can "work to find common ground."

Were I Mr. Romney, I'd not be thanking Kmiec for reminding the voters that I have no principles and will do anything to "work with" the other side!

Lastly, Douglas Kmiec has a warning for that dastardly GOP:

The GOP needs to abandon its suicidal ways before it's too late--for them and, more important, for a nation that benefits from the contest of liberal and conservative ideas and the hard work that it takes to meld them into responsible and prudent policy.

That's right, GOP. Throw away those silly principles of personal responsibility, low taxes, and that anti-welfare attitude and sign onto the far left's ideas quick... or it will be too late.

Now, doesn't this doom-saying seem to demolish the campaign of "hope" that Kmiec was so proud to sign onto when he jettisoned the Republican Party to join team Obama last year? Sadly, hope wasn't the only thing Kmiec jettisoned when he jumped ship and swam over to the S.S. Obama.

(Photo credit: Harvard Gazette/Jon Chase)


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm semi-speechless. Is this man bi-polar?

 Even if he decided to support Obama, what in the sam hell would induce someone to write such a psychotic screed? Do they have blackmail pics of him, or what?

 

All a Democrat needs is the upper-story window of public attention and the chamber pot of rhetoric. How else to explain the rise of Joe Biden?  P.J. O' Rourke

Way I see it...

The way I see it, Kmiec made an unprincipled choice to back Obama and instead of just letting it go he keeps backing himself closer into the corner to justify his bad decision. He's desperately going all in, as they say.

Republicans don't care about

Republicans don't care about "helping" the country, that they denigrate the "values, hopes and planning of others," and have "no interest in family, work or neighborhood."

 

Yep that’s me.

 

I will not “help” you destroy this country.

 

I will not “denigrate” MY values or MY hopes for people and the fact that this is the Greatest Country in the World, if only the lazy SOB’s will extend their hand to work, rather then for a handout..

 

I have “no interest in any one in my family that is too lazy to work,” or enables then to live in a “neighborhood” that they cant afford but is willing for the government to place then there at every one’s expense.

 

Hey Kmiec, people like you are what made the GOP so weak. Don’t comeback when we are in power, (if we all survive this total push into Socialism).

Wow that’s BALLS, for him to call someone a “flip flopper”

 

 

Ronald Reagan, 1962: I did not leave the Democratic party, the party left me.

Insert: your name, 2008, and the Republican party.

 

If this is the same Doug

If this is the same Doug Kmeic, he's a "Catholic" who justified supporting Obama because Obama would somehow reduce abortions and make things better.

It's not the GOP that's against family...it's the DNC.  They create laws and support causes (feminism, gay marriage) that undermine the family.

It's not the GOP that's against work...it's the DNC.  They create laws and support causes that encourage a welfare, entitlement mentality, encouraging people not to work but suckle from the teet of the "rich".

It's not the GOP that's against "neighborhood" (whatever that means)...it's the DNC.  They work to support racial quotas, encourage minority communities to be disaffected with "whitey" and policies that disproportionately affect low-income families and minority small-business owners.

Kmeic is a very confused soul.

Aut viam inveniam aut faciam

In his Tribune article,

In his Tribune article, Kmiec outrageously says that Republicans don't
care about "helping" the country, that they denigrate the "values,
hopes and planning of others," and have "no interest in family, work or
neighborhood."

Sorry, Warner; that's as far as I got....but there really is no need to read any further.

I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows. -Bart Simpson

BOY

BOY do I know what you mean!

He's just doubling down

I think Kmiec feels like an absolute fool and is embarrassed. If you go back and read his explanations for supporting Obama in the first place. You will come to understand why he's doubling down on that support.

Not only was his predictions about how Obama would govern, and that he would be good for Catholic's, so atronomically wrong. To admit as much would make him a laughing stock. I mean a huge laughing stock.

Too understand just how foolish he looks, go here.

Here's a taste: Now, don't think me daft, but when Obama gave his victory remarks
in Iowa calling upon America to "choose hope over fear and to choose
unity over division," he was standing squarely in the shoes of the
"Great Communicator."

Could someone tell Kmiec that Obama has changed his shoes. Now he's wearing Jimmy Carters. 

   The way I see it Kmiec

   The way I see it Kmiec is needing to prove he is loyal to his new gang.  And just like some actual street gangs, often the initiation requires that a new recruit commit some criminal act that is acceptable to the gang as proof of loyalty.  Mr. Kmiec has just burned all his bridges and has made himself an outcast to Republicans.  He better hope this loyalty offering is accepted by the obama gang otherwise he will have a lot of time to sit on a park bench with Scott McClellon where they can reminisce about the old days.

I thought of Scott McClellon

I thought of Scott McClellon when I read this also.  I think McCellon's career is over because he will never be trusted by repubs again and dems see him as the turncoat he is and don't trust him either.  Kmiec will probably suffer the same fate.  Serves them both right.

Normally I would refrain...

Normally I would refrain from petty name-calling, but this guy is just a plain old douche bag.  (Sorry if that offended anyone's sensibilities.)

"Liberate tutume ex inferis, liberal puppets."  Me.

Straw must be on sale

... because the strawmen are being created at an absurd pace. It's like a factory working overtime.

By the way, few are reporting the obvious. Judd Gregg resigned from the Cabinet, not because he had a change of mind, but because the Obama Team undermined him to placate a minority constituency.

Hours after Gregg agreed to join the Cabinet, they took away the Census from his authority. I mean, it was within hours. But the Census is a critical job, since it forms political boundaries. The Obama liberal crowd wants to use statistical sampling to carry out the Census, but that sampling technique is (to say the least) controversial. As a conservative, Gregg would have opposed the sampling and demanded that the count be specific. But minorities pitched a fit, since they would benefit from the sampling. That's why Team Obama took the authority away from Commerce, because they didn't want a conservative running the Census. They offered Gregg a job, then undermined the job as soon as he accepted.

Imagine you were hired to be a NFL head coach. Then, just after you signed the contract, the team owner told you that you had no say about the defense, special teams, or play-calling. That's what Team Obama did to Judd Gregg. They changed the job after he agreed to take it.

And then they had the nerve to send out Axelrod and Gibbs to cover their deceit and ineptitude by insulting Gregg. They painted a story that Gregg approached them about the job, and in a spirit of bipartisanship, Obama accepted, and then for some nefarious reason, Gregg changed his mind to embarrass Obama. They created a fictional Republican scheme to embarrass the president!

This is Clinton-style character assassination. They're the new Carville and Begala, i.e., political cheap-shot hacks without any class whose method is to destroy opponents personally.

What the HE** is in that

What the HE** is in that Kool-Aid?

Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July.  Democrats believe every day is April 15th ~ Ronald Reagan

another Chicago follower of Saul Alinsky

it seems when Comrade Saul urinated in the Chicago river, all of these knuckle heads drank!! 

 

 

comrade BHO hates America's achievers

 

 

 

another Chicago follower of Saul Alinsky

it seems when Comrade Saul urinated in the Chicago river, all of these knuckle heads drank!! 

 

 

comrade BHO hates America's achievers

 

 

 

Not to worry. Those who

Not to worry. Those who might be influenced by Kmiec's words can't/don't read the paper.

 

Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand

DEM CROTROLED AREAS = POVERTY...

Maybe it's just me, but most of the areas that suck & that I would never want to live in are big cities controled by the Dems for 50 years or more. Washington DC, Detroit, Chicago, Cleveland, Buffalo, LA, New Oreleans, & St.Louis are just a few of the big cities that have always had Dem in charge.

 They are troubled areas with high crime rates, high welfare rates, high tax rates, run by unions, have crappy schools, & people are fleeing from them as fast as they can. They could be part of the Dems culture of dependency, I call it the DemPlantation. Make sure these poor folks dependent on the gov't for all their needs. I would rather earn money by working so I can go to the mall for my needs. Shopping online as well...just saying.

I refuse to become a welfare...opps, I mean a Public Investment Recipient.  Click on "Public Investment Recipient" & enjoy. Ta!

http://www.ktlkfm.com/pages/hughtopian.html 

 

"...it's still We The People, Right?"  Megadeth 

danybhoy: And the same Dems

danybhoy: And the same Dems still blame the problems in these big cities on racism and social inequality. The only people flocking to these cities are liberal idealogues who think they can change things "because they care".

 

Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of the tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. - Ayn Rand

Ignorant or stupid?

"How else can one explain total disinterest in a stimulus bill that provides $116 billion in direct tax relief for workers, another $70 billion in tax relief for the middle class..."

Republicans disinterested in tax relief???

Good grief man, get a clue. Tax relief is the one thing most Republicans are interested in. It's the social-leftist entitlement spending crap we can do without.

How does such a weak intellect aquire any kind of public platform?

Fallacies

Logical fallacies are the hallmark of all "liberal" argument. In Kmiec's case it is the Forced Option / Either,Or canard. Either you go for the phony, corrupt stimulus Or you are a person who doesn't care about America. It the same tactic Barry is using--Either we borrow and spend trillions of dollars Or face financial collapse. These same types of arguments are spewed by used car salesmen who want you to sign on the dotted line without reading the fine print ( which, ironically,  is just what the corrupt idiots in Congress did ).

Taxation Without Represenation ( or logic,or honesty ) is Tyranny.

 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Works for me isa...

I guess that makes the answer..."stupid". :-)