Yahoo News featured an interesting short report issued by Agence France-Presse on November 20. In it we discover that a consortium of French, German and Hungarian mathematicians are claiming to have proven that Einstein's famous equation, e=mc2, is correct. The report is all good except for one very small aspect. They call the effort of these mathematicians "heroic" in contradiction to the root meaning of the word. Mathematics isn't "heroic" and it is a degradation of true heroics to say it is.
Unfortunately, while a small thing too casually used in the AFP report, it proves a sort of degradation of our language. Not only that, but it further devalues real heroism, making the word mean less with each garbled usage.
Here is how AFP used the word:
It's taken more than a century, but Einstein's celebrated formula e=mc2 has finally been corroborated, thanks to a heroic computational effort by French, German and Hungarian physicists.
So, what was "heroic" about this effort? Did these mathematicians find that they were being murdered for their efforts? Where they herded into cattle trucks and sent to their deaths for having made the effort to prove the Einsteinian theory? Was there discrimination or oppression as a result? Were their families at risk because of their important work? Or, on the other hand, did their "heroic" efforts save many lives? Did their figuring save even one?
No is the answer to all of those questions.
Even in using the word at its cheapest meaning (a great effort), it is still meant to imply a monumental overcoming of obstacles at self-peril. But, seriously, is this effort a "heroic" act?
It many be monumental, it may have been difficult, it may even have far reaching effect, but "heroic" it isn't.
A soldier putting his life on the line, that's heroic. A fireman entering a burning building to save a child, that's heroic. Medical missionaries in third world nations risking their own safety and health to save the lives of people that have no access to modern medicine is even heroic.
Applying the word hero to greater and greater groups of people, though, degrades real heroism. It dilutes the word until even doing one's job can become "heroic." Politicians, movie stars, sports stars even average Moms and Dads doing their jobs, while all good things, does not rise to the level of heroics. No football player is a "hero" just because he runs around a stadium like a 12-year-old. And neither are mathematicians.
We must not make the word hero into one defined by efforts so common place that just anything applies. Unfortunately, the cultural left is very prone to this sort of moral equivalence and the media loves to over dramatize everything to heighten the emotional level of the tale but we should resist it, nonetheless.
Like I said, this is a small issue, but one that reflects a sad degradation of our society. When there are no heroes, there is no inspiration. Where there is no inspiration, we find little being valued. Everything becomes morally equivalent, nothing is special, better, or worth striving for.
There is a popular saying that holds that "words mean things" and it is a good rule of thumb to observe. Words do mean things. In an age where cynicism has taken a toll on our national character cheapening many of our most cherished beliefs, let's not cheapen this one. If everyone is a hero, no one will be as the word will cease to have a distinction. And our society will suffer all the more for it.
(Image credit: pbs.org)




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Pet Peeve
November 21, 2008 - 08:15 ET by chesterarYou're right Mr. Huston!
Thanks for pointing that out. Reporters are turning out to be wannbe Pulitzers and reach for lofty and unjustified adjectives when normal reporting is appropriate. They try and make their writing the story instead of the, actually, not very interesting one.
Since you've brought up the topic, Democratic Party vs Democrat Party is a pet peeve of mine.
All parties participating in the democratic processes of a representative republic are democratic parties; Green, Republican, Marxist (ahem), Democrat--are all a democratic party.
The Democrat Party is a collection of democrats, not democratics.
Calling the Democrat Party the Democratic Party suggests a faux-nobility, an aire of superiority when, in fact, they're just a bunch of 'rats.
Give it a try--Democrat Party.
chesterar
November 21, 2008 - 11:35 ET by NorthCoasterSo using "Democratic Party' as a descritpor would be considered Elitist.
Glad to have you join us.
Good grief! How many
November 21, 2008 - 08:32 ET by motherbeltGood grief!
How many things are now categorized as "terrorism" of one sort or another?
How many people call sugary snacks or fast food child abuse ?
The other thing that burns me is the headlines on entertainment mags and tabloids that tell of this or that celebrity's "fight for life" or "brave battle to the end" when they are stricken, as if the "lower classes" just lie there whimpering.
he⋅ro⋅ic ~ [hi-roh-ik]
November 21, 2008 - 08:49 ET by abeautifulperson1. Also, he⋅ro⋅i⋅cal. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of a hero or heroine.
2. suitable to the character of a hero in size or concept; daring; noble: a heroic ambition.
3. having or displaying the character or attributes of a hero; extraordinarily bold, altruistic, determined, etc.: a heroic explorer.
4. having or involving recourse to boldness, daring, or extreme measures: Heroic measures were taken to save his life.
5. dealing with or describing the deeds, attributes, etc., of heroes, as in literature.
6. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of the heroes of antiquity:heroic mythology.
7. used in heroic poetry. Compare heroic verse.
8. resembling heroic poetry in language or style; grandiloquent. 9. (of style or language) lofty; extravagant; grand.
10. larger than life-size: a statue of heroic proportions.
from
he⋅ro ~ [heer-oh]
1. a man of distinguished courage or ability, admired for his brave deeds and NOBLE QUALITIES.
2. a person who, in the opinion of others, has heroic qualities or has performed a heroic act and is regarded as a model or ideal: He was a local hero when he saved the drowning child.
3. the principal male character in a story, play, film, etc.
4. Classical Mythology.
a. a being of godlike prowess and beneficence who often came to be honored as a divinity.
b. (in the Homeric period) a warrior-chieftain of special strength, courage, or ability.
c. (in later antiquity) an immortal being; demigod.
5. hero sandwich.
6. the bread or roll used in making a hero sandwich.
i know its hard to think past a HERO as being: someone fighting in a war, a comic book superhero, someone carrying a gun or saving a baby from a burning building, but try not to denegrate other people's accomplishments just because you don't understand them.
doing so would make you INCREDIBLE (2nd definition).
in⋅cred⋅i⋅ble ~ [in-kred-uh-buhl]
1. so extraordinary as to seem impossible: incredible speed.
2. not credible; hard to believe; unbelievable: The plot of the book is incredible.
>whew<
man who writes and has limited vocabulary, attempts to belittle mathematicians and slag 'media' illustrates his own arrogance (or is it ignorance or is it both). oh, this drips with irony. i wouldn't use the word LITTLE, i think PETTY would be more appropriate.
And which of these
November 21, 2008 - 10:01 ET by motherbeltAnd which of these definitions do you think these mathematicians fit into?
i think it is entirely reasonable for some people to define...
November 21, 2008 - 10:15 ET by abeautifulperson... these mathematicians as:
as men of distinguished ability.
or
noble qualities.
or
the bread used in making a hero sandwich.
distinguished
November 21, 2008 - 10:44 ET by motherbeltdistinguished ability?????
That's like saying someone is responsible for their being beautiful or handsome.
That is no reflection on them....abilities are given by God, or by genetics, if you prefer.
As for noble qualities.....Uh, what "noble qualities" were required to prove a mathematical thesis?
-
November 21, 2008 - 11:34 ET by abeautifulpersonretracted
holy crap, are you really this ignorant?
November 21, 2008 - 11:22 ET by abeautifulpersondictionary.com or any dictionary.
try it some time.
we're done here.
abp- you are our resident
November 21, 2008 - 12:28 ET by Tim the Enchanterabp- you are our resident authority on ignorance, having demonstrated it here more times than I can remember.
I consulted three of 'em...
November 21, 2008 - 13:30 ET by JPR1Websters, Oxford American and American Heritage.
Carefully studied the entries under "beautiful".
No allusions to intelligence. Nope. None at all.
i think the main issue i take with this commentary
November 21, 2008 - 10:21 ET by abeautifulpersonis someone who really has no idea the grey matter required or the effort involved, can reduce their efforts because it doesn't fit into his (narrow?) view of what is heroic, or noble or distinguished.
and i really wouldn't care if this was a positive piece. but its not. its an opportunity taken to slag and denigrate. putting down the accomplishments of others and those who appreciate them.
No, I think your take on
November 21, 2008 - 11:09 ET by motherbeltNo, I think your take on this is inflating the accomplishment of these mathemeticians to a degree they don't deserve.
The deserve credit, and admiration; they are not "heroes." Nor was their endeavor "heroic."
how sad that is
November 21, 2008 - 11:19 ET by abeautifulpersonA: because it is one of the most important equations in modern history which affects just about everything in our everyday lives from the engineering of everything to nuclear physics.
B: because others are not allowed to appreciate their heroes when their heroes don't fall within YOUR narrow definition.
APB - response
November 21, 2008 - 13:54 ET by lotrA: In total agreement with you here -- one of the greatest intellectual achievements of all time, second only to Isaac Newton himself.
B: While technically speaking, I must admit you have a point (about some of the sub-entries for "heroic" found in a dictionary -- I checked my own Websters print edition) the original thesis of this thread, while subtle, is nevertheless quite legitimate, namely, that the choice of the adverb "heroic" is at best a hyperbolic one.
First, Einstein himself mathematically derived E = mc^2 within the Special Theory (or Law, if you will) of Relativity. There was no serious doubt as to its truthfulness or accuracy. Yet even with Einstein himself I would be hesitant to apply the title of "hero," which is a fine-honed word generally meant to convey a great self-sacrifice to save/rescue/help others. Far better choices of adverb (ones better describing the reality) for this particular achievement are numerous, including "brilliant," "tedious," "ingenious," etc.
And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall. -- Edgar Allan Poe
A scientist that risks life
November 21, 2008 - 18:24 ET by stratmanA scientist that risks life or liberty may be heroic depending on the circumstances. Sacrifice is a key component to heroics or heroism. Certainly the scientists, mostly Jewish, that were forced by the Nazi's to build an atomic weapon during WWII were heroic for purposefully delaying progress. They believed their actions would be found out and put to death for their actions, and many were killed or commited suicide. In contrast, the scientists involved with the Manhattan project were as heroic, or not, as any other US mainland worker contributing to the war effort. The risk to life and liberty though real was remote. Role models yes, heroes... not exactly, though I'm sure plenty of Americans were grateful for The Bomb which arguably saved millions of lives.
Mathematics may be considered a noble profession because of the purity of the science and the dedication involved, but, being a mathematician does not confer nobility upon the person. Einstein is a role model and a scientific celebrity on the order of any Hollywood star may be to others, but I don't think I could call him a "hero". Socrates maybe, Galileo possibly - these were individuals that risked their lives/liberties to do what was right in their minds and through the lense of history.
Finally, even heroic acts do not necessarily make a hero. A parent that scoops up their child in imminent danger of being run over by a car performs an heroic act - placing themselves in danger for another's well being - but I doubt most anyone would call the parent a "hero". The parent was performing a selfless yet expected function in our society - protecting their child.
To call these scientists "heroes" is hyperbole. This is akin to the Liberal relativistic mindset that gives winner's trophies to both winning and losing children contestants. What did these scientists sacrifice, real or potentially, in their studies - sleep, hygeine, dinner?
Then again, we're talking the French press. Aren't these the same folks that called comedian Jerry Lewis a "hero"?
Mathematicians
November 21, 2008 - 11:38 ET by NorthCoasterMathematicians of amazing intellect and dogged determination.
Heroics---Paaahhhh!
Thanks for proving my point
November 21, 2008 - 10:22 ET by Warner Todd HustonThanks for proving my point that being a mathematician isn't a noble endeavor. It's just a job.
>whew<
Man who tries to make mathematics equal to true heroism illustrates his own need to belittle heroics. I wouldn't use the word arrogant for that, immoral would be more appropriate.
Oh, and you might want to get your dictionary back out and learn what "denigrate" and "belittle" means. No where did I do either to mathematics. I never said a word attacking the usefulness of the art or those engaged in it.
just a job huh?
November 21, 2008 - 11:11 ET by abeautifulpersondenigrate ~ [den-i-greyt]
1. to speak damagingly of; criticize in a derogatory manner; sully; defame: to denigrate someone's character.
2. to treat or represent as lacking in value or importance; belittle; disparage: to denigrate someone's contributions to a project.
you are welcomed to have your heroic figures. and if those people are all risking death i won't take that away from you.
but some people may have different ideas of what is noble or a distinguished ability. AND their definition may include your heroes as well. but don't belittle them suggesting they are 'dumbing down the english language', when it is in fact, your limiting of the definition, that is the dumbing down of the work 'herioc'.
btw, some people spell endeavor -> endeavour. and those people have been spelling it longer that way than your way. do they have the right to accuse you of garbling the english language?
i appreciate that it is the nature of NB to critique. in fact, the entire site is based upon the premise, but there are times when its reaching and mean-spirited and perhaps narrow-minded.
i prefer to critique the critic than those who are out there doing things. PROVING the theory of e=mc2 may not be a tangible accomplishment to you, but some people see it as heroic and more than just a job. let them be. both the HERO and those that praise.
Obviously
November 21, 2008 - 11:21 ET by Warner Todd HustonObviously you have a reading comprehension problem (yes, I'm "denigrating" you).
That was EXACTLY the point of this piece. I am saying that your idea of what is "noble" is WRONG. As in not right, incorrect, absurd, ridicaluss even.
You have taken the word heroic or noble and assigned to it meaning that it never had until YOU decided to morally equalize all actions to the same level.
Math isn't heroic. It isn't noble. It is beyond the call of anything. It isn't practiced to self-imperilment. It is a mere science, important as heck, yes, but NOT a heroic effort.
You are conflating seriousness or importance to heroics and abusing the English language as you do it.
Even WORSE you are imputing emotion into things I never said. I NEVER SAID math wasn't a "tangible" good. I never said a person was less for being a mathematician.
They just ain't heroic!
see , that's the problem with limited vocabularies
November 21, 2008 - 11:33 ET by abeautifulpersonit isn't just knowing how to spell a word and its most common usage. but you don't get it if the most commonly used definition is - in your eyes - the only definition.
look up noble on dictionary.com.
13 definitions.
guess what: not everyone, everywhere in the world uses the same defintions as you.
i cannot believe i am actually arguing with someone who refuses to admit that words have definitions beyond their ken.
I find it amazing that you
November 21, 2008 - 11:37 ET by sherylsimsI find it amazing that you are even arguing about this at all.
WTH
November 21, 2008 - 11:43 ET by MrShy"...until YOU decided to morally equalize all actions to the same level."
Wait, a liberal did this???
*puts hands on cheeks with mouth open wide, a-la kid from "Home Alone"*
You're the next contestant on...
THE MESSIAH IS... LEFT !!
I KNOW!
November 21, 2008 - 11:50 ET by Warner Todd HustonI KNOW! Imagine THAT, right?
LOL
Not true WTH, My Pop
November 21, 2008 - 18:36 ET by general companyIs a Mathematician, after Mom died he raised me and my 5 younger siblings, he also helped out my 2 older sisters who had unwed children, very young. He was told by everyone from state workers in MD and family that he could not do it alone. They had know idea, all of us are very close and still have very large get-togethers every year, even though we are spread out. Pop worked for NSA and also taught night school at several Universities and community Colleges. He is retired now at 75, but continues to teach. Hero has never done him justice. But then I am partial to good men who helped me with my math. : ]
"Television is a freak show" Bernie Goldberg
double plus good
November 21, 2008 - 08:56 ET by ginagwen7The trouble is, that the government educated masses would not understand any more appropriate adjectives. If this short news story had labeled the work assiduous, for instance, most would be baffled. With a "book learnin' is for losers" attitude, most would dare not look to a dictionary and probably believe a thesaurus is a type of dinosaur. I believe this is just another example of the dumbing down of America.
I still remember when
November 21, 2008 - 09:47 ET by mrbucketI still remember when Budweiser changed their advertising campaign after the 9/11 attacks when we saw real heroes die.
It used to be "Real American Heroes" and some half-joking commentary... After 9/11 it was changed to "Real Men of Genius." At least Anheiser-Busch realizes what a hero is...
In France Math is Heroic
November 21, 2008 - 10:20 ET by Dennis DCome on. This is France we are talking about. They have no idea what heroism means.
yeeee hawwwww
November 21, 2008 - 10:23 ET by abeautifulpersonfreedom fries... yum yum
Verdun
November 21, 2008 - 11:19 ET by Elian GonzalezEver hear of that?
My hero!!!
November 21, 2008 - 11:41 ET by misterbillA Fibonacci Warrior
I got up this morning,
It was quite cold
So to warm up I thought,
Do something bold.
I'll add me some numbers
While the temperatures zero
And some silly fools,
Will call me a hero.
I'll even do division
And subtraction too.
That makes me much braver
Than you, you or you.
Then I will check to see
If someplace I can peddle
These brave mathematics
And win me a medal.
Just now?
November 21, 2008 - 12:13 ET by jmtSome mathematicians just now proved General Relativity?
Huh.
I remember proving it in a college lab using atomic clocks and "trains". Guess that showing the predicted results through experimentation is not sufficiently rigorous to "prove" it in a mathematical sense.
Sounds like a slow news day all around...
jmt
http://www.jmichaelt.org
jmt, Since scientific
November 21, 2008 - 17:24 ET by hydrodynDMjmt,
Since scientific theories use induction, they can't be "proven" in the way the mathematical statements can. Experimental results can support or refute a theory - that's it.
Einstein's the true Hero
November 21, 2008 - 12:25 ET by CobraManShouldn't Einstein be considered the heroic one? After all, HE'S the one who actually came up with this theory and he faced HUGE resistance to the initial acceptance of his theories and formulas by the "established" scientists of the day. The fact that Einstein is now "proven" correct makes HIM the hero, and not the "French, German and Hungarian physicists" who are merely confirming his breakthrough theories and formulas.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
absolutely, einstein is a hero.
November 21, 2008 - 13:32 ET by abeautifulpersonhe was a brilliant mind.
but his brilliance doesn't detract from the accomplishments of these other mathematicians. and btw, the entire article referenced used the term 'heroic effort', once. way too much effort has been wasted on the dissection.
for the record, i do agree that HERO is used too often. as well as TERRORIST. just because you put your boots down in iraq doesn't make you a hero. and just because you make americans afraid doesn't make you a terrorist.
See my above
November 21, 2008 - 13:57 ET by lotrSee my above posting.
And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall. -- Edgar Allan Poe
Say again?
November 21, 2008 - 14:02 ET by CobraMan"his brilliance doesn't detract from the accomplishments of these other mathematician"
You have it backwards. These "other" mathematicians would not even have accomplished anything at all if it were not for the work of Einstein . Don't give them more credit than they deserve.
Einstein is the true hero here. He even was forced to leave Germany in 1932 because of the rising antisemitism he faced. Not only was he forced out of his homeland, he faced an ACTUAL threat to his very existence. THAT is part what makes him heroic. What actual threat have these other mathematicians faced in their lifetimes, writers cramps?
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
cobra -- stating the
November 21, 2008 - 13:47 ET by Jack Bauercobra -- stating the obvious, Einstein was a giant who stood on giant's shoulders.
But not everything he theorized has proven to be exactly correct, and today's big brains tweek/adapt his work, as he did to Sir Isaac Newton.
True
November 21, 2008 - 14:11 ET by CobraManTrue, he did expand on the works of others. There's no denying that.
There is one big difference here. Unlike these "heroic" mathematicians discussed here, Einstein actually PRODUCED new theories and the formulas needed to describe those theories. These "heroic" mathematicians simply confirmed the theories and formulas that Einstein created, nothing more and nothing less.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
BTW, Newton was wong.
November 21, 2008 - 14:19 ET by CobraManBTW, Einstein didn't "tweak" the theories of Sir Isaac Newton as you claim, he completely debunked him. He proved that Newton was WRONG in his theory that gravity was a force.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
Sorry, but I gotta chime in
November 21, 2008 - 15:01 ET by lotrSorry, but I gotta chime in here. Einstein did not "debunk" Newton.
Newton's theories are to this day used as the fundamental basis (the first principle) for the bulk of science and engineering in the "everyday world" (e.g., bridges, buildings, airplanes, cars, trains, satellites, weather forecasting, orbital mechanics, fluid dynamics, naval architecture, the list goes on). They are, for all intents and purposes, "the truth" for a well-defined range of phenomena. As with any "improved" theory, Einstein's theories are simply more fundamental -- they are applicable to a larger range of phenomena, including the those falling under "Newtonian mechanics." Newton's Laws are now only considered valid for a specific range of phenomena (speeds much slower than light and when spacetime scales are large) -- they are no longer considered "universally" valid (as they were before Einstein), but that doesn't mean they are not valid at all (aka, "debunked").
As somebody said above, like all the great scientists, Einstein "stood on the shoulders of giants," the primary giant being Newton, who himself modestly acknowledged this centuries before Einstein.
And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall. -- Edgar Allan Poe
Newton "debunked"? Sorry
November 22, 2008 - 06:42 ET by Jack BauerNewton "debunked"? Sorry cobra -- but I don't think so. I stand by my innocent observation.
"Debunking" is when Copernicus used oberservation and mathematics to produce a scientific theory which revealed that the Earth revolved around the Sun, and not vice versa.
lotr has made the universally accepted point on the remarkable Isaac Newton, his contribution to our understanding of the universe, and the way science advances.
You know...
November 22, 2008 - 06:44 ET by Warner Todd HustonThis science fad will never last. It's a flash in the pan like that internets thingie. And rock music. Never gonna last.
WTH -- man, you are so
November 22, 2008 - 07:08 ET by Jack BauerWTH -- man, you are so RIGHT!
Look at what passes for "science" today -- Hansen and Gore. It's so much better to get back to a time when our betters and rulers told us what to think.
It's like they are TRYING to
November 22, 2008 - 07:14 ET by Warner Todd HustonIt's like they are TRYING to give science a bad name!
I think you are confusing
November 22, 2008 - 20:49 ET by katainkentI think you are confusing gravity with gravitational force. Gravity is an accelleration (9.8m / sec-squared) while gravitational force is the force caused by the mass of an object being accellerated by gravity.
example : What you weigh on Earth is an example of gravitational force. If you were to weigh yourself on the moon you would weigh less but your mass would be the same. The difference being gravity, which is the accelleration being exerted on the body. [F=ma]
This is Newtonian physics, and has not been debunked.
member of the Conservative Independant Witness Protection Program since Nov. 5, 2008
The French revolutions
November 21, 2008 - 12:38 ET by CobraManIt's rather ironic that it's the Europeans who claim to have "proven" Einstein's equations over 60 year AFTER the scientists at Los Alamos developed, and detonated, the first atom bomb, which, incidentally, was based on Einstein's famous equations and theories. I guess that big explosion in the desert wasn't proof at all, but was (if you'll pardon the expression) just a flash in the pan.
Obama: My job is above my pay grade
CobraMan, Well, to be
November 21, 2008 - 17:22 ET by hydrodynDMCobraMan,
Well, to be fair, the mathematicians in the story were verifying that the form of the mass-energy relation in Relativity was consistent with Quantum Chromodynamics. There is a large effort in science to make Relativity and Quantum Field Theory compatible and this was just a step in that direction.
The fact that mass and energy can be converted into each other wasn't at issue - it was the details of how you describe that conversion within QFT.
Galileo was heroic. These
November 21, 2008 - 13:40 ET by katainkentGalileo was heroic. These men are apparently persistent. Maybe it was lost in translation :P
member of the Conservative Independant Witness Protection Program since Nov. 5, 2008
This has gone on for quite
November 21, 2008 - 15:05 ET by balboaThis has gone on for quite some time. Advertising practically invented this idea on its own.
Not sure its fodder for a diatribe on the dumbing down of language. It was a poor word choice.
Of course
November 21, 2008 - 22:54 ET by Warner Todd HustonOf course...
I'd agree with you if it were a lone and isolated incident.
But it isn't. It's an epidemic that happens nearly everyday. In THAT case, it IS something to discuss.
Heroic as a word
November 22, 2008 - 14:05 ET by DowitchIt's a fact that language does this all the time. People change the way they use words, which in turn changes the meaning.
Perusing the comments in this thread actually highlights this change. While many commenters understand the intent inherent to the original article, others don't see the point because they've long since accepted as common those meanings that the dictionary includes as accepted but lesser meanings of the word. If the dictionary were designed like the old pop music charts, then some of those lesser meanings would be listed as "#7 with a bullet". [If you're too young to understand the reference, it meant the song was still climbing the chart and could move to a higher standing.]
The struggle is twofold: to understand each other as we use the evolving language, and maintain the ability to express what we need to say. In the example of heroic, I'd say that it's become a casualty of the 'Self-esteem Era' that looks for ways to tell people how great they are when they've done nothing. Now people who have done something have to up the ante, which in turn dominoes down those who have sacrificed and accomplished much. Words that used to be reserved for the greatest achievers have moved down the scale to describe anyone who achieves anything.
Perhaps it's a measure of just how much we as a society seek to have those we can believe in, that we try elevate people to a place that our forefathers in the US once reserved for gods and saints. Unfortunately, this "dumbing down" of the language doesn't really move people up the ladder -- it just moves the rungs closer together.
→ Dowitch
November 22, 2008 - 14:13 ET by Cool ArrowTru Dat irregardless.
ha ha
November 22, 2008 - 15:00 ET by Warner Todd Huston"Irregardless." It always drives me nuts when people use that non existent word.
→ Thanks WTH
November 22, 2008 - 15:14 ET by Cool ArrowI was hoping somebody would enjoy that.
Now, on to "hopefully" -vs- "I am hopeful that".
I'm still flummoxed that "flammable" and "inflammable" are synonyms rather than antonyms.
One from business: "Hey
November 22, 2008 - 15:31 ET by balboaOne from business: "Hey let's find a way to _incentivize_ our people."
I HATE that. It's not a verb!
Actually, technically
November 22, 2008 - 20:25 ET by lotrActually, technically speaking "flammable" is not even a proper word. But resistance seems to be futile on this one....
And one by one dropped the revellers in the blood-bedewed halls of their revel, and died each in the despairing posture of his fall. -- Edgar Allan Poe