Obama Sends Man Linked With Terror Group AND George Soros to Deal With Egypt/Syria

  • Bookmark and Share

News services in Israel are on fire with talk that Barack Obama has just sent a supporter of the terror group Hamas as his envoy to Syria and Egypt to relay news of his policies to come. Last September Israel's suspicions were heated up about "former" Obama advisor Robert Malley being sent to Syria with a George Soros funded group. It was then claimed by Egyptian sources that Malley was still working as an advance man for Obama which angered Israelis because six months earlier Malley announced that he had held "regular meetings" with Hamas. At that time, Malley's comment caused the Obama camp to hurriedly distance the candidate from any connection with Malley. But, with the election over, it seems that Obama's claims that Malley didn't really work for him are not quite true. It also seems that we already have the very first example of Obama sticking his finger in the eye of our allies in Israel. Naturally, the U.S. press is not reporting this news.

In September of this year, Robert Malley caused consternation among people that stand against the terror group Hamas when he went to Syria to work for a group called the International Crisis Group -- a George Soros funded NGO also chaired by other doyens the far left. Some thought that he was secretly there as an Obama advance man, but there is no real proof that he was there in that capacity at that time so the story died down.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

As mentioned, back in May Malley reported that he held "regular meetings" with the Palestinian terror group Hamas causing Israelis quite a lot of heartburn. To appease Israel's supporters in the U.S. at that time, the Obama camp threw Malley under the bus. (Bold mine)

Ben LaBolt, a spokesman for Mr Obama, responded swiftly: “Rob Malley has, like hundreds of other experts, provided informal advice to the campaign in the past. He has no formal role in the campaign and he will not play any role in the future.”

Yet, despite claims that Malley would not have a "role in the future," now word has emerged that Malley was just sent to Egypt and Syria this week as an envoy for Barack Obama causing at least one harshly worded report in Israel to claim that Obama "lied" about Malley earlier this year.

Report: Obama lied about firing anti-Israel advisor

Robert Malley, a top Middle East advisor that US President-elect Barack Obama promised months ago would play no role in his administration due to ties to Hamas, has reportedly been sent out on the next administration's first diplomatic mission.

This is disheartening news for any supporter of Israel and bad news about the direction that Obama could be taking with his foreign policy in the Mid East. If Obama is willing to so early upset the Israelis by sending a man to Egypt known to have direct ties to terror groups, what does that say about his ideas on policy in that turbulent region? And why would an American president hire such people for his foreign policy team, anyway?

This should also make one wonder if Obama was telling the truth back in May? And, if Malley has been hauled up from under the bus, does this make all the others Obama rolled over on his way to the White House suddenly back in the clear? Are we to understand with this sudden rehabilitation of Malley as a trusted Obama representative that just any of the people that Barack claimed he wasn't really working with during the campaign are back in his good graces?

So, can we or can we not believe a word that Obama said about any of those he felt obliged to distance himself from during the election? Will we soon see a William Ayers touring the White House as a guest instead of a murderous bomber? Will uncle Rev. Wright suddenly be back on the Christmas party invite list so he can see for himself where the AIDS epidemic to kill all blacks was planned?

Maybe the harsh words that the Israeli newser had for Obama are not so far off base?

(Photo credit: pbs.org)


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Israeli chickens........

have come home to roost.

As predicted.

None of this should be a surprise. Obama's sweet talk to Jews got them to vote for him, but now the truth emerges. Obama is on the side of Israel's enemies.

 

.....and the story is what?

is anyone surprised by this? 

well, maybe the "peggy the plumbers" of the world...

too late to wake up, America....you slept through the class and then had your heads in the sand enough to believe the hype and then you voted this policy into office...you chose this....this is YOUR guy. 

 

 

a little early for pardons

I thought presidents waited until their last few days in office before issuing pardons. Looks like Obama is getting a jump on that, too, in a way.

But like others have said, who's surprised at this? To the left, the 'axis of evil' is the US and Israel.

 

"Thoroughly worldly people never understand even the world; they rely altogether on a few cynical maxims which are not true."

Chesterton, Orthodoxy 

‘Apartheid’ Israel, Islamophobia on the Agenda for U.N. Racism M

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=39125 

On Israel, the clearest attack is the one labeling its policies “a serious violation of international human rights and humanitarian law, a new kind of apartheid, a crime against humanity, a form of genocide and a serious threat to international peace and security.”
 
A number of further references are made to the “plight of the Palestinian people,” and Israel is accused of “unlawful collective punishment, torture, economic blockade, severe restriction on movement and arbitrary closure of [Palestinian] territories.”
 
The document “expresses deep regret the practices of racial discrimination against the Palestinians … and renew[s] the call for the cessation of all the practices of racial discrimination to which the Palestinians and the other inhabitants of the Arab territories occupied by Israel are subjected.”
 
And it asserts that Israel’s administration of Jerusalem and its sacred sites also entails “racial practices.”

 

 

"Thoroughly worldly people never understand even the world; they rely altogether on a few cynical maxims which are not true."

Chesterton, Orthodoxy 

Taking all bets

How soon before Obama makes a comment that could be interpreted as implying Holocaust denial?

a) 1st term

b) 2nd term

c) 3rd term

d) before Jan 20th, 2009

e) never, but someone from his administration does

By the way, they clearly meant "He has no formal role in the campaign and he will not play any role in the future [in the campaign]."  They didn't say anything about roles in his administration.  So there.  How's that for spin?  Pretty darn good, I say.

Sarah Palin/Jason Lewis 2012

Obama, pathological nacissist: http://www.faithfree...

Good question. By the way,

Good question.

By the way, why would you want to team Sarah Palin with the Actor from Sex in the City?

Who?

Actor from Sex in the City?  I could never watch that show; it seemed as trivial and stupid as Friends.

http://www.ktlkfm.co...

Jason Lewis is Minnesota's Mr. Right, on KTLK from 4-7 p.m. (central)  He's all about limited government, anti-union, anti-liberal policy, 2nd amendment rights... you know, the good stuff.  And yeah, he's filled in for Rush.

As for Jindal, I'm not sure if I've ever heard him speak.  Either we don't get many sound bites from him here in MN, or it's because I work nights and miss everything anyway.

KTLK used to have the Rush replay on from 1-4 a.m.  Then one day I heard some schmuck on instead.  I was furious.  Rush got replaced by Phil Hendrie. http://en.wikipedia....

Puke.

 

Sarah Palin/Jason Lewis 2012

Obama, pathological nacissist: http://www.faithfree...

Ah, that makes more sense.

Ah, that makes more sense. I've never heard of Jason Lewis the radio guy.

Or...

one of Rush's fill-ins.  Personally, I'd take Jindal.

I suspect

that Israel will have a major state visit early in the o's admin. just to see which way the wind is really blowing. After determining that instead of being a staunch ally of Israel the USSA (the United Socialist States of America) will be at best tepidly neutral. At that time the Israeli's will be on high alert and probably go on a war footing and we can expect a large pre-emptive strike somewhere. I would suspect a possibility of a nuclear attack as Israel realizes not only are they now alone but their very existence is at stake. I would bet dollars to doughnuts that middle eastern states were also heavy contributors to o's campaign. The Jews of America, (I am sure voted overwhelmingly for Obama, because ideology trumps your homeland even in the US) have made a serious mistake if they care for Israel. The balance of power has now dramatically shifted and like other breakdowns factionalism, war, and violence will have to fill the void as competition grows for the spoils.

"...no civilization, no matter how rich, no matter how refined, can long survive once it loses the power to meet force with equal or superior force." - Bernard Knox

Israel

Best case scenario:  Israel rightly discerns that the US is abandoning it.  It then uses its conventional and nuclear arsenal to rid the world of the pissants of the mid-east.  No more taliban, al qaeda, hamas, hezbollah, islamofascists, jihadists, mad mullahs, etc. The world heaps condemnation on Israel but is actually grateful that somebody finally had the nerve to do what needed to be done.