You're saying he was mistaken. Ah. My bad. Carry on. 

Sincerely,

a Veteran of a 1000 psychic wars.

Even Bernie Goldberg says they don't actually sit around like an ersatz Star Chamber, trying to figure out the slur of the day - but they DO take direction from the DNC and other leftist groups and rarely if ever bother to fact-check, because they all believe that what they're fed (leftist propaganda) IS fact, hence no need to "fact check" - it's already true.

My favorite example is GRAVITAS, when nearly every talking news head used that same word on the same day to describe Cheney -- yessir, they all came up with that same term, same day; no connection whatsoever.

 <blockquote> JesseJacksonIV: "Did
the liberal bias keep Bush from being elected twice? Do the Dems
control Congress because of liberal media or because of people were
tired of the Bush policies? If McCain loses will it be because of
liberal media or becuase of voters want a change from Bush?"</blockquote>

No! But liberal bias made the election of Bush much closer then they should have been. And the liberal bias of alleged Bush policies caused you to elect the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid as majority leaders. Two of the most incompetent and far left leaders that have ever walked the halls of Congress.

The liberal bias has caused an equally incompetent Senator from IL to be the democrat choice for President this year.

"Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink."  P.J.O'Rourke

Another new slogan..."Media bias: tastes good and good for you!", brought to you by your friends at The New York Times

I agree. The JFK myth depends upon the assassination. The paradox is that it is most likely far left interests (read Communists) that were responsible for the hit.

Never have.  What I object to is the dishonesty and the denial of what is so painfully obvious.  If you're liberal, say so.  Then I know what b.s. filter to use.

"Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain." Official Motto of the State of Iowa

To be fair, Broder is far more centrist than most. In fact, the left considers him a "conservative" and he has often been known to say supportive things about Bush.

I'm still going with my "blind spot" theory.

And, I doubt he's ever heard of NewsBusters much less read anything here.

I love it.  This is proof positive that Broder doesn't know about Newsbusters.  Send him an email summary daily!  Or, could it be that he doesn't research before making his profound statements?  Is he still in full use of his facilties?  Sad that anyone could be so out of it.

These three "objective jounalists" discussed media bias at the convention. They looked at each other with disbelief and denied it outright. They also mocked the idea and laughed at it. However, when they laugh and mock and smirk, it is a sign that they are lying. Lying is part and parcel of their operation. And it has destroyed their credibility. As for Broder, he's an intelligent man and he knows that the bias exists. He too is simply a liar. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, you can be sure it's a duck. Furthermore, it is despicable on many levels that he would be lying to young people at the university. He should be pointing to the bias and instructing them as to its existence, not the other way around. Sad.

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

I thought the same thing, but I was clearly remembering him going up in that spaceship hiding behind that Hale-Bopp comet.

"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" - Joe Biden 6/12/87