Of course our purpose here at NewsBusters is to shed light on the obscene bias often underlying what passes for journalism here in the United States (and in Canada and Europe sometimes, as well). We here at NB, however, want to stress that we aren't out to "destroy" journalism itself. We understand how important a free and open press is to keep our democratic republic on the straight and narrow. And, with this piece I'd like to present one reason why seeing journalists lose their jobs in such massive numbers should serve as a warning to us all about the health of our system.
Journalists have traditionally been antagonistic toward government, we all know. Certainly, they sometimes take this antipathy too far and become responsible for nearly treasonous actions -- The New York Times is the perfect example of that these days. But this antagonism is not all bad because while in practice it can and does lead to exposing the sort of government corruption that can and should be stopped but won't be unless it becomes public knowledge. The light that journalists shed on these corrupt government officials using open records requests is an integral part of our system and not one we should so blithely forget about while hoping to see the field of journalism get its comeuppance.
A recent little blog post by The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, a non-profit legal assistance agency for journalists (est. 1970), gives us a warning that we should all heed, which I repeat in it's entirety:
Smaller news budgets, less ammunition for open records fights
Beset by newsroom cutbacks and declining revenue, news groups are fighting fewer battles over public records -- and government officials are getting hip to the trend, according to a panel of journalists at a National Press Club event in Denver this week.
Denver television reporter Brian Maass said that the government in the past understood the media would go to court if their requests were denied, according to a Press Club article. Now officials know media budgets are stretched thin, and a reporter's leverage in an open records dispute isn't what it was.
"There's less fight in the media to battle for information," Maass said, according to the Press Club. At the same time, Mark Cardwell, who is managing editor of the Denver Post, said newsrooms are supplementing their coverage with the work of “amateur journalists,” who go to events around town, like school board meetings, and then post the newsworthy bits on the paper's Web site.
This is a serious subject that, in our zeal to give the back of our hand to partisan journos, we should not easily dismiss. Open records requests are an important tool in keeping our government honest. And if less of this gets done because the news media has fewer resources to spend on such things, we will all be the poorer for it. Corruption will grow in our government as a result.
Now, to be sure, this is not something that only journalists can do. Bloggers can and should take up where big media is leaving off. You, I... any citizen... can file these open records requests. Among the records you can find are things such as the financial expenditures of your local school district, your town council, records on any construction projects being planned or undertaken by your local government, and many other such records.
As a blogger in your local area you absolutely should not leave to others the task of holding your local, county, or state government accountable. Not only that, but it can get you some BIG press yourself should you find some juicy corruption to write about.
There are several pages on the web to teach you how to file for open records requests. (Such as http://www.wikihow.com/File-an-Open-Records-Request-(USA)) Often your state or county will have a website set up to help you through the process, as well.
However, and here is where having the resources of a news agency backing you up is efficacious, sometimes these requests can cost quite a bit of time and money to fulfill. Why, you might ask? Because the costs of xeroxing these records are charged to the one making the request. It can cost quite a lot at times. Additionally, there are sometimes requirements that these requests be made in person at the city, county or state office that will do the search, often these records cannot be requested through the mail or the Internet.
Having a news agency behind you can certainly help defray costs and focus the investigation. (Here is a series of articles from 1999 by the Augusta Chronicle about open records laws in Georgia as an example of how a newspaper can succeed in this sort of investigation.)
So, here is why we need to be careful about wishing for the demise of the Old Media. As the old saying goes, be careful for what you wish.
(Image credit: http://sunshinereviewblog.com)




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Hold the phone
September 16, 2008 - 04:12 ET by killbill2Who's wishing that journalists lose their jobs? Kieth Olbermann not withstanding. I find your entire premise absurd and here's why: If these biased MSM outlets would get back to gathering and objectively reporting news instead of browsing the web for the next unsubstantiated rumor they can help perpetuate, perhaps networks like BSNBC would see their ratings improve. Bigger ratings equals more revenue and more money for your open record requests.
You want to make an open record request? Why don't you find out what CNN dropped on the CNN GRILL during the DNC... and then get back to me on their lack of resources :)
If you think no one is
September 16, 2008 - 05:16 ET by Warner Todd HustonIf you think no one is wishing the demise of journalists, you haven't been reading too many replies to NB articles!!! MANY times our readers wish such a thing. Certainly, it is probably more in frustration than in truth, but the words are uttered often nonetheless.
That is why I put this here. Just one little way to temper our own passions. We don't want to get as wild-eyed as the DailyKossacks, now, do we?
Backlash
September 16, 2008 - 12:06 ET by killbill2I probably don't read as many replies here as you so I wasn't aware of that sentiment. I'd hate to see us become like the DailyKos too but I don't foresee us all abandoning reason en masse so I think we're ok :)
cutbacks
September 16, 2008 - 05:49 ET by AgnosticThe problem is in the first sentance, "newsroom cutbacks". This puts these media financial problems in the same category as top heavy companies and government entities paying out perks and inflated salaries while the ship is sinking. We should worry about reduced oversight of the government but as we see everyday that oversite is somewhat one sided. In many cases, Sen Stevens and Rep Jefferson, even after being caught there is little being done about corruption in Washington and the media ignores that, albeit selectively, for the cause du jour. This points to a lack of willingness to do research but instead ride the wave of rhetoric, hysteria and political convenience to fabricate a story. They can call it the need for sensationalism to sell if they want to but someday they will have to explain why their numbers continue to fall with the greater sensationalism they exhibit.
These records need to be seen by investigative reporters and when they decide to investigate I'm sure the news agencies will come up with the necessary budget if they feel the story is in their best intrest to investigate. My question would be, is this going to lead to even greater bias due to the need to carefully direct funds?
This is why WE can help
September 16, 2008 - 05:56 ET by Warner Todd HustonThis is why I brought up the fact that we bloggers and folks in the public can also file open records requests. It is NOT just and only the role of the media. However, the media sure has an easier time of doing it than we.
In any case, just as the media acts as a curb on gov't corruption by exposing it, we act as a curb on the media by exposing THEIR corruption. It's a cycle that works, but a cycle that would be damaged without the media in the mix!
If you see what I mean?
WTH,
September 16, 2008 - 06:29 ET by AgnosticI am more inclined to think the bias is due to the social isolation of ideas due to either elitism (as it is the popular word during the last few election cycles) or simply the phenomenon of self proclaimed "thinkers' surrounding themselves with like minded "thinkers"; such as occurs in universities, newsrooms and regulatory offices across the country. The idea that bias is due to corruption is hard for me to fathom at this point but with further evidence of scripted interviews and forged documents I may be soon changing my mind about those with editorial responsibilities.
The investigation abilities of the media is essential for the dissemination of information and that ability allows the media their due place as the watchdog of government, markets and social structures. However, like all failing businesses, with enough freedom in the markets there will be those who step forward to fill the vacuum left behind. Perhaps as you suggest it will be bloggers and other citizens or perhaps, this scares me, an AP like fact gathering service will be created that will pour through records and provide information to news reporting agencies for a flat fee.
People on both sides of the aisle are starting to slowly become aware that they are not getting the whole story from their news outlets. I doubt the public at large is quite ready to read through data and 'legal-eze' to come up with their own facts but more and more are looking to the net for alternative interpretations of given data sets.
As to your last paragraph, I
September 16, 2008 - 07:07 ET by Warner Todd HustonAs to your last paragraph, I sometimes flatter myself that I might serve in a tiny bit the capacity you describe; helping people get a handle on what is going on out there.
Of course, I admit my own bias up front which is more than I can say for most of the media.
all media is market driven....
September 16, 2008 - 05:59 ET by spiderdanIf any journalist loses his/her job, they may look no further than: 1) the market in which they work, 2) their own competence as a journalist.
Bad media does not survive. Therein lies the message many Newsbuster devotees express routinely -- the left wing waterboys, wrapping themselves behind a fraudulent assertion of some constitutional mandate, destroy their markets with bias and prejudice. Journalistic fundamentals -- boring as they may be outside of some gossip rag -- sells. Who, what, when, where, how.
What we -- as legitimate Americans -- should emphasize (to these drooling dolts in the left wing media) is that we will not subsidize biased or prejudicial media. In other words, if the New York Times or MenaceNBC folds, the employees of those organizations have only themselves to blame. Not Newsbusters, not Fox News, not me. I choose NOT to spend a penny supporting either of the aforementioned -- as no legitimate American should. If I find a news outlet worthy of my support, I'll pass it on. But, for the dinosaurs out there unwilling to adhere to basic journalism -- offering only their left wing drool, instead -- it may very well be curtains for you.
Not a f**king moment too soon, either.
Good post Warner, I agree.
September 16, 2008 - 06:23 ET by S PGood post Warner, I agree. I don't want to see the demise of the 'Old' media either, but rather just see them become more fair & balanced. They could do this in an instant by hiring more conservative people in their newsrooms including headline writers and editors. It's only their own arrogance that keeps them doing the same thing all while their revenues and budgets shrink, refusing to recognize the problems that their bias creates.
Exactly
September 16, 2008 - 06:28 ET by Warner Todd HustonExactly my point. Thanks
I'm Not Wishing for Demise of Media
September 16, 2008 - 06:41 ET by CapedConservativeCapedConservative
I'm wishing for the demise of those who don't practice good journalism. I have a neice attending Drake seeking to be a journalist. She wants "to change the world". She actually believes it is correct to put her slant on things in an effort to make "things better". The absolute hubris of such thinking is infuriating.
Reporting complete facts is good. Leaving out facts that don't fit your world view is bad... very very bad. Quite some time ago, we started having talking heads on TV giving us an analysis of what the President or some other political figure just said. This "analysis" is where their world view began creeping in and it has been downhill for them every since.
CC
Well, if I understand this
September 16, 2008 - 07:27 ET by Indiana JoeWell, if I understand this correctly, you are arguing against the death of certain forms of mass-media. Okay, I can agree with that. I don't think anyone here has ever wished for the end of media, old or new, per se. What I do see a lot of is people wishing for the demise of certain players in the media. Obermann, Matthews, CNN, ABC, etc. Which I think is a proper attitude, being as they are not fulfilling the needs you espouse here. They are "media" in name only, being more often shills for a political viewpoint.
And I'll grant that the resources of the "major media" do help to monitor government and perform the "watchdog" function.
However, I hope you're not asserting that the "major media" deserves to survive in it's present form, merely because it's "easier" for them to file these open-record requests. There will always be a "media," in terms of news reporting. Some will succeed, some will fail. The ones that actually fulfill the role of the media in our society should survive. Those that assume the mantle of gadflies, ala many in that role today, should not.
And they always will bear watching... which puts NB and MRC in the catbird's seat!
Quisnam mos tutela custodiae custodie?
"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall
Um, I'm sorry? WHERE in
September 16, 2008 - 07:32 ET by Warner Todd HustonUm, I'm sorry? WHERE in God's name have you ever seen me to make the statement that I want media to "survive in it's present form"?
Dude, that was a stretch BIG TIME.
No stretch
September 16, 2008 - 08:52 ET by Indiana JoeI was merely asserting my take (and hope) that that wasn't a point you were advocating.
But your point of what would happen if the "resources" of "big news" were somehow lost led to that thought. It sounded to me like a "careful what you wish for" type thing. I brought it up to dismiss it, basically.
Chill.
<edit> Just after I posted this, I couldn't get back to NB. Kept getting re-directed to a search engine. I see no activity here since, so... Anyone else have that problem? For about the last hour or so?
"... smells like... victory." - Robert Duvall
Yes, the site has been
September 16, 2008 - 08:55 ET by Warner Todd HustonYes, the site has been offline for a little while.
Warner, your work is a progression...
September 16, 2008 - 10:06 ET by ThalpyWarner, your work is a progression. If the MSM as we know it isn't around for you to skewer, you will no doubt find another worthwhile enterprise. You may, in fact, become a mainstream provider of news done right. Who would have thunk it?
Perish the thought
September 16, 2008 - 10:11 ET by Warner Todd HustonBut... it COULD be possible!
Journalist
September 16, 2008 - 10:09 ET by well99As far as honest journalist I have no problem with them.The ones that lie and use half truths belong on the unemployment line.I dont care which political view keep it honest.Journalist are suppose to put the facts out there for people to decide what to do with those facts.Today too many of the journalist feel they need to think for us and that is bs.They manipulate information for their own purposes and political agenda.
Trust
September 16, 2008 - 10:25 ET by Wildcatter1980For all of us, it should be a matter of trust. Can we trust that when we open up our local newspaper, go to our Google Reader or other online news source, listen on our local radio or watch TV that the news being reported is being done so in a professional, unbiased, fair and balanced manner as is humanly possible? Yet, have we not seen surveys where journalists are right down there with lawyers as some of our least-trusted professionals?
Rush may very well be right when he says that the MSM is quick to criticize others, but fails to look at itself and address their own problems.
As the saying goes, an
September 16, 2008 - 10:28 ET by Warner Todd HustonAs the saying goes, an unexamined life is not worth living. (wasn't that Socrates?)