Reuters Misleading Headline Winner of the Day


Reuters gets the award for the most misleading headline of the day with its Aug 28 story making it seem as if unemployment has wildly increased in New York State -- even calling it a "crisis" -- when there was really only a small increase. The headline would cause the casual reader to assume that the world is falling apart concerning employment rates and on top of that the badly worded headline also feeds into the Bush-ruined-the-economy meme. And we know how Reuters is always looking to smear President Bush whenever it can. Further, Reuters cites the work of the Fiscal Policy Institute without identifying it as a left leaning think tank.

Reuters headlines its New York employment piece Unemployment leaps over 20 percent in 25 New York counties. It is a shocking headline, to be sure, screaming that unemployment "leaps 20 percent." Such a wild headline would certainly cause a casual reader to assume that overall unemployment has risen by 20 to 25 percent. Contrary to the scaremongering of the headline, New York's unemployment did not "leap 20 percent" in over all numbers at all. In fact, the over all unemployment of the state has only gone up by .2 percent, from 5.2 in June to 5.4 in July. That is hardly a number to spark a "Crisis."

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

The report is misleading on several counts.

The ranks of unemployed workers soared more than 20 percent in 25 New York counties in the first half of 2008, even in wealthy suburbs around New York City such as Westchester and Nassau, a report said Thursday.

Then the Reuters piece reports on a press release by a group called the Fiscal Policy Institute that warns, "As New York's policy makers address the large budget gaps, it is imperative that budget actions not worsen the economy and exacerbate the unemployment crisis."

The statistics under discussion focuses on New York City and tires to claim that the economy is in "crisis" mode, but even the reported numbers for the City's five boroughs doesn't show any major "crisis."

  • NEW YORK CITY - July 2008:5.4; June 2008:5.3; July 2007:5.8
  • BRONX - July 2008:7.2; June 2008:7.0; July 2007:7.8
  • KINGS - July 2008:5.9; June 2008:5.6; July 2007:6.4
  • NEW YORK - July 2008:4.6; June 2008:4.6; July 2007:5.0
  • QUEENS - July 2008:4.8; June 2008:4.7; July 2007:5.1
  • RICHMOND - July 2008:5.2; June 2008:4.8; July 2007:5.6

These numbers hardly scream crisis. Especially when full employment has traditionally been considered an unemployment rate of 5 percent.

Even more misleadingly, Reuters does not explain that the FPI is a left leaning, big government advocating think tank with board members that previously worked for government agencies under big spending liberal politicians, redistributionist advocacy groups, and trade unions. Hardly the sort of folks that one could trust to report on economic matters.

Now, it is true that New York's economy has taken a small hit of late. But the alarmism with which this Reuters story is written wildly overstates the truth. Then add the news that the economy has just been found to have gotten a boost with the GDP having a much better growth than assumed earlier and we get more evidence of Reuters chicken-Little style of reporting. Today it was reported that the U.S. gross domestic product grew by 3.3% instead of the less rosy estimate of 1.9% previously estimated.

So, congratulations to Reuters for the most misleading headline of the day.

(Image credit: NBC 25, WEYI TV)


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Sanity takes the day off at Reuters...

"The ranks of unemployed workers soared more than 20 percent in 25 New York counties in the first half of 2008"

Wow!  At this rate, everyone in New York will be unemployed in just over 2 years.

Yea, I live in Nassau County

Yea, I live in Nassau County and one out of every 5 homes just had every working adult fired! Please, Obamessiah, save us!

Mr. Huston,

Can I suggest that "the most misleading headline of the day" become a staple here at NB? It could easily be included in the open thread post. 

 

 

If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love youBut if you really make them think, they'll hate you.

Don Marquis 1878-1937

I like the idea

I like the idea... but I can barely keep up with the news going on out there much less have to keep an eye on the misleading headlines, too!!

I feel I am the one that started the "guess what party" entries here on NB because of when I did about three weeks of them in a row. But, I've missed a ton of them because of trying to cover other stories, too.

There's only so many hours in a day (and I get bored with the same type of story over and over).

I will pass the request up the chain, though.

Caterwauling about

Caterwauling about unemployment numbers are always quite amusing. When they are still under 6-7% they are still in the normal range. It's practically impossible to have a national rate under 4% because of people temporarily changing jobs and the chronically unemployed. And all will agree that you will never see a headline of "Times Are Tough But 95% of People Able to Find Work."

 They've been doing the same thing with the foreclosure 'crisis'. Scary headlines about a doubling, tripling or more of the rate. The national average now is 1 in 775 homes. If that average is 3 times of what it was last year, in mathematical terms it means something like (don't have the exact figures) "the rate of solvent mortgages drops from 99.98% to 99.97%."

Eeeeek... the sky is falling.

And the 'crisis' is not systemwide. If one looks one finds contradictory (and hence not useful to politically-motivated alarmists) tibits such as:

"Eighteen states substantially improved since last January. In Pennsylvania, foreclosure filings fell 55% to just 1,683, one for every 3,226 households. West Virginia recorded a drop of 54% to a miniscule 53, one for every 16,667 households. And Vermont's total dropped in half, from two to one."

Thanks Mr. H

for the consideration. I appreciate it. 

 
As for keepin up with the news, given the volume of outlets you guys cover, I've often wondered if y'all use something like this to keep abreast of developments in certain areas. 

Regardless of the methods, I applaud the lengths you and the other milquetoasts at NB go to expose the media. For what it's worth, keep up the outstanding work.

If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love youBut if you really make them think, they'll hate you.

Don Marquis 1878-1937

We each

We each have different methods, of course. Me, I just have no life, so it makes it easier! LOL

Warner

According to the government I have not had a real job since 1969, I am a self-employed contractor - no work, no pay. I do not qualify for any government benefits, unemployment, etc. They do allow me to pay double the social security tax though. I'm sorry, it's not a tax, it's FICA. Thank you for all your posts.