Some how, the Old Media has missed the good news on Iraq. On August 27, the Rasmussen polling organization published a poll that showed American confidence is at its highest level ever in support of the War on Terror since they've begun tracking in January of 2004. This poll got little notice by the Old Media, of course, but it illustrates an issue that McCain should exploit to his benefit -- especially after Obama's acceptance speech last night.
Rasmussen found that Fifty-four percent of American voters now think that the U.S. is winning the war in Iraq and forty-eight percent think the situation will get even better in the next six months. Further, Rasmussen reports that this turn around in public opinion has been sharp when just last year only twenty-seven percent thought things were going to get better in Iraq.
Ominously for the Obama campaign, the poll also found that sixty-two percent of men agree that the U.S. is winning the War on Terror while forty-six percent of women do. Less than a quarter of women now think the terrorists are winning with just fourteen percent of men feel that way.This growing support augers against Obama's continued anti-war stance.
It all points to two salient facts: the surge worked and we've won the war in Iraq. And people are starting to notice.... not that the media is.
Yet, what did Obama say concerning Iraq just the other night in his acceptance speech?
For while Senator McCain was turning his sights to Iraq just days after 9/11, I stood up and opposed this war, knowing that it would distract us from the real threats that we face.
...And today, today, as my call for a timeframe to remove our troops from Iraq has been echoed by the Iraqi government and even the Bush administration, even after we learned that Iraq has $79 billion in surplus while we are wallowing in deficit, John McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end a misguided war.
...You don't defeat -- you don't defeat a terrorist network that operates in 80 countries by occupying Iraq. You don't protect Israel and deter Iran just by talking tough in Washington. You can't truly stand up for Georgia when you've strained our oldest alliances.
Clearly, according to this Rasmussen poll, John McCain does not "stand alone in his stubborn refusal to end a misguided war." The American people are by increasing numbers standing next to him in support of this effort, sensing its success.
Barack Obama is placing himself on the losing side of the Iraq war, giving succor to the enemy and clearly showing himself to misunderstand the mood of the American people. America is turning the page from its anti-war pessimism and beginning to see that George Bush's "stubbornness" was the right path to victory. Yet Obama continues down his anti-war path.
Despite the lack of reporting by the Old Media of this fact, the McCain camp should exploit this growing gap between Obama's defeatist stance and the public's growing support of the War on Terror.


















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Tax Iraq?
August 29, 2008 - 06:28 ET by Mica the MagnificentWinning was not an option for the dems.
I'm waiting for someone to comment on the fact that the lib mantra was 'no blood for oil' but now Obama wants to tax Iraq to get a part of their '79% surplus.'
Yeah, tax them
August 29, 2008 - 06:42 ET by Cool ArrowThat's the answer. Put a money value on our soldiers' sacrifice.
Torches & Pitchforks
The Iraq War was also about media manipulation
August 29, 2008 - 06:49 ET by ZachJonesIsHomeAmerica
came together for a brief time after 9/11.
What a good feeling that was during such a tragic time. I think most of America
remains regretful that that feeling did not last. So what happened? Why didn’t it last? Well - it seems to me…. I
hope you will consider Obama and The Media vs. “Thinking” America. This is found at:
http://zachjonesishome.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/obama-media-vs-thinking-america/
zachjonesishome.wordpress.com
whether or not we have won
August 29, 2008 - 07:34 ET by patmac49whether or not we have won will be judged by hisory,but it could have been won a heck of a lot earlier if the current administration would have put more troops on the ground and not taken an insurgency so lightly...our boys have been magnificent and they certainly derserved better as did the american public.shame on them
Probably true; then again,
August 29, 2008 - 10:47 ET by SmartypantsProbably true; then again, point out a war that was fought perfectly anywhere at any time. The history of war is such that it is frought with debacles and failures. Remember there is an enemy that wants to win, too, and is doing everything in its power to do so. Add to that the fact that this enemy has no moral obligations to which it is obliged, no media scrutinizing its every move and blasting every little misstep across the air waves, cable lines and press rooms. All in all, the Iraq War has been a successful operation; the media, and Democrats, have done well in painting it as an abject failure
Stupid neocons. Fooled
August 29, 2008 - 07:42 ET by FoolicanStupid neocons. Fooled again.
There is no "rising support" for the War in Iraq. There is decreasing disapproval. Bu$h McHitler is putting the liberals in prison by rounding up innocent protesters in Denver and charging them of petty crimes, when he is in fact committing crimes against humanity by going to a senseless, illegal war that no one approved in the first place!
What an a**!
August 29, 2008 - 07:45 ET by Mica the MagnificentGeez, you are an a**!
Congress approved this war, a**wipe! Including your liberal buddies.
Bush couldn't care less if the wacky libs protest their own in Denver.
ROFL, LMAO, good thing I
August 29, 2008 - 07:51 ET by dscottROFL, LMAO, good thing I wasn't drinking my coffee when reading your post! I guess you flushed that vote by Congress to authorize the invasion down the memory hole. A vote that virtually all Dems in Congress were in favor of at the time, before they decided it was good politics to criticize the sitting president of the other political party.
Of course that was equally funny as claiming President Bush somehow ordered the arrests of demonstrators at the Dem convention, which those who gathered did so with the express purpose of disrupting the Dem convention! Nut case alert, nut case alert! Next you'll claim it was Repub Agent Provocateurs who instigated the left to demonstrate against the Dems to stir up disunity.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
Are you for real? Adjust
August 29, 2008 - 10:49 ET by SmartypantsAre you for real? Adjust that tin foil hat on your head and go back to bed.
FOOLICAN...
August 29, 2008 - 10:53 ET by Clear thinkerYou belong here >>> http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/
I could make you a star!!!
45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goal
When Obama can only give a
August 29, 2008 - 07:40 ET by dscottWhen Obama can only give a speech filled with liberal myths and worn out talking points to whip up the libs, he shows he will be cannon fodder for truth telling.
Claiming Russia's invasion of Georgia is the moral equivalent of the US invasion of Iraq shows a profound ignorance of foreign affairs at best and (what McCain describes as) putting politics before your country at worst. Thanks Obama for a great idea for the next McCain campaign video clip.
Resolute means marked by firm determination, stubborn means unreasonably or perversely unyielding. So Obama claims Bush and by extension McCain are stubborn for not quiting the GWOT in Iraq as though there was no reason or hope to defeat terrorism. What Obama has essentially admitted is that he can not see any way to defeat terrorism in a face to face confrontation and therefore believes appeasement through various forms of pay offs will accomplish peace. Neville Chamberlain believed the same.
To the quitter, the resolute are stubbornly against inevitable defeat; to the resolute, the quitters are stubbornly against victory at hand. Obama is one stubborn quitter.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
APPEASEMENT AND DIPLOMACY WILL NOT WORK
August 29, 2008 - 08:39 ET by bubbatech01when your enemy wants nothing less than you to be dead. osama doesnt want land, money, freedom, etc. they want westerners and the US dead. they believe the koran teaches them that we are evil and need to be wiped off the face of the earth. how are we going to appease that?
our greatest leaders in history did not appease, but rather, stood up to the foe and said, "whatever the hell you do, we are not going away." Both Churchill and de Gaulle rallied up the public against the terror (nazis for Churchill and the campaign in Algeria for de Gaulle). unfortunately for us, we have spineless, pot smoking, tree hugging liberals that control the media now.
Our enemy is not terror...it is the lack of resolve and willingless to go to the end of the earth to fight terror.
HERE IS WHAT THE RNC SHOULD DO AT THEIR CONVENTION
August 29, 2008 - 08:21 ET by bubbatech01Put on a running power point slide that shows all democrat lies, deceptions, and failings. put it factually.
First slide:
1) Democrats: worst Congressional record, by all accounts, ever, yet they want you to believe they can run the white house.
lowest ratings (lower than bush), fewest bills passed...
2) Bush DID say all along that we were going to leave IRAQ, but only until there were certain conditions in Iraq. Conditions met. We are leaving. Barack wanted us out immediately, unconditionally. Everyone thought that was stupid, including biden.
ETC. ETC. Running power point slide.
Such a presentation would
August 29, 2008 - 08:26 ET by dscottSuch a presentation would last to election day just to cover all the issues.
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, starving the poor one gallon of ethanol at a time. Fill your tank with E85 and cull a village.
I didnt think of how bulky
August 29, 2008 - 08:29 ET by bubbatech01it would be!!!
another thing, i would put up a removable screen smack dab in the middle of the convention hall. a huge one, and project the presentation on it. hopefully, it will be big enough that no news organization will be able to hide its contents. take it down for speeches, put it back up when done. keep the information flowing.