Over at Gateway Pundit, Jim Hoft introduces us to Amy Proctor's report on the amazingly large crowd of South Koreans that came out to welcome George W. Bush to their country. It's a good thing that Amy clued us in here in America, because our media sure ignored the story of this large turnout.
Amy directs our attention to The Korea Times report that revealed that 374 "conservative groups" intended to "stage a large-scale demonstration welcoming Bush, at Seoul Plaza," and boy did they ever come through. It turns out, the anti-Bush protesters were only able to muster a could of hundred protesters while the pro-Bush rally saw 15,000 Koreans turn out to participate.
Amy reminds us that none of the pro-Bush rallies were sponsored by the South Korean government, too.

But, true to fashion, the western media did its level best report only the bad. On August 5, at 6:07am EDT, Reuters first tried to report the President's visit with this headline: Bush arrives in Seoul, faces large anti-US protest. But once the truth started coming out, Reuters tried to cover its obvious mistake with this later headline: Bush arrives in Seoul, anti-U.S. protest fizzles.
Amy also found some nice video of the pro-Bush rally.
So, what happened to the US press? Where were the reports of this massive outpouring of affection for George W. Bush? They didn't seem to have a problem showing the love the Europeans dished out to Barack Obama, did they? So, why the silence on the well received Bush visit?
Somehow, the media sort of missed that one, eh?
Great report Amy and good work.
(Photo credits: #1 AP, #2 Reuters)















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
I am reminded of the
August 6, 2008 - 11:39 ET by PeskyDaneI am reminded of the president's trip to Albania where he was mobbed by adoring crowds. If memory serves an adoring fan yanked his watch off as a souvenir. Of course, the libtard scribes could not bear to admit that their favorite punching bag could get the rock star treatment under any circumstances and tried to spin it as yet more evidence of his "stupidity" for "losing" it.
"Crowd size mattters," Warner.
August 6, 2008 - 11:42 ET by Gary Hall"Crowd size mattters," Warner.
Without a doubt there are more people in this crowd than there were in the circle (round a bout) in the front of the Victory column in Berlin for Obama. There were more people in the street between the Victory column and the Brandenberg Gate, of course, but my gut tells me that the total crowd in Berlin was less than 75,000.
Just for comparison, here is how "tens of thousands of people look to the media: Tens of thousands of people have marched through the Venezuelan capital, Caracas in support of the main opposition candidate, Manuel Rosales; a picture showing the mass opposition to Chavez - probably why the American media decided not to share the picture with us. If Obama's crowd was 200,000 - then that crowd in Caracas was 2 million.
Crowd size matters. Especially to a press with small _____.
There wasn't even a rock
August 6, 2008 - 11:50 ET by wiwfThere wasn't even a rock band before him! Well, except for the little Korean kids playing Rock Band/Guitar Hero beforehand, if those count.
The Rocky Mountain Collegian: Illustrating Idiocy
Doesn't fite the mem of a
August 6, 2008 - 11:57 ET by Dan The Man 2Doesn't fite the mem of a lone cowboy President with no backers. And the world hates us. But in South Korea they see first hand what true dictators are like and don't want their country to fall prey to DPRK.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Budget cutting is the problem
August 6, 2008 - 11:50 ET by c5thenAll the MSM TV and newspapers completely used up their travel budgets on the Obama world tour '08. They have nothing left and so are not travelling with the President on his last trip to Asia and the start of the '08 Olympics. This trip, though scheduled for months and months in advance, was deemed not as important as the Obamamessiah's trip through several countries as "just an American citizen". It's not their fault. They can't be expected to report on events that they are not able to witness first hand, can they? George W. will just have to persevere along on that lonly and empty 747.
The day that "politician" became a career choice is the day we started losing the Republic. Let's get it back! Alan Keyes '08.
Media bias this year must set some kind of record.
August 6, 2008 - 11:53 ET by ZachJonesIsHomeAmerican Journalists
are Trampling the Sacrifice of Our Fathers, Mothers, Sisters and Brothers
(Unfortunately, the
Journalists taking part in this travesty far outnumber the headstones at Normandy) from
zachjonesishome.wordpress.com
Specifically:
http://zachjonesisho...
zachjonesishome.wordpress.com
WT, Have you ever written
August 6, 2008 - 11:59 ET by mattmWT,
Have you ever written to the editors of various media outlets and asked them these questions? If so, what response did you get?
I remember in 1992 there was a media blackout on coverage of anything the then president Bush did on an official basis...i.e. anything that might make him look good...
The MSM are a despicable herd of swine!
Surprise, surprise.
August 6, 2008 - 12:03 ET by ontheright1. The MSM is most certainly biased against Bush/Republicans/Conservatives...as is blatantly obvious here.
2. Bush is not the "hated dictator" around the globe like the US MSM tries to "sell" us ad nauseum.
from Amy Proctor
August 6, 2008 - 12:05 ET by Amy ProctorJust a side note; I'm an Army wife and we were stationed in Korea last month. What really struck me about this was that news outlets, like Reuters and CNN, predicted before the president even set foot in Seoul (which is a fabulous city, by the way), were talking about how possibly 50,000 or more protesters would meet the President in "massive protests". And there were only a couple hundred! But there was almost no mention of the 15,000+ supporters of the U.S. and Bush who showed up.
Even on the cover of today's left-leaning Stars and Stripes were photos and an article about the protests against the President, not the warm and large positive reception he received.
I like how Reuters changed their article from Bush arrives in Seoul, faces large anti-US protest to Bush arrives in Seoul amid minor protest . "Bush was greeted by a minor protest aimed mostly at his host instead of a big anti-U.S. rally that had been expected." Well, how about that.
The Republic of Korea has 2 basic parties; progressives and conservatives. Progressives don't like Bush no matter what he does because they're liberals. Although in their defense, some are afraid, because Bush is such a strong leader that seems to be slapping dictators into shape, that he might do something to torque off Kim Jong Il provoking an attack. S. Korea is the size of Illinois and has 50 million people. It's packed here. So a war with N. Korea, although it would be crushed by the U.S. and S. Korea, would produce massive S. Korean casualties.
We've been issued gas masks, every family member, incase N. Korea attacks, which I don't foresee, but Bush's position of strength intimidates some Koreans.
But when 15,000 Koreans come out to pray for and welcome Bush into the country, completely on their own accord and organization, that's impressive.
Bunch of wimps
August 6, 2008 - 12:10 ET by SickofLibsONE brief burst from a watercannon sent the protesters running for Mommy.
Pitiful. Makes Code Pink look like an elite SEAL team.
MSM Strikes Again
August 6, 2008 - 12:19 ET by TheCaffeinatedConservativeIf it's to do with President Bush, it automatically gets an "I'm sick of him" reaction from the media and even some of the American populous. No one wants to hear the good things our President has done, we'd rather continue to focus on the bad things. Now, if it were a reception for Obama... well, you all know.
Though I'm really not surprised any more that this story wasn't covered, the tactics of the MSM are getting old. It's times like these that I'm really glad I don't have cable or TV. Looks like I'm not missing much by not having it, anyway!
Yes, there was a water
August 6, 2008 - 12:23 ET by Amy ProctorYes, there was a water cannon. About a dozen anti-American protesters were arrested because every good "progressive" peace movements needs a little bit of violence.
I have a Korean friend who tells me some protesters are actually college kids who have to protest the government or incident (like the Pres. coming to country) for college credits in their course on democracy and government. I wondered why so many of them were college kids.
This doesn't discount the fact that some Koreans genuinely don't like Bush or America. It just points out that more do like him/us htan not.
ABC News Radio opened their
August 6, 2008 - 12:28 ET by Chris NormanABC News Radio opened their hourly report yesterday afternoon with the announcement that Bush was greeted in South Korea by protesters (against US beef) who were handled with water cannons. They went on to say that "even more" people turned out to cheer him - but that was secondary to the notation of the protesters. Why start with the protesters? Rhetorical question.
McNotObama '08
here we go
August 6, 2008 - 12:35 ET by candanceObama gets [apparently] 200K to show up at a rock concert where he's invited to speak. The media travels there to report live on every network.
Bush gets 150K to show up for a bona fide political speech with little fanfare, and the media are suddenly disinterested.
What more proof do lefties on here need?
President Bush not being
August 6, 2008 - 13:07 ET by bigtimerPresident Bush not being covered here is infuriating.
For the msm to black-out the President because of their hatred, bias, and agenda make fools of themselves in the long run.
Things like this are going to end up back-firing on them...and they won't understand why they are so full of hatred.
These people are contemptible.
Thank goodness for the internet, plus great people like Amy and WTH to post this for us...and of course NBs.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
BigT, The thousands of
August 6, 2008 - 15:57 ET by Biff McCainBigT,
The thousands of protesters were bullied by 24,000 thugs. Thank God for
the New York Times or you would have believed the above propaganda.
"Hours before Mr. Bush’s arrival, the national police sent 24,000
officers to downtown Seoul to guard against violence as the rival
protesters, each side numbering thousands, began rallying in the
afternoon.
Middle-aged Christians and aging veterans in military
uniforms prayed and waved American flags, while young South Koreans
battled the riot police, shouting “Bush Out!” -- NYT
http://www.nytimes.c...
I know how to win wars!
Biff, does your brain get
August 6, 2008 - 16:23 ET by Dan The Man 2Biff, does your brain get lubed by the NYT on a regular basis? The NYT is not a credible source.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
Imagine that!
August 6, 2008 - 16:25 ET by KarmaProtesters doing what protesters do and police...oh!..I mean thugs...doing what thugs do.
Biff
August 6, 2008 - 16:43 ET by MrShyOooooh, I seeeeeeee..... Thaaaaaaa Neeeewwww Yoooooorrrrrrk Tiiiiiiiiimes.....
So THAT's the reputable, unbiased "news" source you refer us to in your argument countering NB's "propaganda".
Biff, you know what? Go away.
EDIT: THIS JUST IN !!!! I'VE BEEN OFFERED A FREELANCE JOB AT OUR BELOVED NY TIMES...... see my post below..... (arg....)
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
Was there a concert before
August 6, 2008 - 13:22 ET by balboaWas there a concert before his speech? ;-)
LOL
August 6, 2008 - 13:36 ET by Warner Todd HustonTo my understanding there was only the rally. No entertainment before or after.
Alternate numbers (and firehoses...)
August 6, 2008 - 13:26 ET by sarcasmoThis story says it was about 20K anti and 30K pro.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
dailynews article
August 6, 2008 - 14:20 ET by dronetekRead some of the comments there. Those people are convinced the country rose up against Bush's visit.
Which means
August 6, 2008 - 14:29 ET by sarcasmoThe truth is probably somewhere between Warner's post's description & theirs.
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
I have a lot of experience
August 6, 2008 - 14:17 ET by usinkoreaI have a lot of experience with Korea. I read the Korean English-language newspapers every day and sevearl blogs by long-time expats in Korea. (I also lived and taught in Korea for over 4 years and have a MA in Korean Studies).
I've also focused a lot of attention for several years on South Korean society's attitude toward the US relationship with it. www.usinkorea.org
So I can offer some perspective on this news item.
The immediate context is the hysteria over the resumption of US beef imports. That hysteria has been going on for a couple of months now - and only recently died out to just the regular groups of anti-American protesters over the past couple of weeks. (mostly the college aged kids as another commenter noted)
Before that, the protests were drawing tens of thousands of people nightly and up to a hundred thousand on weekends.
That means average Koreans were more than willing to join in.
It was nuts. If you google for sites like "Marmot's Hole" and "GI Korea" - two well-known blogs in what the expats call the K-blogsphere -- you'll find a lot of in-depth analysis of this most recent spike in anti-US activity.
Basically, Korean society recently installed a new president - in a return of the conservative GNP party to the Blue House (the Korean White House).
That meant -- the US alliance was again secure - after 5 years of worry.
Because, 5 years ago, during one of the worst periods of anti-US activity in the society since the 1988 Olympic riots - Korean society lost its head and elected a former human rights lawyer who had at one time helped lead a petition drive to demand US forces leave Korea.
When Korean society woke up and realized they had gone too far - when they heard Donald Rumsfeld say the US would gladly remove US troops to use elsewhere if that is what Korea really wanted, and they realized their new president would welcome Rumsfeld's suggestion, Korean society paniced and put the common anti-US activity on ice.
President Roh, the man elected in 2002, made enough notes here and there during his five year tenure, as did members of his staff, that Korean society kept anti-US activity on ice for the longest period I've been able to research --- but now that has come to an end.
As soon as Roh was out of the Blue House, and a new, pro-US president was in office, I predicted we'd see a return to typical pre-2002 anti-US activity - and it happened - big time - over an incredibly minor and stupid issue ---- the threat of Mad Cow Disease in American beef.
But, that massive return in anti-US activity has petered out.
It got too large and ran too long. Elements of the Korean press and regular people, many of the same elements that were happy to join in with the early protests and public outrage, recently started to express concerns that things had gone too far (again) - that damage was being done to Korea's international image and the US relationship.
So, over the past few weeks, pressure has been put on the every-day anti-US activists and things have slowly ground to a halt.
Then Bush was slated to come...
and the press and average Koreans were afraid the anti-US groups would be able to capture foreign media attention - so - the pro-US elements came out to offer a different message.
Don't get me wrong --- the groups that are doing the pro-US rallies are sincere. They are made up primarily of Korean military veterans and older Koreans who can remember the Korean War and Japanese colonial occuption.
But, the only time the society at large joins in with them is when - they want to put on a show for visiting foreign journalists. ---- which occurs fairly infrequently.
Average Koreans, however, find the time much more frequently to join into things like the Cows Gone Wild!! Hysteria some of us have watched roll on week after week this summer....
What and how Korean society as a whole feels about the US relationship with Korea is very complex.
Basically, Korean society likes to have its cake and eat it too: they want the US military to shield it and save Korean tax payer's money --- but beating up on that same US in Korea is one of the most standard elements of Korean nationalism.
In short, the norm in Korean society is not what you see in this recent pro-US rally.
Excellent--and very
August 6, 2008 - 14:31 ET by JerExcellent--and very informative--analysis, usinkorea. Thank you.
Jer
wanting the US shield but beating up on the US
August 6, 2008 - 15:45 ET by UndercoverConservativeIn other words, the same as it was during the Korean War when my grandfather served. He used to tell of arrogant, abusive college kids standing around hurling insults, being rude SOBs, talking all about "Korean pride" but not bothering to volunteer for their Army and content to let Americans bleed and die so they could keep their nationalistic "pride". My grandfather earned his purple heart that campaign, and probably a few other medals like the rest of our servicemen. (R.I.P, "Hank". you're missed.)
Hopefully they grow out of that BS attitude after they get outta college.
"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same"
They were a little too busy.
August 6, 2008 - 14:18 ET by richflanjPoor MSM, they were just too busy covering Obama's most recent trip to the bathroom. After all, the world is breathless wondering if he fold or wads his toilet paper, etc.....
<sarc off>
Spiker
August 6, 2008 - 15:37 ET by SpikerI nearly blew a water cannon all over my keyboard after reading that!
Blame the camera operator...
August 6, 2008 - 15:04 ET by AmericanEnergist...for not bringing a wide-angle lens!!
The President may not always be my favorite guy, but he was handed a full dance card and was the right person at the right time. The MSM will fight tooth-and-nail to downplay anything positive about Mr. Bush because it controverts their 'lame duck' template.
www.ArmchairEnergist...
what's really sad
August 6, 2008 - 15:14 ET by UndercoverConservativeis that the Pro's outnumbered the Anti's by over 2 to1. The Antis show up hours later as fast as they could be organized (so much for being prepared!) and eventually made up a crowd of half the size. Not soon after, bored Anti's wandered off (munchies? Another protest their Northern Masters wanted them to go? homework?) but the few that stayed turned violent and required watercannons and arrests to calm them down.
Not one speck of violence on the Pro Bush side. Hmmm. I'm seeing a common thread among liberal protesters, both domestically and now internationally.
"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".
"You spend your money anyway you want and respect other's rights to do the same"
Media only reports bad things
August 6, 2008 - 16:12 ET by whatajoyThat's sad that the media didn't report this awesome support and love that So Korea showed for Pres. Bush. I guess they feel it isn't newsworthy and only air things that are negative or controversial. Like there are a LOT of battles being won in the war, but they never air our successes over there. They just air the bad news. That's why I love this site. We get the WHOLE story over here. I love it. Keep up the good work!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Take it easy! We're not making a western here.
~ Uncle Junior (The Sopranos)
WTH & NB !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 6, 2008 - 16:36 ET by MrShyOkay, I've just been presented with what is an honest-to-God moral and ethical (okay, maybe just moral) dilemma:
I just got offered a freelance (but open-ended) big-time job offer to do various web and print design work at...... yup, that's right....... The NY Times! The hourly pay is pretty good, although it's through a staffing agency which takes a big chunk. But, needless to say, as much as we hate the organization, they're still a pretty big client that will look good on my resume.
Anyway, what would all of you do? I haven't given them an answer, and waiting on more details. If I took it, would you all hate me?? :(
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
I know my opinion doesn't
August 6, 2008 - 16:42 ET by balboaI know my opinion doesn't really count, but...
Is it a really good gig? Do you have other options? I think you could make it work if it's worth it financially and career-wise.
Shy...
August 6, 2008 - 16:42 ET by JerI already hated you, so it really doesn't matter. ;-)
My advice...take it and say you didn't.
Jer
No question about it.
August 6, 2008 - 16:42 ET by KarmaGo for it Shy! One brick at a time.
MrS.... Heck no... A
August 6, 2008 - 16:43 ET by bigtimerMrS....
Heck no...
A guy's got to do what a guy's got to do! (until he gets his fame and fortune that is)
Go for it....
Besides that ...you can fill us in now and then of some of the workings...lol.
Seriously though, much luck sent you way.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
BT, Karma & those 2 liberals :p
August 6, 2008 - 16:51 ET by MrShyThanks guys/gals.....
Yeah, well, I mean I've already worked at NBC, for BravoTV, which is basically as bad, if not worse, than the NYTimes as far as rampant liberalism.
That building (30 Rock) had wretched, paper-wasting posters plastered everywhere on the lobby walls and in all of the elevators lecturing us all on how to be more GREEN. And let's not forget the a**wipe I had to work next to who couldn't resist mouthing off about how he hopes and prays Bush will die.
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
LOL MrS... Well I almost
August 6, 2008 - 16:58 ET by bigtimerLOL MrS...
Well I almost mentioned that it couldn't be much worse than NBC...I remember your posts well...
I got a kick out of them.
Wouldn't this job be more long term for you though...
...that is unless the Old Grey Lady goes under soon...heheee
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Another option...
August 6, 2008 - 17:03 ET by JerYou might consider holding out for a similar position with the more "respectable" National Enquirer.
Jer
Hahaha Jer... You just
August 6, 2008 - 17:09 ET by bigtimerHahaha Jer...
You just can't help yourself can ya?
...a regular comedian you are.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Put scare quotes around "respectable" all you want...
August 6, 2008 - 17:35 ET by sarcasmoBut this might be a bad day for it, in this case...The Enquirer put a telephoto lens on a Silky Pony, and got themselves a bullseye. (Bring on the Benny Hill video, I say!!) Let's face it, Jer. The Enquirer has now fully nailed Edwards, and they obviously relish nailing conservatives who need nailing, too. "Fair and Balanced" is what I'd call 'em, but that infuriating moniker's already taken. Anyway, considering the facts, it's almost like they're gettin' respectable or somethin'!
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
sarc...
August 6, 2008 - 18:22 ET by JerActually, I had already seen the article, surprisingly or not, on HuffPost earlier today. Also, dKos has a pretty funny diary entry on the subject--by theBlaz, or a name similar to that.
Jer
Ok, you need to learn from conservatives & recent history.
August 7, 2008 - 05:10 ET by sarcasmoNow that the Enquirer's scoop of the rest of the news media is a lock, just like it was with Limbaugh buying drugs from the maid, you want to stop trying to attack the Enquirer's journalistic integrity. Let's face it, they've obviously kicked some political ass once-again. Conservatives gave up on that line of attack in the Limbaugh case, and you can give it up, too. It's easy. Just say "The Enquirer sometimes gets it right, and this was one of those times."
Then you can move on to making excuses for Edwards' behavior just like conservatives made for Limbaugh's behavior not so long ago. Don't remain stuck in the "attack the Enquirer" phase, it doesn't work that well anymore, and it brings infuriating Enquirer-defenders like me out of the woodwork. Just like it did for conservative attackers with Limbaugh. :)
JMR
The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.
sarc...For the second time
August 7, 2008 - 13:12 ET by Jersarc...For the second time in a week, I have been duly chastened by your words. [hangs head...shuffles feet...considers but rejects humiliating grovel].
Again, I acknowledged previously the Enquirer may have been dead on the money with the Edwards "love child" story. But, it still is a tabloid [which--correct me if I'm wrong--pays enormous sums to tattle-tale informants], that mongers a presumptive scandal about the intimate, private life of a politician who, at least presently, neither holds nor is actively seeking public office. That bothers me, just as does the peddling of the Bush drinking story. What are your views on the latter?
Jer
Go for it Shy
August 6, 2008 - 16:46 ET by Dee BunkI wouldn't turn it down it would be great for your resume. Maybe you could even make a few "errors" ; ) (just kidding on the last part)
History lesson
August 6, 2008 - 16:56 ET by BuffNBoneHistory lesson coming.
During Vietnam air operations, "Falcon Codes" were short-hand numerical messages used to communicate something without actually saying the words. For example, "118" meant something like, "I'd rather have a sister in a whorehouse than a brother in a B-52." I believe the codes may have originated at the AF Academy.
So MrShy if you take the position, I'm sure we come up with an appropriate falcon code for your situation.
"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"
Hey Buff.... Great idea,
August 6, 2008 - 17:03 ET by bigtimerHey Buff....
Great idea, I was wondering if he would have to watch what he says ect...plenty of people in this world that would like nothing better than to see, or cause a persons misery/downfall or such.
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
Hadn't thought about him
August 6, 2008 - 17:32 ET by BuffNBoneHadn't thought about him needing a set of his own codes while working there but it has potential.
101 = "I'd rather push a peanut over a mile of sandpaper with my nose than .... (fill in the blank)"
102 = "They are gathering at the watercooler talking about the latest NB posting."
103 = "Someone's head just exploded after BHO's most recent gaff."
104 = "Madame Speaker is doing the pretzel thing again."
"Fighters are fun but bombers make policy"
Hey if you don't have to
August 6, 2008 - 17:16 ET by Dan The Man 2Hey if you don't have to compromise your morals or ethics then go for it. Its like my brother in law in Vegas asked his pastor about accepting money from gamblers. It is all God's money and the source it comes from is not as important as the idea of him contributing to the Lords work. Remember Zachias the tax collector and where he got his money from.
Besides you could reform the NYT from within.
Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.
OMG Shy
August 6, 2008 - 20:13 ET by candanceThat's fantastic! Why would we hate you for it? You're not giving any money to them - you're taking money away from them! And they're going to end up paying someone to do it, so why not coherse them into paying a conservie?
Besides, if it boosts your resume, you can end up doing work for a bigger company you actually like.
I say take the money and run. ;-)
Candance
August 6, 2008 - 20:22 ET by MrShyI say take the money and run. ;-)
And Steve Miller sings.....
"Oooooh, take the money and ruuuun...."
:)
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
Looks like they recycled the "Mission Accomplished" banner.
August 6, 2008 - 17:56 ET by Biff McCainIt's always good to see stuffed reused; I wash and use over my plastic
forks from my Burger King salads. The BK girls are always so impressed.
I know how to win wars!
Looks like they recycled the
August 6, 2008 - 20:23 ET by MrShyLooks like they recycled the "Worst & Most Unfunny" troll in Biffy the IQ Slayer.
* * * SOCKS THE CAT '08 * * *
For REAL Change
*SPEW ALERT!* Now
August 6, 2008 - 20:32 ET by bigtimer*SPEW ALERT!*
Now that was the funniest thing I have seen all day here MrShy!
Thank you..thank you!
I am still laughing as I post this....
"America isn't the problem...America is the solution." ~ Rush Limbaugh
South Koreans love
August 6, 2008 - 21:59 ET by ROTORHEAD77South Koreans love Americans, and love the fact the American's are stationed in their country. USFK has a slogan, and it rings true, "We go together."
Most saavy South Koreans understand the economic and security benefits of having a large US presence in their country.
I am over there about once a month, and I have heard nothing but praise for Americans. Sure, sometimes it is a bumpy road, but in the end, we always find a way to reconcile our differences.
FLY ARMY!
30,000 to 20,000
August 7, 2008 - 03:55 ET by NortoThat was the reported ratio in the local mid-Maine rag, but the headline was about the protest and not the gratitude many South K's have for the US, as we are keeping them from being over-run, despite who the POTUS was or is. Bush just happens to have been tagged "it" for now.
I wasn't Bush per se the gratitude was being shown for it was the UNITED STATES!
"Somehow, the media sort of missed that one, eh?"
August 7, 2008 - 09:46 ET by Ole_SargeMissed it BIG time, but then, why report GOOD NEWS???
I've been stationed in The Republic of Korea twice and found the people to be very wonderful and supportive. As well as being very fiercely independent minded. They may appear to "outsiders" to be of one mind on things, but trust me from having many Korean friends, this is a shallow observation by lazy people that do not know or care about Korean history or culture.
And make no bones about it, if they "don't like you" you WILL know it. I have seen protests larger than the pro-President Bush/Prayers for America rallies before in Seoul.
And even the Korean media underestimated the crowds, since the only site covered was the one in Seoul, there were rallies in several other cities too. That didn't happen for the Free Rock concert followed by a speech in Berlin. That was the only venue for it, no rallies in other cities.