**Video Below the Fold**
Last week, with an "Assignment America" report on the CBS Evening News, Steve Hartman perpetrated a perfect example of why the media simply has no credibility on any subject, even humor. Hatrman’s report was not only dishonest, but missed the main point by a fair margin.
To set his report up, Hartman claims that before his son was born he had wondered why parents universally felt their own children were be so darn cute? He wondered how it could be that every parent thought theirs was the cutest child ever born? So, after Hartman himself recently had a son, George, he thought that he might go out and explore his curiosity on the subject.
The result was Is My Baby Cute? Really? where Hartman went out on the street to ask parents if they thought their own babies were cute. CBS had also previously asked parents to send in to them photos of babies, ugly and cute, in preparation for the story.
Hartman said that...
Nearly 200 people sent in pictures of their supposedly adorable offspring, but not one parent copped to having even an average looking child. It's not right, since logic demands that half of all babies must fall in the bottom 50 percent of cuteness.
Fair enough... if it weren't for that whole human nature thing where babies evoke the visceral desire to love and protect them. Still, it is an amusing bit of human nature that finds few parents ever thinking their progeny was in that "bottom 50 percent."
Hartman next admitted that, despite being a "journalist" he was succumbing to that blasted human nature thingie, too.
That's why, after my son George was born, I tried to maintain my journalistic integrity. Now, the older he gets, the more I fall in love with him, the more I find myself thinking like all the other parents.
I suppose he imagined that the god-like powers of journalists made them better than all they survey and this magical power might have shielded him from becoming just like the rest of us lowly humans. Still, that is a niggling point, to be sure, and I don’t want to beat Hartman up too much for merely being human, despite how it must have disappointed him to discover the singular truth.
Here is where it got dishonest, even for a report that was supposed to be lighthearted.
Hartman then took a photo of young baby George and asked folks on the street if they thought his baby was cute or not. "As I expected," Hartman quipped, "everyone said he was cute."
So, Hartman had the art department do a little photoshopping of his baby photo to make the face appear just a little odd. He "uglied him up" as Hartman termed it.
The picture I originally showed people was an actual picture of my son. Then I started showing an “uglified” version. Believe it or not, everyone still gushed over my little monster, although some more convincingly than others.
And so it went, no matter who I asked, or how ugly I made the picture. I couldn't find anyone who'd give it to me straight. I even showed a priest the picture.
Isn't that funny?
To end, Hartman gave us his best aphorism:
After all that, I've come to the conclusion that cuteness is relative ... if the baby's your relative, it's cute.
OK, so what's the big deal, you might ask? It's just a fluff piece, a Summer time throw away to make the Katie Couric show seem more likable and human, right? Why get so darn picky?
Well, you'd be right with all of those questions should you ask them of me. It really was a meaningless, throw away, faux report to fill space on TV. But, still, despite how flippant the report was, despite how unserious in nature, there is still an underlying dishonesty about it.
See, here is the thing: no one will look a parent straight in the face and tell them that their baby is ugly. It just isn't nice, it isn't neighborly... it isn't even human. Besides the fact that people don't want to be seen dissing the babies, who wants to stand in the middle of the street and get in a fight with a proud parent by telling them that their kid is ugly? Even if the kid is uglier than Helen Thomas, no one is going to say to a parent that his kid is ugly.
It just isn't done.
So, in the end, Steve Hartman did not find out that everyone thinks babies are cute, even ugly ones. What he found out was that people are too nice to look him in the face and tell him his baby was ugly... and that is a whole different issue.
Now, they showed little George (you can see him in the video clip below). I thought he was a fine lad. He was not Gerber cute, but he was no Hunchback of Notre Dame! Still, I can't imagine looking proud papa Steven Hartman in the eye and saying, "Eh, this kid's just average."
Could you?















Editor at Large

Comments Policy
Kindness Cut-Off Age
June 30, 2008 - 07:10 ET by UpwayIt's too bad that people stop applying that basic kindness when it comes to adults. For example, the attacks on President Bush's looks, actresses who gain weight, etc. Hartman could have added to his piece by exploring the magic cut-off age for the obligatory "gushing".
really?
June 30, 2008 - 07:41 ET by saylmanwho cares
Sign reads: DON'T FEED
June 30, 2008 - 09:01 ET by AJSign reads:
DON'T FEED THE TROLLS
Who cares if you don't care? No one needs to know... go away.
This story was "cute" and
June 30, 2008 - 08:53 ET by msh1973This story was "cute" and refreshing in a time of all the craziness in the world. I for one love babies and think they are adorable.
I am reminded of the Seinfeld episode about the baby, where everyone is saying that the baby is "breathtaking" although Elaine and Jerry recoil everytime they look at the baby. Funny stuff!
I think...
June 30, 2008 - 09:06 ET by DelsaThis story was a way for Steve to get his kids face on TV!
Babies are cute. My first son had so much hair I tried to cut it at week old and he looked like heck.
But he was still cute.
Steve was just fishin for baby compliments.
Just sayin
PS the mole? Not believeable
Hartman is just so proud of
June 30, 2008 - 09:19 ET by rimskyHartman is just so proud of his own little guy that he had to find a way to show off. And that's just fine with me. But, I have to ask, why not just say, "Hey, look at my little baby boy, ain't he just great?" Instead, he takes this rather strange, Seinfeld like approach, and actually uglifies his own kid. I agree with Warner, it exposes how the media lacks credibility on nearly all subjects, even in it's examination of the pure God given blessing of birth and the unconditional love of a parent for their natural offspring.
Accentuate the Positive
June 30, 2008 - 09:36 ET by GothampcI haven't seen the ugly picture of the baby, but maybe the people looking at it were trying to find something beautiful in the ugly baby. Maybe the baby was ugly overall but had beautiful eyes and so they decided to "accentuate the positive". The problem with these snap polls on tv is that they never go in depth as to why the person made their decision.
Butt Ugly Babies
June 30, 2008 - 09:48 ET by Copperhead RidgeI'll hide behind the cloak of internet anonymity. I have a friend who's baby is uglier than a poorly built mudfence. No kidding, if they threw the kid in a pond, they could skim ugly off of the water for three days.
I live in the South. It's fun to listen to Southern women comment about ugly babies. First of all, they can't lie, but proper Southern manners dictate that they not say anything bad about a child.
Southern women look at ugly babies and say, "bless its little heart."
I would never say anything to hurt someone's feelings, but my wife gets mad at me because I'm honest after a couple of adoring parents are out of our presence.
"Did you see the mouth on that kid? If you put a pacifier in that mouth, you better have a fishing license."
"That kid's head is so big it should have alternating green and dark green stripes."
Hey
June 30, 2008 - 16:04 ET by bigtimerHey Copperhead...
ROFLMAO!
Now your post was the truth...and danged funny too!
"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson
Rimsky
June 30, 2008 - 10:00 ET by DelsaI agree with you. This story was a not story. I think they need something to do on their new channel and his empty story filled the void.
Hey Hartman...
June 30, 2008 - 10:49 ET by Dr_LibertyBring the kid to me. I have no problem telling you to your face that your kid is uglier than deep fried mole entrails.
I will also tell you that as a "journalist" you have no deep insight into human nature. The only students I have found dumber than journalists are education majors.
<insert witty signature here>
Suri Cruise was a butt-ugly
June 30, 2008 - 12:12 ET by ladyrvtSuri Cruise was a butt-ugly baby, but is now an adorable little girl.
Who??
June 30, 2008 - 12:29 ET by Warner Todd HustonWho the heck is Suri Cruise?
TomKat's kid
June 30, 2008 - 13:17 ET by ladyrvtTomKat's kid
Oh. Hollywood. Dat 'splaines
June 30, 2008 - 13:53 ET by Warner Todd HustonOh. Hollywood. Dat 'splaines it.
Yes, I can imagine saying that
June 30, 2008 - 16:00 ET by ArchConservativeI can also say I hope that the little rugrat doesn't grow up to be a shill for anti-Americanism and an espouser of liberalism like his daddy dearest. If this doofus actually calls himself a reporter then the whole profession should be scrapped. This is news???? This takes up valuable space between ads for Depends and Laxatives???? But it's ok Steve, just take off your clothes and get back with the rest of the media in the ObamaBedLoveFest. There now, sleep dreams you ugly thing.
You support the troops by supporting the mission! If you don't support the mission, have the guts to say you don't support the troops.