Media Fooled: 'Lost Tribe' Not so Lost as Previously Reported


Remember last month when the "amazing" photos of the "lost Indian tribe" in the Brazilian jungle were making the rounds? Remember how every single news agency in the world jumped on this "astounding" report? They were a "lost tribe," they were an "uncontacted" people, they were shooting arrows at the "big bird" and dressed in war paint. All manner of claims were made about these people, but many reports seemed to claim that these photos were intended to "prove" they exist and that the photographs were the result of a chance encounter.

Turns out that there was no "chance" to it and no one seriously doubted these people existed at all. Further, the man who took the photos knew almost exactly where to go to get those pictures, so "lost tribe" is hardly the correct terminology bywhich to describe these people.

What we have with this story is a perfect example of the media jumping on a story without bothering to clarify all the facts. In fact, the newest news of the incident is going to the other extreme and calling the whole incident a "hoax." But the revelations made by the photographer do not really reveal an outright hoax as much as evidence that the original story was only a little misleading.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

To clarify, the original story made it seem as if Indigenous tribes expert, José Carlos Meirelles came across this tribe by accident as he flew above them and that his important photos revealed "proof" that they existed. Now, however, we are told by Mr. Meirelles that he had previous information, coordinates and maps that he followed to "accidentally" find the little settlement and that he had known of these people's existence previously, as did others.

So, this week we are told it was a "hoax."

THE man behind photos of warriors from an "undiscovered" Amazon tribe that were beamed around the world has admitted it was a hoax.

Survival International, the organisation that released the pictures along with Funai, conceded yesterday that Funai had known about this nomadic tribe for around two decades.

The “accidental” find wasn’t so accidental it turns out.

According to his account, the Brazilian state of Acre offered him the use of an aircraft for three days.

"I had years of GPS co-ordinates," he said.

Mr Meirelles had another clue to the tribe's precise location.

"A friend of mine sent me some Google Earth co-ordinates and maps that showed a strange clearing in the middle of the forest and asked me what that was,"he said.

So, while he did not find them by accident, and they weren't a "lost tribe" he did not perpetrate an outright hoax because these people do, indeed, exist and are a basically uncontacted people whose habitat might be endangered by modern encroachment.

What we end up with, though, is the news misreporting this story twice. It's just a sad example of how one really shouldn't trust anything in the media!

But, let's look at some of the new quotes by this supposed Indigenous tribes expert, Meirelles.

Meirelles said when he saw the grass huts he found them using his maps and coordinates previously recorded. He also made the interesting statement about how his flight was received by the natives.

"When the women hear the plane above, they run into the forest, thinking it's a big bird,' he said. 'This is such a remote area, planes don't fly over it.'

He knows this how? If they are uncontacted, how do we know that the women think the plane is a giant bird about to swoop down and eat them? How do we know what they think about planes?

Then Meirelles makes another claim about these people.

"Because painted red means they are ready for war, which to me says they are happy and healthy defending their territory."

First of all, if he only flew over these people once as he claims, how did the men have the time to get "ready for war" and get their bodies all smeared with the red war paint? Secondly, and once again remembering these are supposed to be uncontacted people, how do we even know red painted bodies means they are "ready for war"? If no one has contacted these people and observed their rituals and conventions, how do we have any idea what the red paint might represent?

Also how does anyone know these people don't want to be contacted? How are we sure leaving them in some prehistoric condition is really the right thing to do?

We don't actually. All the assumptions that José Carlos Meirelles has of these people is born out of his own arrogance of being a so-called "indigenous tribes expert" not on reality. After all, if all the tribes are contacted and modernized, then there would be no need for José Carlos Meirelles' services!

One thing is sure, there can be no doubt that these people live short and brutal lives. They are sure to have little by way of emergency health care and it is possible that their women lead harsh, oppressed lives. To be sure, I am not advocating we immediately bring them McDonald's, TV and tetanus shots, but to assume we know what is best for them in any way at all is arrogance on our part. My guess is, that if they wanted to be contacted, they know where to find us!

So, the real hoax is that we as modern humans know what is best for these people better than they do.

(Photo credit: Reuters)


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

→ Lost Tribe

What was the first clue?  The NIKE swoosh on their loincloths?

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

No...

No, I think it was that the photographer caught the tribesmen in WalMart buying their red war paint on sale at an everyday low price.

→ That's right WTH

They came in with a swatch of boolaberry dye.

Now I remember

  • LYDSEXICS UNTIE

Reminds Me...

of the begining of Krippendorf's Tribe.......

"You're either part of the solution or part of the problem"

We never believed a minute

We never believed a minute of any of this story to begin with here in my household...but what I want to know is where is all the madness from the msm apologizing the same as they did when they breathlessly reported this story...eh?

Wait...same place John Murtha and the rest of the msm is about about Haditha!

Silent!!!!!!

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Wilson

Actually, they were

Actually, they were orginally a super-advanced highly technological large and democractic civilization, but then they adopted anti-Global Warming policies and...

Guess I better start looking

Guess I better start looking for red paint at Walmart then, because if Algore has his way, we're next.

It really *is* a hoax,

It really *is* a hoax, though. They are not an uncontacted nor an undocumented tribe, so their is nothing really special about them, just another group of indigenous people living in primitive conditions like so many around the world. He attempted to sell them as something different from any other rainforest tribe to make a tired ecological "point", and got caught on it.

And this Meirelles guy sounds like a typical smug lefty "ah, look at those charming natives with their poverty and brutal lifestyles, back to nature, yay " type to begin with.

Whenever I hear someone lamenting how primitive tribal based societies are vanishing and being "threatened" by "encroaching" modern lifestyles, I say "Good!"

And saying that these people and others like them could be done a world of good by becoming a more modernized society is not arrogance in cases like these, its just common sense and decency.

Survival International

Check out the Survival International webpage.  Pretty much what you'd expect.  Why would anyone use a extremely partisan anti-modern organization like this as a source for a story.

Welcome to Dhimmiland

This tribe is nothing more than what a civilization looks like after decades upon decades of Democrat-rule: uneducated but environmentally friendly, taxed to their loin cloths, and only sticks for defense. 

 

"A man who won't believe in God will believe in anything."

G.K. Chesterton 

meh, been done before. "The

meh, been done before. "The gentle Tassaday," anyone? hell, i seem to recall another loony-let lost society in a country north of brazil. seem to recall they were nice people. they made terrble fla-vor-aid, though...

the MSM jumped on this story

Because they thought that they had found 50 more votes for Obama.

Jeff Lebowski

www.angrywhitedude.c...

the hoax was made to push an anti-capitalist liberal agenda

something about that story just bugged me from the start but i held my opinion knowing that some environmental group was going to cry about how we are invading the sanctity of a raw untouched culture. i honestly was waiting for a straight up GLOBAL WARMING link to the tribe in some way. the hoax was made to cry about logging in the forrest, which maybe in that country there isn't as much regulation and planting of new trees, i have no idea, but it's hard to buy the anti logging groups claims because the last time i heard from their camp they said that the amazon rain forrest was suppose to be stripped bare sometime around 2003. so obviously since that happened i'm wondering what the anti logging crowd are protesting since there aren't any trees left down there(by their claims in the 90s). this all just exposes how liberals don't care about lying, just so long as they get their agenda pushed.

nice to see that the liberal socialist anti-capitalist is still holding to it's belief that it's ok to lie and mislead the public in order to further their agenda. just the same way that al gore copped to "embellishing" the truth as he said "to get peoples attention". all of these are lies but not really, the only person that lied was bush if you ask them. i love the liberal definition of a lie, you knowing go out and push a falicy on the public knowing it's not true, but you do it to push your agenda, and that's not a lie; but if the president who annalizestons of data from known sources, allies, other forgeign agencies, and chews on the data for months on end along with all of congress and aides and scores of others and %99 of everyone agree on the same conclusion, even though it may have been a mistake, that is a lie because ooooooh he wasn't a liberal. i just love the liberal definition of a lie. basically that is if you're a liberal you can say anything without impunity, if you're a conservative everything you say is a lie.

lunaticcringeradio

"...it is possible that

"...it is possible that their women lead harsh, oppressed lives."

 

"...they are ready for war, which to me says they are happy." 

 

Now wait just a minute, how can we be so sure they are Muslims?

they didn't get paid

The general observation of the arrow shooting that goes with the story is fearless warriors defending the home against the terrible metal god-bird carrying demons. The real story is this: they're highly pissed because the photographer promised 'cargo' for the priveledge of taking the photos. He welched on the deal so their after his scalp. I wish them good luck and good aim.

;-))

Clarifying some misconceptions

There's an article at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25350389/ that helps clarify the sitution.  It's not conceivable that they don't know about the outside world from contact with other tribes. They could trot about of the forest any time they want to check out the nearest MacDonald's. The implication is that they, along with a few other tribes, just want to be left alone. The Brazilian government goes along out of respect for that and to avoid transmission of diseases which, historically speaking, tend to decimate such isolated people after contact. As for motive for their cultural isolationism - who knows? Maybe they know about the disease issue.