The MSM are allowing Obama to get away with a level of arrogance (if arrogance does indeed have levels) that would simply not be tolerated in any other politician. Not only get away with it, they are, as Rush calls them "willing accomplices."

Look at the collective hissy fit they had when George Bush said that he prayed for God to show him what to do! Yet Obama campaigns in churches, asks the congregation to pray for him to be elected so that they can do "God's work" and "establish a kingdomr right here on earth." And they not only don't have a fit, they glamorize him for doing it!

You are right, Warner; the other examples were done under oppression. The American MSM have enlisted willingly and cooperate not only freely, but gladly.

Shameless is too mild a word for them.

Shoot 'em all; let God sort 'em out! - Marge Simpson

With 4 $ a Gallon Gas, Americans want Good news.

The MSM is witholding good news...,

The Good news about Iraq

NOT reporting the GOOD news about how much OIL Americans own that is NOT being produced, the Sins of Omission.

Obamarama is NOT a substitute for Good news...he's done Nothing, in Illinois, or in the US Senate.   

He can only CHANGE his Mind to get Votes.  

I  must Confess, I have not seen a LOT of these propaganda Photos, they have eluded me and most of the people I know.  

Americans are beyond the MSM reach, and these photos show the  desperation of the MSM, and in  their desperation they publish these pictures to "convert" believers to the MSM way of thinking.

If you don't "Believe", then you don't watch. 

Americans have Religion, and many go to Church,  we WANT NEWS/Information/Reporting from  the MSM, not Religion.

The Republican Revolution will not be Televised

Warner.. and the contrast is ..in one's face. Here, one of the several pics of President Bush with his head cut off or missing. This one by Time Mag. Another was when the NY Times ran a front page feature picture of President Bush escorting the Queen of England during her historic visit to Washington last year, and in addition to cutting off his head, the paper didn't even know who he was.. identified him only as "an accompanist?"

"Saviors" have come and gone in political history, and Obama is just another failure waiting to happen. This is because there are 6 billion other people on the planet who have their own mindsets, and so they oppose worldly "saviors" in the end, even if they temporarily embrace them in the beginning. This is because it has been proven that "power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely" and so eventually the people rise up in protest or civil war against the "savior."

As for the images in photos and stories of Obama as a "savior," implicit or otherwise, such media is deceived, I promise you, and furthermore it shows you now naive such media is. In the end, domestic and world problems are well beyond the power of one man, and even beyond the power of all the world governments:

- the weather is well beyond the control of man and due to its adverse effects, humans, sadly, believe in a worldly savior to help them when it simply will not be, despite media hype

- internal forces of the earth, which cause earthquakes are also well beyond the control of humans, and still, somehow, humans are naive enough to believe one man can control these too

- the same forces create volcanos, and when you have fewer volcanos, you get a warmer planet due to less sulfiric acid in the air, a mitigator of warmer temperatures, conversely, more volcanos means a cooler planet, so who can control volanos?

- the forces of greenhouse gases are well beyond the control of man, (who can control the sun, the primary generator of warming and cooling, and even controls the amount of CO2 and water vapor in the air, both greehouse gases?)

- as for economies, market forces of 6 billion people on the planet outweigh one man, the feds, the WTO, World Bank, UN and the EU combined, so unless taxes are 100% of people's incomes, they tend to spend their money the way the want to spend it, which sways economies the way it will go, beyond the control of one man, that is, unless Obama want to implement a 100% tax on people, and make them eat what they are told to eat, dress the way they are told to dress, work where they are told to work, play when they are told they can play, have 2.5 children, exactly, etc, etc.

- as for wars, look at history honestly and you will see that war is the product of 6 billion persons, all with a mindset of their own, and whenever they get dictatorial powers (in truth) then bad things happen, and even democracies have fought against one another, because of a temporary unity of mindset, and the primary cause of war is either greed (I want what you have) or desparation (we need what you have or we will die) or we fear an enemy who has those intentions and capabilities to wage war and there is a need to strike first.

Yes, the media is grossly misleading and naive to itself. Can one man stop crime? We know he cannot, so can one man stop war, a political force far greater than the mindset of the common criminal?

Obama, read my lips... Go to Hell you Marxist!

Leave our Democratic Country Alone!  We don't need no stinkin "Change"

Wake up America!  Get rid of this ignorant half-wit now!

If "Papa Doc Obama" loses, it's going to be due in large part to a lot of independents and moderates finally getting sick of these crude attempts to deify Obama into a messiah. Maybe, just maybe, the media and the liberal political apparatus will finally overplay their hand.

I will be honest, I have not even read most of ths thread yet, but this post looks like it took a lot of work. Not sure I like you comparing Obama to the dictators, but kudos on the quality of this thread.

Not sure about the inside yet, so I will read it now.

I think Obama is always staring off into the distance because he's trying to get a clue, and he doesn't have one.  Obama is extraordinarily dishonest and continually misleading - about his positions, his plans, his personal beliefs and personal history, everything!  And so is his wife.

And the MSM just keeps kissing up to him and swallowing his "pose" at every opportunity, enabling his idiocy.  Someone sure needs to honestly pin him down with some real, hard core questioning on a national TV interview - but so far, NOTHING.  Nothing at all, anywhere. 

And that's really strange because Obama certainly IS extremely dangerous to the future of our country, more so than ANY other individual to come along in my lifetime.  And this goes way beyond the Republican/ Democrat stuff.  Wake up, folks - please!

WTH, once again, full of hot air. There is hardly any resemblance between those pictures and the Communist paintings he produces. Out of the four, only one resembles Obama's campaign material in the least. (The one of Castro; although I admit Lenin's disembodied head is almost Obama like, but more angry - like McCain. McCain's anger is akin to Lenin's Communist rage.)

You are blindly trying to convince yourselves that Obama is evil. Oh no! His campaign material has him staring seriously into the future! Like a Communist! Actually, those hard faces are the faces of a superhero. Those aren't Communist poses, those are superhero poses. Jeeze, I mean, why don't you go look through some movie posters for pictures of heroes looking into the future with hard faces and compare THEM to Communist propaganda? Oh. My. God. Indiana Jones has a serious face, and he's standing confidently in from of a halo-like flaming image of a crystal skull! He's a COMMUNIST!

Or let's take the gloves off and ask WTH if he'd like to compare pictures of MLK Jr. looking seriously into the future with Communist propaganda? Or Gandhi? Or the Pope? Or Pres. Bush? He won't, because he knows, deep down, that staring hard into the future is a pose people make when they want to look serious, like a leader - it's the pose of heroes, visionaries and leaders regardless of philosophical affiliation. THIS is journalistic dishonesty. To take a common theme, a common pose, and suggest that it can only be compared to Communist propaganda, when, in fact, it resembles any NUMBER of superhero images in our popular culture, this is low, dirty and dishonest. THIS is bias.

I admit, however, one of the pictures reminds me of the old Japanese flag. If WTH had been earnest, serious and honest in this article, he would have pointed THAT out instead of trying to convince us that these pictures resemble a picture of Stalin standing calmly, holding some paper, in a pose that is nothing at all like what Obama is doing in his campaign material. Where does he show us a picture of Obama standing with a mild face holding paper while wearing a uniform?

Never. Because he's making this all up. THIS, this right here, is the essence of bias. Literally making things up. It doesn't get lower than that, WTH.

You people are all jumping at shadows. You are, to quote Indiana Jones, seeing Communists in your soup. You are all paranoid, and if it weren't so disgusting it would be hillarious. You would all be cute if you were children, but you are adults with a vote. And your vote is being influenced by people wildly shouting, "Look! A serious face! That means Communism!"

Warner...

This is a great collage you have put together. It only strengthens my conviction that Obama is a Communist.Of course the pictures don't prove anything, but they sure fit the hype surrounding him, and they fit quite nicely with some of his so-called progressive thinking.

45 Communist Goals for America http://www.nationmakers.com/com_goals.htm

I just saw that "Presidential Seal" yesterday and my first thought was "wow... he has some chutzpah."  He's not even formally nominated and he pulls this kind of imagery out?  Very presumptuous.

 This media overload of the Obamas coverage is driving me crazy, especially since all I hear from people I know is "Well, he's going to win.  There's nothing we can do about it now."