New Hollywood Film Casts Old West Cowboys as 'Imperialists'

  • Bookmark and Share

What's history for if Hollywood and our other entertainment industries can't take it and warp it to fit a current, partisan political agenda? In yet another example of Hollyweird’s foolishness, we have a new Robert Downey, Jr. vehicle that casts the American Cowboy as an "imperialist". Of course, they will dress it up and try to hide this absurd message by having an alien invasion occur during a skirmish between Cowboys and Indians in the late 1800's, forcing the two human enemies to unite to fight the aliens. This is supposed to be an "allegory." Yes, with this "pulpy mix of the sci-fi and Western genres," we have "allegory" in the fact that the space aliens are trying to invade and conquer the Earth just like the cowboys were doing to the poor, benighted natives. Just once I’d like to see a movie present Indians as real, three dimensional people instead of infantilized, victims.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

After Downey's great success with "Iron Man," it is now reported that he is in talks to join "Cowboys and Aliens," from Imagine Entertainment, a film based on a so-called graphic novel of the same name.

The story centers on an Old West battle between the Apache and Western settlers, including a former Union Army gunslinger named Zeke Jackson (Downey), that is interrupted by a spaceship crashing into the prairie near Silver City, Ariz.

Sounds "B" movie-like, but here is where we get the preachy "allegory."

The story draws a parallel between the American imperialist drive to conquer the "savage" Indians with its advanced technology and the aliens' assault on Earthlings, who must join together to survive the invaders' attack.

Great, another example of a movie trying to be "relevant."

I remember when the movie "Tombstone" came out there was an interview with the director that had me shaking my head, amazed at the blatant foolishness of Hollywood as they do their best to mangle real history so that they can "say something" about a problem we are having today.

In a radio interview in 1993, director George P. Cosmatos claimed that he was making another one of those pointless, Hollywood "allegories" by a costuming decision made for the enemies of Wyatt Earp and his brothers -- those who stood as the law in Tombstone, Arizona. Director Cosmatos had all the cowboys wearing a red sash around their waist because, he claimed, this sash was an "allegory" to today's "gang colors" and he was trying to draw a parallel between today's violent drug gangs and the cowboys that faced the Earps in 1881.

It was all foolishness, of course. The so-called Cowboy "gang" that really faced the Earps in 1881 was hardly anything like a gang, even as gangs existed then, much less any sort of allegory to the sort of violent street gangs that infests our society today. Cosmatos even had several historical western figures involved in the Tombstone fight that had no role at all in the real event. Figures such as Curly Bill Brocius and Johnny Ringo made unnecessary appearances in Cosmatos’ film. The movie also completely ignored the fact that Wyatt Earp was a crook, card sharp and bunko artist or that Doc Holliday was likely responsible for a state coach robbery that was blamed on the Clantons, an event that contributed to the two camps being angry at each other.

But, let's not let reality and facts get in the way of a movie based on "history." Just as this new movie mistakenly uses the "allegory" of "imperialism" as a way to illustrate what cowboys were doing during the great American westward expansion between 1850 and 1900.

It isn’t just the movie taking this silly so-called allegory track, either. The original comic book also had this simple-minded point to make.

Sporting some of the most primitive and child-like art I’ve seen in a comic for a long time, this book grandly labeled a “graphic novel” infantilizes the American Indian at the same time as it tries to elevate him to the heights of nobility, a fate all too often bestowed by condescending liberals on the many and varied cultures that constituted the native peoples of this continent.

Here are the first few lines of this comic:

Every conqueror believes himself moved by a higher power. Imperialist's actions are always justified, by necessity, compassion, or divine providence.

For those who believed in it, Manifest Destiny was a noble endeavor -- a God-given duty to spread the principles of the United States throughout the world in general and North America in particular.

For those who stood in the path of the expansion of the territory of the still young United States of America, it was something else altogether.

The European settlers had superior technology, but even more dangerous than that they believed they had the right -- the duty, even, to bring these 'merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions"*, to heel.

The American frontier was pushed ever westward with no thought of the impact this would have on the native population. Disease, displacement, slavery and warfare killed millions.

Entire tribes were wiped out and the survivors forced to bow to the colonists' will.

Of course, nowhere is it mentioned that the “native population” did the very same thing -- perhaps on a smaller scale, of course -- to members of other tribes, who also constituted the “native population.” Wiping them out, chasing them from their homes and enslaving them as well as stealing from them. And they were doing this for thousands of years before America was founded by those eeevil white men from Europe.

Worse, this sort of Pabulum always treats all Indians as if they were mere Indians, as if there was no difference between the peoples. This uninformed take on the history of Indians also seems to forget that some tribes worked with Americans and worked with Americans against their own enemies in other tribes, at that! Yes, many Indian tribes worked with “whites” to wipe out other Indians.

On top of all of that, this sort of anti-intellectual, simplistic look at history gives short shrift to the real advances that is the United States of America and distills all the amazing things this country has done for the world to one, anti-American, and uninformed meme of hypocrisy and avarice.

In light of that, it’s no wonder that Hollyweird loves this badly drawn little comic book. It makes America a place of thieves, liars and murders. Just the sort of thing that Hollyweird loves.

(Photo credit: www.guyville.com)


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

imperialists existed, but never as a cowboy

How retarded. A cowboy was a grunt moving cattle around. How a wage slave qualifies as an imperialist is beyond me. The land barons on the other hand would. So would the railroad magnates (or is that maggots?). Just like the incompetent gang bangers hitting everyone but the target in a drive-by shooting, Follywood misses the cultural mark by a wide margin. I'm soooooo surprised... NOT!

And then there's Follywood's Native Americans (an oxymoron, no one is native to America; we're all immigrants). For the most part they were vicious and cruel, not a bunch of fuzzy bunnies getting downtrodden by the eeevil white man. The fiction that they were one with Nature also has to go. We have documented evidence that several major indian cultures across North and South America collapsed due to disasterous agricultural methods. Where's Mel Gibson when you need him?

Cowboy Imperialism

The American cowboy as Cecil Rhodes.... or Francisco Pizarro!

So true wizardjr, I mean human sacrifice, come on. I am currently reading Hugh Thomas's book Rivers of Gold (2003) about the Spanish conquistadores. Fascinating tale; this passage gets to the heart of your post: (emphasis mine)

The complexity of the Mexican religion does not lend itself to a swift summary. As far as the common man was concerned, religion signified a large number of festivals: at least one a month in honor of a special deity, and marked by processions, dancing and music. They were also attended by offerings and sacrifices, sometimes birds such as quail and, increasingly, of slaves and other captives. As in earlier regimes, the human sacrifices were carried out on the summits of pyramids before shrines to the different deities. Priests, monarchs and noblemen were called on to offer blood in other ways, from the ear, the wrist or even the penis. Human sacrifice shocked the Spaniards, but it was an integral part of a series of ceremonies common to the region.

The Spaniards and Europeans were cruel, but let's not mythologize North and South American Indian societies and turn them into Woodstock nation. By and large, their societies were way more brutal than anything that came out of Europe.

 

Kemo sabe: Cowboys, Indians and Aliens?

Little know fact: Tonto actually coined the famous phrase "Klaatu barada nikto."

In Potawatomi dialect, Tonto said it to the Lone Ranger when he tried to take a second helping of pork n' beans off the campfire, when Tonto had not yet finished his first.  

I predict...

...a nearly 250 million dollar budget and a 150 million dollar loss, not excluding overseas and DVD sales.

You would think that with the success of plain old entertainment movies like Iron Man, The Lord of the Rings, The Chronicles of Narnia, or even Star Wars parts IV, V, & VI that Hollywood would have a clue that anti-American movies don't make any freaking money with an American audience.

What does it take with these people?

"I'd rather be governed by the first 2,000 people in the Boston
telephone directory than the 2,000 faculty at Hardvard Unversity." -
William F. Buckley Jr.

...a nearly 250 million

...a nearly 250 million dollar budget and a 150 million dollar loss, not excluding overseas and DVD sales.

I agree. It's going to bomb.

“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)

these studio guys got

these studio guys got nothing on oil execs...

so where do these obscene movie profits go?

hmmm...

could go to education, or health care, or fighting terrorists...

but no - it goes to $10 million dollar celebrity weddings and oscar galas...

shame on those capitalist Republicans

Hmmm...

Since there is no such thing as an "obscene profit," I'd guess they go no where.

R.I.P.

John Wayne, Gary Cooper, Harry Carrey Jr. and John Ford are all rolling over in their graves right now. Gone are the great western movies but thankfully you can still rent them or watch them on tv occassionally. I'll never watch any of this new trash out of Hollywood until they change their ways.

The Great Westerns

The great Westerns can still be found on Turner Classic movie channel and the Westerns Channel. But you are right, ort, they are rolling over in their graves. This trash coming out of hollywood is just that - trash.

My favorites:

She Wore A Yellow Ribbon

Stagecoach

Fort Apache

Rio Grande

The Westerner

The Plainsman

My all time favorite - Lonesome Dove  

But we know, Hollywood never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

There is none so blind as they that won’t see. Jonathan Swift 1667-1745

missing

How about The Searchers & High Noon? Two that I have on dvd and will watch when I get my fill of bad tv. When I see the current crop of Hollywood garbage being lifted up, I take a look at Coop and Duke and think they'd be lucky to be able to clean the toilets on the sets for them. TCM is the most watched channel is this household.

Revisionism

Mr. Huston brings up some of my favorite hot buttons concerning the white man's genocide of the Indians. There always seems to be this huge segment in academia and the arts that want to view pre-Colombian America as some paradise where the Indians lived in harmony with the land and in peace with themselves. All was perfect until the Europeans came along.

Manifest Destiny is now considered a black mark in American history by relativist historians. Something like Jim Crow. At the time, the people thought they were doing the right thing. They were bringing technology, science, and religion to what appeared to be innumerable, disconnected groups of people.

At that time, nation building was seen as a noble cause. Tribalism was a step in progress, the Indians needed "catching up". Ironically, we still do it today - even Liberals. We still interfer with societies and cultures based on our current set of "norms", believing we are doing something noble.

The fact that alliances were made by whites with rival Indian tribes is all but ignored in secondary education. Had the Indians presented a united force, the westward expansion would certainly have been slower, and probably would have had several more initial failures. There may not been a permanent colony on North America for another hundred years after Jamestown.

One historical note, they always taught us in school how Cortez conquered the Aztecs with 250 men and 20 horses. It always came off as something miraculous. The textbooks tried to play it off as the Spaniards having firearms, the mounted knights, Montezuma's indecision because of the Quetzacuatl legend. The truth was that that the Aztecs were so hated by surrounding tribes that Cortez had already enlisted a native army numbering in the tens of thousands to fight the Aztecs. That always seems to slip through the textbooks.

Lastly, about the graphic novel. It appears to have been drawn in a softer manga style, as opposed to a harder American comic book style.

Thanks...

Good comments, KennyBunkport.

As to the art style, I despise Manga art. It ALL looks exactly alike. I find it a crime that Manga style art has seeped into American comics. The absurd Big heads and feet, the stupid moon eyes and tiny mouths, the ultra skinny arms and legs... it's absolute CRAP.

Thanks for the compliment.

Thanks for the compliment. Keep up the good work!

Something tells me we have

Something tells me we have a new nomanee for the worst films, film feastival.

Should fit in nicely with the Revenge of the Killer Tomato.  Santa Clause vrs the Martians,  and that western with the midgets from the Wizard of Oz. 

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

now wait a minute...

I thought Attack Of The Killer Tomatoes was a stitch. Of course I'd had a number of adult beverages before watching...      :-))

Dont forget Plan 9 From

Dont forget Plan 9 From Outer Space.

 

There is none so blind as they that won’t see. Jonathan Swift 1667-1745

They should have done a sequel to Brokeback Mountain.

It probably would have made more money than this thing will.

Hollywood is dying.

The truth is insensitive. - Neal Boortz

Imperialist? Christ that we

Imperialist? Christ that we were Imperialist, we wouldn't have a third of the trouble we have now. This movie will probably make a buck fifty. After expenses. This truly would be a waste of ninety minutes or however long this crap is, and you'll never get that time back. Just think of that.

ah, Native Amercian Superiority Propaganda

yet another propaganda piece showing the inherent Cultural Superiority of the Native American over the inferior morals and greed of the White Man.

The comic, like many others, even goes so far as to show the Native American's bows and flint arrows are even vastly superior to the White Man's gunpowder fired slugthrowers, as somehow the arrows can easily pierce the aliens' shields where bullets are stopped.

I guess these aliens never, in all their conquests, fought a primitive tribe before?

I didn't read far enough to see if the Apple fanbois have some Indian shaman chants up a version of MacOS and takes over the aliens' computers...

 

"to call an illegal immigrant an "undocumented alien" is the same as calling a streetcorner drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist".

There could be some valid

There could be some valid points to that argument as in teh shields repelling a certain force against a shield.  If the aliens needed to breathe one could assume the sheilds could be attuned to pass gasses in and out of the shields or to be able to render aid if need be while keeping a shield active.

So a certain force could be passed through.  The bullets would have more force being blunt objects travelling at significant velocity while the arrows having slimmer profiles and less velocity could penetrate the force envelope.

Ok it is pretty hokey but it is a possible expanation.  I based it on teh shields from Dune.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Settlers did not give Native Americans disease intentionally

From Columbus to the cowboys, libs blame Europeans, and later Americans, for bringing disease to Native Americans as if they did it on purpose. None of these people had any idea how diseases spread, so they certainly didn't intend to wipe out the natives with illness. If they did understand the process, then they should have been fearful of new diseases they might have caught from the native population. It works both ways.

Wasn't it Native Americans who gave the world tobacco? Given all of the smoking related deaths over the centuries, I think they got a lot of revenge.

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Did I Hear That Right?

"As to the art style, I despise Manga art. It ALL looks exactly alike. I find it a crime that Manga style art has seeped into American comics. The absurd Big heads and feet, the stupid moon eyes and tiny mouths, the ultra skinny arms and legs... it's absolute CRAP."

 Funny, that's what I would say about some old toothless legacy comic like "Blondie", "Garfield", or "Archie." Now THOSE are crap.

I agree...

With your era of criticism. I also hated the old golden age comics. They were bad art, too.

However, in the late 70s and until the early 90s a new era in comic art emerged in the US that saw occasionally good art work. Still, it was spotty, far and few between.

The crap Manga influence really served to curtail the better art, though. Manga is only for lazy artists. It is so stylistic and sports such an utter lack of realism that it is easy to quickly reproduce.

It is CRAP with a capital C.

My favorite comic artist is Moebius (yes, even though he is not an American!)

Moebius is the same artist

Moebius is the same artist who did the Airtight Garage, I think I still have that series.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.

Yes

He did airtight garage.

I was first exposed to his great draftsmanship in the 1960s with the French magazine Metal Hurlant which became Heavy Metal magazine in the USA. I had every issue from its first to when Heavy Metal folded in the 80s.

Moebius is also the artistic force behind the movie 5th Element.

Having said what I said, I

Having said what I said, I did enjoy reading Heavy Metal in my early college years.

I always liked "The Fifth Element" for being a fairly cheesy sci-fi movie. There always seemed to be something about the look of that movie that I just couldn't quite put my finger on. Always thought that those giant aliens (the good ones) looked familiar somehow. Now you've explained it to me. I remember Moebius from HM as well.

At the risk of losing

At the risk of losing credibility (if I had any, I hope!).

I am a pretty big fan of manga, but was never much of a comic book reader. There a several styles of manga - from fairly realistic (proportional) to ridiculous (chibi and super-deformed). I prefer more realistic, but don't mind some of the more stylized forms.

American comics tend to be more "realistic" with clearer outlines, and in color. Manga may be sketchier, often exaggerated features are drawn, sometimes just in particular frames for emphasis. American comics tend to have more dialogue. American comics are predominantly about specific characters, while manga are more like novelettes.

I can understand that manga isn't for everyone. It's certainly a matter of one's tastes. I think most manga fans go into it more because of the story telling and diversity of subjects. The artwork grows on you. I find American comic art "harsh" anymore.

In Japan, manga is read by a wide range of ages. Therefore much is geared for an adult readership. Most of the manga we get in the US is translated. By contrast, there is an age stigma for reading comics in the US, so most of the domestic product reflects this.

Probably more than you ever wanted to know.

 

Subject matter

I must say that I find many of the stories in the various Manga products to be good, especially the adult oriented ones. I just hate the art work. I just can't take it and this also keeps me away from JapAnime.

And, there is one other aspect of Japanese story telling that I just hate: the comedy sidekick tradition. It is idiotic, the humor is simply unfunny and it is so formulaic that it bores terribly.

Well there's a lot of anime

Well there's a lot of anime out there too. Some of it quite good (art and story) to rival a movie. But, unfortunately, a lot of it sucks (art and story). And please! No more big giant robos!

Tombstone

I've seen Tombstone several times, in fact, it's one of my favorite movies. I especially liked Sam Elliot. As far as the gang allegory, I never got that until now. But then again, it was just a few years ago that I discovered that "Puff, the Magic Dragon" was a drug song. Man, am I slow.

There is none so blind as they that won’t see. Jonathan Swift 1667-1745

Peter Paul and Mary deny

Peter Paul and Mary deny that Puff is a drug song.  I guess you can make anything out of it, but they said it is just a whimsical song.  I saw an Elvis Presley movie Follow That Dream and in it a a trial was held and a social worker asked Elvis some word association questions to determine his state of mind.

Elvis slyly asked if the judge to also secretly take it and hand his answers to the worker.  The bias of teh worker led her to erronius conclusions from teh judges innocus answers.  The result was hallarious, you really must see the movie.

But the idea is that ones bias plays a big part on how some words or sentences are interpeted.

Nuke em til they glow then shoot em in the dark.