**Shocking Image Below the Fold**
Yesterday, Barack Obama began crying again. Someone should remind him... there's no crying in politics. He has whined that we can't use his middle name, he has whined when we bring up his close relations with aging hippy terrorists, that we ask aloud about his "spiritual mentor," the racist Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and now he is crying that we are highlighting the anti-American statements made by his wife as she campaigns for him all across the country. So, on Monday he whined "lay off my wife." Well, fast on the heels of Obama telling us we can't use the anti-American statements of his wife as a campaign issue we get the kiddies over at the DailyKos doing their best to "help" Barack Obama by making an image of Michelle Obama hanging from a tree with robbed KKK figures torturing her with a branding iron and claiming that this is the "NEW IMPROVED" GOP strategy. So much for the subtleties and civility that Barack claims he wants, eh?
Even more damning, Kos pulled the entire post off the website, photoshopped image of Michelle as KKK victim and all. Little Green Footballs has a great screen shot of the original post, but here is the original photoshopped image:

This whole thing of Obama constantly whining that everyone is "attacking" him makes him look like such a weakling. What does he think will happen? As the old saying goes, politics ain't beanbag. This is a tough fight for all the marbles, not a tea party.
First of all, Barack is seeming like the tiny fellow on the playground that has found out that if he always yells as if he was hurt by someone, he can get everyone else in trouble. This unseemly, spineless whining would be amusing were it not showing to a hostile world that one of our candidates for president can't take the heat of a campaign, much less the harsh world he'll meet should he become president. Barack's weakness reflects on us all and puts us all at risk in a dangerous world, unfortunately.
Second of all, Michelle Obama is the one that put herself in the spotlight by loudly campaigning for her husband. This makes her fair game. After all, it isn't like she is sitting home quietly rooting for her hubby to take the White House while we eeeevil Republicans attack her. It just isn't sensible that Barack can send this woman out who isn't proud of her country, that hates the capitalist system and wants people not to send their kids into it, and that thinks her own country is "mean," yet expects no one to comment on the anti-American garbage she constantly spews on a daily basis. Who wears the pants in that family anyway? It sure doesn't look like it's Barack.
Lastly, this is just one more incident to show the distemper and incivility that is de rigueur on leftist sites like the Daily Kos. It isn't just BDS that has them in a tizzy, it is the entire scene of politics. Their fascist tendency to cast civility and seriousness to the four winds in search of a political win has damaged the Democrat Party far more than anything the conservatives have ever done to them.
Of course, it is a good thing that Kos pulled this disgusting, ignorant diary from his site. But, the sad thing is that there are so many of his members that imagine that putting such hatred up in the first place is no big deal.
Welcome Lucianne.com, FreeRepublic.com, and HotAir.com readers. Be sure and stay a while and check out our other fine writers here on Newsbusters.org.















Comments Policy
Good grief. I think they're
May 20, 2008 - 19:14 ET by Chris NormanGood grief. I think Kos is a little too good depicting this controversy, if you know what I mean. Makes one wonder about the "artist". I think Rove had it though, last night on The Factor without Bill O'Reilly. He said if Barak Obama doesn't want his wife to be an issue, then she shouldn't make herself an issue. If he doesn't want her "attacked", then she should stop attacking others. No one protested that ol' Bill Clinton was being attacked when he was out there generating controversy. Same thing - right?
And if I remember
May 20, 2008 - 19:23 ET by motherbeltAnd if I remember correctly, in one of the debates, Obama commented about something that had been said. Mrs. Clinton said "I didn't say that" and he said "your husband did."
And he obviously expected her to be responsible for it.
So, apparently, no sauce for the gander. I guess he's realized Michelle is a liability; that's why he now wants spouses off limits.
Whatever happened to spouses
May 20, 2008 - 19:33 ET by Chris NormanWhatever happened to spouses just providing support, like Laura Bush, who advocates for her husband without forcing herself on the electorate as if she was a candidate? Michelle Obama, like Hillary in 1992, and Bill Clinton now, has made herself obnoxious. This seems to be Democrat thing.
In the Hood...
May 20, 2008 - 19:26 ET by Eileen RightIs that Byrd?
American Dream – 10,000 politicians swimming to Europe with a lawyer under each arm.
Eileen, Thanks for the
May 21, 2008 - 06:29 ET by ThisnThatEileen,
Thanks for the morning chuckle.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
I just realized that I think
May 20, 2008 - 19:35 ET by balboaI just realized that I think I want HRC to win the nomination...
Bal, That's step 2 in
May 21, 2008 - 06:31 ET by ThisnThatBal,
That's step 2 in your 3-step process. Reminder: Step 3: Realize you now don't want HRC, and will vote for McCain. And don't forget -- we're all here to lend you support....
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Bal this is great news, as
May 21, 2008 - 10:35 ET by red_dragon311Bal this is great news, we are here to help you out, this is going to be a rough time for you, liberal withdrawl is an awful thing to go through alone.....almost like herorin.
J/K dude but really we are here to help
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.
-Thomas Jefferson
How honest of the Daily
May 20, 2008 - 19:40 ET by Jack BauerHow honest of the Daily KKKos to illustrate what they'd like to do to African-Americans. So that's what "progressive" politics is all about!
Seems at bit strange, but whatever turns them on I suppose.
Well this is a good example
May 20, 2008 - 19:54 ET by motherbeltWell this is a good example of the over-the-top reaction of liberals to everything. Now criticizing Michelle Obama is the equivalent of torture. And those who do criticize her are Klansmen, because, you know, only a violent racist would have a problem with anything she says!
The Klan is everywhere!!!
May 20, 2008 - 20:25 ET by jefflebowskiDon't you find it interesting that every time the MSM wants to discuss racism (i.e. white people not agreeing with the MSM or black people) that they bring up the KKK or David Duke? Does anybody really know of a Klan group? I remember David Duke running for something 15 or 20 years ago but couldn't pick him out in a line up of 2.
I must be missing something but unless all of my neighbors (white, middle-class, parents, well kept lawns) are all getting together in their sheets and not telling me...I just don't think that the KKK is a real big problem to blacks.
From what I have seen from my own racist (I disagree with the MSM and victimized blacks) views, most blacks do more damage to themselves than the KKK could ever do.
Jeff Lebowski - racist
Heh, sounds like no one is
May 21, 2008 - 09:35 ET by sshuffield70Heh, sounds like no one is checking their history books. I mean who started the KKK anyway? David Duke is the exception, not the rule.
If blacks are worried about the KKK, then they should get out of the Democrat party.
I suppose it is a good
May 20, 2008 - 23:04 ET by kgI suppose it is a good thing that the UN is investigating racism in the US. Daily KOS is sure to be on their list as well as the Drmocratic Party.
"Forget change, I want improvement!"
Good point, kg. I wonder if
May 21, 2008 - 06:36 ET by ThisnThatGood point, kg. I wonder if the UN is going to recognize such things as our Civil War, the Civil Rights laws, the nation's de-segragation efforts? And on the other hand, make comments about the 90% black-voting block; the awful effects of certain black culture on black attitudes against whites; Farrakan's and Sharpton's comments? We'll see.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
Nice hood, Sen. Byrd!
May 20, 2008 - 20:28 ET by R D HelmWe are being smothered by government in this country. - Neal Boortz
Coming from the Liberals
May 20, 2008 - 20:29 ET by ecnirPLet us all remember which end of the political spectrum this continues to come from...the liberal end. They can squawk and moan and complain that this is the kind of stuff the Republicans are going to do, but we keep seeing...clearly...evidence of who is doing it.
The KKK was the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party.
May 20, 2008 - 20:37 ET by coffee260I wonder if the Kossacks know that the KKK was the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party. Or that our nation's top historians reveal that the
Democratic Party gave us the Ku Klux Klan, Black Codes, Jim Crow Laws and other repressive
legislation which resulted in the multitude of murders, lynchings,
mutilations, and intimidations (of thousands of black and white
Republicans). On the issue of slavery: historians say the Democrats
gave their lives to expand it, the Republicans gave their lives to ban
it.
Or that the:
protect
slavery.
expand
slavery.
teachers.
of the Alabama schoolhouse in 1963, declaring there would be
segregation forever.
Martin Luther King, Jr. and the other protesters were fighting.
against the 1957 Civil rights Act.
the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King.
had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI.
Or that:
Democrats opposed:
1. The
Emancipation Proclamation
2. The
13th Amendment
3. The
14th Amendment
4. The
15th Amendment
5. The
Reconstruction Act of 1867
6. The Civil
Rights of 1866
7. The
Enforcement Act of 1870
8. The Forced
Act of 1871
9. The Ku
Klux Klan Act of 1871
10. The Civil
Rights Act of 1875
11. The Freeman
Bureau
12. The Civil
Rights Act of 1957
13. The Civil
Rights Act of 1960
14. The
United State Civil Rights Commission
And that's only the beginning. I could go on and on and on...
Ugh...does everyone keep
May 20, 2008 - 20:48 ET by balboaUgh...does everyone keep these links and lists by their bed for quick cut-and-paste?
Come on...
May 20, 2008 - 20:50 ET by Warner Todd HustonCome on, Bal. You have them somewhere too, don't you? They are waaay in the back behind all your Bushitler and Dearth Cheney the puppetmaster links.
I don't have any Bushitler
May 20, 2008 - 20:53 ET by balboaI don't have any Bushitler or Dearth Cheney links.
And a lot of those facts are given without context.
Sorry Bal
May 20, 2008 - 21:02 ET by Free StinkerAnd a lot of those facts are given without context.
Democrats opposed:
Yep. That's unclear to me too. /Sarcasm off
I'm not talking about those,
May 20, 2008 - 21:08 ET by balboaI'm not talking about those, which in no way describe the modern Democratic party, but are still fun to dust off. I'm referring to the JFK littany.
I recall reading that JFK
May 20, 2008 - 21:10 ET by Free StinkerI recall reading that JFK did have Dr. MLK jr. wiretapped, and apparently, J. Edgar Hoover was too glad to help.
Not sure about the other two items
"Don't forget to vote this fall. Not for McCain, not ever, but there might be a Conservative Rep or Senator that Needs Your Vote" --Free Stinker
RFK talked JFK into
May 20, 2008 - 21:24 ET by balboaRFK talked JFK into wiretapping MLK because they were concerned about MLK's association (wittingly and unwittingly) with shady characters connected to the USSR.
The other two have more to do with politics than policy.
The other two have more to
May 20, 2008 - 21:30 ET by Free StinkerThe other two have more to do with politics than policy.
Could be, but they do look bad, don't you agree?
It looks bad if you react to
May 20, 2008 - 21:40 ET by balboaIt looks bad if you react to them emotionally :-D instead of investigating them.
JFK was worried the march would antagonize a Congress he was trying to get to pass his Civil Rights Act, and he was worried there would be violence that would further antagonize Congress. He wound up welcoming the march.
But it looks really nifty to just say "JFK was against the 1963 Civil Rights March on Washington!"
Fair Enough Bal
May 20, 2008 - 21:44 ET by Free StinkerFair enough Bal.
However, had a Republican done the same things as JFK, they would have been excoriated by the MSM, don't you agree?
"Don't forget to vote this fall. Not for McCain, not ever, but there might be a Conservative Rep or Senator that Needs Your Vote" --Free Stinker
Perhaps. Depends on who it
May 20, 2008 - 21:51 ET by balboaPerhaps. Depends on who it was.
Nixon, Reagan, Bush Sr., Bush Jr.
May 20, 2008 - 21:56 ET by Free StinkerNixon, Reagan, Bush Sr., Bush Jr.
Just to name a few.
At the end of his life King
May 20, 2008 - 21:40 ET by Warner Todd HustonAt the end of his life King was drifting ever more communism himself. He rightly saw that his grasp on power as the leader of the civil rights movement was loosening. He was just at the beginning of being radicalized by the communists around him. It wouldn't have been long before he was Malcolm X lite.
The best thing that could have happened to his legacy is to have had his work end in one fell swoop. If he had lived, his legacy would not be as massive as it now is.
I can't say I'm surprised.
May 20, 2008 - 21:44 ET by balboaI can't say I'm surprised. Many people who felt oppressed or down-trodden turned to Communism, thinking that was a way to get away from a society where they felt they didn't matter.
Of course, such people didn't often understand the pitfalls of Communism or its many failures.
No kidding.
May 20, 2008 - 22:26 ET by Foolican"I've decided to say a few words about the Great Pumpkin,"
- Linus running for class president, where soon after his speech, his poll ratings plunge from 99% to 50%.
There are some things groups of American people just don't want to hear about. Global warming, communism, and abortion rights happen to be in that category.
"At the end of his life
May 20, 2008 - 22:46 ET by Carl Kolchak"At the end of his life King was drifting ever more communism himself."
I don't know if he was going towards communism or not. From the book "The Sword and the Shield:The Mitrokhin Archive and the Secret History of the KGB" by Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin page 236-237.
"King was probably the only prominent American to be the target of active measures by both the FBI and the KGB. By the mid-1960's the claims by the CPUSA leadership that secret Party members within King's entourage would be able to "guide" his policies had proved to be hollow. To the Centre's dismay, King repeatedly linked the aims of the civil rights movement not to the alleged worldwide struggle against American imperialism but to the fulfillment of the American dream and "the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence." He wrote in his inspirational "Letter from Birmingham Jail in 1963: 'I have no despair about the future...We will reach the goal of freedom in Birmingham(Alabama) and all over the nation, because the goal of America is freedom...We will win our freedom because the sacred heritage of our nation and the eternal will of God are embodied in echoing demands.'
This was true
May 20, 2008 - 23:01 ET by Warner Todd HustonThis was true earlier. I said at the end of his life, though. I'll stop back here later tonight when I get home so that I can give some references. I am at work currently and have no access to my research.
33 questions...
May 21, 2008 - 00:59 ET by Warner Todd HustonKing was advocating for redistribution of wealth in the last year before he died. In a 1968 speech to the SCLC, King said the following:
Obviously King was headed toward communism at long last. He was murdered later in 1968. If he had not been his memory would not be so sweet for so many.
33 Questions About American History You're Not Supposed to Ask
-page 14, Thomas Woods, 2007
Thanks Bal !
May 20, 2008 - 20:51 ET by Free StinkerThanks Bal !
I appreciate you bringing another list to my attention! :-)
"Don't forget to vote this fall. Not for McCain, not ever, but there might be a Conservative Rep or Senator that Needs Your Vote" --Free Stinker
I'll continue...
May 20, 2008 - 20:51 ET by ecnirPThe Democrats have given us a Ku Klux Klan Exalted Cyclops as Democrat Majority Leader and current third in line of presidential succession.
Proceed, coffee...
May 20, 2008 - 22:15 ET by JerI could go on and on and on...
Well, then, by all means, do so. I think the current social and racial attitudes of the Democratic party are better defined by the past sixty years than the one hundred or so prior thereto.
Jer
Japanese internment, Jim
May 20, 2008 - 22:17 ET by Warner Todd HustonJapanese internment, Jim Crow, fighting against civil rights... those ARE the Democrats' legacy of the last 60 years or so.
Internment - B-b-but Malkin
May 20, 2008 - 22:22 ET by balboaInternment - B-b-but Malkin said that was a good thing!
Jim Crow, fighting against civil rights - Southern Democrats, right? And the makeup of the Democratic party started to change in the '60s.
Bal,
May 21, 2008 - 00:05 ET by RESTLESS 1but I'm sure your side would love to have them "Southern Democrats'" vote in the general election though, right?
Btw, if I agree to lift the yoke of racism off of dems, will you acknowlege it should have never been placed on the repubs in the first place?
Restless...do you think
May 21, 2008 - 00:50 ET by JerRestless...do you think your lifting the yoke will put an end to the near-daily "Robert Byrd, KKK, Bull Connor, Dems are racists, etc." lists?
Neither party should have the racism "yoke" placed on it.
Jer
Liberals have come full circle
May 21, 2008 - 00:24 ET by CobraMan"And the makeup of the Democratic party started to change in the '60s."
Did it really? If so, then the party has seemed to come full circle. The democratic party has turned racism and sexism on its head and now anyone who disagrees with them is labeled as either a racist or a sexist, or both at the same time. In doing so, they actually have become the racists and the sexists they feared other have become. In this case racist against whites and sexist against men if you disagree with the party line.
The Chinese were right about hate being a curse, as you’ll invariable become that which you hate the most. Just look at what's being posted at the Daily Kos as an example. That's blatant racism in it‘s purest form, yet they don't even realize it, let alone acknowledge it! They hid behind the excuse that they're only "exposing" racism, but they're really just espousing racism and not exposing it.
It's just like the liberals who paint swastikas on their cars and dorm room doors because they only want to "expose" racism. The only problem is that there wasn't any racism evident until they decided to "expose" it. It's the same as breaking into a home to "expose" a rise in home burglaries. That "rise" is only occurring because they want to 'expose" it. They're espousing and not exposing. They're rather stupid, if you ask me.
At least with respect to Jim Crow
May 21, 2008 - 00:07 ET by JerAt least with respect to Jim Crow and fighting against civil rights, those are the legacies of social conservatives in both parties. The social moderates and liberals of both parties were on the other side of the issue.
Jer
typical
May 21, 2008 - 00:48 ET by Warner Todd HustonMoving the goal posts. Lose on one point and claim you really meant something else.
Typical what?
May 21, 2008 - 01:16 ET by JerNot sure where I moved the goal posts, or which point I lost, or what I meant other than what I said. Help me out.
Are you referring to Japanese internment? In light of the near-panic atmosphere on the West coast after Pearl Harbor, there was very little objection to the policy at the time, except from Japanese-Americans.
Besides, you are the one moving the goal posts...I had referred to a period encompassing the past sixty years.
Jer
Are you sure?
May 21, 2008 - 06:55 ET by coffee260This could get u-g-l-y! OK! You can read the whole thing here:
Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, is well known for having been a "Keagle" in the Ku Klux Klan.
Democrat Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, personally filibustered the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for 14 straight hours to keep it from passage.
Democrats passed the Repeal Act of 1894 that overturned civil right laws enacted by Republicans.
Democrats declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican, because the Republican Party was known as the party for blacks.
Democrat President Woodrow Wilson, reintroduced segregation throughout the federal government immediately upon taking office in 1913.
Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt's first appointment to the Supreme Court was a life member of the Ku Klux Klan, Sen. Hugo Black, Democrat of Alabama.
Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt's choice for vice president in 1944 was Harry Truman, who had joined the Ku Klux Klan in Kansas City in 1922.
Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt resisted Republican efforts to pass a federal law against lynching.
Democrat President Franklin D. Roosevelt opposed integration of the armed forces.
Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd were the chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Democrats supported and backed Judge John Ferguson in the case of Plessy v Ferguson.
Democrats supported the School Board of Topeka Kansas in the case of Brown v The Board of Education of Topeka Kansas.
Democrat Arkansas Governor Faubus tried to prevent desegregation of Little Rock public schools.
Democrat Senator John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil rights Act.
Democrat President John F. Kennedy opposed the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King.
Democrat President John F. Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI.
Democrat President Bill Clinton's mentor was U.S. Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat and a supporter of racial segregation.
Democrat President Bill Clinton interned for J. William Fulbright in 1966-67.
Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright signed the Southern Manifesto opposing the Supreme Court's 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.
Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright joined with the Dixiecrats in filibustering the Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1964.
Democrat Senator J. William Fulbright voted against the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
(...)
Republicans gave strong bi-partisan support and sponsorship for the following legislation:
Programs By Republicans & their Supporters include:
The Republicans:
Republicans enacted civil rights laws in the 1950’s and 1960’s, over the objection of Democrats.
Republicans founded the HBCU’s (Historical Black Colleges and Universities) and started the NAACP to counter the racist practices of the Democrats.
Republicans pushed through much of the ground-breaking civil rights legislation in Congress.
Republicans fought slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom, citizenship and the right to vote.
Republicans pushed through much of the groundbreaking civil rights legislation from the 1860s through the 1960s.
Republican President Dwight Eisenhower sent troops into the South to desegregate the schools.
Republican President Eisenhower appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown vs. Board of Education decision.
Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, was the one who pushed through the civil rights laws of the 1960’s.
Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois wrote the language for the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing.
Republican and black American, A. Phillip Randolph, organized the 1963 March by Dr. King on Washington.
The 16th Street Baptist Church bombing was a racially motivated terrorist attack in September 1963 by members of the Birmingham, Alabama, Ku Klux Klan, the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party. The result was the deaths of four African American girls: Addie Mae Collins (aged 14), Denise McNair (aged 11), Carole Robertson (aged 14), and Cynthia Wesley (aged 14), all killed in the blast, and 22 others injured.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act Roll Call Vote: In the House, only 64 percent of the Democrats (153 yes, 91 no), but 80 percent of the Republicans (136 yes, 35 no), voted for it. In the Senate, while only 68 percent of the Democrats endorsed the bill (46 yes, 21 no), 82 percent of the Republicans voted to enact it (27 yes, 6 no).
Thaddeus Stevens, a Radical Republican that introduced legislation to give African Americans the so-called 40 acres and a mule and Democrats overwhelmingly voted against the bill.
During the Senate debates on the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, it was revealed that members of the Democratic Party formed many terrorist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan to murder and intimidate African Americans voters. The Ku Klux Klan Act was a bill introduced by a Republican Congress to stop Klan Activities
History reveals that Democrats lynched, burned, mutilated and murdered thousands of blacks and completely destroyed entire towns and communities occupied by middle class Blacks, including Rosewood, Florida, the Greenwood District in Tulsa Oklahoma, and Wilmington, North Carolina to name a few.
After exclusively giving the Democrats their votes for the past 25 years, the average African American cannot point to one piece of civil rights legislation sponsored solely by the Democratic Party that was specifically designed to eradicate the unique problems that African Americans face today.
As of 2004, the Democrat Party (the oldest political party in America) has never elected a black man to the United States Senate, the Republicans have elected three.
Coffee, it doesn't help to
May 21, 2008 - 10:43 ET by balboaCoffee, it doesn't help to post the same list over again. Did you read anything I posted? No? SHOCKING.
Baklava Breath STRIKES AGAIN!
May 21, 2008 - 06:18 ET by BobAnthonyYou know I am wondering if KKKos and their lemmings have any balls left in them. I really do!
Oh and coffee, why use all those links--especially to leftist Wikipedia, when THIS link will do in one fell swoop.
It Just Dawned on Me
May 20, 2008 - 20:58 ET by geoff.galeIt just became clear to me that Barack is just mad that Cindy McCain is one of those "old fashioned" presidential-level spouses. She smiles, says supportive things about her husband, when asked, and she doesn't go out of her way to draw attention away from the candidate onto herself.
It's not hard to imagine Michelle O. giving Barack verbal hell at home behind closed doors - you know what I mean - talking louder, faster and more insistently than he ever could; never giving him the chance to speak, let alone make a point; zinging him with those sharp-tongued remarks you'd expect of a strong, angry black woman.
So I can see Barack looking over at McCain during some future debate with a jealous glint in his eyes while thinking to himself, "Man, he's got it made - at least his wife knows who's boss!"
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
- Edmund Burke (1729 - 1797)
www.conservativeboot...
"zinging him with those
May 20, 2008 - 21:24 ET by Cortillaen"zinging him with those sharp-tongued remarks you'd expect of a strong, angry black woman."
There's nothing strong about complaining incesantly and breaking people down. Anger, spite, and endless grudges are the source of that kind of energy, not strength of character.
www.rhjunior.com Great comics with a hefty dose of Christian and anti-nutjob goodness.
"With your mind as high as Mt. Fuji you can see all things clearly. And you can see all the forces that shape events; not just the things near to you." -Miyamoto Musashi
WOW,
May 20, 2008 - 21:05 ET by DEVILDOCMOMthis is the best libs can come up with? Something TOTALLY reprehensible and something none of us who are Conservative would never think or do? Sure, I am VERY critical of michelle and bhoohoo, but it is because of what they say, not because of their race. I guess their desperation shows, doesn't it?
Warner. Beware of the Swiftboating.. by the lefties
May 20, 2008 - 21:24 ET by Gary HallWarner. Beware of the Swiftboating.. by the lefties.
This would be a good time to reflect on all of those Democrat principles who have stood side by side with the Daily Kos.
Secondly. Isn't it just about every day now that some MSM journalist asks a nother MSM journalist or one of the Democrat candidates (or their campaign), or Democrat pundits if they are ready and able to fend off the radical, and hate filled attacks from the mean Republican machine? Well, I'm still waiting to see signs of that (there will be very little, of course - as usual).
In the meantime, the left side of the isle just keeps piling it on - and today's from the Kos is sick. Simply sick.
NB - has noted, in recent days, what the attack dogs in the MSM and the Dems is up as a part of their daily diet (just a few blog post headlines):
Well Bal
May 20, 2008 - 21:35 ET by bigpapaeverytime some freaking democrat gets up to the podium it is,,, MLK did this, JFK did that, Bobby did such and such...
So which is it... can we refer to them or is it like the racist Byrd,,, do as I say not as I do???
I have no idea what you're
May 20, 2008 - 22:17 ET by balboaI have no idea what you're trying to say.
uhhhhhh
May 20, 2008 - 23:34 ET by bigpapaif the dems can quote the dems over the last 60 years...
why can't the Republicans use their words to define how the current Democratic party "feels" about things....????
Yes Mr Yuban
May 20, 2008 - 22:00 ET by ChuchulainnYes coffee, I'm sure you could go on and on and cite example after example untill my eyes crossed even more after reading your list. I don't dispute that racism existed in both parties in the past, but do you have anything from this century? I bring to your attention that the majority of African-Americans are Democrats and they are running an African-American for president--what a bunch of racists! Just out of curiousity is any one on this very Republican list African-American? Are any of the contributors to this list African-American? I mean I'm just a dumb ass Dem, but it seems to me that if the Dems were overwhelmingly racist there would be a whole bunch of African-Americans here.
(yawn)
May 20, 2008 - 22:05 ET by Free Stinker(yawn)
"I mean I'm just a dumb ass
May 20, 2008 - 22:39 ET by ckc1227"I mean I'm just a dumb ass Dem, but it seems to me that if the
Dems were overwhelmingly racist there would be a whole bunch
of African-Americans here."
In theory, you might be right. In theory. In reality, folks make all kinds of crazy choices. I mean, if the beating the poor wife down the street takes from her husband every night were really so bad, she would leave him in an instant, right?
Chuchulaimbrain, are you intellectually comfortable with that?
May 20, 2008 - 23:01 ET by R D HelmI know I wouldn't be.
Even after a full frontal lobotomy.
We are being smothered by government in this country. - Neal Boortz
"I bring to your attention
May 20, 2008 - 23:52 ET by RESTLESS 1"I bring to your attention that the majority of African-Americans are
Democrats and they are running an African-American for president--what
a bunch of racists!"
And if Condi Rice or J.C. Watts had run for the repub nomination, we would have an all Black general election. So what? Condi and Colin Powell have reached higher levels than any Blacks before them as part of a Republican administration. And don't forget how dems blocked the nomination of Estrada. Some habits are hard to break.
"I mean I'm just a dumb ass Dem, but it seems to me that if the
Dems were overwhelmingly racist there would be a whole bunch
of African-Americans here."
Well, you're half right there. Many posters here have indicated themselves as African-American. You new here?
Blacks can't be racist?
May 21, 2008 - 00:54 ET by CobraManAre you actually claiming that democrats and blacks CAN'T be racists? That racism DOESN’T exist within the democratic party or amongst minorities? Just how do you justify THAT claim?
Racism is NOT a political affiliation, you know. Nor is it limited to just white people.
I like it
May 20, 2008 - 22:26 ET by WesenI like that picture. It reminds me of the books or comics of the 60's that promised good reading and crime fighting inside. Will her rescuer be Hillary, Bill, Ted or Barry. I wanna know.
The KKK was created to drive
May 20, 2008 - 22:31 ET by robert108The KKK was created to drive Republicans out of the South. Those blacks who were lynched were Republicans.
Unbelievable!
May 20, 2008 - 22:56 ET by seanrobinsThis is the most ghastly, god-awful, shameful, inflammatory and racist thing I've seen from the Left in years - and that says a lot, with the horrors that they have been unloading.
This is beyond unacceptable... Although I doubt that there is a Dem out there on the national scene with the slightest hint of the stones to criticize the filth-mongering Kozzies.
sean robins
blog.seanrobins.com
Warner, do you believe that
May 20, 2008 - 23:05 ET by RMRWarner, do you believe that if something as vicious as this was posted on NewsBusters, maligning Democrats, the MSMs would take into consideration the fact that you eventually "pulled it"? They would be screaming racism at the top of their lungs.This would dominate their news circle for the next 24 hours.
They would also conclude ( as you did ) that it had to be something conducive at NewsBusters, and about conservatism in general, that convinced this individual it was safe to post something as vile as this in the first place.
Conservatives should demand that the Democratic party ( not only the ones who attended the Kos convention ) tell America how they truly feel about this post.
100%
May 20, 2008 - 23:17 ET by Warner Todd HustonYou are 100% spot on. And, guess what? If Newsbusters HAD made such a post it would DESERVE to be pulled and the site would DESERVE the condemnation it would receive.
But, my guess is that the left will ignore this whole episode and hope it just goes away.
After all. The ends justify the means for the left. As long as they win, it doesn't matter that morality and civility are bent or not.
They must have reached into
May 20, 2008 - 23:31 ET by jpm100They must have reached into their manual on how to treat minorities that leave the Democratic Philosophical Plantation (eg. Michelle Malkin) and pasted on Michelle Obama's head.
Someone
May 21, 2008 - 07:11 ET by lumpyneeds to make hay of this, putting the meme out there that MSNBC's Olbermann is a regular diarist at this sick website. And he's a hyper-partisan that NBC allows to host primary debates and sit on their MSNBC news panels.
MSNBC has their pundits, like Olbermann and Matthews, hosting the primary coverage rather than their news anchors like Russert and Williams.
There's no new low the Kos
May 21, 2008 - 14:22 ET by greenfairieThere's no new low the Kos Kidz won't sink to.