In Twofer, Paper Makes Fun of American History And Capitalism At Same Time

Photo of Warner Todd Huston.

Here is a story in a small paper in Philadelphia that serves as a fine example of the junk that all too often passes for "journalism" in America today. This example is as ridiculously anti-intellectual and dismissive of the importance of preserving our history as it is anti-corporate. It's a fine example of a journalist who thinks he is smarter and funnier than everyone about whom he writes -- even his name reflects that condescension. The arrogance and smarminess is so thick with James Smart's "Renovating a historic home" that it just drips off the page.

Of course, Mr. Smart's work isn't what one would call straight journalism, but more like the sort of commentary one would see from writers such as Dave Barry. Light hearted, ultimately pointless wastes of time that would find readers no better informed after having read them, but no worse off for the four minutes or so of their lives they'll never get back from the exercise. But, in this particular piece, Smart goes over the edge of simple minded, blather and into uncalled for denigration. It also reveals his intense anti-capitalist feelings. Whatever his past work, this one reveals far more about his generally dismissive attitude against our history and capitalist system than it does about the subject matter.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

Mr. Smart's little story is about the renovation of Pennsylvania's Meadowcroft Rockshelter and Museum. To Mr. Smart, it seems somehow amusing that the state of Pennsylvania would care enough about its history to build a shelter to protect from the open air and weather this ancient and interesting site of human habitation that goes back at least 16,000 years. In a country that many complain is a "throw away society," the fact that Pennsylvania finds this site worth protecting is admirable. But, no, Mr. Smart can only find ridicule on his plate today.

The Meadowcroft Rockshelter and Museum in western Pennsylvania is getting a lot of attention this week, as it reopens the archaeological site of a 16,000-year-old human habitation. It had been closed to the public for a year for renovations.The idea of renovating a dwelling after 16,000 years is intriguing. They could have called in a television team consisting of the guys from This Old House, that Extreme Makeover crew and those cavemen from the insurance commercials.

Radioactive carbon testing in 1974 of remnants of burned firewood determined the age of the domicile, making it probably the oldest known human habitation in North America. A good renovation project would replace that fireplace with a gas grille. And a stone-age homeowner might be pleased that granite is all the rage for kitchen counters.

Yes, yes. And hilarity ensues.

As it happens, having worked for and with museums in my own past I take the history of this country very seriously. It's already an area of education that most American schools are miserably prepared to teach and do a miserable job at teaching. Mr. Smart should be using his little throw away column to advocate teaching history, not to further diminish it as a joke. But the fact that the state is taking it seriously is encouraging. In fact, I have always thought that historical interpretation and preservation is truly one of the areas that government can do better than the private sector. It is one area that pure profitability should be less of a concern than is education.

But that is not to say that government should stay out of trying to make some money to help with upkeep and improvement of our historical sites, either. And here is another area of which Smart isn't so smart to make light.

The Meadowcroft Rockshelter and Museum of Rural Life was formed, and one thing led to another, as happens at such places. Now there is a nearby recreated 19th century village with log cabins, a blacksmith shop, a covered bridge, and nice ladies in costume teaching people to make apple butter.

An authentic 17th century Indian village is under development. Can an amusement park be far off?

I'm just rolling with the humor, here. If we're lucky he'll take his comedy tour on the road and leave the columns to someone else.

Now, I don't want to be mistaken as saying that this tiny little column from a small regional paper is the end of the world. It is, though, a good example of the absurdities that fill newspapers all across the country. But, more than that, it is a shame to see our history made into a joke and unfortunate to see capitalism so unnecessarily attacked by this snide, snarky columnist in Philadelphia.

Our history is important to pass on to our progeny and Pennsylvania should be praised and encouraged to be so interested in preserving it for our school children. I'd dare say that the left over scraps from the camp fire of a prehistoric American is of far, far more import than the pointless meanderings of one James Smart, esq.

(Photo credit: James Smart's Philadelphia)


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Funny how he and other

Funny how he and other marxists love to deride capitalism as they use luxury cars, private jets, and computers that they use to smear the very things they enjoy.

If there was ever a definition of irony...

In Defense of Dave Darry

I'm not familiar with the writings of this Smart fellow, but I read Dave religiously and am aware that he never pretends to be a serious journalist. He describes his own job as, "making fart jokes." I gather that the Smart guy takes himself more seriously. Otherwise, I see no reason to take him to task.

Not only that...

I defy anyone here to write a better IRS column every April 15th or so. Dave's a multigazillionaire for a reason. Some of us are very concerned about snakes in toilets, exploding toilets, etc. Besides, has any "real" journalist explained the new "Economic Stimulus Payment" this well?

=======================

This is a very exciting new program that I will explain using the Q and A format:

Q. What is an Economic Stimulus Payment?

A. It is money that the federal government will send to taxpayers.

Q. Where will the government get this money?

A. From taxpayers.

Q. So the government is giving me back my own money?

A. Only a smidgen.

Q. What is the purpose of this payment?

A. The plan is that you will use the money to purchase a high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.

Q. But isn't that stimulating the economy of China?

A. Shut up.

=======================

I think not. :)

JMR

The tax & spend drug war looks racist in the real world.

What corporations are being

What corporations are being mocked here?

This is just a bad column by Mr. Smart. It's waaay too subtle to prove his point, and not all that clever. 

Actually

I think I wasn't clear in my title. Is it your vote for changing "corporations" to "capitalism" in the headline?

I really meant capitalism, so maybe my headline is a bit muffed?

Capitalism I get. I can

Capitalism I get.

I can understand his line of thinking, as sometimes you like to keep historic sites a little more pristine. You don't want a Subway next to the Sphinx. But it's not very realistic much of the time since you need money to preserve a lot of these sites. 

Consider it changed, then.

Consider it changed, then. Thanks for the input.

Smart's Throw Away Column

I detected some smarminess here to object to, but I guess I would categorize my impression of the column as "unimpressed." I would object to the $2 million dollar state grant being spent on a Museum if this particular site did not seem so important. That being said, what is Smart being such a smart ass about?

 

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. - Marcus Aurelius