Amazon.com, a Publisher of Racist Bilge?

Photo of Warner Todd Huston.

Amazon.com sells millions of books, CDs and other products each year. So, we can't necessarily expect the online retail giant to be morally responsible for every single last product and, where its book offerings are concerned, we shouldn't ask them to become censors. But, selling a product someone else created and producing the product yourself are two different things. And, in this case, we might be seeing Amazon.com actually printing an anti-Jew, anti-US, "truther," Holocaust denial book with their BookSurge subsidiary company. One wonders if Amazon.com is even aware they are suddenly in the business of publishing anti-semitic books?

And this early warning system is where education serves a chief role. Our schools are supposed to serve as the gatekeepers of what a society deems in good taste, important or necessary to learn. Our schools are also supposed to serve as a critic of sorts to teach students what to avoid or, if not avoiding, teach where certain philosophies that might prove harmful fit into world history. In other words, if Marx is discussed, the evil he is responsible for should be highlighted. If “Mein Kampf” is assigned, the results of Hitler’s hate should be a principle subject.

Story Continues Below Ad ↓

So, my point is books can sometimes be bad things depending upon what is in them. This seems to be a lesson that Amazon.com never learned. Or at the very least, it's a lesson the on-line book giant never thought it a worthy one to consider.

Yuval Levin of Commentary Magazine brings us the story of how Amazon.com is suddenly, but not by design necessarily, responsible for publishing racist, anti-Semitic, anti-US, “truther” trash with their on-demand book service.

To expand their Internet empire, Amazon.com purchased an on-demand book printing service named BookSurge where customers can order printed copies of any particular book. The customer chooses the book they want and this service prints the desired number of copies and ships them off. This service also prints short run books for those wishing to sell them. It's all quite innocent, isn't it?

But, then again, it depends on what book the customer wants printed, doesn't it? And in at least one case, a book being printed by BookSurge is not the kind of book that a serious bookseller would want on their shelves.

Levin reports about a new book being printed by Amazon.com's BookSurge company:

I tell you all this because this morning I received a press release by email from BookSurge, informing me in breathless tones of the publication of an exciting new book called Persecution, Privilege & Power, edited by Mark Green, and offering “a searing collection of articles about the organized-but often unrecognized-exploitation of political and cultural power in the United States.” Here is how the email describes the book:

"In Persecution, Privilege & Power, Green has collected the sharpest commentaries and analyses from 30 different writers as they critically examine the role that Zionism plays in shaping U.S. policies abroad as well as cultural transformations at home. This riveting volume provides a broad and exhilarating inspection of Zionist machinations as well as the entrenched taboos and covert alliances that sustain them. Green’s array of commentators includes James Petras, Charlie Reese, Alison Weir, Kevin MacDonald, Gilad Atzmon, Ray McGovern, Joe Sobran and many others. Persecution, Privilege & Power unearths the unchecked malfeasance within the political wing of organized Jewry, specifically examining that international lobby’s political excesses from a multiplicity of perspectives."

The email is signed by Amanda Sullivan Wilson, BookSurge’s public relations manager, and it details the company’s status as “a subsidiary of Amazon.com Inc., (NASDAQ AMZN)”.

Let’s not just take CM’s Levin’s word for it, though. So, what is this exciting new book that Amazon's subsidiary is publishing? Let's take a look at some of the writers that the advertisement so "breathlessly" brings to our attention.

  • Gilad Atzmon is a musician who has a long history of anti-semitic political views. He has compared Israel to Nazi Germany and verges on Holocaust denial.
  • Kevin MacDonald claims his specialty is the evolutionary psychology of Judaism that allows Jews to "out-compete" whites for resources and that this sort of voluntary eugenics helps Jews undermine white people.
  • Ray McGovern is an ex-CIA agent who is a 9/11 truther and is one of those who imagines that if the USA didn't plan the attacks behind the scenes, it at least deserved what it got.
  • James Petras is one of those guys who imagines that "the Jooooos" hide behind every powerful person, manipulation their every move. The rest have similar ideas.

So, we wonder if Amazon.com is aware that they are responsible for printing anti-Jew, anti-US propaganda with their BookSurge operations? It’s one thing to sell books that others publish, even if they are off-color or troublesome in some way or another. But to actually become the publisher of them?

Well, that is another thing entirely.

(Photo credit:Amazon.com)


Comments Policy

All comments are owned by whoever posted them and are subject to our terms of use. They should not be assumed to represent the views of NewsBusters.

Viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Isn't free speech a wonderful concept.

We might not like it and surly will not support it, but Amazon.com is just practicing their right to free speech. Just like I'll practice my right not to buy from them.

 

In these days of troubling times, when polictical correctness is at its zenith, I reserve the right to let you know.... Your An Idiot.

"Our schools are supposed

"Our schools are supposed to..." blah, blah, blah!

In an ideal world, maybe. Schools today are irrelevant and disfunctional . Todays graduates are ready to compete in a 1980's world. At $16K per year per student and only every other student graduating, somebody is getting screwed. This is the one time I side with the anarchists. You can't fix this mess. Wipe the slate clean and start over.

I appreciate your position,

I appreciate your position, but when you state:

"Our schools are supposed to serve as the gatekeepers of what a society deems in good taste, important or necessary to learn. Our schools are also supposed to serve as a critic of sorts to teach students what to avoid..."

You seem to be saying that schools should provide moral grounding. In my world, that's the province of parents, families, and churches.

Having raised two children, I've seen quite enough of the "moral education" provided by schools.

 

And, by the way, someone who thinks that "your" is the same as "you're" is the idiot.

sarcasmo, are you back again??

I do stand corrected as one is a general and the other is personnal.

You are an idiot.

Uh, Humble

That wasn't Sarcasmo.

I know he annoys everyone...but really, he didn't do it! 

David Gregory, do you know which damn network you lie for? ~ Uncle Jimbo, @Blackfive

 

Thank you Blonde

And my apologies to sarcasmo. I do stand corrected.

 And, by the way, someone

 And, by the way, someone who thinks that "your" is the same as "you're" is the idiot.

Not necessarily. I have known the difference for at least 35 years, but occasionally I'll insert the wrong word when I'm typing fast. Sloppy? Yes. Stupid? No.

“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)

newsbuster

we'll keep an eye on ya!

 

"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house."       Groucho

LOL Though I'm pretty

LOL

Though I'm pretty good at catching my mistakes, you never know. :-)  

“There are no easy answers' but there are simple answers. We must have the courage to do what we know is morally right.” - Ronald Reagan (1964 Republican Convention)

NBB it's not just you we are watching

it's a calling i guess

 

"Television is where you watch people in your living room that you would not want near your house."       Groucho

Teaching societal mores and

Teaching societal mores and "morals" are not necessarily the same thing, though they certainly intersect. But, I'll turn it right back to you.... do you think Hitler and Stalin and Marx should be taught free of ANY moral determination? Should they be taught entirely dispassionately DESPITE all the evils associated with them? I find THAT problematic in itself!

I'd say that schools should

I'd say that schools should teach a kind of "conventional wisdom". "Social mores" comes close to that, I guess. As you point out, the line between "mores" and "morals" is narrow, and it's one I believe schools crossed many years ago. 

Any discussion of Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Castro, Mao, etc (what a LONG list I could write!) should include the evils they committed, along with the admonition that in this society, at least, those acts are considered evil.

 

I seem to have shaken the tree a bit with part of my first comment. Notice what fell out?

As some have pointed out,

As some have pointed out, there is a Free Speech issue here, but in this country one has the right to write a book (or make a comment on a public website) that shows him to be a fool. I would never support measures such as one finds in Germany or England regarding speech or publications.

Thanks to our schools, however, there is an attitude that all viewpoints have equal validity. This is, of course, pure b*llsh*t.

Welcome to you'er

Welcome to you'er "DOOM"

 

I was a professional twice over - an analyst and a therapist. The world's first analrapist

Im not sure I get it

Im trying to find the desired result of this post. Am I supposed to shun amazon, or perhaps call for the banning of the book? I am of the mind that this is indeed free speech and while I may not agree with virtually anything on the concept of a mass consperacy, this person is certainly free to talk about it just as much as I am free to rebut his comments. Honestly, I commend amazon for providing a place which makes it so easy to float new ideas and dont see this as a bad thing at all.

Imagine if you will that I wrote a book entitled "why those spicks need to die". The publisher isnt exactly endorsing my views, just making money off of them. The book would largely be debunked and tossed aside as any such garbage, and through out it all an intellectual equalibriam will be established.

The funny thing is I get the impression that Im supposed to be shocked and appauled by this story. However it flies in the face of the exact point of this site, which is advocacy for an equalibriam of ideas. All views are welcome, even radical ones. As long as none are suppressed as is the case with todays media, it will work itself out and the truth will become evident.

Perhaps I missed the point or misread the article. Its possible I suppose. However if the point was to get me to desire censorship, even of things I think are rediculious, then I do not subscribe to that method of thought.

The "point" is naught but

The "point" is naught but information. No call to censorship, or "sunning" of Amazon.com was made. You do with the information what you will. Whatever you read into the this posting is on you.

I find it a bit alarming, though, that Amazon would turn to publishing such anti-Jew and anti-American crap. It diminishes its reputation in my view.

If, however, you like that sort of junk, why then Amazon might take an uptick in your estimation.

.

Its not something I would buy, so in that vein I dont really care who publishes it. I have to ask, if your not calling for it to be restricted, which is the defacto result if amazon did not publish it, then why do you find it alarming that they did?

If the article was just to inform me, then it did as much. I however am not alarmed by such things. Also in answer to your above question about schools teaching marx and what not. Yes I do belive they should be taught inpartially. There should be mention and discussion of the results of such thought, such as the millions upon millions of death ranging from outright murder to starvation. However an implication of good and evil I do not belive is the place of a school, and in reference to an above poster, the place of the home and family to instil their morals and values. I have had quite my fill of moronic idealistic and ideological teachers trying to indoctrinate children into a particular method of right and wrong. I would much prefer them to simply lay out the information and let a rational mind determine if it was right or wrong.

See, here is how society AND

See, here is how society AND capitalism works...

Everyone is free to find their market, free to have their say.

BUT, both the market AND society have the corresponding right to denounce what they do not like. The market can make such a book, for instance, very unprofitable. And society can heap scorn on folks that violate good order and societal mores.

THAT is how things work.

So, I mention that Amazon prints racist crap and if enough people don't like it Amazon might find itself losing money in the market place.

But, finally, I have to ask you this:

If you don't support the sort of bilge that Amazon just published, fine. If you don't support the sentiment and think it bad, though, what do you do to relay that? Do you just turn away from anyone who supports such stuff but otherwise have "no problem" with their advocacy of racism and oppression? Do you know the saying that holds that bad people only get away with things because good people turn away and allow them to get away with it?

In the end, YOU (the good person) are just as responsible as they (the bad) are for what happens in this world.If you don't stand up the bad become more powerful all the time.

.

That is however a battle that must be fought in every generation because its not as important to be told that certain things are wrong, not even to belive it, but more important to know why you belive it. If this book wernt written it would remove an opportunity to discuss its topic. Also thats a mighty broad brush your painting with there that just because I think this book, and others like it should be published, that I somehow stop there.

These are questions that need to be anwered over and over again. Things that cant be answered if we never ask the question. Look at the 9/11 truthers, they had their peace and are now nearly universally debunked. Thats a good thing, its in the presence of censorship and restriction that conspiracy's gain strength. Openly discussed the cream floats to the top as they say.

You are a very confused

You are a very confused person. You write this...

"Look at the 9/11 truthers, they had their peace and are now nearly universally debunked."

OK, and HOW was it that they were "universally debunked" again? Wasn't it by people speaking out and DENOUNCING them and then presenting THEIR case to do it?

Gosh, isn't that what I just did here and isn't THAT what you are claiming I shouldn't be doing???

You are very vague on what you think should be done and how ideas should be presented in a society.

And please, stop writing "your" when you mean "you're." It's very annoying for our literate readers.

Thanks for the debate though. Stop back often.

.

Wait, the conversation is over because you said it was? Thanks Mr. Gore.

I wasnt vague at all, I feel it is the place of the family to determine that families morals and values. My confusion with "your" post, which I in no way said you shoulnt make so you can stop with the whole whiny victim game, was about how you didnt deem the material print worthy. "You're" (happy now grammar nazi, try reading for content next time, you'll live longer) claim that you are denoucing the ideas is incorrect, you are denouncing the issue of the ideas being presented. That, for us literate readers, is not called a rebuttal; it is called censorship.

Thanks for the groundless personal attacks though. Stop back often.

The debate is over, not

The debate is over, not because "I said so" but because there is no where else to go with it. We both said our piece ( not peace) and that is where we are.

Again: thank you, come again.

Life is grand

I continue to teach my kids right from wrong and then they are confused when we go shopping and other act the way they do. When we, the responsible parent, try to correct our children in public, we are looked upon with disgust. How many times have you been told that because you spanked your child (don't compare spanking with beating, there is a difference) you will be reported to certain state agencies. It's time everyone practice what they preach. If you want to teach your kids that they are not responsible for their actions and acting up will get them whatever they want, go for it. But, at the same time let me raise my children the way God wants me. Yes GOD, the three letter word that raises the hairs on most liberal and libertarian's neck.

Most parents believe both must work full time jobs to make ends meet, in all
reality most are competing with the "Jones." You can tell within 10
seconds of watching their kids if they practice what they preach. Just remember, you should be held accountable for your children's action not society. Society is just a window of the people currently living in it.

As for hoping the schools help, they need to be overhauled. Get rid of the political correctness and actually teach the truth. Let them know that the world, not only the US, was built on slavery in part. We celebrate Columbus, but he was a murderer/slaver and oppressor. The biggest slavers today are the believers of Islam, don't believe me, look at how they treat their women. Oh yea, let them know that it WAS arab muslim terrorist that crashed five airlines on 9/11, thereby killing thousands. Tell the truth and stop trying to play the "feel good/political correctness" card.

Start living in a black and white world, where your actions are either black or white not "well you have a point... but...." gray world. Its either right or wrong. Thats the major difference between liberals and conservatives. If you're not part of the solution, YOU ARE part of the problem.

The consitution gives every american rights, how we use them is a different story. Our founding fathers believed in a small central government because they believed in the corruptness of man. Our basic law were adopted to promote welfare and security for all the mass, not just certain individual. Thus, if you feel that certain rules hinder your beliefs, take solice in the fact that they were passed for the benefit of all americans.

 

*sorry about the rant.

Good Rant!

Fairly well-written, too!

<g>

 

We agree a lot more than we disagree. Ain't it grand?

excellent

excellent post, I'm going to have to save this one.

It is even more interesting

It is even more interesting to look at the lone book reviewer who gave it 5 stars and google him.

http://www.thetruths...

http://www.jewishtri...

http://www.adelaidei...

http://www.jewishtri...

WOW

"Forget change, I want improvement!"

I say just don't buy the

I say just don't buy the books...no matter who the publisher is. 

Simple as that to me.

"Never murder your opponent when he is committing suicide." ~ W. Churchill

Its all in the packaging

The main fault of this so-called publication is the insistent way Amanda Sullivan Wilson, BookSurge's PR manager, promotes this. Its totally one-sided without any regards to a balanced assessment. It's a lookie, lookie, this great outstanding book will explain it all, mentality.

I despise this human excrement for even trying to downplay the holocaust, but, my duty is to fully explain to my children the stupidity of these idiots.

It is the duty of the schools to teach the truth and leave personal options behind. Anyone who thinks there is not a difference between the way teachers use to teach, please explain why high school grad's can't figure out your bill unless they have a calculator. We have raised generation after generation of idiots who don't think for themselves and all their problems should be placed on someone else. And we are letting them get away with it. We don't teach them to think for themselves and act responsible (thank you liberals and ACLU).

We constantly bombard our children with TV shows/cartoons that are more violent than the old roadrunner of the 70's. By the way, they were censored years back for being too violent for small children. Then again, we now have video games that promote violence and stupitity to the masses. The new parents see it as a tool to help keep their kids quiet.. oops, I mean amused.

The main thought behind this article is not who or what is teaching our kids. It's the moral obligation of a publishing company, or any company really. If they wish to digest and fill the masses with BS just for the almighty buck, or take a higher ground and not entertain social agendas that does not support the facts and history of the event.