If this isn't a hoot; Bill Clinton scolding CNN (memorably termed the Clinton News Network in some circles). Apparently, CNN hasn't shilled for Bill and Hillary enough to keep Bill from scolding CNN for bringing up recent criticism of him over his ongoing smear campaign against Senator Barack Hussein Obama.
CNN's Jessica Yellin wasn't gellin' for Bill, I guess, for after a South Carolina event Bill gave his famously jabbing pointer finger some exercise with Yellin at the receiving end. "You live for this," he said sternly as Yellin tried to ask a few questions about recent comments by former SC Dem party chairman Dick Harpootlian who said that the Clinton's attacks on Obama were "reprehensible."
Then Bill launched into another Right-wing-conspiracy styled theory over why CNN was asking the questions, imagining that the Obama campaign was now in charge of CNN's editorial decisions.
"They are feeding you this because they know this is what you want to cover." Bill yelped, adding later a "Shame on you."
This is an amazing magic trick that the Clintons are pulling and it really shows just how naive Barack Obama is in confronting the Clinton attack machine. Seriously, Bill comes out and makes blatantly untrue statements, then has the gall to break out the mean, jabbin' finger when someone dares to confront him with his actions (shades of "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"). And what does Obama do? Sputters about how unfair it all is but mostly just lets it all go unaddressed? What an amature.
Here is the CNN video of this amazing display of Clinton's chutzpah and brazenness.
Bill is a piece of work, ain't he? Barack better learn that they are in it for the kill. It ain't bean-bag, Mr. Obama, for the Clintons it's a blood sport.
Transcript of Bill's comments (courtesy The Trail Blog):
"I never heard a word of public complaint when Mr. Obama said Hillary was not truthful, no character, was poll-driven. He had more pollsters than she did.
"When he put out a hit job on me at the same time he called her the senator from Punjab, I never said a word. And I don't care about it today. I'm not upset about it.
"The only thing I pointed out was that there was substantially no difference in her record and his on Iraq, and that he had said in 2004 there was no difference between his position and President Bush. And he said that was somehow dishonest, but he never answers how it's not accurate. So this is crazy.
"This rhetoric is getting a little carried away here. And let me remind you, my ultimate answer is this -- there are still two people around who marched with Martin Luther King and risked their lives, John Lewis and Reverend Andrew Young. They both said that Hillary was right and the people who attacked her were wrong, and that she did not play the race card, but they did.
"So I don't have to defend myself from Dick Harpootlian. I will just refer you to John Lewis and Andrew Young. And let him go get in an argument with them about it.
"Let him go get in an argument with Dolores Huerta, one of the founders of Farm Workers, against what happened in Nevada. There is a fact here -- this is almost like once you accuse somebody of racism or bigotry, or something, the facts become irrelevant. There are facts here.
"And the final thing I would like to say is, you're asking me about this, and you sat through this whole meeting. Not one single, solitary soul asked about any of this. And they never do. They are feeding you this because they know this is what you want to cover. This is what you live for. But this hurts the people of South Carolina, because the people of South Carolina are coming to these meetings and asking questions about what they care about. And what they care about is not going to be in the news coverage tonight because you don't care about it. What you care about is this. And the Obama people know that. So they just spin you up on this and you happily go along."
Still, lefty on lefty violence is always a hoot!
Editor at Large
Comments Policy
Great screen-capture of the
January 23, 2008 - 21:53 ET by Roger the ShrubberGreat screen-capture of the "Clinton Finger". I thought I would never pine for the days of the "Clinton Thumb". What an angry man.
-
January 23, 2008 - 22:44 ET by dahliatraversGreat screen-capture of the "Clinton Finger".
Exactly. That was my first reaction. A very telling picture.
LOL, I spent 20 friggin'
January 23, 2008 - 22:47 ET by Warner Todd HustonLOL, I spent 20 friggin' minutes trying to get that just right. I still couldn't capture the hand still without the movement. He was so angry that hand was just a flyin'.
-
January 23, 2008 - 23:37 ET by dahliatraversGood job!
Warner, that is okay.
January 24, 2008 - 00:52 ET by R D HelmAs I think we got the, ahh, point.
Imagine that. Broom Hilda's husband ripping into the very network that covered up the myriad of crimes this low-life committed while in office, not to mention the ones that occurred before he became POTUS.
What irony.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe
It looks like a still
January 24, 2008 - 10:19 ET by hawkrock60from When Animals Attack 4. Did the reporter live?
The Fickle Finger of Mate?
January 24, 2008 - 12:10 ET by Chris NormanThe Fickle Finger of Mate?
Amazing
January 23, 2008 - 21:53 ET by OldSailor88Hussein was right in the debate when he said he didn't know who he was running against. It's almost scary how Slick Willy can find the right campaign strategy to beat any opponent. Have you noticed that you're seeing more of him now than you are Mrs. Bill? Someone needs to buy Hussein a set of tungsten balls with a kevlar scrotum then let him loose to confront all of the lies that the Clintonistas have been putting out. It's the only way for him to survive the onslaught with his manhood intact. As it sits, he's being emasculated by the Master.
Stultus est sicut stultus facit
BHO had his chance
January 24, 2008 - 13:11 ET by MikeHe had a chance to end the Clinton Era, and myths about it during the debate. When he responded to the misquote about Reagen, he could have said that the reason that Clinton was different was because the reason for the current state of politics is not the fault of George Bush, it is because of Bill Clinton. If he was not a scumbag that all democrats had to back and support in order to keep power, then there would not have been the backlash on Bush for the treatment that Bill received. If you want more of the same take a look at the general opinion of Hillary and ask if you think there is a chance that things will be better.
He also could have said that Reagen took on and won the Cold War, and Bill had affairs with interns instead of dealing with terrorism, which would have caused Bill to charge the stage, and Hillary to cry again.
Bill, we don't even care any
January 23, 2008 - 21:59 ET by motherbeltBill, we don't even care any more if you go away mad....just go away.
mb -
January 23, 2008 - 22:02 ET by drillanwrHeh! (`nuff said ...)
What a gasbag
January 23, 2008 - 23:37 ET by stratmanWhat a gasbag. Does he ever stop, at least repeating his points?
I wonder how Jesse Jackson, who was standing next to MLK Jr when he was shot and killed, feels about Clinton's statement that there are only two people left who marched with King and Jesse was not either named?
Killing them with kindness isn't working. Time to get scrappy with the Donkeys.
Hillary can go home now
January 23, 2008 - 22:09 ET by celatorHillary can go home now and bake cookies. Bill is in charge. He'll take care of this situation--the pesky press. No doubt the Saudi Arabians and Chinese Communist handlers who have given millions directly and indirectly to Hillary's campaign are very dissapointed with her performance. Billy knows what they are thinking: "Hey! We made an investment in Hillary and we expect results! Why do you let the press ask all those questions of her? Are you not the powerful Bill Clinton? We expect far more for our investment. We want you to take over the campaign. Do it NOW, Mr. Billy Clinton! Hillary MUST win this election."
Somewhere, in a far off land, in the light of the full moon, a wolf bays mournfully at the sky, calling the pack together for a night of hunting.
Liberal's Basic Rule For Discourse: I don't care if you agree with my premises, but I demand that you agree with my conclusions.
hahahahaha
January 23, 2008 - 22:09 ET by bigpapaTHIS is why I don't wish for bad things to happen to people who I know deserve it..
Karma baby... what goes around comes around...
Unfortunately when this POS has a stroke or fatal heart attack the old c#@t will be nominated on a sympathy vote...
Because people are stupid like Carnahan getting elected in Missouri after her husband and son died in a plane crash.
Syphilis Syndrome Clinton
January 23, 2008 - 22:12 ET by Lame CherryI have refrained from this as I have believed Bill Clinton is tanking Hillary on purpose to save his own butt from exposure in neckid sex tapes with an Australasian Bimbo of recent vintage..............
But has anyone considered that Bill Clinton's brain is like Al Capone having a latent syphilis VD attack? That has been the book for years on Bill Clinton's medical records that he gave Hillary VD when he was snorting coke and banging Little Rock whores and is why his records are sealed as well as or sick a her's.
If people do not believe Bill and Hillary are taking a dive, then there has to be a reason he is turning into this ramped up crazy man........the answer is syphilis.
Whatever the reasons, I sincerely ask liberal Democrats if they really want this insane couple in her bawling and blubbering at questions one minute and then being an amazon torching Obama the next........with Bill blowing up non stop HAVING THEIR FINGERS ON NUCLEAR BOMBS?
Think about it Martin Sheen.
*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS
I find it a bit funny now
January 23, 2008 - 22:19 ET by USA4freedomI find it a bit funny now that they are not getting the cover that they use to, how Bill gets sooooo mad.
Ohh to be a fly on the wall.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. Ronald Reagan- 40th Anniversary of D-Day
Hmm...Do I, a liberal-leaning Democrat,
January 24, 2008 - 08:51 ET by JerHmm...Do I, a liberal-leaning Democrat, want this coke snorting, whore banging, syphilitic brained, porno taping, insane crazy man's finger on nuclear bombs?
Gosh, now that I'm aware of those facts, I guess not. I mean...who knows where that finger may have been. Thanks for the heads up, L C.
Jer
It's refreshing to see the old "Slick Willy" back
January 23, 2008 - 22:18 ET by kg"They are feeding you this because they know this is what you want to cover."
Bill yelped, adding later a "Shame on you."
It's refreshing to see the old "Slick Willy" back. This certainly brings back
memories of the Clinton administration. More entertainment than I can
handle.
I am waiting for him to start hitting the podium as he is yelling "No, No,
No, No, No".
Yep he's back
January 23, 2008 - 22:40 ET by celatorYep, he's baaack.
Somehow, the current Billy Clinton reminds me of the Pee Wee Herman character after ingesting about 5 years of cheap steroids. He's bigger and meaner but goofier than ever.
Liberal's Basic Rule For Discourse: I don't care if you agree with my premises, but I demand that you agree with my conclusions.
Yeah, he's back, still with
January 24, 2008 - 08:26 ET by motherbeltYeah, he's back, still with the same old exaggeration and lies. Notice how, when he's talking about people who supposedly weren't allowed to caucus (and he mentions that the folks were Latinos...what has THAT to do with anything?) he says they heard the same thing "hundreds of times."
And Yellin doesn't even ask "Hundreds of times?????"
Don't get your hopes up...she still allowed him to spout his propaganda unchallenged.
Another...
January 23, 2008 - 22:53 ET by BarkerBubba Eruption
I have to say, 4 years of
January 23, 2008 - 22:56 ET by Warner Todd HustonI have to say, 4 years of Bubba making Hillary look like a fool is gonna be fun!
Warner, do you thnk there
January 23, 2008 - 23:27 ET by red_dragon311Warner,
do you thnk there is any chance if her thighness does get the nomination that she will pick Obama to be her running mate?
i was SURE she was going to do the a woman (but not just any woman HILLARY) and a black man running for pres and veep a liberals wet dream because if that were to happen and they don't win america would be sexist and rasist for the proce of one.
but now after all this i don't think it can happen, i just hope Obama has the stones to stand up for himself....hell Rush said "Conservitves, we like Obama" and I do too, if not for some of his view on the issues he would have my vote locked.
and it is nice to say to the left and the MSM "SEE WE TOLD YOU WHAT THEY WERE LIKE, BUT DID YOU LISTEN ...NNNNNOOOOOOOO"
"Get off the phone you big dope!!!!!!!!!!" Mark Levin
My guess is that she'll pick
January 23, 2008 - 23:37 ET by fitzfongMy guess is that she'll pick that Edwards clone, Evan Bayh. A wild card: Harold Ford (to bring the moderates who think that the party has surrendered to MoveOn and DailyKos back into the fold).
My thought
January 24, 2008 - 00:27 ET by DEVILDOCMOMis Bill Richardson...after all his mother is Mexican as are three out of four of his grandparents. That is a big plus for the dems; of course it might insult the blacks...who knows?
The concern the Clinton's
January 24, 2008 - 01:58 ET by Scout FinchThe concern the Clinton's have for blacks is a mile wide and an inch deep. They know the "latino" vote is the vote to go for in the coming years. They also know that even though they keep blacks down on the plantation and never high up the corporation, blacks will still obligingly vote for Miz Hill'ry.
I agree...the Clintons
January 24, 2008 - 07:18 ET by motherbeltI agree...the Clintons think they have the black vote in the bag They have to pander to Latinos now. Richardson is my guess
A woman and a Latino....only a racist, sexist bigot would vote against that ticket.
Red_Dragon,
January 24, 2008 - 11:01 ET by Warner Todd HustonMy guess is that by the time we are done with the primaries, the hatred between Obama and Hillary will be too great. Also, she won't pick someone who has the possibility to eclipse her and Obama is showing as a strong candidate. He's too strong for her to trust.
She might pick Richardson. I doubt she'll pick Bayh and she will not pick Edwards. Edwards is finally finished from the race for the president. He is a joke.
I am pretty sure she will have a strong urge to pick an Hispanic VP because she is banking heavily on the Hispanic vote and she'll want to reward them to solidify their vote.
Let's hope we never get to
January 24, 2008 - 13:50 ET by lotrLet's hope we never get to the point of who she picks for her running mate. I shudder at the prospect. For all his shortcomings (i.e., naivitee and radical liberal positions on issues), Obama does seem to have a backbone, which is more than you can say about Hill-Bill Vol. II.
I don't know who you think
January 23, 2008 - 23:15 ET by fitzfongI don't know who you think you are. Who do you think you work for? Remember, CNN stands for the Clinton News Network. That means you work for me. You will praise me. You will praise Hillary. You will trash all the other candidates. And you'll like it.
Family Fight
January 23, 2008 - 23:15 ET by Jerry MackHave no fear because this is just a family fight. Soon they will kiss and make-up.
Family Fight been simmering for some time
January 24, 2008 - 15:38 ET by CarlosSI think this family fight has been going on for sometime..., recall the "spat" over Maynard Jackson having to "give in" the DNC chair
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/stories/02/03/dnc/
Good 'ol bill
January 23, 2008 - 23:38 ET by FastEdhe knows how to keep the 'name' IN the news. Folks, this is all calculated clinton inc. Seems that when the "news" isn't going their way, the best thing to do is attack, and attack your "friends" so that you get noticed! Ask yourself the question - what have the clinton inc folk done that wasn't part of their agenda? cnn will be all over themselves, making apologies, since their bud, bill the victim, pointed out HE wasn't being highlighted/covered. When not in the spot light, make sure the light returns to the center of the universe.
There is no sense in being stupid, if you can't prove it! - my dad V
Scarrrry
January 24, 2008 - 00:11 ET by needleImagine, if by some miracle, CNN started presenting the news
objectively, and I mean ALL of the news, and without bias.
Whew! Scarrrry! Especially
if one were a journalist whose conscience occasionally comes to the fore.
Impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat.
Hypocrite
January 24, 2008 - 00:22 ET by Tom1969caSomeone who has no shame whatsoever should never be allowed to point his finger at someone and utter the words "shame on you!"
Hillary and other liberals decry Bush's "you're with us or you're with the terrorists" rhetoric, but then turn around and essentially say the same thing - "either you're with the Clintons, or you're with the VRWC."
~~~
The difference between liberals and conservatives is that conservatives believe liberals are wrong, while liberals believe conservatives are evil.
The Impeached Rapist is
January 24, 2008 - 01:36 ET by bigtimerThe Impeached Rapist is still improving on his real Legacy...
Priceless
This is great!
January 24, 2008 - 01:46 ET by Gat New YorkMost Presidents leave office and spend their post-Presidency in securing their legacy including reforming their image if it had been damaged.
Bubba is clearly undoing his legacy (which is great!) and reminding Democrats how bad a President he was and that times were really not that great under him. They are being reminded that he left the office with a long list of questionable pardons and clemencies. They are being reminded that he left office mired in a recession and leaving a landscape of corproate corruption. They are being reminded that his only accomplishments were to co-opt Republican led initiatives (ie. NAFTA, welfare reform, balanced budget). His wife promises change and is fed up with the lack of effort by this adninistration on healthcare and energy. over their 8 years they acocmplished nothing in those areas and Democrats are being reminded of it. The only thing Bill Clinton is accomplishing is that he is ruining his own legacy within his own party.
Exactly GNY... That was
January 24, 2008 - 02:02 ET by bigtimerExactly GNY...
That was my same point which I think you knew...
The most delicious part of this all for me is watching/listening to the leftist arm of the party having to face and spin this themselves...tasty indeed.
....after-all they crammed the Deadly Duo down our throats for years....
Going to be interesting to see who wins...the leftist msm or the Clinton Machine.
don't forget, bt....he's
January 24, 2008 - 08:19 ET by motherbeltThe Impeached Rapist is still improving on his real Legacy... bigtimer
don't forget, bt....he's "setting the record straight."
That's the new euphemism for "rewriting history." Or attempting to.
And parker is right about him..he is an embarrassment as a former President. Between him and Jimmy Carter, there is not a microgram of shame. I think the older he gets, he's even starting to look like Carter. And he looks like he is aging fast.
A Bully Is What A Bully Does
January 24, 2008 - 01:43 ET by SquonkamaticBill Clinton is simply a creepy old bully in a suit who is reacting in the way most bullies do when you use their own proven tactics against them: Feigning innocence, acting hurt, being indignant, and pointing the finger of blame at anybody but himself for something they started. The Clintons are the two individuals most responsible for the toxic, debasing and spiteful manner in which politics are framed for mass consumption these days. It's amusing to see the indignation with which they react to people pulling exactly the same crap that they spew only with themselves on the recieving end of the vomit chute. I actually hope Bill doesn't shut up, at some point Clinton Fatigue & embarassment will set in with their public no matter how the press tries to frame it. And while I really don't want a President Obama anything is better than eight more years of this guy's crap, even if She does get to wear the pants this time.
My first post here by the way, longtime reader/lurker, and as good of a place to start as any. This guy makes me want to retch.
Gee, Jessica Yellin, I hope
January 24, 2008 - 02:15 ET by jdhawkGee, Jessica Yellin, I hope you didn't get any of that "famous" Clintoon splooge on you!!!
By the way, you all have put out a number of possible vice-presidents for billary. Have you ever thought that she might pick her own husband? Hey, its a two'fer!
Scarry . . .
→ Chivalrous Bill
January 24, 2008 - 03:13 ET by Cool ArrowHow would you feel if somebody said your wife was "poll driven"?
Man he looks bad...
January 24, 2008 - 03:24 ET by Parker1227He comes off as overly desperate to touch the ring of power just one more time.
No nobility. No grace.
Its pathetic.
Parker... ...but the
January 24, 2008 - 03:33 ET by bigtimerParker...
...but the two'fer team are the smartest politicians we have ever seen doncha' know...
Bank on it...
I love watching them putting everything on the line (via the msm now, that is all they can pray/blackmail for, and it may work)...including cutting their own-selves and tossing the last shovel of dirt on the digging of their own graves.
You're right Big...
January 24, 2008 - 04:06 ET by Parker1227...he got her to the ten yard line and now he's doing a failed quarterback keeper instead of letting her run the ball.
The betrayal is almost Shakespearean.
He comes off as overly
January 24, 2008 - 09:45 ET by motherbeltHe comes off as overly desperate to touch the ring of power just one more time.
That's true. I think the best thing Barack Obama could do would be to refuse to be drawn in by him..(..he's outclassed anyway in the "politics of personal destruction" department).
Maybe with the admonition that "I can't respond to everyone on Mrs. Clinton's campaign that attacks me. I prefer to deal with the candidate herself."
What do you think?
Canker Sore Confirms Syph
January 24, 2008 - 06:23 ET by RudykerLame Cherry hit it right on the lip. The type of canker sore Billy is sporting is usually caused by syphillis.
That may help to explain some of his most recent lunacy - the syph is eating away at what brain he may have left, and, turning him into The Picture of Dorian Gray. SCARRY!!
Lame Cherry points out possible sources for that dreaded disease; however, he fails to include Hillary Rodham - shades of the 70's hippy, free-love, flower children, which they both were.
Aren't you thinking of a "cold" sore and herpes?
January 24, 2008 - 07:42 ET by Britcom-
Canker source IS SYPHILLIS
January 25, 2008 - 06:47 ET by RudykerThe herpes "cold sores" are much smaller, and dissipate after a few days.
This cankers is a rather large one that is being treated by a lot of makeup.
The other sympoms are his dissipated look, what I call The Picture of Dorain Gray : "revealing the hideous corruption of physical and moral decay"
Yikes
January 24, 2008 - 07:58 ET by ThisnThatAnd this is what some people want back into the White House? If she is elected, one of two situations will exist:
She will allow Bill to continue to do what he is doing now, and take over all power of the Presidency, or....
She has no control over Bill, and will continue to have no control over him, and Bill will take over all power of the Presidency.
In either case, it's now clear that Bill is running for re-election: not Hillary.
___________________________________
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it is in English, thank a Soldier. - My barber
I agree, TnT....when Bill
January 24, 2008 - 08:15 ET by motherbeltI agree, TnT....when Bill talks, he talks about "our" campaign and he called Obama "our principle opponent." They are definitely running as a pair....no one should doubt that for a minute.
How can Her Royal Clintoness claim that she was pretty much a "co-President" in the 90's and expect people to think she alone will be making the decisions now?
I said jokingly some time ago that the only way she could convince the country she is on her own would be to divorce him. Apparently the plan now is to play her as NOT on her own, but part of the "2 for 1 team."
Heaven help us if they win.
What happened to Rodham?
January 24, 2008 - 08:48 ET by Apollo77When the Clinton's left the White House and she began her Senate run, she wanted everyone to refer to her as "Hillary Rodham....." She even went so far as to simply call herself "Hillary", just like Cher, Madonna, Barbra...
Now that polls indicate that so many Americans have forgotten the bad Bill, and only remember the good Bill, she is now using the "Clinton' name again.
Yes, she has indeed found her own voice. Its name is Bill !!
What happened to Rodham Boys?
January 25, 2008 - 07:16 ET by RudykerTake it a step further, "Where are they hiding the Rodham Boys; and, the Bill Clnton brother, Roger?
I believe they were included in the 11th hour presidential pardon list of hundreds BillyBob signed as he was being escorted out of the White House.
One of the Rodham Boys is currently involved in a marriage $$$$ scam with one of Sen. Boxer's daughters. Couldn't happen to a nicer senator.
By the way, Apollo77, who is this "Good Bill" to whom you refer?
MB
January 24, 2008 - 09:35 ET by OldSailor88Here's today's case of pot meeting kettle.
Stultus est sicut stultus facit
→ Old Sailor
January 24, 2008 - 09:40 ET by Cool ArrowThanks. As I posted earlier, Bill had every right to get riled up if Obama called Hillary "poll driven"
I love this line:
January 24, 2008 - 09:49 ET by motherbeltI love this line:
"I never heard a word of public complaint when Mr. Obama said Hillary
was not truthful, no character, was poll-driven," he told startled
reporters.
Mr. Obama, not "Senator Obama"....that was not a mistake.
And uh, Bill, maybe no one complained because he was, you know, right?
They both are, just like the
January 24, 2008 - 13:57 ET by lotrThey both are, just like the first time around (Hill-Bill Vol. I), except now the rolls are reversed. Let's pray the sequel never comes to pass.
I feel bad for Barak
January 24, 2008 - 09:12 ET by Six String SpiffHe seems to have a good heart, and doesn't pander (I think) to anybody. He has SO MUCH ammunition he could use against the Clinton war machine, but refuses to. He is crumbling under the "Don't stoop to their level" moral. The Clintons are vicious, calculative, power hungry criminals. Barak KNOWS THIS. But being a only a Junior Senator, he doesn't have the battle experience to face them down (For now). I had a lot of hopes for him, but it seems the Clintons wont even stop short of poisoning a water supply to get their ways. I am hoping for a Barak Nomination for 2 reasons:
→ Feel bad for Barak
January 24, 2008 - 09:19 ET by Cool ArrowBut yesterday Obama admitted pushing the wrong button on six of his votes in the Illinois State Senate.
No way he should have admitted that. Gotta wonder if he can handle a football.
Did he mention witch 6?
January 24, 2008 - 10:00 ET by general companyDid he mention witch 6? He probably ment to "vote" present a few more times. If not then no doubt those votes are polling high in the Dems circles bout now. That is about the most naive thing I have ever heard. What a putz
"Always do right. This will gratify some people, and astonish the rest". Mark Twain
Obama's wrong button issues.
January 24, 2008 - 10:10 ET by Cool ArrowApologies to NB for linking a skanky source (LA Times), but here's the article.
I sincerely hope that their
January 24, 2008 - 14:00 ET by lotrI sincerely hope that their marriage survives. For that reason (among many others, of course) I also sincerely hope that they would leave public life and take the time to work on their marriage. But I'm a bit of a dreamer...
Whew!!
January 24, 2008 - 09:24 ET by mytwocentsBoy - I'll bet right now he wishes he knew how to inhale.
It hurts when it's not about
January 24, 2008 - 09:26 ET by Steve SternIt hurts when it's not about you anymore, Bill, doesn't it. hehehe.
Thank you Mr President, may I have another!
January 24, 2008 - 10:08 ET by CrashLike so many other's "anything, but, Hillary." I can't imagine that rag soaking up tax payer money for a day let alone four miserable years. I'd eat nothing but bread & water for four years rather than generate extra tax revenue for the Clinton nightmare.