This is all the "liberals" have going for them---HATRED. Any American who buys this crap is also an anti-American hater. No need to go point by point in reaction to this nonsense. Simply understand what America is facing, even within its own borders. BTW, these haters support HILL-AR-EE! ---Please don't vote for her. 

NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"

Aside from the topic at large.....

George Soros is one ugly M'erF'er. With all the money in the world why hasn't someone told him that the 90 year old looking face doesn't jive with the 20 something hair.    

Also funny that The Center for Public Integrity is run by William E. Buzenberg, formerly a vice president at American Public Media / Minnesota Public Radio. I don't associate "public radio" as telling the whole story.  It is telling the LIBERAL story; LOL.  By their own standards, doing such is certainly lying. 

I was listening to NPR this morning and, during a segment highlighting the ever-increasing odds of the US falling helplessing into endless, suicide-inducing recession, none other than George Soros was interviewed for his expert opinion on how bad things could get.

"Bush lied, people died"?

600,000 Iraqis to be exact.  Oh wait, that was a number from another Soros group that has now been discredited.  Sounds to me like the only one lying here is Soros and his bunch.  The whole Bush lied mantra of the far left is so old and tired.  I love asking someone who spouts this to tell me one of the lies and no one ever can.

Mr. Huston, perhaps it would be a good idea for Newsbusters to explain how one taps into the money train of George Soros as he hands out big bucks to wackos.

Now while you are too high profile, I would be certain that there are Newsbusters who could if given contact information could Barbie Doll:

1. George Bush lied
2. People died because chimp Bush lied
3. George Bush hates black people
4. George Bush is the most brilliant stupid evil Christian doped up sober homosexual straight lead about by neocons absolute dictator on the planet. (This last one is how Jeff Rense posts his stories in the wacko version of their idea to mould Bush to fit all situations.)

So said Newsbuster writes letter acting nuts or democrat, requests how to start a non profit from Soros funds and probably could ride that Soros welfare train for a few years until they figured out your mailings were all supporting Conservatives.

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Just look at the websites content tells you all you need to know.

I tried not to spend more than 5-10 minutes looking at what they were all concerned about and not ONE of their stories dealt with dishonesty by Democrats.

One particular "investigation" was how horrible it was that Bush was giving away 15 billion to fight AIDS in Africa and was saying that if you don't stress abstinence you can't have the money. They were all bummed because of course the only logical way to fight aids is to not try to stop the sex but to teach kids to use condoms. Ridiculous.

I didn't even need to know who funded it or anything else. If you are truly a non-partisan organization, then there should be some stuff about media cover-ups or mis-reporting. Things seriously lacking in "objective" sites like the 2 mentioned and another "Orwellian-Named" organization "Fair".org.

Poster reasonjester actually put up a thread last night about this in the forums. You can read my response here.

http://newsbusters.o...

Well, the RNC video (with no lack of respect to you and Ken here) was about the best video that was put out, but in my view they missed the more powerful cases.

The left has defended their case in these examples by suggesting that the 1998 material from the Clinton administration was prior to us (the Bush admin.) finding out more in 2002 - after the inspectors went back in briefly after being gone for more than 2 years (was it 3 or 4?).  Secondly, they claim that the comments by Democrats, (those noted in the ad) were made just because those D's had bought hook line and sinker, the lies and misrepresentations that Bush has sold them.

A better case would be a video which shows:

 Al Gore in Sept. 2002 stating on the record that he was still "absolutely, absolutely" convinced that Saddam still had WMD's.

Bill Clinton in July 2003, on Larry King Live, stating that he still believed that Saddam had the WMD's; that we should not make a big deal about the potential debate over the silly "16 words" in the STOTU address; and that we should stand behind the president and bring a democracy to the people of Iraq - that is what is important, he said.

Secretary William Cohen  in 2003 saying that Saddam was probably still just moving the materials away from the sites in trucks, just as they were doing back in the 90's -- fooling the inspectors.

Sen. John Edwards on Meet the Press being very clear, that he did not just take the words and evidence of the Bush administration, he went back and talked to the Clinton officials, who confirmed that Bush had it right.

And of course, there were those high up Democrats, such as Sen. Levin (D) -- who as Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee had their strong feelings, as well:

'Hardball with Chris Matthews' Nov. 7, 2005

Senator Carl Levin (D) of Michigan, a member of the Intelligence Committee

- look there was plenty of evidence that Saddam had nuclear weapons, by the way.  That is not in dispute.  There is plenty of evidence of that.

When will the Associated Press decide it's time to just come out and tell the truth; that the media has misrepresented, twisted, and lied about almost every aspect of the history, the facts and the views which were offered up by many in the know.

As usual, they offer no proof that "Bush lied". All this piece proves is that Bush and others were wrong. Being wrong isn't the same as lying.