Perhaps you can start a third party and I dont know, maybe give the Green Party a run for their money or something.

So you'd pick a child killer over a PRO-LIFE, ANTI- HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS, war hero, who's tax and immigration policies you disagree with? That says a lot about you, who's the RHINO now? For your information and the information of a lot of the FAKE REPUBLICANS on this blog, the Republican Party platform which you can read here.....http://www.gop.com/images/2004platform.pdf

Speaks against abortion yet you doofus' are contemplating an abortion supporter like Romney as your president. See his lies on this issue below. For the racists on this blog, the Platform of the Republican party doesn't say ONE WORD about KICKING ILLEGAL ALIENS OUT.  Perhaps because Republicans above all others, have been financially benefitting from them being here! But it does say that this party is the PRO-LIFE party. So it's is YOU PEOPLE who are the RHINO'S as you consider either a lying abortion supporter (Romney) or a truthful abortion supporter in Guiliani.  And don't give me that Dope Addict Limbaugh nonsense about  "what can a President do about abortion or gay marriage, nothing, but he CAN give us tax relief". That drug addled moron wouldn't know morality if he fell over it. Out of the treasures of the heart the mouth speaketh and tax cuts are all that 's on his mind!  THIS is the lying morass of position switches and garbage you support by supporting Romney the Untruthful. 

 Here's a snippet of a great article by Joe Farah over at WND, find something to disagree with and then when you CAN'T, figure out wrong with you, that you support this (my dad marched with King) lying phony. Bold mine.

"Romney claims he had something of a Damascus Road conversion on abortion during his governorship as he studied the issue of embryonic stem cell research. As the legend has it, he decided in a moment of wrestling with his morality that both were wrong.

Left out of that official version of events, however, is this little tidbit: Romney still – to this day – owns stock in two companies involved in embryonic stem cell research.

Now, keep in mind, it was less than three years ago that Romney "saw the light" on the issue of life.

"In considering the issue of embryo cloning and embryo farming, I saw where the harsh logic of abortion can lead to the view of innocent new life as nothing more than research material or commodity," he said.

In other words, Romney claims to have awakened to the harsh realities of abortion by studying the issue of embryonic stem cell research.lol.

First, from a logical standpoint, this makes no sense. If you can't see why stabbing an unborn baby in the head with a pair of scissors is an overtly evil act, I don't think any amount of study of embryonic stem cell research will awaken your sense of moral outrage. But that's what Romney would like us to believe. After all, he's got to explain why he discovered so late in his public life that people have an inherent right to life.

But now we're supposed to believe this gazillionaire, worth about $250 million, didn't even bother to examine his own financial portfolio to see how he was actively supporting the killing of unborn babies with his own investments.

Or, are we supposed to believe this was just an oversight? If so – if this guy is so cavalier about his own investments – how are we supposed to trust him with the federal budget? 

Now let's move on to the flipperoos that escaped Ann Coulter's attention:

• Immigration: As late as last year, the candidate who now ridicules amnesty proposals said: "I don't believe in rounding up 11 million people and forcing them at gunpoint from our country. With these 11 million people, let's have them registered, know who they are. Those who've been arrested or convicted of crimes shouldn't be here; those that are here paying taxes and not taking government benefits should begin a process toward application for citizenship, as they would from their home country.'' Wasn't that pretty much the Bush party line?
• Gun control: He supported bans on so-called "assault weapons." He supported the Brady bill. He spurned the National Rifle Association. As late as 2002, he was still defending Massachusetts' confiscatory gun laws. But, last year, he joined the NRA and claimed to favor easing licensing requirements. ( Timing suspicious? Apparently not to you KOOL AID DRINKERS! btw what was going on last year that would make ROMNEY THE LIAR join the NRA I forget, OH, THAT'S RIGHT HE STARTED RUNNING FOR POTUS!)
• Minimum wage: In 1994, he opposed an increase, but offered as a compromise tying a hike to the rate of inflation. By 2002, he supported an increase. In 2006, he vetoed an increase. Like some other notable politicians of the recent past, he was against it before he was for it, before he was against it.
• Same-sex marriage: In 1994, he opposed the federal marriage amendment and promised to help establish "full equality for America's gays and lesbians." In 2002, he provided legal recognition to same-sex couples in Massachusetts, even though he was not required to do so under a state Supreme Judicial Court ruling, as he has suggested (LIED). As governor, he even threatened to fire officials who would not issue same-sex marriage licenses and perform civil ceremonies. Yet, now, in 2007, he miraculously supports the federal marriage amendment.
• Homosexuals in the military: In 1994, he supported "don't ask, don't tell," saying it was a step toward "gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nation's military." Today he claims he doesn't want to change the policy to permit homosexuals from serving openly in the military.
• Tax cutting: In 1994, he opposed a cut in the capital gains tax. In 2002, he refused to sign a "no new taxes" pledge. In 2007, he claims to support a cut in capital gains taxes. He has taken the "no new taxes" pledge. And he says he supports making President Bush's tax cuts permanent."

 In the age of fetal imaging, where every one with any serious political interests have SEEN PICTURES of BABIES SUCKING THEIR FINGERS IN THE WOMB, we're supposed to believe that Romney the Liar was moved by CELLS ON A FRIGGIN' SLIDE?????!!!!! How you people can rail against a religious man or a war hero who had a couple of policies you didn't like, which were UPHELD by SCOTUS by the way, in favor of a LIAR who would tell you whatever you want to hear at the moment is beyond me. 

bigtimer...you had all three branches for six years.  Where did that get you?

Jer

Gary P and Delsa....

I Second your sentiments!

Me too, Delsa...some great tennis.  Did you see any of the Hewitt-Baghdadis match that lasted until almost 5:00 a.m. Aussie time a couple of days ago?

Jer

For once I agree with you.

I knew we were in trouble when he first started using the term 'compassionate conservative'.

However, I back him 100% on the GWOT. 

Rush Limbaugh stated that of the top 5 Republicans running for the presidency, only one was a true conservative. http://www.fred08.com/ 

Some might even say it was 1988.

None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. -J.W. von Goethe

If it didn't reach its end 8 years ago, it sure did today.