The oldest trick in the book in the "news" biz is to take a photo of a politician that makes him look worried, sad, or downcast to offset a story of how things aren't working so well for that pol's policies or plans. Well, the Chicago Sun-Times has used that ages old trick to lambast president Bush's "No Child Left Behind" program by giving us the stories of several Illinois students that supposedly slipped through the cracks of the Federal program and using a picture of Bush with furrowed brow with inset pictures of the several students. Of course, their stories are expectedly filled with nonsense, but it is the photo that the Sun-Times really expects to tell the tale. This photo says "failure and he knows it" all over the thing and sets the tone of bias from the start.
The Sun-Times starts out to lower our expectations of Bush's policies:
President Bush arrives in town today, primed to spread the gospel on one of his key policy initiatives, the No Child Left Behind Law... The goals are lofty, but the reality is jarring. We thought the president should meet some of the children in Chicago who are left behind every day, especially in our high schools.
First of all, Sun-Times, schools are run by the state and, in Chicago's case, even the city itself has far more sway than the Feds due to a deal that Richie "King" Daley made with the State of Illinois. So Bush alone isn't responsible for the kids "left behind" in Chicago's schools.
The Sun-Times goes on to introduce us to a Denise Ferrusquia who claims that she can't learn because she feels she has to "do learning on my own." Someone should let this empty headed youngster know that EVERYONE learns "on their own." There isn't a computer upload that can feed education right into your brain, Denise. You have to make the effort yourself. The truth is, you don't necessarily need a school at all to learn. All you have to do is read! (not that schools are unnecessary, of course. But her assumption is ridiculous on its face)
Then they give us young Mr. Brad Johnson who was shocked that he was not so well served by his Chicago school system once he got to Loyola University.
"Professors expect me to know a lot of things, and I just don't," said Brad, a 2007 Austin High School graduate. "I thought I had study skills, but now that I'm here, it's been hard. I got straight A's [in high school] without studying."
How is that again? You "thought" you had great study skills even though you never studied in high school? Look up the word non-sequitur, Mr. Johnson.
Then they give us this whiner...
Finally, Bush should hear about David Wells, who dropped out of Morgan Park High School. He accepts some responsibility but also blames the school, where he says his teachers were distant.
Wake up and smell reality, fella. No one cares a whit about you, pal. You have to care enough for yourself to accept an education and you being a quitter sure as heck isn't Bush's fault. Distant, indeed! The schools in the U.S. are the easiest in the civilized world and if you can't pass here you are truly dumb as a box of rocks. Dumb or just too lazy to bother. None of this is government's fault.
Next we get this foolishness from a so-called educator:
"NCLB doesn't do anything for the huge numbers of kids who have dropped out," said Jack Wuest, director of the Chicago Alternative Schools Network.
You're kidding right?
Now, we can have serious and substantive problems with the NCLB policies. In fact, one can seriously and legitimately hold the Constitutional position that no Federal money at all should be put toward education. But, the "examples" that the Chicago Sun-Times gave us are facile and pointless to the argument for or against the NCLB. Further, it must be remembered that 90% of the reason our schools are failing have nothing whatever to do with the Federal government and more to do with the uncaring Teacher's unions and failed state administration of our schools.
So, the Sun-Times' empty editorial fits their photo trick quite well. Neither are substantive arguments and both are mere tricks utilized to attack the president all the while avoiding any real debate of the merits of the program or any serious discussion on fixing the problems in our failed schools.
Correction: Edit to reflect that it was the Chicago Sun-Times, not the Tribune that had this story. I apologize for my mistake.




















Editor at Large
Comments Policy
old... trick... it's
January 7, 2008 - 13:05 ET by TruthMongerold...
trick...
it's the MSM all right...
This is just a more a
January 7, 2008 - 16:32 ET by motherbeltThis is just a more subtle (not really subtle, but at least more subtle) form of bias. Bias isn't simply what they write in a story, it's what they leave out, the stories that they don't cover. AND it's the photos they choose to run with stories. A couple of months ago one of the papers had a story about Americans without medical insurance the the SCHIP bill not passing, and for that story they had a photo of Bush laughing heartily.
How dumb do they think people are?????
No Bias There
January 7, 2008 - 13:23 ET by mattmI remember in 2000 how the MSM, as run by a pack of Libs who would never, ever, ever, judge a book by its cover, ran stories on Bush's so-called smirk.
Typical lying, propagandistic, hypocritical bigots! Maybe this time they'll succeed in getting Bush out of office...say by around January 2009...
What sophomoric losers!
I'm so busy busting the blatant stuff
January 7, 2008 - 13:29 ET by sarcasmoI haven't even had time to comment on photo-bias lately, but let's just say this isn't exactly the only instance...
JMR
Rally online with fans of Dr. Ron Paul. (All purpose anti-slander-link, sadly-needed these days...)
Pure lib insanity
January 7, 2008 - 13:42 ET by not_lima_H"Denise Ferrusquia who claims that she can't learn because she feels she has to "do learning on my own."
I tutor adult drop outs and I see this attitude a lot. Amazing.
It floors me to hear liberals complain about public education when they have such total control over it. This Tribune article is so obsurd I can't believe the writer is buys it.
Wait! Clinton soved education problems?
January 7, 2008 - 13:43 ET by Gary HallWithout wasting the time to search, I'm going to suggest that ole Bill Clinton, while president, was popping in and out of towns all across America, perhaps even Chicago, touting some terrrific rhetortic about what he proposed to do to solve education problems, etc. How the story could have been written in the late 1990's:
How did President Clinton perform during the 90's in solving Chicago's dropout problem?
From the "Chicago Reporter," June 2001:
If the Chicago Tribune treated Clinton (the Black President) like they treat Bush, they would have photshoped Clinton's photo - in the Sambo mask.
PS - he performed the same way on protecting the Country, and in fighting the world HIV/Aids pandemic --Too little, too late -- How many times is Bill Clinton going to apologize to Africa?. He did the same in preventing Genocide in Rwanda. He performed the same in preventing the 4 1/2 million deaths in the civil war which broke out in the DR Congo in 1998. And the MSM performs in the same unethical fashion, day in and day out - protecting Democrats while blaming Bush for all the world's ills.
Good catch on that one,
January 7, 2008 - 15:52 ET by tracheostomyGood catch on that one, Warner. I completely agree. That one had "manipulative" written all over it.
And Denise is in for a life of disappointment IMO.
-PJ
"Trake: Your lofty convictions are another blemish on the rump of congregational sectarianism." -Tumbler 5/15/07
American education
January 8, 2008 - 13:02 ET by iveseenitallJust as with our government, American education needs an overhaul from top to bottom. Unfortunately, it will not happen under a Democratic administration with a Democratic Congress. Our schools, from elementary school through graduate school, are prime examples of the nanny state in action. The entire system treats modern problems like missionary work. It produces non-thinking, dependent, unskilled people-- many of whom will not survive in the 21st century without government "assistance". Like all "liberal" institutions, this is their true agenda: keep people dependent upon them. Unconscionable and sad.
NEVER,NEVER trust a "liberal"